User talk:JörgenMoorlag

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:CTA map.png[edit]

Hi! Thanks for uploading this image. If possible, could you add a minor correction--there should be a dashed blue line alongside the pink from Polk to 54th/Cermak station. Thanks again, JeremyA 01:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

The blue line connection between Racine and Polk is already there, but I omitted the dashed blue line as to not to make the map too full. If you think the current scheme is not clear enough and the blue line services on the Cermak branch should absolutely be included, I will of course be happy to to do that. Xyboi 11:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Bild:Omsk Metro deutsch.png[edit]

Hi, the german word "geplant" should be written with one "n" only! --Exxu 12:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I will take care of it. Thanks for reporting :) Xyboi 18:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Externe link op je Gebruikerspagina[edit]

Hey. Op jouw gebruikerspagina heb je een externe link naar jouw account op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia. Het hoeft niet per se een externe link zijn: je kan het ook zo maken: [[wikipedia:nl:Gebruiker:Xyboi|click here (o.i.d.)]] en dus hoeft het niet per se een externe link te zijn. Voor vragen kan je op mijn overlegpagina terecht. P.S. Ik ben trouwens TahR78 van de Nederlands- en Engelstalige Wikipedia. TahR78 (NL) 12:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Vragen? Ik geloof dat ik hier al een tijdje langer rondloop dan jij, dus andersom lijkt me meer van toepassing ;). Van de linkmogelijkheden ben ik prima op de hoogte en het nut van bericht zie ik niet echt in. (het kan trouwens nog korter: [[:nl:NAAM PAGINA]]) Groeten, Xyboi 12:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Ik wou je alleen helpen, hoor, en ik loop hier langer rond, maar dan liep ik hier als anoniem rond. Nou ja, dan hoef jij geen hulp. Tahrim-NL (Overleg) 13:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Groß-Berlin map[edit]

Groß-Berlin.png

Hi Xyboi,

Your map "Groß-Berlin" is used on a lot of pages in different languages as illustration of the Greater Berlin Act of 1920. However I feel it's slightly misleading as your map shows the boundary as of today, not as it was in 1920. Even though the differences are minor and the boundary is mostly the same, there were a couple of alterations of the city boundary in between, which are listed here.

My suggestion is to change the map to reflect this. I've thought a little on how to do it and came up with

  • Alter the map to reflect the boundary as of 1920.
  • Alter the map to reflect the changes in between (dotted lines or different colour shades where changes occured - probably difficult to do clearly especially in the West-Staaken case where the boundary went back and forth)
  • Create an animation which shows each stage as an individual frame (my favourite, but a lot of work).

As I don't want to interfer with your map and I don't really have the time anyway, I thought I'd just talk to its creator.

I'm user de:Anorak and en:Anorak2, please answer on either of my two talk pages there as I will probably forget to look for an answer here :).

Thank you. Anorak 29 October 2007 09:00 CET

Answered on your German talk page. Xyboi 11:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Minsk Metro map[edit]

I made a new version for en-wiki, consider updating the one in Dutch. --Kuban kazak 15:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:S-Bf Under den Linden Sign.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion warning[edit]

Hi, I have nominated one or several images uploaded by you for deletion, please see Commons:Deletion requests/Artwork from Brussels. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:MetroBrussel_Hallepoort_lijn2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:MetroBrussel_Hallepoort_lijn2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf /talk to me/ 13:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:MetroBrussel_Merode_perron.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:MetroBrussel_Merode_perron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf /talk to me/ 13:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Stockholm Metro map used by MTR Corporation?[edit]

An image you uploaded, File:Stockholm metro map.png, is apparently used by the MTR Corporation in its press release [1]. - Keithorz (talk對話) 06:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Indeed they do. One would think they could have found a better, slicker map. ;) Xyboi (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:S-Bahnhof Berlin Hohenzollerndamm Bahnsteig.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:S-Bahnhof Berlin Hohenzollerndamm Bahnsteig.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Hekerui (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with this image. Both source and author are provided, file information added with Flinfo.
Also, the license specified is correct (as harvested from flickr and added by Flinfo): "somme rights reserved" = CC-BY. Apparently though, the image id in the link was incorrect, so that it led to another image; this has been fixed. Please recheck the image on flickr and remove the tag you placed. Xyboi (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MetroBrussel Sint-Gillis VP.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MetroBrussel Sint-Gillis VP.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:The Hague Tram Tunnel02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The Hague Tram Tunnel02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

File:The Hague Tram Tunnel01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The Hague Tram Tunnel01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

File:The Hague Tram Tunnel03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The Hague Tram Tunnel03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)