User talk:Jacopo Werther

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
To avoid communication problems, try to keep yourself on the top sections of this scheme.

Purgecache ?action=purge

Commons:Talk page guidelines

English: Welcome to the Commons, Jacopo Werther!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 21:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)




Jacopo Werther
it
en-1
... This user would like to be able to speak more languages.
To Commons.svg
Noia 64 apps karm.png This user has been on Commons for
6 years, 4 months and 16 days
You'r welcome!



Contents

Immagine Berlusconi[edit]

In riferimento all'ex-immagine Image:Nano pelato tra Giganti.jpg ti pregherei di non caricare più immagini con quel titolo poiché - oltre ad essere un duplicato - è offensiva e non rispecchia in maniera obiettiva la sintesi dell'immagine. ----ßøuñçêY2K 18:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


Per completezza riporto sotto la discussione intercorsa tra Eh101 e ßøuñçêY2K in relazione all'immagine in oggetto:

==Segnalazione per cancellazione==
Ciao, ti segnalo l'immagine Image:Nano pelato tra Giganti.jpg, il cui titolo è chiaramente offensivo
e inappropriato. 
Come si segnala per cancellazione una immagine su commons ?      
Esiste un template simile a quello sulle altre wiki per patrollare ? Saluti e buon lavoro. 
--Eh101 23:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
== Nano tra i giganti ==

Prima di cancellarla, salvati l'immagine sul computer e ricaricala con un nome più appropriato.
Dopo  di ché segnala (anche a me) che l'immagine è da cancellare.
Ciao! ----ßøuñçêY2K 20:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Non c'è bisogno di ricaricarla. Esisteva già come Image:Chirac Bush Blair Berlusconi.jpg dal  2005. 
É il simpatico User:Jacopo Werther che sembra avere uno strano concetto di Commons e qualche giorno
fa si è messo a giocare mettendo a rischio di critiche sulla stampa il progetto. 
Su it.wikipedia conosco i template per i vandali, qui cosa si fa ? 
Buon lavoro --Eh101 20:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Ho provveduto a cancellarla. Generalmente basta segnalarla ad un amministratore 
(o in maniera più lunga nella pagina delle proposte per le cancellazioni) 
e la cosa si risolve. ----ßøuñçêY2K 18:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Onde evitare equivoci mi scuso anticipatamente con ßøuñçêY2K e con Eh101 per aver riportato sulla mia pagina di discussione quanto sopra. Dato però che il tutto mi riguarda in prima persona, ritengo di avere il pieno diritto di tenere una memoria storica dell'intera segnalazione. --Jacopo Werther 17:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


Io parlerei più propriamente di didascalia satirica dell'Immagine in oggetto.
Ricordo il pronunciamento della Corte di Cassazione che si è sentita in dovere di dare una definizione giuridica di cosa debba intendersi per satira:
« È quella manifestazione di pensiero talora di altissimo livello che nei tempi si è addossata il compito di castigare ridendo mores, ovvero di indicare alla pubblica opinione aspetti criticabili o esecrabili di persone, al fine di ottenere, mediante il riso suscitato, un esito finale di carattere etico, correttivo cioè verso il bene. »
(Prima sezione penale della Corte di Cassazione, sentenza n. 9246/2006)
La satira è una manifestazione fondamentale della libertà di pensiero in ogni Stato Civile e Democratico.
La censura è invece tipica dei regimi dispotici e dittatoriali.
Scambiare per vandalismo la satira politica mi sembra un atteggiamento chiaramente censorio ed antidemocratico.
Tuttavia niente paura o panico!!! La cosa non si ripeterà più, così potremo tutti dormire sonni tranquilli!!!
Cordiali e sinceri saluti e Buon Lavoro --Jacopo Werther 21:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


Questa è una enciclopedia. Quando troverò voci scritte in tono satirico in una enciclopedia affermata, concorderò con la tesi così dottamente esposta, ma temo completamente fuori contesto. Lo spazio che ci viene messo a disposizione gratuitamente, non contempla nel regolamento esistente che lo si possa usare per fini diversi da quelli enciclopedici. Mi preme precisare, che avrei segnalato ugualmente anomalie simili, anche se riferite a politici dello schieramento opposto. Concludo esprimendo il mio parere difforme all'interpretazione del pronunciamento della Cassazione, in quanto ritengo che in caso di querela, l'autore di una frase del genere uscirebbe soccombente. La cosa accade continuamente a operatori dello spettacolo, i quali possono tranquillamente pagare le sanzioni che vengono irrogate, anzi ne ricavano pubblicità. Un progetto come Wikipedia, non è in grado di gestire con vantaggio nè economicamente, nè sotto il profilo dell'immagine, una vertenza legale di questo tipo. Saluti. --Eh101 22:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Aggiungo anche io una cosa. Non voglio mettere in dubbio la libertà d'espressione e di satira, ma questo non è il luogo adatto per farla. Inoltre riporto quanto scritto nelle guide di Commons: "Dato che i nomi criptici rendono molto più difficile la ricerca, scegline uno il più possibile adatto per Wikimedia Commons."

Ciao! ----ßøuñçêY2K 20:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Preciso innanzitutto che non è mia intenzione polemizzare e che concordo con il fatto che questo
non è il luogo per fare satira. 
Tuttavia perché in Wikimedia Commons esistono categorie come Category:Caricatures of politicians
e sono regolarmente caricate immagini come Image:Bush Stencil.jpg,
Image:Michael Dickinson. Tyrant's Pants.jpg (quest’ultima addirittura nella gallery
George W. Bush, nella sezione George_W._Bush#Protests),
Image:EvilBushCostumer.jpg, Image:Karl Meersman Sarkozy caricature.jpg, 
Image:Bush Choice.jpg, Image:Arielsharonsecretlove.gif ed altre ancora…
L’immagine da me caricata conteneva (e contiene!) note caricaturali in quanto è evidente 
una chiara differenza tra alcuni tratti caratteristici della fisionomia di Chirac, Bush e Blair
e quelli di Silvio Berlusconi.
Nano pelato non è un nome criptico ma è uno dei tanti nomignoli satirici affibbiati
a Silvio Berlusconi come (per par condicio) Mortadella lo è per Romano Prodi. 
Potrai obbiettare che le caricature sono generalmente dei disegni e non delle foto, tuttavia 
come sai meglio di me, oggi l’uso massiccio della fotografia digitale e del fotoricco,
diventati ormai alla portata di tutti consentono di realizzare cose prima impensabili.
Nel nostro caso non è stato necessario neanche il fotoritocco…
Faccio presente (e già questo personaggio mi stà proprio antipatico…chissà perché?!!!? 
Forse perché in passato ha dato al sottoscritto - e a qualche altro milione di Italiani
- del  coglione!) che ho provveduto a rinominare Image:Nano pelato-Geoge W. Bush.jpg 
(immagine caricata l’08 marzo 2008) con Image:S. Berlusconi-George W. Bush.jpg
aggiungendo alla prima il template -Bad name|correctly named image-, ti pregherei pertanto 
di  cancellarla.
Mi assumo la piena e consapevole responsabilità di quanto scritto sopra.
A scanso di spiacevoli equivoci faccio presente che la citazione delle immagini
Image:Bush Stencil.jpg, Image:Michael Dickinson. Tyrant's Pants.jpg,   Image:EvilBushCostumer.jpg, 
Image:Karl Meersman Sarkozy caricature.jpg, Image:Bush Choice.jpg,   Image:Arielsharonsecretlove.gif
non costituisce in alcun modo  segnalazione per cancellazione.
Scusami per eventuali problemi e disagi che ti ho creato. Sinceri (e non formali) saluti
e Buon  Lavoro. Ciao! --Jacopo Werther 20:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Devo obiettare. La categoria che mi hai linkato te contiene immagini di caricature fatte a personaggi noti. Le caricature sono fotografie fatte da utenti (o da altre persone) e caricate su commons con nomi normalissimi (caricature of ... per esempio). Tu invece hai caricato una fotografia già preesistente (il che non si può fare) con un nome non adatto alla descrizione dell'immagine (anche questo non va bene). A tal proposito ho dovuto cancellare anche l'immagine Image:Nano pelato-Geoge W. Bush.jpg. ----ßøuñçêY2K 23:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


RE: Your message[edit]

Thank you, I've now reviewed it. If their is anything then just contact me. Best regards --Kanonkas(talk) 18:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Commons, I always see your name each day now ;) --Kanonkas(talk) 13:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Don't worry, we all make mistakes. No, your English is just fine ;) if their is anything then you know who to contact! Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 07:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much! :) --Kanonkas(talk) 13:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

My Request for Adminship[edit]

Admin mop.PNG Dear Jacopo Werther,

Thank you for voting in my request for adminship, which passed with 25 support, 4 oppose, and 3 neutral. I'm honoured that the community have granted me the administrative tools. If there is anything, then do not hesitate to ask me.

Thank you for the nomination Rocket, it wouldn't have been possible otherwise. Kanonkas(talk)

I'm glad that you do trust me and supported my RfA. If you need any help be sure to leave me a note! --Kanonkas(talk) 18:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

My RFA[edit]

Broom icon.svg
Dear Jacopo Werther,
Thank you for participating in my
unsuccessful request for adminship, shown here. Regardless of not being an administrator, I look forward to working with you in future Wikimedia Commons projects. -- miranda

My RfA[edit]

Thanks for supporting my RfA. --Túrelio (talk) 15:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


Thank you![edit]

Hi Jacopo! I must thank you for your very kind words and support in my admin request! I hope to stay up to the trust you deposited in me. Best regards, Waldir talk 15:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you![edit]

Thanks for supporting me in my successful RfB. Cheers, Rocket000(talk) 21:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


Many Thanks[edit]

Cross of Sacrifice.jpg
Dear Jacopo Werther,
Thanks for your support of my Request for Adminship. I’m honored by your trust.


Cheers, SterkeBak

RFA[edit]

float
Thank you

Thank you for voting on my request for adminship. The result was unanimously in support, which really surprised and overwhelmed me. I'll do everything I can to make sure that it was justified.

-Adam Cuerden          

My RFA[edit]

Thank you very much for supporting my RfA. I'm really honored to have gotten unanimous support and I hope I can live up to everyone expectations! Let me know if you need anything. --J.smith (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Diti’s RFA[edit]

Thank you for your trust

Dear Jacopo Werther,
^v^
Thank you for your support on my request for adminship, here at Commons. Now that I am a new sysop, I plan on starting small, closing obvious (to my eye) deletion requests at first, getting bolder with experience as and when my contributions here intensify. As a contributor, I look forward acquiring professional photography/video skills and equipment, that will allow me, one day, to proudly help Commons to be better (I would like to obtain my Master's degree while in Antarctica, more free videos and photos of this place would be truly great). Waiting for this moment to happen, let me address you once again my warmest thanks for your trust and your support in my successful request for adminship, that received 100% of Symbol support vote.svg support votes.
I do feel the tools given to me will be useful for the project as well as, obviously, for me. And even for you: besides questions regarding templates (about parser functions for example) and licensing, I will be henceforth there at any moment to perform administrative tasks like deletions, interventions on protected pages, and the like. You just have to ask me on my talk page or by IRC at #wikimedia-commons, and I will normally be glad to honor your request.
Diti the penguin 16:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


Thank You[edit]

Hi Jacopo Werther, I would like to express my gratitude for your participation at my recent RfA, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of 100 % support. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and I promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. Please do feel free to get in touch if you feel you can improve me in any way; I will be glad to listen to all comments. Again, thanks,Abigor talk 17:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks ..[edit]

...for the RFB support. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


Il file "Compagni"[edit]

Ciao, in merito al File:Compagni.jpg... Wow, ma dove l'hai trovato ? A Cesena ? Ma allora ha fatto il giro d'Italia. Io me lo ricordo da bambino che lo trovai nello studio di un mio parente (a Cava dei Tirreni -SA-), penso nella prima metà degli anni '80. All'epoca mi colpì come grafica (ne ho sempre avuto un'interesse), poi con la mia politicizzazione a sinistra lo rielaborai oltre una decina di anni dopo con altre invenzioni. Ti ringrazio per questo piccolo flashback d'infanzia. Ma l'autore chi è ? Che storia c'è ? --87.17.152.115 15:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


Ping[edit]

Hey, long time no see. How are you? Nice work with you contributions, please keep it up. Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 12:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Girl[edit]

I recover it. --Lestat (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your nomination File:Tree example IR.jpg[edit]

Hello! I have a question: How did you create your nomination for File:Tree example IR.jpg? I need to know for technical reasons; we are trying to implement a mechanism that will display a message when the voting period is over, and for some reason it wasn't included in your nomination. Did you use the button "Create new nomination" on Commons:Featured_picture_candidates?
Thank you in advance & have a great day. -- JovanCormac 09:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your question. I'm Italian so I used the button "Candida una nuova immagine" (Italian for "Create new nomination") on Italian interface ("Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina") of Commons:Featured picture candidates. Maybe the Italian interface doesn't work well? Jacopo Werther (talk) 10:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll look into it. -- JovanCormac 10:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I fixed it now. There were some old templates in use by other languages, which is also why the ImageAnnotator tool didn't work on them (it will now). I have also added the voting period flag to your nomination manually, and when the period is over it will display the appropriate text. -- JovanCormac 10:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Peacock mite, Tuckerella sp.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Peacock mite, Tuckerella sp.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peacock mite, Tuckerella sp.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Una questione su flickr[edit]

Ciao Jacopo
Oggi ho utilizzato una bella fotografia da Robert Swiers su flickr che tu hai messa su Wikimedia sotto Creative Commons 2.0 (Wind Tree Clouds), per un video che mettero' su YouTube. Quando faccio le menzioni (the credits) sul video in questione, devo far menzione solamente di Robert Swiers oppure anche di te?
Amicizie
David
Dwsolo (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Grazie[edit]

Grazie Jacopo :-) Il video e' adesso qui: Christmas Haikus Amicizie
David
Dwsolo (talk) 17:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


stamp of Laika[edit]

Hello Jacopo, I scanned and uploaded a picture of the stamp of Laika.

Rumanian stamp from 1959 with dog Laika

I found your picture which has less resolution. I linked my picture to the wikipedia articles. Shall we mark yours (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Laika_Stamp.jpg) as duplicate? Best regards --Neozoon (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Picture requests/Requests/Nature#Chemistry[edit]

Hi Jacopo. If you cannot draw/find chemical structures in an appropriate quality, you can list your wishes at Commons:Picture requests/Requests/Nature#Chemistry or at de:WP:RC/BW (normally faster). --Leyo 17:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

FPC vote[edit]

Hi Jacopo!

Please sign Your vote at FPC Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:P1170085 Coenonympha glycerion.jpg

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

File:LEGO Space Shuttle Discovery with Hubble Space Telescope 7470 - 2003.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:LEGO Space Shuttle Discovery with Hubble Space Telescope 7470 - 2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Grazie, dottore :-) -- Blackcat (talk) 13:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Eh, ma facci attenzione quando carichi, mica che stiamo a fare la permanente ai peluche qui :-)) -- Blackcat (talk) 19:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
    Devi pubblicare solo foto di tua produzione di ragazze come questa o questa... :-) -- Blackcat (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
    Sì, ma questa biennale è troppo poco :-) Ci vorrebbe come minimo settimanale :D -- Blackcat (talk) 11:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Solid_phase_microextraction[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Solid_phase_microextraction has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

DMacks (talk) 18:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Useful for uploading images with more than one version in their history[edit]

FYI. tools:~magog/oldver.php. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Categorizing multimedia files[edit]

Hi Jacopo,

thanks for your work on categorizing files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer. Most of these changes were really helpful. However, I noticed that you have started to move materials out of categories named "Media from X" into similarly named "Videos of X1" or vice versa. This breaks the existing categorization by source, since X typically stands for the name of a journal and is categorized under "Media from Y", where Y is the respective publisher.

So please take a break on these recategorizations now and let's see together how we can fix the categorization by source and then move on to improve the categorization by topic and by media type.

Thanks and cheers, -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token 81196c124546a5def2b65dbc2b7fc1b5[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Cats picture[edit]

Hi! I classify pictures of felines, and I note that you choose Category:Felidae for your pictures of cats. The right category for house cats is Category:Felis silvestris catus. There is a lot of cat pictures in Commons and in consequence a lot of categories (cats by color, by setting, by behavior, etc.). If you feel lost, just choose Felis silvestris catus ^^ Regards, --Abujoy (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Ramirez zoo images from Flickr[edit]

Ciao Jacopo, I've come across File:Kudu & Peacock.jpeg and I doubt a lot that the antelope shown there should be a kudu. It looks much more like a springbok to me. So, what would do you think? Should we rename this? De728631 (talk) 15:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I've tagged for renaming. File:Antelope & Peacock.jpg should be a neutral file name, so anyone can still adjust the description. De728631 (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hi, thank you for your great uploads. It would save us all a lot of time when you would use less but more precise categories. Reading COM:OVERCAT might help to explain that we don't use a tag based category system. If you are in doubt for a specific image group, you can give it any name; we will pick it up sooner or later. Enjoy. --Foroa (talk) 08:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Please categorize...[edit]

Hello.

When I upload some images from Flickr, categorize it correctly.

Look it [1] for example.

Regards.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful girl?[edit]

Is she beautiful? This is a question of taste. For me she has rather ugly face. There are lots of really beautiful girls on Flickr. Bad choice :-) 85.193.199.141 15:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Review of Flickr images[edit]

When an image from Flickr has already been reviewed regarding license, I don't see the need to have it reviewed yet again. Removing an existing Flickr review and replacing it for a request for review seems to me highly inappropriate. Why are you doing that? Wondering, -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:24, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, you are right, I agree with you. But please take a look to the File history. I'm removing the existing Flickr review and replacing it, to replacing image by its original image from Flickr (Original high-resolution images generally provided with EXIF Data). Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 23:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Ah, I see! Thanks for your reply. Hm. I wonder why the original res wasn't uploaded to begin with? Seems awkward, but thanks for your work! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
You are welcome! To know because the original res wasn't uploaded to begin with, please take a look to: Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2013/06#Flickr_extended_free_membership. Have a nice day, Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 00:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Template:It with no text displayed[edit]

Hi Jacopo Werther. Could you please help me cleaning out this maintenance category? In the case of File:IC 2602.jpg (uploaded by you) for example I am unsure on how to fix the source code. --Leyo 14:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Sei stato un signore[edit]

me ne ricorderò, grazie.... davvero grazie di cuore! :) --Xinstalker (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Death1.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Death1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 20:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Quadri di pittori chiaristi[edit]

Grazie per la risposta al quesito posto in Bar. Dici che è meglio richiedere la cancellazione delle due immagini? E quale è la procedura? Grazie. --Massimo Telò (scrivimi) 10:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Però le foto non le ho caricate io. --Massimo Telò (scrivimi) 16:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Myrabella (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Dubbio foto[edit]

Ciao Jacopo, come sempre torno alla carica con domande sul possibile caricamento di file; stavolta però non mi addentro in strani siti istologici :). Per scrivere questa voce ancora grezza, mi sono imbattuto in un libro edito nel 1990 come opuscolo e che non è mai stato venduto (almeno credo visto che non presenta nè il costo nè l'ISBN). In tale pubblicazione sono presenti delle foto interessanti che però non riportano nessun dato, in particolare:

  • 3 foto di parroci in attivo negli anni che vanno dal 1900 alla fine della Seconda Guerra Mondiale (di cui uno sicuramente morto nel 1955, come citato nel libro);
  • 1 foto del comitato che ha presieduto i lavori della chiesa (che stimo essere stata scattata intorno al 1924, anno di inaugurazione);
  • alcune foto del luogo, scattate prima degli anni 60 ad occhio;
  • alcune foto delle processioni che venivano fatte (e anche qui a giudicare dai vestiti stimo degli anni 20-40).

Purtroppo a descrivere le foto si fa sempre fatica e spero che questa magra presentazione possa bastare. In alternativa c'è un modo per caricarle per mostrartele senza poi incappare in possibili copyviol (ovviamente non voluti)?

Grazie infinite, --Dan1gia2 (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Così può andare? --Da uno, già due (dan1gia2) 15:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Ok, ho aggiornato la data che sta sotto "Descrizione" e sopra "Fonte", pensavo che fosse un parametro automatico, per quello non avevo inserito nulla. --Da uno, già due (dan1gia2) 18:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Gillie at the window (3948491883).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gillie at the window (3948491883).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Lovebug Problems (7713605358).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lovebug Problems (7713605358).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Strobist Smurf shot.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Strobist Smurf shot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Niklem (talk) 05:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely - Darwin Ahoy! 21:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely - Darwin Ahoy! 23:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:AIDS awareness in Espungabera (4513659899).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AIDS awareness in Espungabera (4513659899).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 05:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely - Darwin Ahoy! 11:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Demande de support[edit]

Bonjour Jacopo,

J'ai à nouveau besoin de ton aide pour soutenir l'image "0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg" que certains veulent encore supprimer malgré les votes positifs successifs en faveur de celle-ci.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Youtube uploads[edit]

Hey, I just reviewed some of your video uploads from youtube. May I ask how you uploaded them? From time to time I transferred files from youtube too, but I was doing it manually and that wasn't much fun. Is there a script or a bot I don't know? But thank you for your contributions! --Indeedous (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, and there was one file under a youtube standard license (no CC). --Indeedous (talk) 21:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Administratorship[edit]

I see you've commented in a lot of requests for adminship discussions for other people. Now its your turn. Do you accept? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jacopo Werther,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Helga Olga.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Helga Olga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ghirlandajo (talk) 15:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Helicopter Anatomy.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Helicopter Anatomy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

68.12.254.228 22:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Vote?[edit]

I would appreciate your opinion on this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Moonrise_over_Nationalpark_M%C3%BCritz.jpg

File:"Un calcarone ou meule de soufre en Sicilie".jpg and other[edit]

I think license should be changed to {{PD-old}} for these images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)