User talk:Jakubhal/Archives/April 2017 - September 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170401 Starorobociański Wierch 5609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rafesmar 20:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 Palace Sri Ksetra 9190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 Gate Sri Ksetra 9207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170401 kozica Kończysty Wierch 5537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some significant color fringing around the head. May be possible to improve it to satisfactory levels. Juliancolton 00:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrected --Jakubhal 16:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Juliancolton 15:45, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:20170305 Niedzica zamek 5195.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20170305 Niedzica zamek 5195.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170401 Tatry Czubik 5463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170415 graffiti Ostrowiec 5957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170415 EN57-1218 Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski 5943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170210 Kościół św. Stanisława w Nowym Korczynie 4027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170401 Czubik 5468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170401 Tatry Dudowa Przełęcz 5646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Starorobociański Wierch 6932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Synagoga w Szydłowie 4364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would be better with more sharpness, but it's still OK. QI for me --Halavar 16:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Zamek w Szydłowie 4314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments W porządku --Pudelek 08:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Brama Krakowska Szydłów 4198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Kościół Wszystkich Świętych w Szydłowie 4192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please check the sky - there are at least two dustspots --A.Savin 11:58, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrected --Jakubhal 12:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC) OKnow. --A.Savin 11:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170305 Widok z Sokolicy 4984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Uoaei1 07:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160417 Zamek w Bodzentynie 4878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160527 Zwierzyniec 7645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160402 Długi Upłaz Jarząbczy Wierch i Łopata 4419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160327 pies nierasowy 3691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cute dog, but there is some CA in the fur on its nose. Could you please remove that? --W.carter 18:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrected --Jakubhal 19:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 21:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160227 Gacki stawy 3578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170402 Klöckner-Humboldt-Deutz Jupiter 5831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Maybe slight tilted to left, and also a white triangle bottom right. --C messier 20:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you! Corrected --Jakubhal 12:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Do you have any pixels at the top? The top crop isn't optimal. --C messier 10:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, another correction. Better? --Jakubhal 15:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support A bit tight but OK, IMHO. --C messier 09:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Starorobociański Wierch 6928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Tatry Błyszcz 6886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Tatry Błyszcz 6812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Siwe Skały 6888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160423 Chotel Czerwony kościół 5097 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The cross on top is quite unsharp, but overall good quality. --Uoaei1 06:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skalbmierz kościół 20160227 3493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 11:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160402 Tatry Zachodnie Rakoń 4431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments People in the foreground disturb the composition a bit, but quality is high enough for Q1 for me --Michielverbeek 07:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160402 Wołowiec 4446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Siwe Skały 6894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2445[edit]

I was promoting and you were withdrawing. Problem? --RaboKarbakian (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was not sure about that one and have doubts since I have nominated it. I felt the face on the left is somehow distorted but I have no space left to correct the picture properly (the legs are too close to the edge of the photo). Moment before you probably tried to promote it I checked and it was still not reviewed so I withdrew it. I think it is better to keep it like it is. I have a lot more much better pictures of that theatre, some already reviewed and QI. I'm sorry I took your time. ---- Jakubhal 16:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for putting it there. QIC is one of my favorite locations. I was worried about permission problems. And, you are right about the crop.... :) -- RaboKarbakian (talk) 17:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2334.jpg[edit]

How's it going? Do you think File:29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2334.jpg is a good candidate for FP? I feel like it's your clearest shot of this group of women, with the least distracting background, but you might have a better sense of what people are likely to find fault with and give as reasons for opposing its nomination. One thing I thought of is that they're likely to complain that the pillar on the left is not exactly perpendicular to the ground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Let's find out. For sure I do not have yet a good grasp of what people do like or not on FP candidates page. Do you think perspective correction is necessary for the picture? ---- Jakubhal 05:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Groupe Tango Sumo - Around - 20160707 1187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Markeliñe - Andante - 20160710 4161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Terrific! I'm tempted to nominate this for FP. What do you think of that idea? -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think that for FP background may be a problem. But please do as you like. --Jakubhal 09:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Markeliñe - Andante - 20160710 4101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Jakubhal 15:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC) The photo is full of charms and has good quality. I like this photo. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Jashgawronsky Brothers - Trash! - 20160710 4367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Groupe Tango Sumo - Around - 20160707 1096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Groupe Tango Sumo - Around - 20160707 1134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170501 Kot w trawie 6202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments R u distubin my nap wid teh camera agin? Goood kvalty. (LOL-speak) ;-) --W.carter 20:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170501 graffiti Kraków 6149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good graffiti and good photograph. -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170501 graffiti Kraków 6156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170501 Klasztor w Hebdowie 6276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170501 Kościół Wszystkich Świętych w Nowym Brzesku 6206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.I've added Category:Sticking out the tongue for you, please remember such special cats in the future. --W.carter 17:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170501 Hebdów kościół 6294 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This one looks OK. --Peulle 06:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Wat Arun Bangkok 5532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Alandmanson 06:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 - Royal guard in the Grand Palace in Bangkok - 5389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Alandmanson 06:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - The Trick Brothers - Piggy Circus - 20160710 3968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - The Trick Brothers - Piggy Circus - 20160710 3982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Relief Bangkok 5483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 201607277 - Wat Phra Kaew - Bangkok - 5340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Uliczny - Eunika w krainie cyrku - 20160710 4553 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Uliczny - Eunika w krainie cyrku - 20160710 4564 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Markeliñe - Andante - 20160710 4160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Main person is good in focus --Michielverbeek 06:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Farang Wat Pho 5446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Wat Arun 5530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160728 Mandalay 5724 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Mandalay Hill 5811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and good quality IMO. The top crop and the darkness of the altar are unfortunate, but this isn't FPC. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 traffic in Mandalay 5761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Wat Phra Kaew - Bangkok - 5316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Oppose - Tilted. :-)  Support - Just kidding, obviously intentional, and though a bit dark, good quality and the composition is fine. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160730 Mandalay 6115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Nanmyaebonthar Sannandawya Sandamuni Pagoda 5932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160802 Mount Popa 7203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160802 Samica makaka karmi młode 6955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo and capture. -- Ikan Kekek 00:02, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Mandalay Hill 5827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, but the highlights seem a bit too bright to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Corrected. Is it good enough now? --Jakubhal 17:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's acceptable. A really great-quality picture of this motif could be a nice FP, but as it is, I think it's a QI, though I'd welcome any other opinions. -- Ikan Kekek 01:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Uliczny - Eunika w krainie cyrku - 20160710 4561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Nanmyaebonthar Sannandawya Sandamuni Pagoda 5931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Nanmyaebonthar Sannandawya Sandamuni Pagoda 5914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Atumashi Mandalay 5865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 pies Bagan 6550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 E-bike Bagan 6616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 Nanmyaebonthar Sannandawya Sandamuni Pagoda 5940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:21, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan 6665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO good quality. Tournasol7 22:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160802 - Rhesus macaque - Mount Popa, Myanmar - 7178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan 6524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be sharper, enough for QI --A.Savin 13:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Ananda Temple Bagan Myanmar 6687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160802 Mount Popa 7176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Myanmar Bagan 6647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160803 krowa w Miktili 7272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is a pity that the plan is not shifted to the left - in the direction in which the cow goes. Nonetheless is good quality IMO. Tournasol7 20:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan Myanmar 6694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The building in the foreground is natural leaning? Tournasol7 20:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think so. Lot of those minor temples in Bagan are half ruined and leaning to some direction. --Jakubhal 21:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dzięki za szybką odpowiedź. Good quality. Tournasol7 22:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160802 Elephant Mount Popa 7140 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The DoF could have been a bit deeper to include the back leg but overall quite good quality imo. --Peulle 19:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan Myanmar 6751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are some perspective issues, at least the towers on the left lean to centre. A bit dark too, please brighten the image a bit, especially the shadows. --Basotxerri 11:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Thank you. New version uploaded. Is it good enough now? --Jakubhal 17:17, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems obvious that the building in front is slanted in reality, the rest of towers are straight. OK, now, good quality! --Basotxerri 20:18, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Ananda Temple Bagan Myanmar 6682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment At least two dust spots at the right --A.Savin 07:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Thanks, corrected --Jakubhal 17:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC) Good. --A.Savin 10:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 Zamek w Olsztynie 6787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 Zamek w Olsztynie 6797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 - Htilominlo Temple, Bagan, Myanmar - 6714 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I presume that the left building is tilted in reality. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 Zamek w Olsztynie 6805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 stodoły Żarki 6967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 ruiny kościoła w Żarkach 6947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 Zamek w Olsztynie 6766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Zoppo59 11:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 Zamek w Olsztynie 6782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Zoppo59 11:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170528 stodoły Żarki 6968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170611 Kościół w Kargowie 8442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 23:37, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170610 Szewna 8235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:59, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170610 Rynek w Opatowie 8206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK but could you remove at least the motion-blurred birds? (some birds are sharp which is OK) --Basotxerri 17:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrected --Jakubhal 12:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170624 XIII Małopolski Piknik Lotniczy 9512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 21:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170624 OV-10 Bronco Krakow 9287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 21:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170624 OV-10 Bronco Krakow 9340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 21:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170624 M-28 Skytruck SP-DDA 9248 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 21:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170604 Sphynx cat 7984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Beautiful light. --MirandaAdramin 20:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170624 OV-10 Bronco Krakow 9313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 22:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170604 kot wystawa Kraków 8006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170604 LN-NGQ Boeing737-800 Norwegian Balice Kraków 7905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170624 Jurgis Kairys Su31 Krakow 9091 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170604 kot na wystawie w Krakowie 7971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely and wonderful. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170610 klasztor w Opatowie 8228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170615 Płaskorzeźba jeleni Podgórze Kraków 8466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20170708 1911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:06, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30. Ulica - Teatr Hothaus - Zabiłem brata mego... - 20170706 0479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170722 Demonstracja Krakow 4387 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --WClarke 19:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170716 Demontracja Krakow 3560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --WClarke 19:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170716 Demonstracja Krakow 3658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170716 Tomasz Piątek demonstracja Krakow 3673 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 18:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170716 Demonstracja Krakow 3697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 18:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170716 Demonstracja Krakow 3710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good "in the crowd"-photo, but please put the {{personality rights}} template on all these photos. Good quality. --W.carter 10:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170716 Demonstracja Krakow 3714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170720 Demonstracja Krakow 3948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite good for a late evening photo with moving people and difficult light conditions. Good quality. --W.carter 22:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170720 Demonstracja Krakow 3991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for a night photo with moving people. QI. --W.carter 22:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170729 Jezioro Wióry 5045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170809 kot 5133 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Czarnocin kosciol 5701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 pola kapusty Małopolska 5707 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Kolosy zbor arianski 5676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Zalipie 5521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Zalipie 5497 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (Piękne zdjęcie! (Polecam nominować je do FP na Commons oraz na Ilustracje na Medal na polskiej Wikipedii) --Halavar 19:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dzięki, spróbuję :) --Jakubhal 19:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170814 Jezioro Rożnowskie 5440 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170814 Zapora w Rożnowie 5240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170814 Jezioro Czchowskie w Tropiu 5479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Szczerbaków stawy hodowlane 5574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170814 Górny zamek w Rożnowie 5266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Chop the trees off they will ruin the ruin --Ermell 06:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:20170815 Zalipie 5497 DxO.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20170815 Zalipie 5497 DxO.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170819 Nepomuk Wrzepia 5746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170814 Jezioro Rożnowskie z Tabaszowej 5398 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Kolosy zbor arianski tablica 5680 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170815 Chotel Czerwony krzyz 5672 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170820 Bielańsko-Tyniecki Park Krajobrazowy 5773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 Radom Air Show MiG-29 8119 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --SuperJew 21:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 PZL Świdnik SW-4 Puszczyk Radom Air Show 7090 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 20:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 Artur Kielak XtremeAir XA-41 Sbach 300 Radom Air Show 7551 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 Artur Kielak XtremeAir XA-41 Sbach 300 Radom Air Show 7563 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 Vought F4U Corsair Radom Air Show 7772 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 North American T-28B Trojan 7786 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170826 MiG-29 Radom Air Show 8117 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]