User talk:JonRidinger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
English: Welcome to the Commons, JonRidinger!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 20:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:P&O Aqueduct.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (MifterBot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (talk) 22:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hello, JonRidinger!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:


2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:South Endzone Aerial Large.jpg[edit]

Yeah, thanks for giving me a heads up anyway. I knew I had seen the image somewhere else, but couldn't remember where it was. :) Latics (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Then again, when was that image placed on their page? Because if you go to the "panoramic view" button, it links to the image that I took and uploaded to the commons. :s Latics (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. As far as I can see, there is nothing on the page to indicate where the images were acquired from. In the case of your panoramic view, though (which, by the way is an awesome picture...thanks for uploading it!), the website links directly to the Commons file rather than sticking it on the page. Because the bottom of the page has a "Copyright 2009" on it, we have to assume that all the pictures on the page are not public domain and are owned by or approved for the website. It is, however, common for people to assume they are public domain. Just from seeing the picture, I find it unlikely it was on the Commons or Wikipedia first as a public domain image since it was abviously taken with a professional camera in an aircraft. It's not unheard of to have photographers upload those kinds of images to the Commons, but it's unusual. In most cases, the University owns the copyright to the photo if they commissioned it and fans upload them with incorrect licenses. --JonRidinger (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Davey Tree Company Photo[edit]

I have added a photograph of a Davey truck to the article on the Davey Tree Expert Compan article. I placed it above your photo of the company headquarters with the fountain. This may give my photo more prominence but I felt since there was already a photo of the HQ building in the infobox it would be better to put my photo where I put it, but if you object, then move it. I would suggest, however, that the article doesn not need two pictures of the HQ building and the more interesting picture with the water fountain should be moved to the infobox. Dwight Burdette (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

To be totally honest, the article is so small right now, it barely merits either of the two. I put them there months ago just to give it some kind of visual aid. The area at the top of the infobox is really for the logo, which I went ahead and added, taking out the picture that was there. I have no problem with the truck photo, though was wondering if you had one that showed one more from the front. The current photo is nice, but emphasizes the machinery on the back with the truck in the background. In any case, what the article needs now is some actual content. Thanks for your contributions! --JonRidinger (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I took the truck picture from within my car while on the way to photograph pictures for a different Wiki article. I will keep my eye open for a better photo. Dwight Burdette (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
OK sounds good! --JonRidinger (talk) 00:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate License[edit]

You removed what you said was a 'redundant license' from my photograph of the Davey Tree truck. I'm quite certain that I've been threatened with image removal when I have not had both a 'license' and 'permisssion' value. As I understand it, a 'license' refers to the justification for being able to use or upload an image while a 'permission' refers to being able to re-use an image outsise of Wikimedia Commons. Although they may normally be the same, on Wikipedia at least, one can upload use an image on a fair-use basis, but not be able to re-use the image elsewhere. If this is not the case, then it makes no sense that the Wikimedia Commons upload form has separate 'License' and 'Permission' fields. Do you have a different understanding? Dwight Burdette (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I've uploaded over 200 PD image files on the Commons and pretty much all of them simply have the permission field only. Some of them have gone through the Featured Article process, so I know they've been looked over and scrutinized and none have come back and said they need to have both permission and license filled out. If you leave "permission" blank in an upload, it will simply say "See below" and refer to the license. If you leave both permission and license blank during an upload, you'll get a warning, but not when you leave license blank but have a permission. The license you choose is the level of permission you allow it to be used, so having templates in both license and permission that say the same thing is redundant. I'm not even quite sure why both are available, but they are and only one needs to be used, not both. The difference is that the "License" section has a drop-down selection menu while the "Permission" section is part of a template and you actually have to input a license template manually. "Permission" is also only available on Public Domain images. --JonRidinger (talk) 02:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Dear JonRidinger,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.


Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

File:Jacobs Field logo 2.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jacobs Field logo 2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Magog the Ogre, I put an undeletion request because I'm not seeing how these logos are copyrightable, hence why I uploaded them here to begin with instead of Wikipedia. My understanding for logos has always been that any logo with just text and shapes doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Both Jacobs Field logos I uploaded do not include any original artwork; only the text and the shapes of a diamond, home plate, and the banner. The other logo File:Jacobs Field logo.png just has the added representation of the light towers, which is just rectangles and stars. Again, had there been some question in my mind, I would've uploaded them at Wikipedia, but I still don't see what part of them is protected by copyright that prevents them from being uploaded here like other similar logos. --JonRidinger (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
No problem; that is well within your right. I wasn't trying to template the regular, so to speak, but just performing my normal maintenance. Apologies about the cold warning. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Still can't say I'm convinced it's even copyrighted, but so goes consensus. In the long run, I guess it's not really needed on the article since the subject isn't the logo but the stadium (so I didn't try and upload it on Wikipedia). Oh well. Thanks! --JonRidinger (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Solomiya Krushelnytska statue Ternopil.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Solomiya Krushelnytska statue Ternopil.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Микола Василечко (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)