User talk:InverseHypercube

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, InverseHypercube!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 01:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Contents

File:Khan Academy heart disease.ogv[edit]

Either they changed the license or you were wrong: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. -- RE rillke questions? 19:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, they did change the license. In the YouTube ([1]) description it says it is licensed under CC-BY-SA which, since perpetual, still applies now. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


This is Sal from the Khan Academy. Yes, the file is licensed under cc-by-sa so it is cool to use. I actually wanted to let you know that this video has an error in it and that I've made a new version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYnreB1duro.

In general, let me know if there are other videos that you all would want to use and we should be able to loosen the license on most of them (email me at sal@khanacademy.org).

-Sal

Thank you Sal! I much appreciate the work you do with the Khan Academy. I will upload the updated file.
Regarding the licenses on other files, I will email you. InverseHypercube (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

File:William A. Stein.png[edit]

Please place {{licensereview}} on those uploads from ext sources. Thanks. -- RE rillke questions? 19:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

William A. Stein is the depicted person but who is the camera-operator? -- RE rillke questions? 19:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Since it was uploaded under William Stein's YouTube account, I assumed he owned the copyright. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Kite photo Cambridge.jpg[edit]

Would be nice if can send the permission to COM:OTRS. That's what we usually enforce. See COM:Permission -- RE rillke questions? 19:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I am aware of this. However, he said he would edit the page, confirming his permission, something he has not yet done. I will remind him. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
OTRS is now pending. Thank you. InverseHypercube (talk) 21:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Laser Towards Milky Ways Centre Wallpaper.jpg[edit]

Just cropping an image is not enough original research to create a new copyright. It would be nice if you mention the original author, too even if this is not mandatory. -- RE rillke questions? 20:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

I did mention the original file and licensed it under the same license as the original. I see what you mean about the original author though; I will fix it. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Done. Does it look good now? InverseHypercube (talk) 20:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought the original was a PD US-Image (and therefore no attribution required). But I was wrong. It was cc-by and therefore this was a breach of terms and conditions of cc-by. Yes, now it looks good. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 13:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Bombay-native.jpg[edit]

Sir It is true I uploaded these photos from my flickr account because I search and gather these photos for the purpose of article. I mainly found them on public domains or blogs or any other websites who are freely distribute their material.

Hello. It would be preferrable that you don't upload these from your Flickr page, because then it is hard to find the license and the author of the original work. As well, it is not enough that you find your images on websites that freely distribute them, the author must either have licensed it under a free license, or have died 70 years ago. For works published in the US, anything published before 1923 is public domain. Regarding the Bombay Native Infantry file, it is old enough to be in the public domain. However, I nominated it for deletion since it is a duplicate of File:29TH BOMBAY NATIVE INFANTRY on Firing Exercise 1885 Simkin.jpg. InverseHypercube (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


Sir please tell me How add public domain tag for India because upload form has united states license.Sir please tell me how to found license tags on blog.

Copyright law in India is different than that of the United States; see Commons:PD#India. In essence, a work enters the public domain in India either 60 years after its publication or 60 years after the death of the author, depending on the work. The India copyright tag is at Template:PD-India. It's difficult to know what license a file has on a blog, but in general images on a blog are not created by the blog author. Sometimes, a picture on a blog will be old enough to be in the public domain, but you have to make sure first. See Commons:Free_media_resources for some good websites to find free images. InverseHypercube (talk) 18:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Dhm 355 small.jpg[edit]

Sir please tell me how it is copy right violated

It is an image by David Rowlands,[2] which is under copyright. It's a shame, because it's a really nice image. InverseHypercube (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Note that if you really want to have an image on Wikipedia which is still copyrighted, you can ask the author for permission. See Commons:OTRS. InverseHypercube (talk) 17:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Sir, Is wikipedia accepts written permissions.

An email from the author is usually used, but if you have written permission, signed by the author, it would work as well if you scan it. InverseHypercube (talk) 18:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Rama-army.jpg[edit]

Sir I add some links and modify links of this image.Please see these links and verify them.

Unfortunately, the page you linked is the license for phpBB, the forum software, which is open source. However, the images are not; they are part of a copyrighted book (unless the illustrator has died 60 years ago; see Commons:PD#India). It's a very nice image, but unfortunately it can't be used. InverseHypercube (talk) 18:02, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
By the way, you should add ~~~~ at the end of your posts, so people can see your username. InverseHypercube (talk) 18:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, InverseHypercube!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Satavahana soldiers.png[edit]

Sir I add Original links for this work. Please see these and verify them. Please sir --by sridhar1000

Although that seems to be the original source, it never says that the images are licensed under a free license. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for review[edit]

Latte art.jpg

Sir Have a cup of coffee. I think you are a good image reviewer. So I request you to review my other new uploads. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Sridhar1000 sridhar1000 (talk)

Thank you! I will take a look. InverseHypercube (talk) 02:15, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kite photo Cambridge.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kite photo Cambridge.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kite photo Cambridge.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear InverseHypercube,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Steve_Jobs_tribute-de.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Steve_Jobs_tribute-de.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Esby (talk) 09:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:ZBar logo.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:54, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hello my name is sticker.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hello my name is sticker.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Coekon (talk) 21:17, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar for you![edit]

Thank you InverseHypercube for the barnstar! Steveoc 86 (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! You deserved it. InverseHypercube 00:59, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Steve Jobs tribute-it.png del. note[edit]

File:Steve Jobs tribute-it.png and File:Steve Jobs tribute-es.png needed to be deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Jobs tribute-de.png. If you have questions feel free to ask on my talk page. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Steve Jobs tribute-en.png[edit]

I had to take down this image according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Jobs tribute-de.png. Maybe we get permission or another admin will restore it if he believes it is not covered by copyright. You can request undeletion at COM:UR. My apologies. -- RE rillke questions? 01:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:St._Andrew's-Wesley_Church_plaque.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St._Andrew's-Wesley_Church_plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Qube Vancouver bottom.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

File:KeepOnTruckin'.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:KeepOnTruckin'.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 00:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

tretyakov.py lossless jpeg?[edit]

Hallo InverseHypercube, I just saw a upload by you using a ripped file. Is the convert +/-append in User:InverseHypercube/tretyakov.py lossless jpeg editing? If not it might be best to to the intermediate steps with png. Just in case you didn't think of the loss jpegs recompression each time. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm... I checked it with SciPy, it is indeed lossy. I'll fix it; thanks for the heads-up! InverseHypercube 03:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, annoying, but good that I decided to ask you. ;-) I see the script is just newly created - so you probably didn't use it for many pics, did you? If you go for png there just may be a problem in case of color profiles or 32bit jpeg or useful EXIF data. Probably not the case here. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Saw your change. "convert %s -append output.png" is only done once (only one save), right? There you could use jpeg - it might be even better for these artwork repros (thumbnail sharpening by mediawiki + smaller filesize). Add "-quality 100" in case of output.jpg (it should use the best quality then = nearly no loss). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
I tried doing that but only 29% of the pixels are left intact. Is this fine? InverseHypercube 04:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Well, you could also upload the pngs and hopefully at some time in the future it will be adjustable if sharpening should be done - also for pngs. I did test it myself now: quality 100 is not really the least possible compression. In GIMP there is a better jpeg quality available (quality 100 + no chroma subsampling) which results in much less errors compared to convert's "quality 100" - but I couldn't find that for convert. So go for png for no loss. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay thanks. Do you think jpg versions should be deleted? InverseHypercube 17:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Can - but don't need. E.g. for most/all(?) NARA images we have tiff + jpeg. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

User:HypercubeBot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! InverseHypercube 16:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Of Red River carts[edit]

Re this: I removed the category as the image depicts a sleigh, not a cart. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 14:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah, okay. InverseHypercube 19:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Musee du Leman[edit]

Hi. Please see [3]. Thank you. --Krd 20:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Situation has been sorted now, but most of the high-res versions had to be deleted. Sorry. --Krd 12:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh. That's unfortunate. Thanks for handling it anyway.
The watermarks will have to be cropped per COM:Watermarks. InverseHypercube 03:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, but I think that's a different story, and it doesn't neccessarily need to be done immediately. --Krd 06:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File:1943–44 Jewish calendar for the Canadian Armed Forces.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1943–44 Jewish calendar for the Canadian Armed Forces.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Wikimedia_Foundation_merchandise[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, InverseHypercube. You have new messages at Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2012/03/Category:Wikimedia_Foundation_merchandise.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

File:Takeshi Yamada painted horseshoe crab.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Request to vote in administrator request[edit]

I requested for administration. Please vote in my request.Please give your view about me. I f you oppose no problem But please vote in this. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/Requests/sridhar1000 --P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 07:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Jenga[edit]

Hola, ese video lo grabé con una cámara compacta, por lo que la imagen era de bajísima calidad. De todas formas, no tengo el archivo, pues lo grabé hace varios años y lo borré. Lo que sí tengo es la jenga, así que tal vez vuelva a grabar otra 'caída' pero con una mejor iluminación. Saludos. Jorge Barrios (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ah, entiendo. Gracias. InverseHypercube 02:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cahill Expressway from Art Gallery Road – CN.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cahill Expressway from Art Gallery Road – CN.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cherry blossoms in Vancouver 3 crop.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry blossoms in Vancouver 3 crop.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

TUSC token a3522a4c866296b55ba1dc9319c8b958[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Meet our photographers[edit]

Hi,

thanks for your appreciation of my pictures! It is a real honour for my to own the qualification to enter the "Meet our photographers":) I am looking forward to uploading some new amazing picture in the near future. Perhaps I'll add myself to this exquisite gallery of photographers.

Best regards Tobi 87 (talk)

That would be great, as I think it's a good page to display the talent at Commons. I really like your landscape photography. InverseHypercube 20:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Your Vote (Picture of the Year)[edit]

It seems one of your votes is undefined. Maybe this is related to Can't_vote_on_ogv_files. Could you please try to vote again and remove your undefined vote? --McZusatz (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I apologize for this serious application error. The file you voted for was one of the two videos (1, 2). Simply revisit the gallery, click on the statistics-button next to the video and add your vote manually if it does not work properly this time. You can use # [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]] for manual voting. Thanks in advance. -- RE rillke questions? 15:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. I have added my vote. InverseHypercube 18:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

POTY 2011 - voting - 1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg[edit]

Dear POTY-voter, some helpful people made us aware of a mistake in our candidate list. We regret the inconvenience.

Therefore we will add your vote to Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/R1/Into the Jaws of Death 23-0455M edit.jpg after voting is over, if you do not disagree and it is not yet there. If you don't want to have your vote transferred, visit Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/R1/1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg and remove your vote, either by editing the page and removing exactly the line containing your username or clicking the button.

Yours sincerely -- RE rillke questions? 10:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Le Voyage dans la lune colour[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_Voyage_dans_la_lune_colour.ogv

This 1902 film might be public domain. However is the color restored version public domain or is it copyrighted by Lobster Films? I'm interested in using this file for YouTube and other projects but I'm skeptical if this particular version is indeed PD. Oudler (talk) 01:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, Méliès did create the colour version, so if there was any copyright to claim it would be solely on the restoration. As far as I know, restorations do not qualify for new copyright. This is not a legal document, but [4] provides some information. InverseHypercube 15:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation photo essay blog post[edit]

Hi InverseHypercube, I think we're going to publish the post tomorrow, Friday morning (San francisco time). Would you like me to list you as having contributed to the essay? Please let me know if you'd prefer not. Thanks, Matthew (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

If you think the contributions were significant enough, then sure. I don't mind either way. InverseHypercube 00:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I'll add you in the signature line. Thanks for your help! Matthew (WMF) (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Uploads from http://www.lindahessmiller.com[edit]

Hello, your bot has been uploading photos from http://www.lindahessmiller.com (for instance, File:Apulo_1990_21.jpg). The source website prominently states that the images are under copyright. Nick-D (talk) 04:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Look at the home page. There is a CC BY notice. InverseHypercube 04:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Also, Creative Commons photographs are still copyrighted, unless they're under CC0. InverseHypercube 04:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
The source for each of images very clearly states that they're under copyright, and the photos are currently marked with a copyright watermark. For instance; http://www.lindahessmiller.com/coppermine/displayimage.php?album=207&pid=6290. I think that these need to be deleted. Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Again, copyright and Creative Commons licenses are not mutually exclusive. She has explicitly licensed all of her website under CC BY; that does not mean that the photos are not copyrighted, but it does mean that they can be used on Commons. InverseHypercube 07:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't think that's at all tenable. The front page of the website says only "This work by Linda Hess Miller is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License", and then all of the photos are clearly marked with very prominent copyright notices (no CC license appears on these pages), which include a copyright watermark and an explicit statement that asks that the photo not be reproduced without her permission. Given that there's a bot involved here, I've raised this at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Bot appears to be uploading copyright protected images. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 02:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear InverseHypercube,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 08:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs[edit]

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello,
Sorry I missed this message. I don't know much about interlaced JPGs though. InverseHypercube 06:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Wanna trade?[edit]

I noticed you have a camera in Vancouver. I have one in Edmonton. Can we take pictures for each other for articles? I may do an article on the sculptor that did the concrete lions at the w:Stanley Park end of the bridge. I couldn't find any decent ones with a free licence. If I remember is is either easiest to walk to from Lost Lagoon or the seawall below it. I also hope to get out in Ed. in the spring and hopefully create and article on public sculptures here. w:List of attractions and monuments in Stanley Park has some pretty lame images and could use a few more.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello,
I'm busy with school at the moment, but it is a good idea, thanks. Did you look on Flickr though? There are many free images of the lion statues (http://www.flickr.com/photos/goldberg/216630342/, http://www.flickr.com/search/?l=commderiv&ss=2&ct=6&mt=all&adv=1&w=all&q=lions+gate+bridge+statue&m=text). InverseHypercube 06:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Have I been using flickr search incorrectly? I just click the search 'The Commons' for free licence images. I did find a better one that didn't show in search that way, but did have a free licence.--Canoe1967 (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, the Commons is a different thing, it's for images donated from several institutions (muesums, etc.) To search all of Flickr for Creative Commons-licensed files, go to Advanced Search and check off all the sections in the Creative Commons section. InverseHypercube 21:55, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Resolved

Thank you. I just spotted that and found some more.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Tim Westergren signature.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tim Westergren signature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amada44  talk to me 10:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Le Voyage dans la lune colour.ogv[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le Voyage dans la lune colour.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

File:1337 Part 3.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:1337 Part 3.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ralgis (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:1337 Part 3.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1337 Part 3.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1337 Part 3.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Alan Lorenzo (talk) 03:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bryan Birch 2011.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bryan Birch 2011.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear InverseHypercube,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Linda Hess Miller[edit]

Hey. I cannot find any proof that these images uploaded by your bot are under CC license. The source is of course given, but I don't see any CC claims there. Could you please take a look. Thanks. Masur (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello. The homepage says they are licensed under CC-BY, which she added after I sent her an email. InverseHypercube 09:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I believe it's not enough, as the text explicitely says "This work" (meaning the current page) and not all the content. Like at least it's not unambiguous. Masur (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC) ps. and please reply at my discussion page, as I really don't want to dig through my history to check who I discuss with and whether the reply was posted. Thanks.
    • OTRS would be the best. And if you could run your bot to correct permission= field to indicate both OTRS ticket and the link you've given to me, then I think there will be no doubts. Masur (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


The home page has a CC-BY notice, but the source page for this image has a clear copyright notice and a copyright watermark, see http://www.lindahessmiller.com/coppermine/displayimage.php?album=217&pid=10040. A copyright notice on a particular page always overrules a free license on a home page. OTRS permission from Miller, or her removing both the copyright notice from the page and the watermark is required. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Okay. I sent her an email to clarify, and will send to OTRS as soon as I hear back. InverseHypercube 04:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Note that the e-mail to OTRS should come directly from Miller, not forwarded by you. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Commons:OTRS says forwarding is fine. In any case, I've gotten the permission and sent it to OTRS. Once it's processed I'll get the bot to change add the permission to the files. InverseHypercube 01:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
I, and many other OTRS volunteers, don't like forwarded permissions because they are very easy to forge. However, given the depth of your WMF record, I've accepted this one. It's ticket 2014091610002391. I have not added the tags because you said your bot can do it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Ah, I see, thank you! I'll try to get the tags done on the weekend. InverseHypercube 04:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Der Stürmer Christmas 1929.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Der Stürmer Christmas 1929.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Assayer (talk) 21:51, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues[edit]

Hello InverseHypercube. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:41, 1 March 2015 (UTC)