User talk:Joergens.mi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:Joergens.mi/archiv

User:Orgullobot/whitelist[edit]

Ich hab dich mal in die Liste eingetragen, damit sollte das Kategorieumlinkproblem für dich gelöst sein. Lieben Gruß, Arnomane 00:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

User:GerWsUpload[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko 19:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Admin?[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Polarlys#User:joergens.mi_als_Administrator Danke für deine im Chat avisierte Bereitschaft, dich zur Wahl zu stellen --Historiograf 18:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Gratulation, lieber Administrator!![edit]

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Ein Willkommenspräsent für unseren neuen Adminstrator von deinen Kollegen...

Joergens.mi, Gratulation! Du hast jetzt die Rechte eines Administrators auf Commons.

Nimm dir bitte einen Moment Zeit, um dir die Seite Commons:Administratoren und die in Verbindung mit der Beobachtungsliste stehenden Seiten zu lesen (insbesondere Commons:Administrators' noticeboard und Commons:Deletion requests), bevor du damit beginnst, Seitenlöschungen, Accountsperrungen oder Änderungen am Seitenschutzstatus bzw. an den geschützten Seiten selbst durchzuführen. Der Großteil der Bearbeitungen eines Administrators kann durch andere Administratoren wieder rückgängig gemacht werden, mit Ausnahme der Zusammenführung von Versionsgeschichten, die deshalb mit spezieller Obacht behandelt werden muß.

Wir laden dich herzlich ein mit uns auf IRC Kontakt aufzunehmen: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Du findest zudem in dem Commons:Ratgeber zur Administratorentätigkeit vielleicht eine nützliche Lektüre.

Bitte überprüfe, ob du in der Commons:List of administrators und den jeweils nach Datum oder Sprache sortierten Listen eingetragen wurdest und ergänze deine Daten andernfalls.

EugeneZelenko 14:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


TUSC token ea068d0bca2c0c25e98c200fba8a3bd7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File:Thomaskirche (Freiburg) 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Die File File:Thomaskirche (Freiburg) 3.jpg wurde auf Commons:Löschanträge gemeldet, damit die Gemeinschaft entscheiden kann, ob sie behalten oder gelöscht werden soll. Es wäre gut, wenn du dich an dieser Diskussion auf der Antragsseite beteiligen würdest.

Wenn du diese File geschaffen hast, solltest du beachten, dass dieser Antrag keineswegs bedeutet, dass deine Arbeit nicht geschätzt wird. Es bedeutet nur, dass jemand glaubt, dass es ein Problem gibt, zum Beispiel mit dem Urheberrecht oder einer Richtlinie.

Bitte denke daran, auf die Begründungen der Antragssteller zu reagieren und diesen ggf. sachlich zu widersprechen. Aussagen, die auf den Antragsteller selbst abzielen, werden das Ergebnis des Antrags nicht beeinflussen. Vielen Dank!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tut mir leid. Flominator (talk) 09:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, ich musste nochmal nachlegen: Commons:Deletion requests/Thomaskirche Freiburg reloaded. Dennoch vielen Dank für den Marie-Ausbau und frohes Fest, --Flominator (talk) 14:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Rotation of book pages[edit]

Hi, Joergens.mi, I asked for a rotation of this file and noticed afterwards your comment: Don't rotate book pages. Is there a specific reason why you do not want book pages to be rotated? Suppose it would be a file to be inserted in an article, how can someone look at the image or read the description (if there is any) unless turning the head for 90%? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Lotje I hope i can give a full answer. The books pages should be left as is, to keep the book as book, if a picture is needed it will be extracted, rectified, optimized and brought to an upright position. There are some pages with one picture only - wihtout text -, but other will fit on two pages or only on a part of a page. Therefore we decided in german language wikisource to do it that way. If you can tell me the specific page, an the optimized Version is missing, i'll add it. The naming convention is for the book page "File:Die Gartenlaube (1891) 004.jpg" the picture is "File:Die Gartenlaube (1891) b 004.jpg" --Jörgens.Mi Talk 15:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Example: I would like to start looking for images by Franz Molitor (Maler) and imo Besiegt (nach dem ölgemälde von J. Molito) is such a case. What do you suggest? Lotje (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

see File:Die Gartenlaube (1885) b 061.jpg --Jörgens.Mi Talk 17:10, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Die Gartenlaube (1885) b 061.jpg
Danke. Lotje (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Noch schnell kleine Korrektur --> J. Molitor Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

File:De Lieder Sprüche Württembergs 407.jpg[edit]

Hi. This file has 20 duplicates. Perhaps your bot malfunctioned?   — Jeff G. ツ 02:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Lacquerware?[edit]

Are you sure that the images in Category:Lackschale are indeed lacquerware and not just some modern, high-gloss paint? Could you please reply at Category talk:Lackschale? - Takeaway (talk) 17:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Commons bot inactivity[edit]

Hello!

Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bergheimer Altar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01203.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergheimer Altar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ercé 18:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Altarbild Orlier (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01107.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altarbild Orlier (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could you crop out the borders so that there's only red border left? I'm not sure if you can understand what I mean. --Basotxerri 18:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you for this remark, Gzen92 07:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, that's it! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01221 deriv.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01221 deriv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. The Photographer Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:04:35 GMT
Rue Morel (Colmar) jm01465.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Morel (Colmar) jm01465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit soft everywhere but far from being unsharp. Lighting is good, verticals are vertical - good quality. Granada Tue, 01 May 2018 06:34:25 GMT
Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01227.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Granada 06:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01229.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Granada 06:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01231.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Granada 06:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Altarbild Orlier (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01079.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altarbild Orlier (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01099.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Suisant7 19:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01101.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01103.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 11:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01105.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bild (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 11:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Die Hochzeit zu Kana (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01319.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Hochzeit zu Kana (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 11:07, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Kapitell,Letzte Kommunion der Heiligen Maria von Ägypten (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01417.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapitell,Letzte Kommunion der Heiligen Maria von Ägypten (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 11:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Johannesaltar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01323.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johannesaltar (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good for me. --Rbrechko 10:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) jm01502.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) jm01502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 16:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Reliquiar St. Hippolyt (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01085.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reliquiar St. Hippolyt (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A little bit noisy in unfocused areas, but good for me at all. --Rbrechko 10:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) jm01475.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) jm01475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 12:30, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) jm01495.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) jm01495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Slight drawback: the cropped person on the right. Otherwise it's OK and since the buildings are the subject, I think it's good enough for QI. --Peulle 15:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
St. Martin (Colmar) jm01450.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Martin (Colmar) jm01450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 15:01, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01071.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01055.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Place de la Mairie (Colmar) jm01547.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Mairie (Colmar) jm01547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

There is some tilt and the left crop should be improved --Poco a poco 13:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Gzen92 09:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Quai de la Sinn (Colmar) jm01445.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Sinn (Colmar) jm01445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Quai de la Sinn (Colmar) jm01447.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Sinn (Colmar) jm01447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01043.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Rue des Marchands (Colmar) jm01525.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Marchands (Colmar) jm01525.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, --Fischer.H 17:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01045.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterlinden-Museum (Colmar) jm01045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for me --Megatherium 18:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01221 (retouched).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isenheimer Altar (Colmar) jm01221 (retouched).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 12:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Rue du Rempart (Colmar) jm01047.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Rempart (Colmar) jm01047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Le petit vigneron (Colmar) jm01509.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le petit vigneron (Colmar) jm01509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Rue des Écoles (Colmar) jm01503.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Écoles (Colmar) jm01503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

It needs a vertical perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Gzen92 10:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Rue de Têtes (Colmar) jm01042.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Têtes (Colmar) jm01042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Kreuzigung (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01213.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kreuzigung (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit grainy but OK for me. --Basotxerri 12:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Melancholie Cranach der Ältere (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01307.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melancholie Cranach der Ältere (Unterlindenmuseum Colmar) jm01307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

File:PK1 jm65263.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:PK1 jm65263.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 11:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Trauernde Theologie (Emil Stadelhofer) jm24933.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Trauernde Theologie (Emil Stadelhofer) jm24933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tyler de Noche (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Inschriften auf der Sonnenuhr an der Abtei Hohenburg[edit]

Hallo, ich habe von zweien Deiner Bilder Ausschnitte mit den Inschriften erzeugt: Teil 1, Teil 2. Ich wollte das auch von einem dritten Bild tun, aber das Ergebnis ist leider nicht so gut. Dein Bild: Le Mont Ste. Odile (Odilienberg) jm3121.jpg, mein Ausschnitt (übrigens leicht aufgehellt und geschärft): Bild "inscriptionbackcropley1kn3.jpg" (ich werde dieses Bild später wieder löschen, wenn Du es dir angesehen hast). Hast du vielleicht noch Material zurückgehalten, weil das Gesamtbild nicht so gut war, wo aber eventuell die Rückseite der Sonnenuhr im Bereich der Inschrift besser erkennbar ist? Übrigens stimmt die von dir in Commons eingetragenen Übersetzung für den Vorderteil nicht. Auch im Dewiki ist das falsch. Das will ich dort ändern und die drei Ausschnitte dort einfügen. — Speravir – 23:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Ich kann mal schauen ob ich noch ein anderes Bild davon habe. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 05:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Heilige Familie (Freiburg) 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Heilige Familie (Freiburg) 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Blasius (Zähringen) jm4062.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:St. Blasius (Zähringen) jm4062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Green carrot jm103186.jpg[edit]

Gehört File:Green carrot jm103186.jpg wirklich zum Festivalsommer? Atamari (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


Dnake mein Fehler. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 17:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Laguiole (Messer) jm120846.jpg[edit]

Hallo Joergens.mi, hervorragende Arbeit! perfekt arrangiert und dokumentiert... Ach, wenn nur ein Viertel der Wiki-Bilder auf diesem Level wären... Da mich interessiert hat, wie diese Composition auf einem neutralen/weißen Untergrund aussehen würde, habe ich mir eine Version erlaubt. Das "einstellen/nutzen" der Version überlasse ich dem Urheber der Vorlage ;-). Eine kleine Anregung: Vielleicht wäre eine Ansicht des geschlossenen Messers von der Seite interessant, da es für den Tragekomfort (z.B. in der Hosentasche) recht aussagekräftig sein könnte... nochmal Danke für die Arbeit, mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 11:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Catgory:UGC objects 10000–10999[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Catgory:UGC objects 10000–10999 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

NGC 2722[edit]

CptViraj (📧) 14:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

NGC 3175[edit]

CptViraj (📧) 14:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:jömi(201910)[edit]

Hello.Sorry, I had emptied it because I thought it is meaningless and I didn't notice that there were similar categories ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


Everthing is fine. I forgot to fill it yesterday night --08:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Category naming[edit]

Hallo Joergens.mi!

Zuerst mal danke für die vielen Apfelfotos! Aber in Commons sollen alle Kategorie-Namen einheitlich in englischer Sprache gefasst werden. Also schreib bitte "October" statt "Oktober"!

gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 13:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)