User talk:Immanuel Giel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image:Marienpforte, Tympanum 2006-02-11.JPG[edit]

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Leider reicht es rechtlich nicht aus, dass Du schreibst, dass eine Genehmigung der Veröffentlichung (hier: PD) vorliegt. Dies muss nachprüfbar sein. Du und die Bilder sind auf der rechtlich sicheren Seite, wenn Du Dir eine schriftliche Einverständniserklärung geben lässt und diese an Commons weiter leitest. Ein Modell der Einverständniserklärung (Vorgabe/Vorschlag) ist folgendes:


Hiermit erkläre ich in Bezug auf das Bild/den Text OBJEKTNAME [ggf. Weblink/Quelle angeben], dass ich der Fotograf/Autor oder Inhaber des ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechts bin. Ich erlaube, das Bild/den Text unter der freien Lizenz LIZENZ /den freien Lizenzen [ Auswahl gemäß http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lizenzvorlagen_für_Bilder bzw. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Copyright_tags ] zu veröffentlichen. Mir ist bekannt, dass damit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritte das Recht haben, das Bild/den Text gewerblich zu nutzen und zu verändern. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann und kein Anspruch darauf besteht, dass das Bild dauernd in Wikimedia Commons eingestellt wird. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild/den Text im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.


Solltes Du diese Einverständiserklärung für jedes einzelne Bild nicht per eMail erhalten, so sende diese bitte papierhaft an: Wikimedia Foundation Inc. permissions@wikimedia.org 200 2nd Ave. South #358 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-4313 United States of America Näheres findest Du auf folgender Seite: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Emailvorlagen#Nutzung_eines_Fotos.2FGrafik Es wäre sehr schade, wenn die vielen schönen Fotos gelöscht werden müssen. Bei weiteren Fragen schreibe mir bitte einfach. PS: Ich werde Dir frühestens am Samstag antworten können. --- gildemax 09:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Bitte gebe auch mehr Informationen zu dem Bild an. Wenn du willst, kannst du diese Formatierungsvorlage kopieren, einfügen und anpassen:

* Beschreibung: Was ist zu sehen?  
  * de: z.B. ...
  * en: z.B. ...
* Quelle: , Einverständiserklärung (Public domain)liegt mir und der Wikimedia Foundation Inc. vor.  
          Permission has been received from the copyright holder to license this material under Public domain
* Fotograf: 
* Lizenz:   {{PD-author|}}

Alle von Dir auf Commons hochgeladenen Bilder kannst Du hier finden: Gallery Vielen Dank für deine so schnelle Mithilfe ! --- gildemax 10:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Galerieartikel[edit]

Hallo. Zunächst mal danke für deine vielen Bildbeiträge hier in Wikipedia Commons. Eine paar Bitten zu deinen Galerieartikeln. Sie haben leider in der Regel derartig lange deutsche (!) Namen, so dass man sie selten wird finden können und sind auch etwas zu fein granuliert. So ist bspw. die Galerie Heidelberger Schloss noch direkt ausbaufähig. Viele kleine Unterseiten (genauso wie Unterkategorien) erzeugen das "Ostereiersuchproblem": "Wo ist denn nun das was ich suche?". Ich bitte dich deshalb um Folgendes:

  • Umbenennung der Galerienamen auf Englisch außer Eigennamen (stell dir mal vor du müsstest chinesische Lemma finden, geschweige denn eintippen, das Problem hatten wir schon) und kürzere Artikelnamen.
  • Unterseiten behutsam in Obergalerien zusammenfügen und nur wo ein wirkliches Längenproblem ist nach dem bewährten Schema von Wikipedia vorgehen, nämlich ein Übersichtskapitel zu dem Thema in der Obergalerie mit einem Verweis direkt im jeweiligen Kapitel auf die Themengalerie.

Gruß, Arnomane 10:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


Image:Schule in Dannstadt.jpg[edit]

Hallo Immanuel, mir ist ein Fehler in der deutsche Betitelung aufgefallen. Das Foto zeigt das Rathaus (Sitz der Verbandsgemeindeverwaltung) in Dannstadt, Ansicht von der Nordseite an der Ortsdurchfahrt B 9. Die Description:town hall stimmt dagegen. Bei der Gelegenheit möchte ich dir noch für die zahlreichen Fotos dieser Region danken. Weiter so! Grüsse von einem ehemaligen Dannstädter.

Wall in King's Lynn[edit]

Wall in Kings Lynn.JPG

Guten Tag, Herr Giel. Sie haben ein Foto einer Mauer in King's Lynn, England in Wikimedia eingestellt. Haben Sie mehr infos darüber? Wo sie in King's Lynn zu finden ist? Mich interessiert, mehr über die angebrachten Symbole zu erfahren. Elwenspoek

Leider kann ich gar nichts mehr dazu sagen. Ich weiß nur, dass es in der Innenstadt war. Ich fand die Motive interessant, konnte sie aber nicht deuten. Vielleicht findet sich noch jemand. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Großes Schade. Ich habe angeschrieben eine Freimaurerloge in King's Lynn. No reply. Angeschrieben eine Zeitung dort, da den Mann für die Fotos. No reply. Dann die Stadtverwaltung. No reply. Was meinen Sie wie ich es zu schätzen weiß. dass wenigsten Sie Kinderstube haben. Also. Vielen Dank für die prompte Antwort. Elwenspoek

Ich nehme an, dass es sich um dieses Bild handelt. Meistens werden auf solchen Reliefs Hinweise auf die Stadtgeschichte dargestellt:
  • Ritterhelm
  • Bienenwaben
  • Schiffstau
Habe ich wirklich meinen Schatten mitfotografiert? Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Feldzug[edit]

Hallo Immanuel, du scheinst dich nun aus fast allem herauszuhalten? Das kann ich sogar verstehen. Vielleicht interessiert es dich doch am Rande, oder belustigt es dich als "Vater der Radikale", vom aktuellen Geplänkel um Prinzipien zu erfahren, das ein Benutzer entfacht hat.
Schade, dass du dich aus dem Projekt zurückgezogen hast. -- sarang사랑.svg사랑 06:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Villa Shatterhand[edit]

Hallo, ich wollte Sie nur darauf hinweisen, dass ich das Bild der Villa Shatterhand in einem Buch aus meinem Verlag über Karl May verwenden werde. Nennung Ihres Namens sowie der Lizenz verstehen sich von selbst. Falls Sie Interesse an einem kostenlosen Belegexemplar haben, dürfen Sie mich gerne kontaktieren, entweder über Wiki-Mail oder über info@jmb-verlag.de. Beste Grüße --Jmb1982 (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Geht in Ordnung. Wie heißt das Buch? Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Vielleicht dieses hier. --Túrelio (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Elektrizitätswerk in Bamberg[edit]

Hallo Herr Giel, sie haben oben genanntes Bild ins Wikicommon gestellt [[1]]. Hans Erlwein hat seine Gebäude in der Regel mit einem kleinen Wappen signiert: [[2]] Findet sich dort ebenfalls dieses Merkmal und könnten Sie es nachtragen? Ich würde mich freuen! --Dgarte (Diskussion) 16:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Die Sache mit dem Wappen finde ich ganz witzig, aber ich weiß nicht, wann ich dort wieder vorbeikomme. Ganz vergessen werde ich es aber nicht. Es kann jedoch dauern. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Herr Giel, ich werde vermutlich demnächst nach Bamberg kommen und mir das E-Werk vor Ort ansehen, finde es aber weder im Internet noch bei Google-Erde. Könnten Sie mir bitte die Adresse mitteilen. Danke. MfG --Dgarte (talk) 10:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Burgellern 127.jpg[edit]

Hallo Immanuel Giel, könntest du mal zu/auf dem obigen Löschantrag (Stichwort Burgellern) Stellung nehmen, insbesondere zur Frage, welche Aufnahmen von nicht-öffentlichem und welchen von öffentlichem Grund gemacht wurden. --Túrelio (talk) 11:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe gar nicht gemerkt, dass ich auf ein Privatgrundstück geraten bin. Wenn der Wichtigtuer meint, die Fotos sollen gelöscht werden, dann löscht sie halt. Irgendwie fällt mir bei dem Thema immer wieder das Wort "kleinkariert" ein. Änliche Bilder habe ich bei Panoramio hochgeladen:

Panoramio Soll ich jetzt warten, bis er die auch entdeckt, oder soll ich schon mit dem Löschen anfangen? Und was war mit dem Bild der Kirche in Ramsen? Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Bzgl. Panoramio ist das deine Sache. Fakt ist halt leider nach dem dämlichen BGH-Urteil dass zumindest die kommerzielle Nutzung solcher Fotos genehmigungspflichtig ist. Um eventuelle Regressforderungun seitens Nachnutzern zu vermeiden, würde ich die Fotos zumindest auf NC umstellen. Aber, IANAL. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Du hast ja Recht. Eigentlich dachte ich eher, der Mann freut sich, wenn sein Hotel abgebildet ist. Na ja, ich werde am besten deinen Rat befolgen. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 07:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Wirklich verstanden habe ich das Löschverlangen auch nicht, denn die Fotos hätte ja eher für das Haus "geworben" als die uralten Stiche, die jetzt im Artikel über Burgellern stehen. So muss man sich fragen, ob er etwas zu verbergen hat. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Ganz deiner Meinung. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Image:Sender Friedelsheim.jpg[edit]

Hallo, ich wollte dich nur mal informieren, dass ich dein Bild aus Panoramio für die Wikipedia "entliehen" habe - ich denke mal das geht so in Ordnung, nicht? -- Liliana-60 (talk) 04:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Meine Bilder dort sind alle so frei wie bei Wikimedia. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 08:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Schwegenheim: Tabakschuppen[edit]

Hallo, schönes Bild von unserem Tabakschuppen. Bei Bedarf sagen Sie mir das nächste mal Bescheid, dann kann ich ein paar alte Traktoren vor den Schuppen stellen ;-)) Gruß Carsten Lind

Hallo Carsten, hast du vielleicht einen Lanz-Bulldog oder einen Hanomag? Es wird aber dauern, bis ich das nächste Mal dort vorbeikomme. Gruß! --Immanuel Giel (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Not Malkin Tower[edit]

Blacko Tower

It's late so I'll be brief. Spot the problem. See en:Malkin Tower--Trappedinburnley (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

I spent several weeks at Malkin Tower Farm and this tower always helped me to find my way. Should I have been wrong all the time? --Immanuel Giel (talk) 10:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Malkin Tower farm has holiday cottages, so I’m sure you stayed there and I hope you had an enjoyable visit. But the farm is much older than the tower which was built in 1890. It is a common mistake, actually it is possible that it was built to capitalise on the Pendle witches tourism trade. Do you need help with the renaming or can you handle it? --Trappedinburnley (talk) 22:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, we had an enjoyable visit. I walked to the tower several times and took photographs of it, but I am completely confused now. Is the right name Stansfield Tower? And is there no Malkin Tower existing any longer? Could you please do the renaming for me? I don't know how to do it. Thank you. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 09:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Honestly, I’m struggling with the best name for the tower myself. It is most commonly known as Blacko Tower, but on every map I’ve found it is named Stansfield Tower and is mentioned as such at en: Blacko. I think the images should be renamed "Stansfield Tower, Blacko", hopefully they will then show up in a search for either. I can’t say with certainty that Malkin tower doesn’t exist anymore, but it seems unlikely, as it would be more than 400 years old. It might have been near Malkin Tower Farm, a lot of people think so, but my opinion is that it is too far from Pendle Hill to be the place. I will have a look at the renames shortly. One last thing – I really like some of your photos, especially the morning ones, I’ll see if I can get one or two into articles.--Trappedinburnley (talk) 12:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the enlightenment. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 15:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello again, I forgot to do anything about this until a couple of days ago. Your images have now been renamed. We are trying to get the en:Malkin Tower article to FA status and I wondered if you might have an image that would be very useful. At Malkin Tower Farm there is the remains of an old building that make up part of the field wall. This should be somewhere uphill from the farm. If you have a photo of it that you haven't uploaded it would be great if you could! Thanks --Trappedinburnley (talk) 09:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Me again! The Malkin Tower article made FA and now under discussion to feature on the main page on Halloween. Did you notice my previous post? If you have a suitable image we could certainly work it into the article. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
On a related note, there are no good photos of Pendle Hill taken from the Pendle district on here. If you have any they might help also.--Trappedinburnley (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, when I was there for the last time it was raining heavily and I won' be there for quite a long time. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 19:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Abbildungen zur Hochschule der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (HdBA[edit]

Bitte prüfen Sie die korrekten Bildunterschriften. M. E. haben Sie Abbildungen mehrerer verschiedener Hochschulen falsch zusammengefasst. Danke! - 12.02.2013

Image: Xerxes lash sea[edit]

Hi Immanuel,

ich schreibe grade eine wissenschaftliche Arbeit über Xerxes I. Du hast der wikimedia hier ein Bild zur Verfügung gestellt, das ich gerne als Aufhänger in meiner Einleitung beschreiben würde. Könntest du mir mehr über die Herkunft des Bildes mitteilen? Es sieht so aus als würde es aus einem Kinderbuch oder Jugendroman stammen?

Beste Grüße --Orpheus ex umbra (talk) 10:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Orpheus

Hallo Orpheus, vielleicht helfen dir diese Angaben weiter: From Story of the greatest nations : from the dawn of history to the present. (New York : Niglutsch, 1901-1906) Ellis, Edward Sylvester (1840-1916)
Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Immanuel, wunderbar. Das hilft sogar sehr. Merci und Gruß --Orpheus ex umbra (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Bayreuth 250 Jahre.jpg[edit]

Hallo Immanuel, ich habe einen Teil deines Bildes "File:Bayreuth 250 Jahre.jpg" genutzt, siehe hier [3] und hier [4] Gruß --Benreis (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Teufelsbrücke (Mannheim)[edit]

Hallo Immanuel, Du hast mehrere Fotos mit Dateinamen "Teufelsbrücke ..." in der Kategorie :Teufelsbrücke (Mannheim). Das ist leider nicht die Teufelsbrücke, sondern die Neckarvorland-Brücke, siehe auch Schild rechts auf dem Bild "Teufelsbrücke-(Mannheim)-01.JPG". Die Teufelsbrücke ist die alte Brücke im Verbindungskanal hinter der Aral-Tankstelle, siehe auch http://rhein-neckar-wiki.de/Teufelsbr%C3%BCcke. Ich habe übrigens eine Kategorie "Neckarvorlandbrücke" angelegt und anschließend zufälligerweise Deine Bilder gefunden. Gruß + weiterhin frohes Schaffen --HubiB (talk) 10:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Nachdem sich an dem Zustand nach mittlerweile mehr als einem Jahr nichts geändert hat, wollte ich nochmals an meinen Hinweis erinnern. Es wäre wirklich sehr sinnvoll, die Dateien umzubenennen und der richtigen Kategorie zuzuordnen. -HubiB (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Du hast Recht. Aber ich müsste die Bilder umbenennen und wieß nicht, wie das geht. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 13:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Immanuel Giel,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Moonstone.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moonstone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Kreisel Bilder[edit]

Moin! Die Bilder sind OK gem. § 59 UrhG. Ja, der Urheber der Skulptur sollte schon genannt werden. Bitte dringend nachholen, dann sollte das Problem erledigt sein. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Ich hatte einfach keine Lust auf eine Diskussion über Panoramafreiheit usw. Den Urheber der Skulptur kannte ich nicht. Das Problem ist offensichtlich, dass ich als "Urheber" und das Bild als "Eigenes Werk" bezeichnet wurde. Da hat Herr Sand offensichtlich etwas falsch verstanden. Ich trage also seinen Namen nach. Dann dürfte es wohl in Ordnung sein. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Das sollte genuegen. Wenn da noch mehr kommen sollte, wir haben ja zur Not die WMF. M.E. ist der Fall erledigt. LG, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Graffito-Neckarstadt-01.JPG[edit]

Hallo Immanuel, ist die "Bildtafel" dort dauerhaft aufgestellt oder nur im Rahmen einer zeitlich begrenzten Ausstellung? --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Es wurde laut Beschriftung 2011 aufgestellt.

Ist File:Schlosskirche Bad Duerkheim 05.JPG von innen oder von außen aufgenommen? Falls von innen, wer ist der Glaskünstler bzw. wann wurde das geschaffen? --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Das Glasfenster wurde von innen aufgenommen. Künstler müsste Eugen Krumholz aus Bad Bergzabern gewesen sein. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Danke. Die Bildtafel habe ich mit FOP versehen, ist also o.k. Eugen Krumholz lebt aber offenbar noch[5], weshalb seine Werke geschützt und im konkreten Fall nicht unter FOP fallen (Innenraum). Da er leicht kontaktierbar (siehe obiges Link) ist, willst du ihn nicht einfach fragen, 1) ob das sein Werk ist und, falls ja, 2) ob er die Zustimmung gibt, dass dein Foto unter einer freien Lizenz verbreitet wird? Andernfalls müssten wir es leider löschen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Ach, so wichtig ist das Foto nun auch wieder nicht. Löschen, bevor es Einspruch gibt. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 18:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bahnhof Mannheim 1845 von JJ Tanner.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bahnhof Mannheim 1845 von JJ Tanner.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bahnhof Mannheim 1845 von JJ Tanner.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Moin, moin! Ich durchforste die Kategorie Datei ohne Quelle und bin auf dieses Bild gestossen. Koenntest Du bitte die Quellenangabe nachtragen? Selber gescannt, z.B.? Danke sehr! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


File:Gedenkstein fuer Guellich 2.jpg[edit]

Hi Immanuel, in welchem Land hast du dieses Foto aufgenommen? (FOP und so) --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Rhein-Land (Pfalz). Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Bilder[edit]

Können Sie einen besseren Kategorien für hochgeladenen Fotos geben? Zwiadowca 21 18:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Snowden in Shanghai.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Snowden in Shanghai.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Collini-Center_13.JPG[edit]

Collini-Center 13.JPG
Collini-Center 12.JPG

Hallo, Du hast dieses Bild im Dateinamen und in der Beschreibung als "Collini-Center" bezeichnet. Das erscheint, entschuldige, etwas verwunderlich. Das Collini-Center ist ein ca. 100 m hoher Hochhauskomplex in Mannheim. Bei dem Bild handelt sich eindeutig um eine Aufnahme des Mannheimer Schlosses. -HubiB (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Im Prinzip hast du ja Recht, Hubi, aber das etwas unscharfe Bild zeigt den Ausschnitt mit dem Mannheimer Schloss auf dem großen Bild-Teppich im Eingangsbereich des Collini-Centers, der den ganzen Innenstadtbereich von Mannheim aus der Vogelperspektive wiedergibt. Schöne Grüße. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PanchoS (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat Grossniedesheim.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wahlplakat Grossniedesheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wuzur 02:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:038 Veitsberg.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:038 Veitsberg.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:038 Veitsberg.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Haryana.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Haryana.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

115.185.148.11 12:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

About that Chinese Characters to Radical Distribution Chart you created![edit]

Red Kitten 01.jpg

Congratulations! Great educational value! It is in simple Excel? Do you use a database ? How did you create it? I am asking out of personal interest. . . Anyway, if you see this & answer, thanx in advance, otherwise, just cheers!

Olgidium C (talk) 15:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Labyrinth im Hortus Palatinus von Jacques Fouqueres vor 1620.jpg[edit]

Moin! Die Datei duempelte in der Kategorie ohne Quelle herum. Ich hab da ein wenig geputzt, hoffentlich richtig. Sonst bitte korrigieren. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Schokladennikolaus 2006.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schokladennikolaus 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Anastasis Dodekaorton.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anastasis Dodekaorton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Testus (talk) 16:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Annunciation Dodekaorton.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Annunciation Dodekaorton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Testus (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Baptism Dodekaorton.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Baptism Dodekaorton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Testus (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Crucifixion Dodekaorton.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Crucifixion Dodekaorton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Testus (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Nativity Dodekaorton.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nativity Dodekaorton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Testus (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radical 001 Bei-Wei.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radical 001 Bei-Wei.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Radical 001 Bei-Wei.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radical 001 Dong-Jin.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radical 001 Dong-Jin.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Radical 001 Dong-Jin.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radical 001 Tang.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radical 001 Tang.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Radical 001 Tang.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radical 001 Zhong Shuowen.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radical 001 Zhong Shuowen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Radical 001 Zhong Shuowen.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radical 001 Zhong Tang.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radical 001 Zhong Tang.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Radical 001 Zhong Tang.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Remigiusberg Verhas Frommel-Winkles.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Remigiusberg Verhas Frommel-Winkles.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Remigiusberg Verhas Frommel-Winkles.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)