User talk:Jollyroger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Write HERE please --Jollyroger 15:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Grazie delle traduzioni.[edit]

Quando riesco fotografo la valvola del regolatore della 880.001, ma dobbiamo aspettare che raggiunga l'officina, temo.

Dai una occhiata a http://www.880001.it e http://www.trenistorici.it

--Baol 20:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

740.038[edit]

La macchina e` transitata per Padova nel pomeriggio: e` arrivata al segnale di protezione alle 16:23 viaggiando in regime di tradotta. E' stata instradata al binario 5 (invece che al 2, indovina per chi era l'avviso "Servizio: treno storico al binario 5 invece che al 2" :) :) :) - avevo una ventina di litri di acqua, un tavolino ikea ancora imballato e i miei bagagli :) ). In composizione la barchetta a 2 assi col carbone, il bagagliaio-stube con funzione di carro appoggio (ci ho passato la notte) e 4 carrozze Centoporte tra cui una rarissima di prima seconda e terza classe (anche se la marcatura dice solo prima e seconda).

Mi guardo il filmato stasera a casa con Linux, che le macchine Windows del cliente ovviamente non ci riescono. La 740.038 e` comunque del 1906, prima fornitura ancora con la guida a destra. Tutto il materiale che c'e` sulla pagina http://www.trenistorici.it/italiano/avts52preparazione.php e` sotto GNU FDL. Peccato che i filmati .mov non vadano su wikipedia, ma la Gianozia Orientale si sta attrezzando per convertirli.
--Baol 12:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Allora, la macchina è una 345 nella vecchia livrea verde e castano.Il convoglio è standard per i trasferimenti, questa volta il bagagliaio non ci ha seguiti in viaggio, ma è stato il nostro ostello per la notte. L'interno fortunatamente venne attrezzato a stube dalla provincia di Bolzano per treni che portavano turisti in Alto Adige, ci offrivano le delikatessen tipiche ai passeggeri.
Per la conversione, alcuni sono molto pesanti, i filmati sono disponibili su http://www.trenistorici.it e sono dichiaratamente sotto GNU FDL. Se ti serve qualcosa di scritto per fare il relicensing doppia CC/GNU FDL per wikipedia dimmelo. Ma guardo cosa riesco a fare io.

--Baol 18:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Copia[edit]

L'ho fatto apposta per sottolineare il concetto. Tanto è in GFDL... ^_^ Ciao --Jacopo86 15:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Copyright to fix[edit]

Hi,

I fixed the Wikiquote one, but the Wikiversity one cannot be changed unless WMF do some deal with the creator (not a Wikimedian). I am not sure this is the official logo anyway - there is a vote going on at m:Wikiversity/logo. I left some comments at m:Talk:Logo and wrote a message on the textbook-l mailing list. I will keep an eye on it. Thanks, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome log active again[edit]

Hi, on User:Orgullobot/Welcome log you are listed as a helper. Orgullobot hasn't been active for a while and SieBot has taken over the welcoming a few days ago. There is fresh output again. I thought you might be interested in that info. I do hope on your continued participation in checking newbie edits. Cheers! Siebrand 09:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

parata[edit]

ti sto lasciando telegrafiche note nelle talk delle immagini, spero possano aiutarti

perdona la pignoleria, ma se hai un termine per "medagliere", sarebbe bene usarlo, la differenza dal gonfalone, anche e soprattutto in valore militare, è di grandissimo rilievo. grazie
ci torno dopo, attualmente ho grossi problemi a scaricare le foto

Parata 2 giugno[edit]

Ho visto le foto che hai caricato e mi sembrano ottime. Perché stanno mettendo il tag per cancellarle? A me sembra la solita fregola cancellatoria. Fammi capire, se puoi. Ciao Massimop 19:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

OK, grazie. Ciao Massimop 20:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Caliper[edit]

Hi, I made some fixes to Image:Using_the_caliper_new_en.gif.
The image some bad mistakes that were pointed out at the Commons:Bar_italiano (i suppose you ar not a technician :-)

  1. the measurement was given in centimeters: this is an error since the caliper is used for technical measurement, and the official standard for technical measurement is the millimeter
  2. the measurement reported only one decimal, while the common use stated by ISO wants two decimals

I replaced the image (since the wrong one was linked), if you feel this as an abuse or an error, I will upload your version again and load the correct one with another name. --Jollyroger 11:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your concern. But in this case I don't think these modifications are a real improvement, for the foloowing reasons:
  1. This an exact replica of an actual caliper and the scale is graduated in centimeters. To display the result in milimeters is a source of confusion for anyone trying to understand how the instrument works.
  2. To insert an aditional significant digit is to imply an accuracy of 0,01 mm (0,001 cm), which is not exact. The accuracy (and the instrumental precision) of this mechanical caliper is around 0,05 mm.

As you see I'm not a complete ignorant on the matter ;_). Yes, I would prefer the original version to be uploaded. - Alvesgaspar 11:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Reggimento San Marco[edit]

Non ho nessuna idea come sono i gradi o lo stemma del San Marco, ma se mi informi di una fonte dove posso vedere come sono, faro il mio meglio a disegnare una copia esatta. --Noclador 09:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

re: Copyviol[edit]

Hi Jollyroger,

I deleted those images. Thanks for pointing them out.

He has been uploading again recently. Could you have a look and tell me if they are OK or not? If they are not, I am inclined to a much longer ban, especially since his itwiki page looks like he has been banned there for uploading copyvios here!

thanks, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

ps> I am really surprised you are not an admin. I can nominate you if you want, or you can self-nominate. It would be great to have more Italian-speaking admins.

Re: Rollback by admin[edit]

Hi, you don't need to be an admin to revert image overwrites. At the bottom in the file history there is a list of the file revisions. If you're logged in you can click "revert" to go back to an old file revision. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Misc[edit]

Hey,

About VP, I know it is not a great system... the it.wp system looks interesting. What if you are the type of person who likes to follow all discussions? There's no easy way to see which discussions are "hot topics", is there? It is probably worth proposing on the VP itself. If it has no major objections, then the hard bit is finding someone to implement it (or do it yourself). I think we have a bot archive ours at the moment.

About Commons adminship, sometimes people come from other wikis and flood RfAs with either positive or negative comments. In general Commoners are smart enough not to let very emphatic people sway their opinion too much either way. The overwhelming thing that will determine your RfA is your action on Commons. If you can point to a couple of months or so of good, helpful contributions on Commons, that is what voters will really look at. But if you have had recent conflict on another wiki, it is best to let some time pass just so it cools down. Hope this helps, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Pandrol type spring[edit]

I would like your comment in discussion page on the image of the rail spring that you marked as Pandrol type, to resolve the discussion on the type. Audriusa (talk) 10:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Jollyroger!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 16:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:Help in removal[edit]

Qui sono un temp admin quindi posso fare solo cose limitate. In ogni caso ricarica una nuova versione così ripuliamo --melos (talk) 12:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


File:SchwererGustav.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SchwererGustav.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

78.55.220.108 11:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Deposito Locomotive di Pistoia[edit]

A quanto mi risulta Rimessa Ferroviaria di Pistoia è il nome del sito amatoriale relativo all'associazione che cura il materiale storico presente nel Deposito Locomotive della città toscana (nome più adatto secondo le convenzioni ferroviarie in uso). Siccome i nomi su commons vanno generalmente internazionalizzati sarebbe più corretto indicarlo come Pistoia railway depot. -- Ciao, Moliva (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Infatti non ho parlato di regole ferree, tuttalpiù mi affido al buon senso: siccome l'inglese è la lingua internazionale di commons credo sia più agevole, per tutti, utilizzare un termine (generico) anglosassone. Poi se guardiamo ai tedeschi, ci hanno creato una pagina intitolata Tendabahn per la linea del Tenda italo-francese, poi è stata creata la categoria anglofona a parziale rimedio, ma tant'è... :) Idem per il termine in italiano: se indichiamo su wikipedia le rimesse del gruppo FS come Deposito Locomotive di Nomecittà (di Catania, di Castelvetrano etc) per uniformità sarebbe meglio seguire questa prassi, anche se il DL in questione è dismesso. -- Ciao, Moliva (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, darkweasel94 20:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 22:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Mantide narni.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mantide narni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brunei (talk) 18:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Mantide2 narni.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mantide2 narni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brunei (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)