User talk:InfantGorilla

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please post a message, but I may not notice it for a few days as I am an infrequent Commons user. --InfantGorilla 13:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:OFFICE[edit]

The office protection here was done at the explicit request of BradP on IRC. They don't actually have sysop rights here and decided to be nice and work through the commons admins as opposed to using steward powers to do it.--Nilfanion 02:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thought it was something like that - lets edit w:WP:OFFICE to reflect that. --InfantGorilla 02:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Panoramafreiheit in the UK[edit]

Please read http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880048_en_4.htm#mdiv62 --11:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

It would be great if you could change whatever you want at Commons:Licensing because I do not work on these texts. --ALE! ¿…? 12:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Firefox[edit]

without the non-free Firefox logo? What do you mean exactly? I've just made a screenshot on Ubuntu Linux with 2.0 version, which logo do you mean? --Emx 14:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

replied at User talk:Emx --InfantGorilla 16:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Commons Scope - Pdf and Djvu files[edit]

I have added some text dealing with these based on the discussion on the talk page. Users are by no means unanimous about which files should be allowed, and I have tried to follow the majority opinion. Thus, the suggestion is that if a Pdf or Djvu file is educationally useful even to a single other Wiki it should be kept. Would you like to comment before this page goes live? Please do so at the bottom of the talk page. Regards, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Category:Rivers of Devon[edit]

(Responding to User talk:Dave.Dunford.) Hiya - I created these categories mainly to deal with the overpopulation of Category:Rivers of England, rather than of the separate Rivers of <county> categories. Creating categories for all the represented rivers of England seemed the most logical way of doing it, so that Category:Rivers of England could contain a sensible list of all rivers (rather than a mixture of links to categories for some rivers and then a load of files showing various random rivers around the country). At the same time I created Category:Rivers of England by county and reorganised all the Rivers of <county> categories in the same way. I'm fairly new here (though not to Wikipedia) so apologies if this isn't as sensible as I thought. Dave.Dunford (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

For your information[edit]

[1] Regards, --Flominator (talk) 21:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

replied on my talk[edit]

I've replied. Cheers! NonvocalScream (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

happy[edit]

happy to have that little misunderstanding about File:Nadia Nyce (porn star).jpg and File:Nadianyce.jpg cleared. Thanks. Aditya (talk) 03:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Bot issue: uploader was not informed[edit]

Both? And what if the uploaders are 10? --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 13:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

A loop? Or at minimum the 1st uploader? --InfantGorilla (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Moved deletion request[edit]

As proposed 3 days ago, the deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:AN Liana K 1.jpg has been merged into Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan, wich is a mass deletion request of images under the same terms (costumed people being or not copyright violations). If you haven't done so, you should state your opinions there Belgrano (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

File:UN-SOGR-signatories-2009-10-06.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:UN-SOGR-signatories-2009-10-06.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

23prootie (talk) 05:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)