User talk:JackPotte

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Natura 2000 cats[edit]

Salut, please, don't continue moving (empty) categories of Natura 2000 as you did here, since we are using those as a help to find a proper category later on. The target category Natura 2000 in Spain is too generic. Thanks! 14:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Poco a poco: OK I'll stop. But I recommend that you could begin to import them into the generic Category:Natura 2000 in Spain, in order to allow them to be found, and avoid them to appear as to be categorized into Special:WantedCategories. And in a second time, a bot could precise this category by scanning it, and when finding {{LIC|ES2410064}}, it would be able to modify it. Or you could modify {{LIC}} to categorize in function of its parameter. JackPotte (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could you bring them back? The issue here is that we don't know whether the LIC code is right and we're reviewing all of them. You've simply created a lot of extra work with no real gain for anyone. --Discasto talk 16:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
YOU'VE REMOVED THE CATEGORIES FROM THOUSANDS OF FILES!!!!! WAS IT THAT DIFFICULT TO ASK FIRST? HAVEN'T YOU NOTICED THAT YOU'VE DESTROYED A CAREFUL CATEGORIZATION WORK!!!!!!
Yes I can simply edit Template:LIC to create a review list, but I would proceed accordingly to Commons:Naming categories. @Discasto: but obviously you didn't get my points above: revoking the current classification as you're doing now is splitting the images to review, and will be exposed to call again the maintainers of Special:WantedCategories and Category:All_media_needing_categories_as_of_2015 in a few hours. JackPotte (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You could have simply asked first. Your solution simply does not work. The issue here is that a third of the categories have been already reviewed. Modifying the template would simply make us to review again one third of the already reviewed categories (and we do have a list, thank you: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Earth_2015_in_Spain/categories). Why don't you do productive work instead or ruining other people's work? Again, can you revert your pointless editions (we're meaning about 3500 files that have been stripped of its category)? --Discasto talk 16:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Again, can you revert your editions? Or just enjoying creating useless work for other users? --Discasto talk 16:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually there isn't any manual way to revoke me at this scale. And when you write irrespectively "useless work", you're not responding to my explanations precisely. JackPotte (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've just checked Category_talk:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Earth_2015_in_Spain/categories and I've noticed that I wasn't the first maintainer to treat it, as it could have been predictable, because it would be much simpler if these names was conform to Commons:Naming categories. JackPotte (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We have had to stall all our review process thanks to you. Again, what are you planning to do to fix your miscues? --Discasto talk 16:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC) PS: incidentally, we talked to the person you mentioned and he understood the case very well. Here, you've removed categories from 3500 files without asking or trying to know what's going on. So, again, how are you fixing your pointless editions?Reply[reply]
We should finish this conversation into the the community page you've used. JackPotte (talk) 16:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Given your unwillingness to fix the mess you've created, I'm just regenerating the categories and categorizing images again. Our team is stalled until the bot finishes working and you've proven to be the typical bureaucrat that totally disregard other people's work. That is, just the opposite of what should be expected from a collaborative project. You're not only removed the categorization of 3,500 files but also refused to sort your vandalism out. And last, but not least: stay away of WLE Spain businesses. --Discasto talk 21:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, I don't want to disturb you anymore since we couldn't find any agreement to integrate this work. JackPotte (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, the work was already integrated and you "dis-integrated" it. No fixes, no excuses, no apologies...: en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a bureaucracy --Discasto talk 22:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually I've apologized into the community page and proposed to install myself several consensual fixes, you didn't even envisage to change your singular method. JackPotte (talk) 22:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is there Sanbox in Wikimedia commons?[edit]

Dear JackPotte! I' am writing you because you are the author of File:Lang-en.gif, File:Lang-ru.gif and others. I would like to make something like this. And I have question: is there something like Sanbox here for my experiments? Thank you in advance. Hunu (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I used Easy GIF Animator for those, no need to use a sandbox here because the work is done locally, before uploading. JackPotte (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Commons File mover.svg

Hi JackPotte, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 00:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2014_in_Hungary[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2014_in_Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Effeietsanders (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair Use moves to Commons[edit]

Hi JackPotte. Please do not transfer files that have a Fair Use rationale on them to Commons. This automatically tags them for speedy deletion here, because Fair Use is not allowed on Commons. This happened with the Celestia screenshots yesterday (they should not have been tagged as Fair Use to begin with--they are pure GPL) see Commons:Undeletion_requests#Celestia_screenshots, and again with File:Resize2_Trainz.jpg today. Is that free software? If a file is tagged as "fair use" on a sister project, please either leave it there, or if the tag is bogus, remove the tag before transferring. Thanks. Storkk (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, these three files contained a double license and my bot had imported them from the GFDL category. But the transfer is finished today. JackPotte (talk) 11:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Abietic acid.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abietic acid.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 23:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tower of Tokyo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tower of Tokyo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Me national art gallery.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Me national art gallery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jamie1322SF (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Camphor.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Camphor.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 22:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Unispecs.gif[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Unispecs.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 18:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Autocad2000.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Autocad2000.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Banjo tell me 18:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Cyclohexaneline.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cyclohexaneline.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Bicyclo2.1.0pentane.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bicyclo2.1.0pentane.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ocelot at Zoo.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ocelot at Zoo.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

@Leoboudv: I don't understand the problem: if the original uploader had used {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} 12 years ago, with the source URL and author name, and the image is no longer on Flickr (or archive.org) now.
Why couldn't we just trust our good old data? JackPotte (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Dear JackPotte,
  • If the image is not verified as free, Commons cannot keep it. The original uploader in 2008 didn't ask for a review and was presumably not trusted. Only a trusted user who uploaded images prior to 2012 can have their images kept--in case of license changes. In this case, Commons cannot keep the image. Perhaps you didn't check the image link to see if the image was still there. But the problem is the copyright owner saw his image being used and did not approve and deleted it before it could be reviewed (ie. passed). If it was reviewed or passed, it would be considered passed for life in the case of future image changes or deletions. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I uploaded the image below in 2009 and it was on a free license then. Today the image's license is 'All Right reserved' but since the flickr review bot marked/reviewed the image in 2009...thereby confirming its free license in 2009, it is considered passed for life:
  • File:Villarica Volcano (aerial view)1.jpg
  • Unfortunately, some reviewers even today forget to order a flickrreview or licensereview on their newly uploaded images in order to avoid the problems of future license changes or image deletions. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Leoboudv: OK I get it, thanks a lot from Paris, France. JackPotte (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bonjour, JackPotte (et Leoboudv)! J’ai trouvé une version plus grande, File:Ocelot Marwell Zoo.jpg, dont la licence a été vérifiée en 2009. Alors nous ne perdrons rien.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JackPotte: : Odysseus1479 is right. You should use File:Ocelot Marwell Zoo.jpg since that image was reviewed by the flickrreview bot. So, the pictue is kept for life. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Curvedarrow.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Curvedarrow.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Half-arrow.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Half-arrow.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Two sides arrows.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Two sides arrows.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Crossing arrows.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Crossing arrows.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Autoxydation Ether.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Autoxydation Ether.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Halogenation Ether.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Halogenation Ether.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]


File:IRQ.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, JackPotte!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Stombari7 (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Stombari7 Reply[reply]

File:Sulfhydryl.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sulfhydryl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 15:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Example organic molecules.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Example organic molecules.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 09:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Matlab code.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Matlab code.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jahobr (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:JESSICA.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:JESSICA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B (talk) 20:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Itunes advanced.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Itunes advanced.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: iTunes proprietary interface
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Koma env.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Koma env.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Mathematics.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mathematics.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, DMacks (talk) 05:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Abadie.jo[edit]

Category discussion warning

Abadie.jo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 08:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Penicilling.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Penicilling.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:2,3bpg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:2,3bpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 18:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:BPG.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:BPG.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:TinoDCC.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:TinoDCC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Tinodideoxy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tinodideoxy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:TFA.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:TFA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Carbamylation formula.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Carbamylation formula.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WIKImaniac 13:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Matlab.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Matlab.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GZWDer (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Matlab.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Matlab.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 06:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:ITunes 8 on Windows Vista.png[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ITunes 8 on Windows Vista.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Andel (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Reply[reply]

The author is inactive for ten years, so its book page and image may be deleted. JackPotte (talk) 08:22, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

IP scolaire[edit]

Bonjour JackPotte, 205.237.30.142 est vraiment un IP scolaire, mais c’est bloqué pour toujours sur Wiktionnaire, pouvez-vous demander aux gens s’ils sont d’accord de changer la durée de blocage SVP? La preuve : https://www.findip-address.com/205.237.30.142 138.229.19.202 11:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ma directrice m'a dit qu'elle est pas d'accord que 205.237.30.142 soit bloqué indéfiniment, car il y a d'autres élève qui modifient. En fait, Fête arrêtera l'école en juin 2024, pouvez-vous bloquer jusqu'en juin 2024 SVP? 205.237.30.142 16:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:KASENDOU2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:KASENDOU2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fl.schmitt (talk) 13:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Saint-Augustine-de-Catherine-Road.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Saint-Augustine-de-Catherine-Road.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Regards, Marbletan (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Regards, Marbletan (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Glucose conversion1.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Glucose conversion1.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Innerstream (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:ᠬᠢᠨᠣ᠋ (182C+1822+1828+1823+180B) Mongolian Baiti.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ᠬᠢᠨᠣ᠋ (182C+1822+1828+1823+180B) Mongolian Baiti.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enkhjargal.b (talk) 00:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Lightbright.JPG[edit]

Dialog-warning.svg
File:Lightbright.JPG is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

Deutsch  English  español  português  français  Bahasa Indonesia  +/−

GeorgHHtalk   20:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Partygirl 001.JPG[edit]

Dialog-warning.svg
File:Partygirl 001.JPG is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

Deutsch  English  español  português  français  Bahasa Indonesia  +/−

GeorgHHtalk   20:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:IMANI.JPG[edit]

Dialog-warning.svg
File:IMANI.JPG is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

Deutsch  English  español  português  français  Bahasa Indonesia  +/−

GeorgHHtalk   20:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Modern greek colors.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Modern greek colors.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Contains en:File:Flowerslookingup.jpg deleted for lack of licensing information
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

– Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 18:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Ammonium sulphate mhchem.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ammonium sulphate mhchem.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wostr (talk) 11:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]