User talk:Jafeluv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a Wikimedia Commons user page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jafeluv.


azərbaycanca | български | বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | shqip | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikimedia Commons
Old messages can be found in the archive.

Template:PD-US-record[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:PD-US-record has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Jafeluv (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jafeluv, you put a lot of work into this previously. The DR closed "Kept but fix", meaning if no changes are made to the template, the next deletion may go through for lack of action. What would you think about replacing it with the template you created in 2010. There didn't seem to be any serious objection to it at the time and it seems to follow the previous thinking put forward by Carl on "commercial value". I had another idea, which is not to cite any particular state or case law, rather the series of LoC documents which show that it's possible to make a case for using sound recordings pre-1972. For example LoC Pub 146 has 10 states and various ways to argue for use. From the Forward: "The authors .. examine the laws and court cases that may determine the extent to which non profit institutions may preserve and disseminate pre-1972 recordings." It goes on to say:

Professor Jaszi outlines what he terms “potential defenses for nonprofit institutions.” In these sections, he examines the courses of defense a nonprofit institution might take if accused of unauthorized use of pre-1972 sound recordings. These analyses will be invaluable to all nonprofit institutions working to make historical recordings accessible. However, the legal issues related to dissemination of pre-1972 recordings, and all recordings, are complex. Having these analyses of potential legal defenses is useful, but the mere need to consider “potential defenses” has a chilling effect on all institutions without the legal resources and wherewithal to undertake legal risks.

There are a total of 7 LoC documents that discuss it which can be linked from the template. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, and sorry for the delayed response. The only consensus on that issue for as long as I can remember has been that "somebody should do something" :P The possible defenses for non-profit institutions could be useful for individual wiki projects that use the recordings as non-free content, but I don't think it necessary applies to Commons. We're only allowed to host content that can be used by anyone for any purpose, including commercially. So even if it would be legally defensible for a non-profit institution to use such recordings, it's a different situation entirely if we're publishing them as public domain and indicating that they're free for anyone to use for commercial purposes, right? Jafeluv (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes you're right. I guess one (many) solutions is handle it on the project side as non free content. What would you think about replacing the current template with one you made earlier that incorporates the "commercial value" idea advocated by Carl? That seems to be pretty key though still nebulous on how to define, at least it could be there for discussion. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 01:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

OTRS[edit]

It seems that no-one has visited 'permissions-fi' for a rather long time. You seem to have access to it. Can you take a look into it? Kruusamägi (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure, I'll see what I can do. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Fiwp Viikon kilpailu 2013-44.svg[edit]

Moi! Voisiko tiedoston File:Fiwp Viikon kilpailu 2013-44.svg palauttaa? Se on botin tekemä kaavio pisteistä, joissa ei ole ollut mitään lisenssiä ilmeisesti vahingossa. Muissa vastaavissa kaavioissa (katso Category:Viikon kilpailu) on sittemmin PD-malline, joten ne ovat säilyneet, mutta viikkoa 45/2013 aiemmat kaaviot on poistettu. Kun kaavio on palautettu, voisi pyytää botin ohjaajaa laittamaan sille käyttöoikeuden kuntoon. --Pxos (talk) 21:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Tai voisihan nuo kaikki palauttaa, ilmeisesti poistetut kuvat viikoilta 32–44 vuonna 2013. Kehtaatko itse laittaa noihin PD-tagin? Kyseessä on automaattisen tekoälyn (botti) luoma yksinkertainen kaavio. Toisaalta asiasta voi vinkata myös botin omistajalle Danmichaelolle norja-wikiin jos palautat kaikki kuvat. --Pxos (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Moi! Palautin koko roskan ja kopsasin tietot/lisenssit myöhemmistä kaavioista. Laitoin vielä varmuuden vuoksi kyselyä bottikuskille että menikö varmasti oikein. Jafeluv (talk) 00:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hienoa. Mukavaa kun on frendejä korkeilla paikoilla, niin asiat sujuvat eikä tarvitse jaaritella englanniksi jonkun satunnaisen ylipeikon kanssa :) --Pxos (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jafeluv,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Brita Koivunen[edit]

Poistatko [1], koska kyseessä oleva valokuva ei olekkaan vapaasti käytettävissä oleva. Terv. Ville Siliämaa (talk) 11:46, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Tehty. Jafeluv (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
tämän voisi poistaa samalla perusteella. --Zache (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Tämä Tuntemattoman sotilaan stillkuva on edelleen tekijänoikeussuojan alainen. Kuva on todennäköisesti Tenhovaaran, sillä latauslinkissä lukee Tenho, tosin elokuvan tiedoissa on kaksi muuta nimeä, mahdollisesti olivat Tenhovaaran valokuvaajia. --Abc10 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Tämä televisio-ohjelman stillkuva Matti Kuuslasta ei myöskään ole vapaa. --Abc10 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
[File:Thomas Funck vuonna 1955.jpg Stillkuva] Ruotsin tv:n ohjelmasta. --Abc10 (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Loin listan nyt noista poistettavista kuvista User:Ville Siliämaa/poistettavat. Pahoittelen, että itsellä on tullut useimmissa tapauksissa tulkintavirhe, että kuvan voisi ladata vapaasti. --Ville Siliämaa (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Kaikki poistettu. Muutaman tallensin paikallisesti fi.wikiin sitaattikuvina. Jafeluv (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Kiitos paljon sinulle. Category:Spede Pasanen kyseisessä luokassa olevat kuvat vissiin voisi myös siirtää fi-wikipedian puolelle X-paroni -artikkeliin sitaattioikeudella, koska ilmeisesti saattavatkin olla itse elokuvasta otettuja still-kuvia. --Ville Siliämaa (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Lisäsin tuonne poistettavat-sivulle vielä muutaman, jotka pitäisi poistaa. --Ville Siliämaa (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Tuossa listassa ei vissiin varmaan ihan kaikkia ole, mutta tuosta omasta tallennuslistasta näkyy [2] kaikki tallennukset, ja sieltä voi postaa ne, jotka olen virheellisesti ladannut tänne. --Ville Siliämaa (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)