User talk:Jeromi Mikhael

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Copyright status: File:Anthem of the Soviet Union - 1944, unknown book.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Anthem of the Soviet Union - 1944, unknown book.png

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anthem of the Soviet Union - 1944, unknown book.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:COA of Seychelles, 1903-1961, Abadie.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:COA of Seychelles, 1903-1961, Abadie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Kgalemang Motsete (cropped).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kgalemang Motsete (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Tallinn in the Estonian SSR[edit]

Tom-L (talk) 08:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Minsk. Tom-L (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Conversation from the Illustration Workshop[edit]

I didn't want to clutter up the workshop with our conversation, so I copied it here.

@TilmannR: Wow! Since when do you learn vector graphics? I downloaded Inkscape in just 9 months ago.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeromi Mikhael: I don't remember when I started using Inkscape. I'm not a professional artist, so I've only been using it regularly since I started doing Illustration Workshop requests. TilmannR (talk) 15:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@TilmannR: Do you think you can compare yourself to Sodacan? In ocialist heraldry, I think you are one of the best.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeromi Mikhael: I don't personally know Sodacan, but he seems to be very experienced and has contributed plenty of great images to the Commons. If you want to become better at vectorizing emblems, I recommend trying to resolve some of your own requests. Practice makes perfect. Face-smile.svg TilmannR (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@TilmannR: When I try to do one..., the result is awful. The best one is that.Another one is those.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeromi Mikhael: Coat of arms of Himalayan Union.svg looks fine. LogoKPT.svg is great for practicing. Ask yourself: What's wrong with that image? Focus on a specific flaw and try to fix it. (E.g. there's a notch in the bottom left of the flag. What can you do to make the path smoother?) Then find the next flaw and fix that. Of course you can't see how much work Sodacan or I put into our images, so it might seem like we just have some magical talent or secret knowledge, but that's not true. Nobody makes everything perfect on the first try. The beautiful thing about SVGs is that you can always fix things. Nothing is final. And the only way to become better and faster at making graphics is to put effort in it, to never give up and practice, practice, practice. (And learn all important features of Inkscape either by experimenting or by reading manuals and tutorials online, but I hope it's obvious that you need to know your tools in order to use them effectively.) TilmannR (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
@TilmannR: Dang. I would put your conversation in my room and will frame it.
Of course you can't see how much work Sodacan or I put into our images, so it might seem like we just have some magical talent or secret knowledge, but that's not true. Nobody makes everything perfect on the first try. The beautiful thing about SVGs is that you can always fix things. Nothing is final. And the only way to become better and faster at making graphics is to put effort in it, to never give up and practice, practice, practice.

--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 05:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:COAMirkzistan.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:COAMirkzistan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Traumrune (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of Mirkzistan.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of Mirkzistan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Traumrune (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)