User talk:Jon Harald Søby/Archive/5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
◄◄ User talk:Jon Harald Søby ►►
Archives: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6



User:Jon Harald Søby/Kartlisens[edit]

Hi. Just want to inform you that I've requested that a bot subst all uses of the above template since personalised license/creator templates should always be substed. /Lokal_Profil 20:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth would be the point of that? The only thing you'll accomplish is makig it 400 times harder to localise these pages' description (e.g. translate). Please don't. Jon Harald Søby 05:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The reason is that personalised licenses are discouraged and after the last discussion on the village pump it was decided that if used they should be substed. The reason for this is that it otherwise becomes impossible to trace any change in licenses etc.. Another reason, the reason why I noticed in the first place, is that one cannot make any sensible edits/changes to the image pages. For instance the map of Lund linked (and was placed in the category of) the swedish municipality Lund, and only by substing the template was it possible to correct this.
If one want's to ad on a translation at a later point it's not that hard to do that using a bot. If you wish to keep track of the images for personal reasons then I'd recomend adding a personalised category to the images (via the template before it's substed). /Lokal_Profil 10:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't intended as a personal template, it is intended as a practical way of unifying the pages for these maps. I will never change the license (AFAIK, I'm not entitled to when I've already released it to the public domain), so that's not an issue. I made some changes to the Lund page, so that is is correct now. I believe that is the only case where this would occur ever. If there are more places, I can change the code so that it is easy to customize. Jon Harald Søby 17:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is twofolded. Firstly even though I trust that you won't change you're license (and I know you can't legaly) if you (or anyone else) changes it in the template then it automatically changes on all the images without it being noticed in the image history. it's for this reason that the decission was taken to always subst personal license templates.
The second less critical problem is that it simply makes any edit to the image pages a lot harder for the less wiki savvy. /Lokal_Profil 23:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Found the Village Pump discussion Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2007Jan#Personal_license_templates /Lokal_Profil 10:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, the solution with double templates seems to slove both problems. Do you mind if User:Jon Harald Søby/Kartlisens (but not User:Jon Harald Søby/Kartbeskrivelse) is substed? /Lokal_Profil 22:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, that's the intention. Jon Harald Søby 19:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and apparently that substing did not happen. There's a problem with categorisation here as well, I've manually substed some Norwegian municipalities where the proper category name was Rana, Norway instead of Rana and such, but still all munic. are stuck in Category:maps of FYLKE along with Elisabethtds .png locatormaps. That leaves categories like Maps of Nordland overcrowded and not very helpful for practical purposes, even after I moved the png maps to Category:PNG Locator maps of municipalities in Nordland using cat-a-lot. Could you consider editing User:Jon Harald Søby/Kartlisens so that these locatormap go into a separate subcat? Finn Rindahl 21:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon Harald, I see you updated the Swedish language shading the Sami-speaking areas of Lapland as well as the Swedish-speaking parts of Finland. That's better than the previous map, but there remain some points about this map: First of all, Aland is unilingually Swedish, so there's no need to mark it in shaded coulours. On the other hand, what about the Finnish-speaking areas in Tornedalen? I don't know if Meänkieli has an official status there, but de facto those areas are certainly not unilingually Swedish. And marking a dot near Tampere in central Finland seems quite incorrect, since that area is nowhere near Swedish-speaking. Best regards, --BishkekRocks 19:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Along the River 7-119-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Along the River 7-119-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 08:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS-fråga[edit]

Hej, Jon Harald. Jag har förstått att du har tillgång till OTRS. Enligt beskrivningen av bilden Image:Bianca Press Pic.jpg har ett tillstånd skickats in men det finns ingen uppgift om OTRS-nummer. Finns det ett sådant? Thuresson 22:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, jeg blander meg inn her, håper det går bra.
Tillatelsen for dette bildet er problematisk. Det er OTRS Ticket#: 2007033010018121 som Image:Bianca Press Pic.jpg refererer til, men den nevner ikke noen lisens. Det er kun User:RadioKirk som sier at «Licensing will be the same as for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BR_Studio.jpg». Image:BR_Studio.jpg viser til OTRS Ticket#: 2006112510014228, der RadioKirk ber om et bilde der foreldrene til Bianca er «willing to release all rights worldwide». Jeanette Ryan sender da en e-post med bilder til RadioKirk der hun sier «Hi Kirk, Hope these will do».
Jeg minnes at jeg så disse e-postene i systemet før de ble besvart, men at jeg bestemte meg for å la noen andre ta problemet. Jeg vet ikke helt hva vi bør gjøre med bildene. --Kjetil r 23:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nauru_Capelle_&_Partner.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 17:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Valgerd Svarstad Haugland.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ALE! ¿…? 10:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I untagged the image but is there a OTRS ticket available? Maybe that number should be added to the template. --ALE! ¿…? 10:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why do we need a OTRS ticket? The source says quite clearly that they use CC-BY 2.5. --Kjetil r 19:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon Harald, since you are the uploader of this high-res image of Nauru, may I ask you if the same source has an image of similar quality of neighboring Banaba Island? I haven't figured out how to navigate or search the source http://www.amr.gov very well.--Ratzer1 19:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autres versions[edit]

Hi,

Funny, I didn't realize that other people created other versions templates (apart me). That's a good news since it can be considered as a proof of success, but now we have to deal with two close but different standards (Template:Other_versions/Easter_Island_map and Template:Other versions/Homer world map).

Your arguments are good sense but in fact, I always thought that above, below, left or right, the little plus/minus was a mistake... not flashy enough. Perhaps should we consider a more significative way to notify the user that other versions are centralized in a subtemplate? Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 19:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to say that using +/- is best because it is most neutral, language-wise. But then I did a test, and it turns out that {{int:...}} is turned on here (perhaps even universally). That means that when I write {{int:Edit}}, it will show up as Rediger for me, Modifier for you, and سمادول for a Pashto user. That will be a lot more visible, and probably very familiar to users as well (much more so than +/-). About placement, I think that it then might be best to have it above the gallery, to the right, just like the edit button for sections. I'll make an example on Template:Other versions/Märket plain. Jon Harald Søby 20:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good for me. I guess we should finally create a template (Template:Edit other versions?) to wrap the wikicode on. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking Template:Other versions could work for that, as it's not being used for anything else. Jon Harald Søby 12:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, as we use Template:Other versions/... as basename, I find a bit confusing to use it also as a true template. Furthermore if we just create a template for the “edit” link, it seems natural to me to use “edit” in the template name. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 17:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, good point. I’ve created Template:Edit other versions now, and am in the process of inserting it to all the Other versions templates. Jon Harald Søby 20:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. OV templates are now ready to colonize Commons :) Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Www.wikipedia.org screenshot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 06:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Highlands of Scotland.svg[edit]

Hi, I found the image of a supposed flag of the Scottish Highlands you uploaded ... it's very nice but it seems it's out of use ... Can you provide some information abut its real use?. Regards. --CavallBernat 17:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check the upload history, I didn't upload it. Someone else did, based on another flag I made. Jon Harald Søby 12:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Coat of arms of Mexico.svg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Coat of arms of Mexico.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 18:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AndresBonifacio.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jodo 19:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ask the original uploader. I'm just the messenger. Jon Harald Søby 20:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fast question from Photo Editor for textbook publisher in Washington, DC; immediate response needed[edit]

June 25, 2008

Dear Jon,

Please forward your email address and reply asap/immediately to Hollmarsh1@aol.com.

I found your photo at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Flag_of_Nigeria.svg#filehistory while doing photo research for a textbook publisher on a project. I thought your image might be appropriate for inclusion in a literature curriculum.

I am specifically seeking to confirm that you are the artist/creator of the image and the copyright holder and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of work. Please confirm this and confirm that you have released the work into the public domain.

I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. We are in a hurry to confirm the images that will be used.

Thank you,

Holly Marshall Photo Researcher for Pearson Digital Learning Group Washington, D.C.

Email: Hollmarsh1@aol.com


Image deletion warning Image:YouTube_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

-Nard the Bard 23:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:The_Phantom,_Australian_Woman's_Mirror_5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Teofilo (talk) 12:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]