User talk:Imehling

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Mount Brandon image[edit]

There is some very wacky stitching going on at the middle summit Brandon Peak of File:Mount Brandon.jpg. Can you possibly fix it? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks much better now. I can't find any noticeable stitching. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued image candidates/Pergamon Acropolis.jpg[edit]

  • Hallo Imehling, habe mal die Kategorie scope so umformuliert, dass sie bei den VI akzeptiert wird. Gruß -- Palauenc05 (talk) 16:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Imehling, Do you have any objection if I enhance the colours of the image using Picassa? Martinvl (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, you're welcome. I've uploaded the original version. Feel free to improve it. --Imehling (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Pergamon Acropolis.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Pergamon Acropolis, seen from the Sanctuary of Asclepius, Pergamon, Turkey..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ica Cathedral.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of Ica Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.


Mezquita_de_Cordoba_-_Capilla_de_Villaviciosa[edit]

Dear Imehling, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosque%E2%80%93Cathedral_of_C%C3%B3rdoba#/media/File:Mezquita_de_Cordoba_-_Capilla_de_Villaviciosa_1.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia, or we can use your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 14:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Demirkan,
please use my nick name for credits.
[reply]


Der scharfe Turm von Pisa[edit]

Original
Nachgeschärft

Hallo Imehling, ich habe Dein Turm-Bild etwas nachgeschärft - obs damit für QI reicht, weiß ich nicht, im Zweifel reich es einfach nochmal ein. LG --Superbass (talk) 22:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

’tás t’a passar…[edit]

ó meu!? Este é o Dom José I, não o Dom João I. Já tinha corrigido, mas tu teimas. Por quê? -- Tuválkin 16:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't check the file history and got confused. Thanks for correcting my mistakes. Imehling (talk) 18:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tomar - Staircase Ermida de Nossa Senhora da Piedade - 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar - Staircase Ermida de Nossa Senhora da Piedade - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tomar - Varzea Grande - Castle View.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar - Varzea Grande - Castle View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ponte di Diavolo -1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte di Diavolo -1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tomar - Parque do Mouchão.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar - Parque do Mouchão.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Veritcals at the right side should be corrected and some more categories would be helpful. --Ermell 19:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done --Imehling 08:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tomar - Praca da Republica.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar - Praca da Republica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Verticals need to be corrected. --Ermell 19:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done --Imehling 08:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tomar - Water Wheel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar - Water Wheel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Convento de Cristo - South Facade.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convento de Cristo - South Facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mata Nacional dos Sete Montes - Aqueduct.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mata Nacional dos Sete Montes - Aqueduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Convento de Cristo - South Facade - Terrace - 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convento de Cristo - South Facade - Terrace - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks --Imehling 10:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mata Nacional dos Sete Montes - Water Basin.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mata Nacional dos Sete Montes - Water Basin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The spot and the line should be removed. --Steindy 17:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you --Imehling 10:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado![edit]

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)