User talk:Iridescent

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token 4b69cf284140cca553011b7011a6fa1f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

timestamp so it archivesiridescent 22:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Titanic Slipways 20180914 102858 (46881108405).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Titanic Slipways 20180914 102858 (46881108405).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Also:

MGA73 (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Walthamstow Wetlands 20180903 152408 (46849508855).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Walthamstow Wetlands 20180903 152408 (46849508855).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Also:

Remember if it is own work you could just change the source to own and perhaps make an edit on Flickr to confirm that it is your Flickr account. MGA73 (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

@MGA73 My Flickr account] already confirms that this is me ("Also User:Iridescent on Wikimedia projects"). I've changed the attribution to own on a couple of them that are of potential use, but most of these ones that Flickrreviewbot didn't pick up are of such marginal value it's probably not worth the time it would take to change the licensing on them.iridescent 23:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Thats Great! You could also upload your photos directly to Commons as own work. No need to send them via Flickr! I will check the DRs after work. --MGA73 (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
@MGA73 In theory yes, but we're talking upwards of 30,000 images, and Commons is deeply shitty at handling batch uploads. The alternative to using Flickr2Commons would be downloading ≈150gb of data from Flickr onto my computer, laboriously categorising each one, trusting to the neither-stable-nor-user-friendly Pattypan to actually do what it's supposed to, and then uploading the same 150gb of data.iridescent 08:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Question is if all 30k images are relevant. If they are then you should of course go ahead. I don't see how uploading via Flickr should improve categorizing for example. Perhaps someone know a good way of uploading the images? It would be nice to have a better way. --MGA73 (talk) 08:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
I checked Commons:Upload_tools#Standalone_desktop_applications but that did not help me. Do you know how to use a bot? If yes that may be a way to do it. --MGA73 (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Most of them are already uploaded; there are only about 5000 left to go. All of them are in scope so that isn't an issue (in the past I kept the images parked on Flickr and only uploaded them here as and when I needed them for articles, but with Flickr likely to shut down soon I want them out of there). I see nothing to be gained by downloading them from Flickr then re-uploading purely for the sake of avoiding Flickr2Commons, unless F2C starts malfunctioning.iridescent 09:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gap Road Cemetery 20200217 115453 (49547730221).jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gap Road Cemetery 20200217 115453 (49547730221).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

File:St Pancras 20181205 124417 (47027599524).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:St Pancras 20181205 124417 (47027599524).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Reading Old Cemetery 20201024 105721 (50527346367).jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Reading Old Cemetery 20201024 105721 (50527346367).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 10:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)