User talk:Jakec

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jakec!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki — it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on Commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your renaming request for the votive relief from Mount Parnes

I noticed you requested the renaming of Votive relief from Mount Parnes, Attica to its current name, from the former name National Archaeological Museum of Athens 1859. I can see how the former name could be considered misleading, but this leaves us with another problem: I uploaded two votive reliefs from Mount Parnes, namely National Archaeological Museum of Athens 1448 which you missed. Also, the removal of the inventory number from the file name was not a good idea because it was useful to identify the file. Please take a look at Category:Ancient Greek votive reliefs in the National Archaeological Museum of Athens where this is also done for other images. I think it would be best if both files would be renamed to the following:

1. Votive relief from Mount Parnes NAMA 1448
2. Votive relief from Mount Parnes NAMA 1859

This combines both your descriptive name with the inventory number commonly used for the pieces in the museum. Would you agree with this? --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 19:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes I would. King jakob c2 ^thunder_lightning 23:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Hi King jakob c 2, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

---

• I've made you autopatrolled as well. INeverCry 21:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Renaming

Hello, King jakob c 2. You refused to rename the file “Utagawa kunisada, attore nella perte di un monaco buddista bambino, 1872.JPG“ to “Utagawa Kunisada III, attore nella perte di un monaco buddista bambino, 1872.JPG“ pointing to renaming guidelines. There are three artists using the name “Utagawa Kunisada“: Kunisada I, Kunisada II and Kunisada III. All three have categories in Commons. To distinguish them and also to distinguish there work, it would be better if theire prints were named accurately using the correct artist name. Renaming the image is not simply a cosmetic act. Regards. --Horst Gräbner (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done, thanks for pointing that out. --Jakob (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! --Horst Gräbner (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Railroad bridge over the Susquehanna River north of Catawissa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Mellivora capensis

Thank you for renaming "Mellivora capensis - Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria - Genoa, Italy". I very much appreciate it, and am sorry that I screwed up by uploading it without the right name. Many thanks and best wishes, Daderot (talk) 23:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. --Jakob (talk) 09:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

User boxes, etc

Hi Jakec, as you know you just 'moved' a file that I had requested a move for within the last hour (of this writing). I was checking out your user boxes and one caught my eye that I'd like to include on my commons use page. It's the one that says Jakec has uploaded 218 files to Commons. When I went to look for it in your user page markup I didn't see anything that looked like such a box. How is such a user box added to the user page?

Also about a month or so ago I requested 'filemover' rights, but at the time I only had one or two requests for file moves and found out that this of course was not nearly enough to be considered for filemover rights. Since then I have requested over 30 file moves which have been granted. I do a lot of work with files, uploading, uploading new versions, adding categories, etc and am wondering, and hoping, that I have enough granted requests to be eligible for filemover rights so I don't have to keep running to someone else to do this. I don't bother requesting a filemove for an image unless the filename really needs a change, and of course I am mindful of the rules for file moving. If you think I have enough successful filemove requests to request flemover rights i'll go ahead and make such a request again. Any feedback on this would be most appreciated. All the best. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 03:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

@Gwillhickers: The userbox that you're describing is {{User Files 2}}. As for you getting filemover rights, it could be possible. 33 rename requests isn't a lot. My first request for filemover was declined in August 2013 when I had about as many requests done. To be fair, though, I had only 120 edits to Commons at that time. On the other hand, you seem to have been around for a while and are already trusted enough for autopatrolled, so it could go either way. The only way to know is to file a request and that can't do any harm. Go for it! --Jakob (talk) 15:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• Well, if you had about as many requests granted as I do when you were declined then perhaps I'd better not rush it and get a few more requests under my belt, even if I do have more edits.

• I was experimenting with some user boxes. Several work, but a few of them (which are presently hidden in the mark up on my user page) result in red links. For example Template:User history. Have they been deleted and don't exist anymore?

• Last, I guess this is as good as time as any to request reviewer rights, and since I'm here, you're it. Formally requesting reviewer rights. -- In any case, any and all help would be greatly appreciated. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• It seems that you're trying to transclude templates from Wikipedia onto your userpage. --Jakob (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• Seems so. We can use images form commons on Wikipedia, but templates don't cut it. Btw, didn't mean to sound flip or that I was taking anything for granted when I requested reviewer rights. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Sechler Run looking upstream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 09:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field in Anthony Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 02:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Dornsife Gap

I'm surprised that the halos got worse when you reduced sharpening on this image. Are you editing from raw, or is this a jpg already massaged in the camera? I see you cropped a bit and rotated a bit, the image is improved, except for the halos. And if you want to add a camera location, it looks like you were at 40.730753, -76.791945, more or less. Generic1139 (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Generic1139: I'm not really sure how to fix halos, since I'm not that good at image editing (I only have GIMP and Picassa, not anything fancy like Photoshop). --Jakob (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Fisher Run Road 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Catawissa Creek near Brandonville 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View from Hallgrímskirkja 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support QI for me --C messier 12:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Nuremberg, Pennsylvania from the south.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 19:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Power lines on Catawissa Mountain 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Old Reading Road in the foothills of Catawissa Mountain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Catawissa, Pennsylvania from the southeast 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Hill in Catawissa Township.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Creek Road in Catawissa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Catawissa Mountain from the west in November (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Surface of Muncy Creek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Request please add some meaningful categories. Also, the description needs to be a bit more precise (where can I find that creek? where along the creek was the picture taken?). Geocoding would be nice as well. --El Grafo 09:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Jakec 17:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC) OK for me. --El Grafo 20:04, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 924 in Sheppton.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI --Bahnfrend 03:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 339 in Brandonville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI --Bahnfrend 03:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC))

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Shamokin Creek looking downstream in Shamokin, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Cropping was not the suggestion, but overall can pass as QI --Poco a poco 11:35, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cranberry Run Road sign.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Clouds above Catawissa Township.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK, though I think it's upside down. --Mattbuck 19:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mountains in southwestern Columbia County, Pennsylvania 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! County Bridge No. 23 sign (Columbia County, Pennsylvania).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Sorry,no very sharp --Livioandronico2013 20:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC) Sharpened. Jakec 21:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC) Weak  Support Better --Livioandronico2013 21:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field in Roaring Creek Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Catawissa Creek looking downstream south of Zion Grove.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Zerbe Run in Trevorton looking downstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. Shadows on the left are a little bit disturbing. --XRay 09:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Brandonville Road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Buck Mountain Road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments It's hard to find a good reference but I think both sides are leaning in a bit --Christian Ferrer 09:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Better now? Jakec 18:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Support yes --Christian Ferrer 20:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Railroad in Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 06:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Coal waste pile west of Trevorton, Pennsylvania far shot 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment Please check the image. There are halos at the top of the hills and IMO to much sky.--XRay 09:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC) The halos are mostly gone now, but I think the sky is about right. Jakec 17:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)  Support IMO it's OK for QI.--XRay 16:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of West Cameron Township, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania looking north.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality., A bit too much sky for me. --Cayambe 21:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of East Cameron Township, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field in Madison Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Adequate quality is enough for a QI. --Ram-Man 04:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Briar Creek Lake in August.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mahanoy Creek in Little Mahanoy Township, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Enough for QI. --Hubertl 20:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Little Mahanoy Township, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Enough for QI. --Hubertl 20:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Valley of Long Hollow.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A little bit soft. --XRay 12:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 54 bridge over the West Branch Susquehanna River.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Fun stuff. –Be..anyone 03:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Greenwood Valley from Turkey Path Road 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Clouds in the sky in August 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. QI now! --Hubertl 23:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Orange Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania looking east.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good Quality. Please, the category:Greenwood Valley needs to be created... or removed. --Cayambe 21:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 54 near Turbotville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Zerbe Run in Trevorton looking upstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Ah, stream! ok :) QI --Poco a poco 10:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! East Branch Briar Creek in August.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 12:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 225 north in Little Mahanoy Township, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 07:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC) Fixed. Jakec 23:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC) Not done, you just tilted it much more ccw. --Cccefalon 05:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Maybe now? Jakec 17:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Yes, I think this version is working. Thank you for your patience with me :) --Cccefalon 07:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! West Branch Susquehanna River looking upstream near Montgomery, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. A geotag would be appreciated. --Cayambe 10:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 442 east.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Building in Pine Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Building is in my opinion a bit crooked but okay for me.--Famberhorst 06:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Catawissa Mountain from the east.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 54 in Anthony Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field in Anthony Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Scenery of southern Pine Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Scenery of Benton Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 118 in Lycoming County.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mauses Creek looking downstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good. --Hockei 12:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! U.S. Route 11 in Danville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality... see image note for what I believe to be a better crop. --Cayambe 19:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 54 crossing of the Susquehanna River.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Montour Power Plant 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Muncy Creek Township, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:45, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 42 in Eyers Grove.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Huntington Creek looking upstream from Winding Road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of New Columbus, Pennsylvania from Fishing Creek Township 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. I promote it for the technical quality, although that most of your pictures are pretty boring. Sorry, but thats my impression. Maybe, its an extremely boring countryside --Hubertl 12:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of New Columbus, Pennsylvania from Fishing Creek Township 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. I promote it for the technical quality, even that most of your pictures are boring. Sorry, thats my impression. Maybe, its just an extremely boring countryside, which doesn´t mean, we don´t need the pictures! --Hubertl 12:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of New Columbus, Pennsylvania from Fishing Creek Township 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Scenery of Mahoning Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Beaver Run looking downstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field in Mahoning Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 15:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 254 east of Washingtonville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK, but some minor CA - watch out for this. --Mattbuck 14:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 254 in Derry Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania looking west.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 254 west of Millville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments it's tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC) If you're talking about the tilt in the foreground, it's actually the road that's tilted, not the camera. Jakec 20:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC) No my references are the houses at left anf right --Christian Ferrer 07:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Fixed. Jakec 01:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 08:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of Scott Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Probably a bit red, but ok. Mattbuck 17:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Railroad in Montgomery, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment IMO another crop would be much better.--XRay 06:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC) What crop do you suggest? Jakec 20:04, 28 December 2014 (UTC)  Comment Please have a look to the note at the image.--XRay 08:33, 29 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I think. Jakec 00:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC) It's tilted ccw. Ram-Man 23:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Fixed too. Jakec 21:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Good now. --Ram-Man 21:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Maple Run looking upstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Rapids on West Branch Fishing Creek 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Rapids on West Branch Fishing Creek 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! West Branch Fishing Creek looking downstream in December.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View of southeastern Fishing Creek Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments It is tilted on left (all the verticals), and shadows are a bit strong --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Should be fixed now. Jakec 21:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Please correct crop outside image bottom right. Mattbuck 17:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Fixed. Jakec 12:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Changes made, looks good. Reminds me of home. --Ram-Man 01:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Two roads forking off in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Fishing Creek north of Benton.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Beautiful river. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Davis Hollow looking upstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Nice landscape. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Huntington Creek in its upper reaches 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Nice. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pothole on Huntington Creek Road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Northeastern Huntington Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania from Cemetery Hill Road 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Rock formation in Fairmount Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Streambed of Phillips Creek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Streambed of Kitchen Creek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pine Creek in New Columbus, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Western edge of Central Mountain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Reykjavík Harbor vista 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Delicate monochrome photograph with tender hues. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mud Run near the Kramer Covered Bridge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Northeastern Huntington Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania from Cemetery Hill Road 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment There is a dust spot, I left a note. --Code 21:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Jakec 22:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Code 05:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Wetland near the headwaters of Stony Brook 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View from Hallgrímskirkja 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View from Hallgrímskirkja 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Seems okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 21:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! View from Hallgrímskirkja 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Seems okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 21:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Bridge in Huntington Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Too bad that they lost their covered bridge. –Be..anyone 21:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Painter Run looking upstream above Oxhorn Run 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 01:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Painter Run looking upstream near its mouth 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 01:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

QIC

Hi Jakec; A diff you posted recently on COM:QIC was not displayed and prevented the display of the other review comments. I removed it.[1] The "=" character seems to be responsible. I'm sorry, but I don't know how to fix this. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

I think Special:Diff would work in the future. Thanks anyway. --Jakob (talk) 00:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/147029341/147030683 Good to know. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Northeastern Huntington Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania from Cemetery Hill Road 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 03:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pylons in Briar Creek Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments The lighting is harsh, but not blown. The composition is just ok, but at least the main subject is shown. --Ram-Man 03:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Central Mountain from west of Central.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! West Branch Fishing Creek sign.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Beautiful motive. --Johann Jaritz 14:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Scenery of Sugarloaf Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality although heavily downsampled. --Code 14:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! West Creek (Pennsylvania).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Nice creek. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 254 looking west in Rohrsburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Stream bed of Fishing Creek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Greenwood Valley scenery 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cumulus clouds as seen from an airplane.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tenmile Run in its lower reaches 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Devil Hole Run looking upstream.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 04 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Shingle Run in its lower reaches.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ice formation on Shingle Run Road 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 254 north of Rohrsburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ice formation on Shingle Run Road 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Icicles on Shingle Run Road.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 05 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pennsylvania Route 42 northbound northwest of Slabtown.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mugser Run.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 15:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! West Branch Run in wintertime 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment IMO the snow/ice shouldn't be so dark.--XRay 18:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Brightened. Jakec 15:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now.--XRay 08:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Spruce Run looking downstream in wintertime.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Madison Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania in January (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Bit red and oversharpened but ok. --Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Little Fishing Creek looking downstream above Millville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Greenwood Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania in January.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment The main motif is the field, not the township. IMO you should crop out most of the field.--XRay 18:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC) But the field is part of the township. Besides, the texture in the foreground is kind of nice. Jakec 19:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC) A bit oversharpened but ok. Maybe a bit red? Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Two trees in a field in April.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field and hill in Fishing Creek Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Field in Fishing Creek Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coal Run (Shamokin Creek).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm unsure what you mean. Does there have to be a Commons category for Coal Run? Isn't an article sufficient? (This is my first VI nomination, hence the confusion). --Jakob (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
    • @Jakec: Theroretically, linking the scope to an article on any Wikipedia language version would be sufficient (see instructions). However, in practice Commons categories are preferred because they are our main tool for organizing content and using them in the scope provides reviewers with quick access to all potential counter-candidates. Hence, I've created Category:Coal Run (Shamokin Creek), moved all relevant files I could find over there and linked the category in the scope. @Archaeodontosaurus: hope you are OK with that? --El Grafo (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
      • Ah, thanks. I'll keep that in mind with future nominations. --Jakob (talk) 21:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely! and especially welcome in VI }--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)...
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Area51 Tikaboo Peak 07.2008.jpg

File:Area51 Tikaboo Peak 07.2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Notifying you since you were the principal editor arguing for deletion. Mz7 (talk) 03:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)