User talk:Ies/Archive 2015-3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fotos sem marca[edit]

Infelizmente, se não há como assinar uma foto que se coloca na wikimedia, restringirei minhas contribuições. Assinar uma foto nem sempre tem a ver com direito autoral, tem a ver com história. Olhar para uma foto e não saber quem a tirou é algo impensável, pois considero de suma importância, historicamente, saber quem a tirou e até em que circunstâncias. Swendt 30 de outubro de 2015

Sorry for being late![edit]

Unfortunately I have no access to my own computer for a while and only can use another computer for few minutes from time to time. Sorry! -- Ies (talk) 10:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal Ronsdorf - Ronsdorfer Talsperre 05 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal Ronsdorf - Zum Bergischen Haus 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal Vohwinkel - Bahnhof 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Bauhaus 06 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Bayer-Sportpark 17 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal Ronsdorf - Ronsdorfer Talsperre 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, even when its too dark in the background --Hubertl 12:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Friedrich-Engels-Allee 135 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Friedrich-Engels-Allee 143 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Friedrich-Engels-Allee 185 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Haus Bartels 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malta - St. Paul's Bay - Triq il-Bekkum - cat shelter 19 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressive and very good quality -- Spurzem 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Haus Bartels 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malta - Mgarr - Ghain Tuffieha - Il-Karraba 05 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malta - Mgarr - Gnejna Bay 28 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File: Sus scrofa[edit]

Hallo Frank,

ich ueberlege dein super Sus scrofa Bild fuer mein Praktikumsprojekt zu verwenden, in dem ich ein Kinderkartenspiel mit erzieherischem Hintergrund ueber die Tiere eines Nationalparks in Bulgarien erstelle. Ich weiss, dass das Bild unter CC lizensiert ist. Allerdings ist mein Chef sehr nervoes bezueglich der moeglicher Lizensierungsprobleme. Deshalb moechte ich dich bitten mir deine Zustimmung und Erlaubnis hier mitzuteilen, insofern du das moechtest :)

Liebe Gruesse

Daniel

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Sus_scrofa_ies.jpg

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Haus Röhrig 06 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 18:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Hünefeldstraße 53 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Heimat - Hindenburgstraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Heimat - Heimatplan 12 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Friedrich-Wilhelm-Straße 1 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - I'm alive 06 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Hünefeldstraße 84-84a 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Johannisberg - Arc 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Bayer-Sportpark 07 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Weak support Settings are a bit wrong, ISO 400 has created unnessary noise, but QI IMHO. --C messier 17:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jubiläumsbrunnen 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  weak - the composition forground/background could be better. But it is, unlike the other nominations, sharp. --Hubertl 08:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Höhne 08 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Needs reprossessing to get rid of the noise reduction artifacts. Apparently ISO 400 is too high for this camera. --C messier 17:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Atamari 22:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support A bit soft, but QI for me. --C messier 12:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Hotel Golden Tulip 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jubiläumsbrunnen 08 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jüdischer Friedhof am Weinberg 08 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Karlstraße 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Katholische Hauptschule Bundesallee 07 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Friedrich-Engels-Allee 202 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --C messier 18:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malta - St. Paul's Bay - Triq J. Quintinus 09 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radevormwald - Lotti outdoor 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK, but further indetification of the breed would be welcomed. --C messier 18:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Laurentiusplatz 08 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Hotel Golden Tulip 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok imo.--ArildV 10:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Bayer-Sportpark 15 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. --XRay 14:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Friedrich-Engels-Allee 267 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentPlease check the image. I've marked a dust spot.--XRay 14:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
better version --Atamari 15:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Not the best image, but IMO still QI. --XRay 16:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Lucas & Vorsteher 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI, even when it could a bit lighter. --Hubertl 11:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jubiläumsbrunnen 11 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality--Dh1970 19:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ein Hallo[edit]

Schön, dass du wieder aktiver bist. Nun kommen einige Regentage ... da kann man einiges Nachholen.

Was ich sagen wollte: lass' dich nicht irritieren, wenn der User:QICbot deine Diskussionseite zumüllt . Ich gehe zurzeit die Wuppertaler Bilder durch (aufsteigend nach Jahr) und nominiere die einigermaßen guten Bilder als QI. Mir ist es nicht wichtig wer das Bild konkret gemacht hatte. Bei einem Teil liege ich daneben, aber ein paar kriegen den Status QI. Wenn der Aufwand und mein Können es zulässt - verbessere ich hier und da das Ergebnis. --Atamari (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Pavillon Stadthallengarten 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Stadthalle 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Wasserturm Roßkamper Höhe 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Wasserturm Roßkamper Höhe 01 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Windhukstraße - Christus Gemeinde 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Steinbecker Wasserturm 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Rauental 23 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Schwarzbach - Luhns 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Laurentiusstraße 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jubiläumsbrunnen 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jubiläumsbrunnen 05 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Heimat - Hindenburgstraße 114-116-118 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Needs perspective correction. --C messier 15:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Atamari 21:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC) Support Boring, but QI --Jebulon 09:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Waldfriedhof Krummacherstraße 06 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Jubiläumsbrunnen 15 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail where it counts; nice colors --Daniel Case 19:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Stadthalle 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Kriegerdenkmal des Schulbezirks Ronsdorf-Linde 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Sharpness could be better, but OK IMO. --C messier 13:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Stadthalle 02 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Wittener Straße 129 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Wunderbau 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal - Wunderbau 04 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Copyright violations[edit]

Hello. In response to the copyright violations I'd like to note that my first picture of Ashkenazi Jews in Jerusalem should not be marked as a copyright violation as if you look my picture up on google you will find that it has been used by other magazines and has even been posted on twitter. If you would like me to e-mail chabad for permission to use the picture of the Rebbe I will be more than happy to do so.

Thank You, HC0502

This image might be found with Google. However, you didn't explain how you can verifiable proof the fact that you are allowed to upload this image under a free license over here in Commons! And this is what you need to do. -- Ies (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pictures[edit]

could you hold off recategorizing my photos listed as "placeholder for description"? its easier for me to upload with a blanket name/desc/cat and then go back and add/change descriptions, names, and proper categories.Famartin (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me han borrado la imagen y quiero saber porque[edit]

Quiero saber porque la foto no cuenta con permiso para estar en wikipedia, si ya esta con la licencia de creative commons, ademas la foto en cuestión esta en google y a sido usada por muchas paginas, revistas incluso. En todo caso me podrias dar los pasos para poder ilustrar una pagina de wikipedia sin tener estos problemas, veo que muchos cuelgan fotos sin problemas y los casos son parecidos a este.

usuario: Pancrasio80

Please write in English language to be understandable! -- Ies (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

traductor google

My image has been deleted , I want to know why

I want to know why the "Rapid Fire - Brandon Lee" photo not have permission to be in wikipedia if already licensed by Creative Commons , besides the photo in question is in google already been used by many pages, even magazines . The only thing I want is to put some images in articles on Wikipedia , anyway you give me the steps to illustrate a Wikipedia page without having these problems , I see many post photos without problems and cases they are like this .

User: Pancrasio80

Why the image was deleted was already explained here. Wheter or not the image can be found with Google or is used on other websites has no influence on the license rules of Commons. And as already four times explained on your talk page: "Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here." -- Ies (talk) 14:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK , entiendo , pero tu me puedes explicar cómo las páginas de algunos artistas tienen imagen, yo quiero poner el autor , la página y todo eso, pero no se hacerlo ... la verdad es que soy nuevo en subir fotos y algunas instrucciones de Wikipedia está en Inglés, especialmente los derechos de autor . Por eso, yo te escribí en el mensaje anterior si había una oportunidad para ilustrar las páginas de Wikipedia con imágenes de la web sin tales problemas . en serio, no quiero causar problemas a la wikipedia , sólo quiero poner imágenes a algunos artistas que no tienen .

im sorry for the traductor google

OK, I understand , but I can not explain how the pages of some artists have image , the image I want to go putting the author , the page and all that but ... the truth is I'm not new to upload pictures and some instructions of Wikipedia is in English , especially copyright . Therefore I excribí in the previous message if there was a chance to illustrate Wikipedia pages with pictures of the web without such problems . seriously, do not want to cause problems for wikipedia , I just want to put images to some artists who do not. Sorry if I made a bad time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pancrasio80 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 08 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User: Pancrasio80

Hallo Ies, überprüfst Du bitte die seinerzeit von Dir angelegte Kategorie auf Richtigkeit? M. E. schreibt sie sich mit h beim tal, also: Category:Wasserkraftwerk Wilhelmsthal. --Asio 21:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast völlig Recht, dieses "Wilhelmstal" wird Wilhelmsthal geschrieben. Die Bilder habe ich soeben verschoben. Danke für den Hinweis! -- Ies (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]