User talk:Infrogmation

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Authors should decide their own license preferences[edit]

I, Infrogmation, hereby "opt out" of the involuntary "license migration". Notes: The vast majority of my uploads I would happily agree to add cc-by-sa-3.0 to the listed license option (if that license is not one of the listed options already) IF I am ASKED. I do NOT consent to any change license of any of my copyrighted works that I have not personally authorized. I have NOT authorized any party other than myself to change licensing of any of my works without my explicit permission. See here on my talk page for discussion.

This was my stand more than 2 years ago. It has not changed. Months of work and thousands of edits have been required of me for this simple assertion of my basic authorship rights. I consider Wikimedia a noble project, but think Wikimedia should be deeply ashamed of the way they have treated and continue to treat contributors who have been kind enough to share their own media under free licenses. Infrogmation (talk)

I do so agree with you. This license policy of the commons project prevents me from uploading more photos because I do not like my pictures changed by other people and not even knowing about it. --Manuela (talk) 06:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

en:User_talk:Infrogmation

Older disussion has been moved to User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 1, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 2, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 3, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 4, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 5, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 6, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 7, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 8, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 9, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 10, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 11, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 12, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 13, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 14, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 15, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 16.

Please add new discussion to bottom of page.



Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miles Glacier Bridge, Alaska.jpg[edit]

Hi,

please delete also the file File:Miles Glacier Bridge, Alaska (cut).jpg. Thanks --Krib (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Medal- Commerative medal honoring Charles Lindbergh. "Charles Lindbergh" inscribed on front and "Lone Eagle" inscribed on back.jpg[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Infrogmation. You have new messages on another wiki at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by UltimoGrimm#Kept.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- VLu (talk) 19:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

wines-world[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "wines-world.over-blog.com"

File:Tastevin taillé dans du buis origine Auvergne.jpg is also a miserable upscaled image. Varaine is either the owner or contributes to wines-world. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Interestingly http://img.over-blog-kiwi.com/2/24/66/83/20171109/ob_02b8f9_tastevin-taille-dans-du-buis-origine.jpg is actually a better copy, but still, I don't quite see how we can trust wines-world. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I'll look it over again later. Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
I forgot to link Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Varaine? Pinging @VIGNERON. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I deleted that one as well. I hesitated because it was in use and the external link source looked to be free licensed; I had not realized the details of the uploader's problems and licensewashing. Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Metacat templates[edit]

Hello, Infrogmation. When you use the {{Metacat}} template, please make sure you include at least one sort criterion parameter. See this change for an example of what's needed. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 05:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Brian May at Guitar Trade Show, New Orleans - 1985.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Brian May at Guitar Trade Show, New Orleans - 1985.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 16:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Clemens Gubernath, Big Freedia, Kimberly Emerson, Chief Shaka Zulu, Tim Renner, Glen David Andrews, Daniel Hammer, and Scott Hutcheson in Berlin, 2015.jpg[edit]

Please help! Chief Shaka Zulu, Daniel Hammer and Scott Hutcheson from New Orleans need some categories. See also New Orleans-The Sound of a City exhibit opening. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 17:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Llewelynpritchard2 (2nd nomination) --KKKNL1488 (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Block length for 104.243.167.204[edit]

Indefinite period seems to be way too long for an anonymous user. --jdx Re: 22:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Per their blocks as "Dragonrap2", "Wikilester_2", "Futurewiki", etc etc. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
But this is an IP address. Sooner or later it will be assigned to a completely different person. --jdx Re: 23:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Suggestions? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
They have edited for two days from this IP, so I would give them a week. --jdx Re: 23:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
You have some knowledge this a rotating ip #? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Just experience and a few hints: [1], [2] and [3]. --jdx Re: 10:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Fatal exception[edit]

Hi. When I try to undo this edit, I get an "Internal error" of [XdvluwpAADkAAFqAAIQAAABP] 2019-11-25 14:31:23: Fatal exception of type "InvalidArgumentException". Why is that?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

@Bbb23: See phab:T236320. Tomorrow, after a month of waiting, it should be fixed. --jdx Re: 15:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Logos protected by the law[edit]

Hi. Can you delete these logos: File:ParmaCalcio1913 logo-400x400.png, File:FC Internazionale Milano 2014.svg, File:Logo FC Bayern München (2002–2017).svg (for https://www.trademarksandbrandsonline.com/news/fc-bayern-munich-close-down-online-counterfeits-store-4998) and File:Logo-VfL-Wolfsburg.svg. It's the same situation as here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:HK Čukarički.PNG. Should i propose them for deletion?--MSClaudiu (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

I suggest you nominate them for deletion. (The example I deleted was a false "own work" and false licensing claim, making it a clear case. The others are under "below threshold of originality" claims, perhaps debatable, but I am less familiar with non-US law in such cases.) Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

File:شتيجنبرجر ألداو 231.jpg[edit]

All photos about Egypt hotels are allowed according to Template:FoP-Egypt ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Justus Lipsius.jpg[edit]

Hi! Could this be undeleted? I found this file lb:File:Justus Lipsius.jpg and I wonder if it is the same file. --MGA73 (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes, the deleted version on Commons and the file on lb:w are the same. I deleted the version on Commons per the link of relevant law at the time. I suggest you check with someone more familiar with Belgium law as to if it is allowed now. However there is a different file at that name on Commons now, so if it is ok I suggest the lb:w file be copied to Commons under a different name. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! As I understand Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Belgium#Freedom_of_panorama then laws were changed so now they have FOP. There is a whole category to undelete per Category:Belgian FOP cases/undeleted. I think the best would be to undelete the file on Commons instead of copying from lb.wiki (to give credit to original photographer). It will ofcourse be needed to move the excisting file either permanent or temporary or to delete it temporary. :-) I will start a formal undel request so we can be sure ppl have a chance to comment so we are sure it is cool. --MGA73 (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
You may comment here if you like Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Image:Justus_Lipsius.jpg_and_files_in_Category:Belgian_FOP_cases/undeleted. --MGA73 (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

My Fotos![edit]

Hello!

You deleted my fotos of Sarah von Neuburg because of Copyright. I made this pictures she used on her social media... I added the ‚Exif‘ Informations. Please undelete my fotos. Thank you!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fangirl861 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

My mother's photo[edit]

I wonder what was the reason of remove picture of my mother painted at Siberia in 1945. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Szkic_Aleksnadra_Fuglewicz_rys_Pawel_steller.jpg

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandra_FuglewiczFugiel (talk) 00:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File:KduV06DenMrBillNaginChocHeart.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:KduV06DenMrBillNaginChocHeart.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Flickr2Commons[edit]

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I haven't done uploading from Flickr via downloading to my computer in many years, since the early years of Commons. I've usually been using Upload Wizard in recent years, seems fairly easy - I remember my uploads used have the licenses auto confirmed, for some reason it seems to have stopped doing that for me. Doesn't Upload Wizard automatically do the largest size? I'll check out the Flickr2Commons tool (I may have used an earlier version of that years ago, but found Upload Wizard easier). Thanks again for your feedback! Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Kari Stefnasson photo deleted[edit]

Hi Infrogrmation, I wanted to write to you as an administrator recommended by Wikicommons as someone who can advise - or help to resolve - conflicts over the deletion of images uploaded to the commons. Now that I have read your page, I realize that it's serendipity that I chose you out of a list of hundreds of administrators, mainly because I liked your name. The issue I am having is the opposite of the blanket license policy that you have taken strong exception to. In a nutshell, I was adding an infobox to the Wikipedia page for Kari Stefnasson, the geneticist, and wanted to add a certain photo that I had seen and that was taken by a photographer here in Reykjavik, where I also live. I wrote to Stefansson's company, which I knew had commissioned the photograph and used it on their website and elsewhere, to have them ask the photographer if he would grant a CC4.0 license and upload it to wikipedia. This he did, along with the license. So this was all as it should be: The copyright holder had granted and signed a license to add it to the commons. However a bot then came along and removed it because they saw a similar one online and so presumed that it had been copied without permission and the right license. I have written to the bot's master, an informatician name Magnus Manske in Cambridge UK, and heard nothing back. So I am wondering what I should do. Is it best for me to upload the photo again, accompanied by the signed license from the photographer (he sent a copy to the company and they on to me), and just keep undoing any further deletions until either the bot relents or its master gets in touch? Or should I ask you intervene and see if you can nudge him to bring his bot - Regasterios - to heel.

The note on the page was as follows: 19:13, 29 January 2020‎ CommonsDelinker talk contribs‎ 101,730 bytes -46‎ Removing Dr-Kari-Stefansson-CEO-of-deCODE-genetics.jpg, it has been deleted from Commons by Regasterios because: Copyright violation, found elsewhere undo

Any thoughts or help you might have would be greatly appreciated in the cause of enabling a photographer to make use of a permission that he has generaously granted!

Cheers, Lehmansson (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello. It looks like the photo you're talking about was File:Dr-Kari-Stefansson-CEO-of-deCODE-genetics.jpg, which was uploaded by User:Christopher Lund, and tagged for deletion by User:Patrick_Rogel, and deleted by User:Regasterios. (You might wish to contact those two about this as well at their talk page, User_talk:Patrick_Rogel and User_talk:Regasterios respectively.) Confirmation of licensing of photos by third parties can be sent to Commons:OTRS, usually the best way if you are uploading something copyrighted by someone other than yourself. It can be listed at Commons:Undeletion requests. Does this answer your questions? What is the connection between you and the uploader of the file, User:Christopher Lund? Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Freret New Orleans 15th November 2017 - 37.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello Infrogmation, it appears that the version of File:Freret New Orleans 15th November 2017 - 37.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-12T19:06:32Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I removed categories accidently[edit]

Hi Infrogmation, while I was adding the new state categories for the National Guard photos, I accidently removed the March 2020 categories you had added. I thought I could add the date to the whole category, but that was a mistake. I see you added them back. Thanks and sorry again.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

CfD: College athletics programs[edit]

Hi, I have started a discussion to rename a large collection of categories, one or more of which you may have created or edited. Please see the discussion thread at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/College athletics programs for details. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Logan's Run in Dallas.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Logan's Run in Dallas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A loose necktie (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 01.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 01.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 02.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 02.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 03.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 03.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 04.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 04.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 04.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 05.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 05.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 06.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 06.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 06.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 07.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 07.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Alejandro Giammattei en Quetzaltengo Feb 2020 07.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 01.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 01.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 02.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 02.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 03.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 03.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 04.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 04.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 04.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 05.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 05.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - Hospital Regional de Occidente, Quetzaltenango 05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - PRESIDENTE ALEJANDRO GIAMMATTEI INAUGURA FERIA DEL EMPLEO EN QUETZALTENANGO.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Presidencia de Guatemala - PRESIDENTE ALEJANDRO GIAMMATTEI INAUGURA FERIA DEL EMPLEO EN QUETZALTENANGO.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Presidencia de Guatemala - PRESIDENTE ALEJANDRO GIAMMATTEI INAUGURA FERIA DEL EMPLEO EN QUETZALTENANGO.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

clean up[edit]

im just clean the natchitoches parish up —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.243.166.75 (talk) 03:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

File:1976 Balcony.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1976 Balcony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 00:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons[edit]

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

I don't download them to my own computer. I use the "Upload Wizard", which has all of the functionalities you mention. I'm unsure why a different tool would be preferred. What other differences? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Protest in Old Jefferson Louisiana 6 June 2020.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Protest in Old Jefferson Louisiana 6 June 2020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:SS
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Infrogmation, likely not a screenshot, but how is this pattern to explain? --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

I took the photo through a window with a screen. (I did not know this procession would be passing by where I was working; I was unable to go out and follow it to get better photos. I thought a quick snapshot through the window was better than no photo of it.) Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  • @A1Cafel: - For your information, "Screenshot" means extracted from computer screen, film, television etc, not meaning photographed through a door or window with a screen. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  • If you insist on speedy deleting it because it was photographed through a screen window, fine. Just don't allege that the photo I took is in any way a "copyright violation". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

This discussion mentions you[edit]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Sideboob - would you take a look? Aditya (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Christmas 1930.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Christmas 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Obada Adnan.jpg[edit]

Hi, First of all , hope you are being safe in the current situations, Second, I would like to ask you why you deleted the file File:Obada Adnan.jpg Alex1981march (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok, Thank you Alex1981march (talk) 03:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:FQRustyBuickCenturyFront.jpg[edit]

The picture of the rusty Buick Century you taken in New Orleans in 2007 is specifically the 1985 model year by the grille design, as well as the 1963 Impala parked in front. What is the white car park behind the Century?

1985 Buick Century: https://media.freelibrary.org/assets/digital/items/arcd00932/images/large.jpg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 21:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the year identification. Sorry, I don't recall what the other car was, if I even knew at the time. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi there. Can you kindly close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Theresa Greenfield.jpg? I had opened it before a bot reviewed the file. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

New Orleans Rivergate Convention Center[edit]

Hi, Infrogmation, As a Wikipedian that often writes / edits on subjects related to New Orleans, I appreciate the many photographs that you upload to the Commons. Do you know of a publicly available photograph of the New Orleans Rivergate Convention Center? I'm working on an article about the now defunct New Orleans architectural firm Curtis & Davis, which designed the Rivergate (and many other notable structures in NOLA and elsewhere), and I'd like to include a photograph. Thank you! Nolabob (talk) 21:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

No, sorry. I didn't photograph it myself (I wasn't really thinking of documenting such things back then), and haven't come across any free licensed nor PD images. There may well be such out there, something to keep looking for! Cheers! Thanks for your work. Red beans & ricely, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
I've noticed some local postcard photographers failed to put proper copyright notices on their works... might be a good bet... I'll take a quick look online, of course one needs to see the back of the card and have some evidence it predates 1978 to confirm status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
@Nolabob: A possibility seen here! No copyright notice... if we could confirm it predates 1978 we're in business. Looks like the Battle of Liberty Place Monument was in front of the Rivergate at the time... that would likely give a date range I think. Was that where the Joan of Arc statue later went? If we can confirm it's before Joannie came there, this is good {{PD-US no notice}}! Any help with date info? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Infrogmation, that's a great photograph. How should we proceed on this? Nolabob (talk) 00:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I've asked a couple of other New Orleans history fans elsewhere on-line if they know/can see anything that would confirm the proper date range as well. If we get a confirmed proper date range, I'll take care of copying to Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Alas no luck *yet*. Haven't gotten an exact chronology of when the BLP monument was there with it's multiple moves (if you have any hints on determining that, it'd be welcome). Another possible card without copyright notice is this one - thing is we have to have some fact that shows, rather than just suspect, it's pre-1978. Too bad no visible automobiles or other buildings that could be dated for construction/demolition. Other folks I asked think it's likely the views were from early in the Rivergate's history. I was reminded that it seemed to attract soot and automobile exhaust, and didn't look so clean for long! I do remember it looking grimy. I suspect we'll find something confirmable PD *eventually*.... P.S. - I should mention another way of establishing postcard date is to find a *used* one with a postmark or other inscribed date, which would mean first printing would have to be before then. Keep a lookout! Yours in Gumbo, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the update. I don't have any ideas on this right now but appreciate your guidance and efforts. Nolabob (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Great! Thank you! I much appreciate this. Sorry, I don't know what the building is. Regards, Nolabob (talk) 11:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
I figured it out - the building was originally the WTC Parking Garage, and is still there, incorporated into the Hilton complex as their parking garage. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

St. Frances Cabrini Church, New Orleans[edit]

I don't mean to impose on you, Infrogmation, but another photographic record that is missing is that of St. Frances Cabrini Church in New Orleans. This is another one that was architecturally distinct, also designed by Curtis & Davis. In fact, the Wikipedia article on St. Frances Cabrini Church in New Orleans lacks a photograph. This church was demolished, with some controversy, in 2007. Do you know of a publicly available photograph of that church? Many thanks as always for your dedication to documenting the people, history, and culture of NOLA. Nolabob (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC).

I see we have one of the demo in progress File:Cabrini Demo - Paris Avenue, New Orleans.jpg. I got a mediocre snapshot of it while driving around after the Federal Flood near the London Avenue Canal breeches File:7WardBrokeSteeple.jpg (Alas not a part of town I was much familiar with and by the time I found out it was important and worth more effort to photograph it was already gone). I'll keep an eye out for other images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
I found and uploaded some more of the demolition from Flickr, and started a category: Category:St. Frances Cabrini Church (New Orleans). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks! Nolabob (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

NOLA photos wish list[edit]

Hi, Infrogmation. I'm not trying to be burdensome on you, but I wanted to suggest to you some photos that are needed for the Commons and for the accompanying Wikipedia articles. Perhaps you can keep these in mind during your endeavors in the coming weeks / months / years. Here's the wish list: Noted NOLA broadcast journalists Hap Glaudi, Wayne Mack, Buddy Diliberto, and Mel Leavitt. Also, these architecturally distinct buildings: Caribe Building (still exists, it is at 2475 Canal St. -- I'd take a photo myself but I don't live near NOLA and can't travel in the pandemic), the Municipal Court House on Rampart St. (demolished), the Thomy Lafon School (demolished), and George Washington Carver School (destroyed in H. Katrina). Many thanks in advance for putting some thought into these possibilities. Nolabob (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Courthouse on Rampart? Where was that? Or is that the one that was where the main branch of the New Orleans Public Library is now? I know we have a few images of that already. I'll see if we have some images of 2475 Canal here already. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I've not been able to find the exact address of the Courthouse on Rampart, only that it was very close to Our Lady of Guadalupe Church. As I understand the story, parishioners at that church back in the 1950s when the court house was built were highly offended by the nude sculpture by Enrique Alferez that adorned the court house. City fathers then had to take down the sculpture, which was subsequently lost, even though it evidently was a fine work of art. Nolabob (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
A courthouse near OLoG on Rampart in the 1950s new one on me. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Another one for the list -- There's a bronze marker commemorating those who died at the Battle of Shiloh at the base of a large tree in Chalmette National Cemetery. Nolabob (talk) 12:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! Much appreciated. I'll add one or more to the article in Wikipedia on Curtis & Davis very soon. Nolabob (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Removal of license tags[edit]

Hello Infrogmation. Please do not remove license tags from files, as you did in this edit. Removing a license tag, especially without an edit summary, puts the file in a not-well-monitored backlog, makes more work for other administrators, and does not resolve any concerns about the copyright status of a file. If you believe the stated copyright status of a file is incorrect, please nominate the file for deletion or fix the description page yourself. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The license was clearly fraudulent. I guess I should have just listed it for deletion, which I shall do now. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the reminder. I was in the process of going through files from a user that seemed to upload many files under incorrect licenses when I got distracted. Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Voting lines?[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2008_Wash_State_Democratic_Caucus_10A.jpg&diff=510776659&oldid=487136184: not sure I agree with this. They are standing in line to sign in to attend a caucus. While voting is, indeed, part of the caucus process, the same is true for a party convention. Would you call the line to sign in at a party convention a "voting line" as well? - Jmabel ! talk 15:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

OK, good point, thanks! -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Beavers[edit]

Category discussion warning

Beavers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

BMacZero (🗩) 18:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Translation ????[edit]

Hi, Infrogmation, wondering why you added this to the file description. Do you speak Dutch? I replaced the text because it is vulgar. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Only me again, going through the edit history of this anonymous user, in all fairness, I think the IP address should be blocked. Lotje (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess I assumed good faith and moved anon's text to the proper language place. I should have checked with an online translator first for a language I don't speak! I see the anon has a history of such inappropriate edits going back for years, and has had previous shorter blocks. I reblocked them for 2 years. Thank you for your attention and edits, and for alerting me to this. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
You are very welcome Infrogmation. Glad I could be of any help. :-) Lotje (talk) 10:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Other NOLA historical photographs[edit]

Hi, Infrogmation, Do you know of any photographs of Schwegmann's Supermarkets in the Commons or otherwise in the public domain without copyright restriction? I'm referring to their large stores, such as what were on Airline Highway and also on Broad Street. They were forerunners of today's "big box retailers", and I'm considering writing a Wikipedia article on the subject. For that matter, photos of John Schwegmann himself are of interest. Thank you! Nolabob (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

On another matter, do you know of photographs available for use of the Granada Theater, which was located at 2256 Baronne Street? The theater was designed by noted NOLA architect Leon C. Weiss, also a Huey Long crony. I have an article under development in my Wikipedia sandbox on Weiss. As always, I appreciate your efforts on documenting the people, history and culture of New Orleans. Nolabob (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
I've created a category Category:Schwegmann's. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)