User talk:Jakubhal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives: September 2011, December 2015, September 2016, April 2017, September 2017, April 2018, October 2018, March 2019, September 2019, March 2020, July 2020, December 2020, December 2021

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1707 8768.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1707 8768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1724 8060.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1724 8060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Tatarski Zespół Taneczno-Wokalny Buńczuk - 20210710 1914 9229.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Tatarski Zespół Taneczno-Wokalny Buńczuk - 20210710 1914 9229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1313 9546.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1313 9546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1724 8063.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1724 8063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1319 9563.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1319 9563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1331 9615.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1331 9615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1734 8096.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1734 8096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1317 9558.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1317 9558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fontanna w ogrodach Belwederu w Wiedniu, 20210727 1940 0452.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontanna w ogrodach Belwederu w Wiedniu, 20210727 1940 0452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1729 8791.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1729 8791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 08:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1821 8242.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1821 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1827 8246.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1827 8246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34. Ulica - Tatarski Zespół Taneczno-Wokalny Buńczuk - 20210710 1935 9296.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Tatarski Zespół Taneczno-Wokalny Buńczuk - 20210710 1935 9296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1834 8299.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1834 8299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1729 8790.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1729 8790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Park of Melk Abbey, 20210728 1012 0555.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park of Melk Abbey, 20210728 1012 0555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Belweder w Wiedniu, 20210727 1926 0436.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belweder w Wiedniu, 20210727 1926 0436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1412 1011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1412 1011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1428 1034.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1428 1034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1827 8250.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1827 8250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1829 8268.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1829 8268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1804 8138.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1804 8138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Lallint 01:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Melk Abbey - garden pavilion, 20210728 0944 0503.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk Abbey - garden pavilion, 20210728 0944 0503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rzeźba w ogrodzie Belwederu w Wiedniu, 20210727 1948 0457.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rzeźba w ogrodzie Belwederu w Wiedniu, 20210727 1948 0457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kościół Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Marii Panny w Toruniu, 20210908 1552 2759.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Marii Panny w Toruniu, 20210908 1552 2759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1023 2501.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1023 2501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1028 2507.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1028 2507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Park Opactwa Benedyktynów w Melku, 20210728 1005 0545.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Opactwa Benedyktynów w Melku, 20210728 1005 0545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View of Emmersdorf an der Donau from Melk Abbey park, 20210728 0959 0536.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Emmersdorf an der Donau from Melk Abbey park, 20210728 0959 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Argenberg 19:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Osioł pręgierz w Toruniu, 20210908 1745 2832.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osioł pręgierz w Toruniu, 20210908 1745 2832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zakole Wisły pod Skawiną w województwie małopolskim, 20220129 0847 4145.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zakole Wisły pod Skawiną w województwie małopolskim, 20220129 0847 4145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 19:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Giewont w Tatrach, 20210906 1146 2382.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giewont w Tatrach, 20210906 1146 2382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality Face-smile.svg Lmbuga 20:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
View of Bratislava from Nový most, 20210727 1014 0275.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Bratislava from Nový most, 20210727 1014 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality Face-smile.svg Lmbuga 20:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stein an der Donau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1244 0798.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stein an der Donau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1244 0798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality Lmbuga 20:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dunajec - widok z mostu w Sromowcach Niżnych, 20210807 1316 1690.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunajec - widok z mostu w Sromowcach Niżnych, 20210807 1316 1690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 06:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kościół św. Benedykta na Podgórzu w Krakowie, 20220213 0901 4228.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół św. Benedykta na Podgórzu w Krakowie, 20220213 0901 4228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tomer T 14:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fort 31 Benedykt, Kraków, 20220213 0907 4229.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort 31 Benedykt, Kraków, 20220213 0907 4229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kopiec Kraka w Krakowie, 20220213 0922 4240.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kopiec Kraka w Krakowie, 20220213 0922 4240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kamieniołom Liban w Krakowie, 20220213 0934 4247.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamieniołom Liban w Krakowie, 20220213 0934 4247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kot na ulicy Obozowej w Krakowie, 20220214 1200 4283.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kot na ulicy Obozowej w Krakowie, 20220214 1200 4283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good cat portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 20:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Estakada kolejowa na linii nr 624 w Krakowie, 20220213 0930 4245.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estakada kolejowa na linii nr 624 w Krakowie, 20220213 0930 4245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, 20210728 1212 0708.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, 20210728 1212 0708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Czerwony Klasztor, zegar słoneczny, 20210807 0853 1386.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czerwony Klasztor, zegar słoneczny, 20210807 0853 1386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tatry, widok z polany Świnkówka na Gorcu, 20220313 0950 4372.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry, widok z polany Świnkówka na Gorcu, 20220313 0950 4372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kamienica Gorczańska, 20220313 1204 4430.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamienica Gorczańska, 20220313 1204 4430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1025 4408.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1025 4408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tatry, widok z Gorca Kamienickiego, 20220313 0959 4379.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry, widok z Gorca Kamienickiego, 20220313 0959 4379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kapliczka pod Krzczonowicami, 20220319 1021 4504.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapliczka pod Krzczonowicami, 20220319 1021 4504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 15:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1025 4409.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1025 4409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 12:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1030 4421.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1030 4421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1026 4412.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1026 4412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1024 4405.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1024 4405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1024 4404.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1024 4404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1143 0641.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1143 0641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1022 4395.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1022 4395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tatry, widok z Gorca Kamienickiego, 20220313 1004 4388.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry, widok z Gorca Kamienickiego, 20220313 1004 4388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1141 0628.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1141 0628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hofarnsdorf, Wachau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1201 0668.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofarnsdorf, Wachau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1201 0668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 19:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Przystań na Dunaju w Spitz w Dolinie Wachau, 20210728 1147 0655.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przystań na Dunaju w Spitz w Dolinie Wachau, 20210728 1147 0655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, 20210728 1212 0700.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, 20210728 1212 0700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unterloiben, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1236 0777.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterloiben, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1236 0777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stein an der Donau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1245 0803.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stein an der Donau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1245 0803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 17:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bratislava Castle, 20210727 1058 0316.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bratislava Castle, 20210727 1058 0316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, interesting window in the facade :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pichlhof, Dürnstein, Lower Austria, 20210728 1324 0821.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichlhof, Dürnstein, Lower Austria, 20210728 1324 0821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unterloiben, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1327 0823.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterloiben, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1327 0823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1022 4394.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1022 4394.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Las w Aleksandrowicach pod Krakowem, 20220403 0857 4658.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las w Aleksandrowicach pod Krakowem, 20220403 0857 4658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Joching, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1411 0869.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joching, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1411 0869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1143 0638.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1143 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wiewiórka pospolita, Kraków, 20220315 0951 4444.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiewiórka pospolita, Kraków, 20220315 0951 4444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trzy Korony i Dunajec - widok ze słowackich Pienin, 20210807 1014 1531.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trzy Korony i Dunajec - widok ze słowackich Pienin, 20210807 1014 1531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Malborku, 20210908 1036 2517.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Malborku, 20210908 1036 2517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zamek w Malborku, widok z północnego wschodu, 20210908 1035 2512.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, widok z północnego wschodu, 20210908 1035 2512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok na Bratysławę ze wzgórza zamkowego, 20210727 1113 0341.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok na Bratysławę ze wzgórza zamkowego, 20210727 1113 0341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1023 2502.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1023 2502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Čumil, Bratysława, 20210727 1143 0352.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čumil, Bratysława, 20210727 1143 0352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Holocaust and Demolished Synagogue Memorial in Bratislava, Rybné námestie, 20210727 1041 0301.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holocaust and Demolished Synagogue Memorial in Bratislava, Rybné námestie, 20210727 1041 0301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Christ statue, Beblavého, Bratislava, 20210727 1044 0307.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christ statue, Beblavého, Bratislava, 20210727 1044 0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sigismund Gate of Bratislava Castle, 20210727 1047 0308.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sigismund Gate of Bratislava Castle, 20210727 1047 0308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Polana Kondratowa, Tatry, 20210906 1008 2328.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polana Kondratowa, Tatry, 20210906 1008 2328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Observation deck of the New Bridge in Bratislava, 20210727 1029 0296.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observation deck of the New Bridge in Bratislava, 20210727 1029 0296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cathedral of St Martin, Bratislava, 20210727 1119 0345.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Martin, Bratislava, 20210727 1119 0345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Devín Castle, 20220428 1011 5715.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devín Castle, 20220428 1011 5715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 22:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Devín Castle over Danube, 20220428 1020 5740.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devín Castle over Danube, 20220428 1020 5740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zamek Devín nad ujściem Morawy do Dunaju, 20220428 1015 5732.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek Devín nad ujściem Morawy do Dunaju, 20220428 1015 5732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Large dust spot in the center of the sky to remove. --Steindy 19:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. Thank you, fixed --Jakubhal 05:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Devín Castle, 20220428 1050 5782.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devín Castle, 20220428 1050 5782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Forchtenstein Castle, Austria, 20220425 0938 4943.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchtenstein Castle, Austria, 20220425 0938 4943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
View from Castle Forchtenstein, 20220425 1006 4949.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Castle Forchtenstein, 20220425 1006 4949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
View from Castle Forchtenstein, 20220425 1006 4950.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Castle Forchtenstein, 20220425 1006 4950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Forchtenstein Castle, Austria, 20220425 1106 5039.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchtenstein Castle, Austria, 20220425 1106 5039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chmura burzowa, Rzuchów, świętokrzyskie, 20220513 1950 5852.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chmura burzowa, Rzuchów, świętokrzyskie, 20220513 1950 5852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 17:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ruszków, z kościołem św. Stanisława Biskupa pośrodku, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0829 5897.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruszków, z kościołem św. Stanisława Biskupa pośrodku, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0829 5897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 19:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pola rzepaku ze Świętym Krzyżem (Łysą Górą) w tle, 20220515 1408 5963.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku ze Świętym Krzyżem (Łysą Górą) w tle, 20220515 1408 5963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Ruszkowie, 20220513 1615 5826.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Ruszkowie, 20220513 1615 5826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pola rzepaku pod Trębanowem, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220514 1536 5863.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku pod Trębanowem, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220514 1536 5863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Krzyż przydrożny w Czerwonej Górze, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0834 5906.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Czerwonej Górze, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0834 5906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Krzyż przydrożny w Kosowicach, 20220515 0916 5941.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Kosowicach, 20220515 0916 5941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pola pod Małoszycami, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220513 1534 5810.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola pod Małoszycami, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220513 1534 5810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pomnik Władysława Beliny-Prażmowskiego w Ruszkowcu, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0831 5899.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Władysława Beliny-Prażmowskiego w Ruszkowcu, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0831 5899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pola pod Kosowicami, świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0914 5939.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola pod Kosowicami, świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0914 5939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1734 5411.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1734 5411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1722 5396.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1722 5396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0549 5666.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0549 5666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1725 5407.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1725 5407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1833 4870.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1833 4870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. A goose and two goslings, right? If so, it would be good to state that. Does the father help raise the goslings in this species? -- Ikan Kekek 19:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, I think it is female, although I'm not 100% sure. The father helps to raise the goslings. Here he was also present, but one meter behind and out of focus for this photo. I've updated the description --Jakubhal 19:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1329 5068.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1329 5068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1333 5078.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1333 5078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1329 5067.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1329 5067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Can you sharpen the photo? --Steindy 16:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done Yes, sharpen a little bit. I wouldn't go further. The focus is on the stork head and the thing he throws away and I think now they are sharp. --Jakubhal 16:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 13:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pola pod Roztylicami, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0906 5932.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola pod Roztylicami, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0906 5932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Staw w Garbaczu, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0911 5938.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staw w Garbaczu, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0911 5938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1649 5980.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1649 5980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1650 5983.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1650 5983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1655 5994.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1655 5994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1723 6005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1723 6005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1729 6017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1729 6017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1640 4818.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1640 4818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 21:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1656 5995.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1656 5995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1738 6054.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1738 6054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1824 6219.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1824 6219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1824 6225.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1824 6225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1825 6227.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1825 6227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Latarnia Morska Hel, 20220522 1619 6208.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Latarnia Morska Hel, 20220522 1619 6208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bałtyk na Helu, 20220522 1558 6194.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bałtyk na Helu, 20220522 1558 6194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 20:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks, fixed --Jakubhal 11:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ruiny kościoła w Steblewie, 20220522 1859 6252.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruiny kościoła w Steblewie, 20220522 1859 6252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Posąg Neptuna w Helu, 20220522 1552 6192.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posąg Neptuna w Helu, 20220522 1552 6192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Port of Hel, Poland, 20220522 1550 6190.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Hel, Poland, 20220522 1550 6190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pole rzepaku pod Osłonką, województwo pomorskie, 20220523 1000 6376.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pole rzepaku pod Osłonką, województwo pomorskie, 20220523 1000 6376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pola rzepaku w Grochowie Trzecim, 20220523 0938 6358.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku w Grochowie Trzecim, 20220523 0938 6358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kanał Drzewny pod Osłonką, województwo pomorskie, 20220523 1003 6380.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanał Drzewny pod Osłonką, województwo pomorskie, 20220523 1003 6380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zachód słońca na Pychowicach w Krakowie, 20220601 2022 6422.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zachód słońca na Pychowicach w Krakowie, 20220601 2022 6422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kościół w Palczewie, 20220523 0843 6316.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół w Palczewie, 20220523 0843 6316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bałtyk na Helu, 20220522 1534 6164.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bałtyk na Helu, 20220522 1534 6164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stary dom i pola pod Orłowem, 20220523 0908 6348.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stary dom i pola pod Orłowem, 20220523 0908 6348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dom podcieniowy w Orłowie, 20220523 0911 6350.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy w Orłowie, 20220523 0911 6350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pola rzepaku w Rybinie, 20220523 0928 6357.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku w Rybinie, 20220523 0928 6357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zachód słońca na Pychowicach w Krakowie, 20220601 2023 6428.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zachód słońca na Pychowicach w Krakowie, 20220601 2023 6428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1833 4868.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1833 4868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anser anser in flight, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1652 5367.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser in flight, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1652 5367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pigs on a farm in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1354 5124.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigs on a farm in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1354 5124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. This is a Mangalica. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lamb on a farm in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1349 5111.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamb on a farm in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1349 5111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Garbs in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1409 5176.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garbs in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1409 5176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mörbisch am See, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1635 5353.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mörbisch am See, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1635 5353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anser anser in flight, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1351 5116.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser in flight, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1351 5116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1448 5271.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1448 5271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1448 5272.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1448 5272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lalka z miotłą na bramie farmy, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1453 5276.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lalka z miotłą na bramie farmy, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1453 5276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jezioro Nezyderskie w Mörbisch am See, 20220425 1552 5307.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Mörbisch am See, 20220425 1552 5307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1447 5264.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1447 5264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Sweet! Good quality. --Steindy 15:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1820 4852.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1820 4852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, zachód słońca, 20220425 1942 5414.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, zachód słońca, 20220425 1942 5414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dachy w Rust, 20220424 1640 4816.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dachy w Rust, 20220424 1640 4816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1610 4781.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1610 4781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1811 4851.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1811 4851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1558 4780.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1558 4780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1810 4849.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1810 4849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Holy Trinity Church and Rathausplatz in Rust, Austria, 20220424 1634 4802.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church and Rathausplatz in Rust, Austria, 20220424 1634 4802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Joseph Haydngasse, Rust, Austria, 20220424 1640 4815.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joseph Haydngasse, Rust, Austria, 20220424 1640 4815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1941 4890.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1941 4890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1944 4902.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1944 4902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1947 4919.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1947 4919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Widok na Jezioro Nezyderskie z wieży św. Trójcy w Rust, 20220424 1640 4817.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok na Jezioro Nezyderskie z wieży św. Trójcy w Rust, 20220424 1640 4817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clouds over Lake Neusiedl during sunset, 20220424 1951 4923.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clouds over Lake Neusiedl during sunset, 20220424 1951 4923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0548 5664.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0548 5664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0555 5690.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0555 5690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ulica Promowa w Tyńcu w czasie wschodu słońca, 20220612 0501 6486.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulica Promowa w Tyńcu w czasie wschodu słońca, 20220612 0501 6486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ulica Promowa w Tyńcu w czasie wschodu słońca, 20220612 0501 6487.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulica Promowa w Tyńcu w czasie wschodu słońca, 20220612 0501 6487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wisła w Tyńcu wcześnie rano, 20220612 0504 6489.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wisła w Tyńcu wcześnie rano, 20220612 0504 6489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1941 4889.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1941 4889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Poranne mgły w okolicy ulicy Janasówka w Krakowie, 20220612 0509 6494.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poranne mgły w okolicy ulicy Janasówka w Krakowie, 20220612 0509 6494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Poranek w Pozowicach pod Krakowem, 20220612 0528 6500.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poranek w Pozowicach pod Krakowem, 20220612 0528 6500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Poranek w Pozowicach pod Krakowem, 20220612 0528 6501.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poranek w Pozowicach pod Krakowem, 20220612 0528 6501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciconia ciconia nest in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1631 4798.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1631 4798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alexandre Falguière, Eve, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 20220618 1007 6965.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexandre Falguière, Eve, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 20220618 1007 6965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. -- Ikan Kekek 21:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Amalienborg, Copenhagen, 20220616 1917 6593.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amalienborg, Copenhagen, 20220616 1917 6593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Old town hall in Roskilde, Denmark, 20220617 1157 6733.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall in Roskilde, Denmark, 20220617 1157 6733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]