User talk:Jean-Marc Pascolo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jean-Marc Pascolo!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Jean-Marc Pascolo!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Norbert Festor conseiller municipal à Carling de 1965 à 1971.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Norbert Festor conseiller municipal à Carling de 1965 à 1971.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

L'image a été transmise par ma famille au Républicain Lorrain qui n'est pas l'auteur de la photographie et l'a simplement reprise pour illustrer la rubrique nécrologique. Ne sachant si la transmission de l'image entraîne une perte des droits, je propose dans le doute de la supprimer du fichier. Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Monteaperta et palazzo Cobai.jpg[edit]

Hi Jean-Marc, did you really shoot the original photography of which File:Monteaperta et palazzo Cobai.jpg is a reproduction? If not, who is the photographer? Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes it was my own shoot but only a bad copy of a old paper photography because negative is lost during terrible earthquake 1976. No problem.Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
O.k., could you then add the date (year) of the original shot to the date entry in the description, as the reproduction date is of no interest. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
But who is the photographer of the original photography, of which you made the reproduction? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Catégorisation de vos images[edit]

Bonjour. Comme l'a indiqué le premier message de cette page, vous devez prendre attention à la classification de vos images dans les catégories adéquates. Les catégories ne sont pas des "tags" indiquant un lien vague entre le sujet et le contenu de l'image. Chaque image doit être rangée dans la catégorie la plus proche du sujet de l'image. Voilà pourquoi je dois enlever toutes vos images de bâtiments de Carling de Category:Architecture pour les mettre dans des catégories plus précises comme "houses in Moselle" par exemple. Vous trouverez plus de détails ici : Commons:Catégories. Merci d'avance. Mel22 (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Louise Bloch, née Lévy.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Louise Bloch, née Lévy.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Louise Bloch, née Lévy.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Marc Pascolo, surely you did not shoot the original photo. Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Louise Bloch sent this photo to my gran-parents in Carling before the last World War as gift and souvenir. Regards, Jean-Marc Pascolo
Well, then you cannot write "own work" and that you are the author. You need to research to date, when this photo (the original) has been shot/created. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gori Tita.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gori Tita.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gori Tita.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Marc Pascolo, surely you did not shoot the original photo. Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm a friend of Catarina Gori and I get original photo from my father. Regards. Jean-Marc Pascolo
Well, then you cannot write "own work" and that you are the author. We need to know when this photo had originally be shot and who is the true photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Ça suffit comme ça ![edit]

Monsieur Pascolo, plusieurs contributeurs vous ont déjà écrit pour vous demander cordialement de bien vouloir faire un effort de catégorisation de vos photos. Au lieu de donner suite à leur requête, vous continuez à balancer vos photos n'importe comment en vous fichant de vos collègues contributeurs qui doivent passer derrière vous pour classer correctement les images que vous fournissez. Exemples : [1], [2]. Ce manque de respect élémentaire n'est pas plus apprécié ici qu'ailleurs. Pour la dernière fois, faites l'effort qu'on vous demande ! ! ! --Edelseider (talk) 20:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Je suis surpris par le ton de votre message. Je vous réponds courtoisement et vous prie de faire de même. L'absence de catégories que vous me reprochez dans l'exemple que vous donnez [3] relativement à un vitrail est absolument infondée. J'avais placé 5 catégories et vous en laissez 3. Vous corrigez "Ott frères" en "Ott Frères", je vous l'accorde. Par contre transformer "église Saint-Nicolas de L'Hôpital" en "Saint Nicholas church" me stupéfait. La langue française est-elle censurée? Le mot "Nicolas' doit-il devenir "Nicholas"??? Le mot église devient-il "church"? Quand j'importais des "files" on me corrigeais le mot anglais en "images" ou "fichiers". Alors je m'applique à respecter le français. Quand vous transformez "vitrail" en "stained glass" je reste tout aussi étonné. Wikimedia et Wikipedia doivent-ils être rédigés en anglais? Doit-on transformer les noms de lieux et des gens pour les "angliciser"? Dois je transformer mon propre prénom de Jean-Marc en John Mark? Il est heureux que le mot "Frères" ne devienne pas "Brothers". Et vous me dites que "plusieurs contributeurs" me reprochent mon approche des catégories. Il n'y en a eu qu'un seul qui me parlait des catégories (en 2012) et depuis son message j'essaye de faire de mon mieux. J'ai rattaché ce vitrail à: 1° son auteur; 2° sa nature; 3° le lieu où il se trouve; 4° le lieu où il a été fabriqué (que vous avez supprimé) ; 5° au motif qu'il représente (que vous avez également supprimé). J'ai donc mis 5 catégories (en langue française!) à ce vitrail, essayant de faire un effort certain. Je me débrouille tout seul, peut-être maladroitement sur la création d'articles et l'import d'images n'ayant jamais eu de "parrain" (pourtant je l'ai bien demandé) et en me fiant aux messages des autres contributeurs, ce qui me permet de corriger mes erreurs. Par contre je suis étonné par le ton de vos remarques et votre position par rapport à l'anglais. J'accepte avec plaisir votre effort de m'écrire, mais je reste réservé relativement aux anglicismes extrêmes relatifs à des noms français dont l'usage reste légitime. Vos reproches ne me semblent donc pas tout à fait justifiés. Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cordialement, Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cher Jean-Marc, continuez à catégoriser comme vous l’entendez. C’est exactement ce que je fais, je n’ai pas des heures à perdre à rechercher des catégories qui vont bien en anglais.
De plus on ne retrouve plus rien à force d’enterrer nos images dans des sous-sous-sous catégories !
Les mecs font ce travail de leur plein gré, et si cela ne leur convient pas, il peuvent toujours aller jardiner ailleurs. D’autres, moins agressifs dans leur ton et manière de communiquer avec les autres finiront par les remplacer. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Merci[edit]

Merci pour votre petit message très sympathique. Parfois on aimerait mettre un visage sur des mots. En tous les cas c'est un plaisir de vous lire et de lire vos contributions. Et qui sait au plaisir de vous croiser virtuellement ou encore à Strasbourg. Excellente journée à vous et cordialement,Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 09:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cher Jean-Marc, recontactez-moi en MP afin que nous convenions d’un rendez-vous, maintenant qu’une structure de Wikipédiens, appelée la Cab’Alsacienne, existe à Strasbourg. A très vite, et tout aussi cordialement Face-smile.svg --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 18:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Platt.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Platt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hangsna (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mosquée de Farébersviller.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mosquée de Farébersviller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)