J'ai enleve a nouveau les 2 category que tu avais remises a Versailles. Initialement, je ne m'etais pas apercu que tu les avais remises. En fait, ces categories existent au niveau de la "categorie:Versailles". Les mettre dans l'article revient a creer une redondace. J'ai fait pas mal de "rangement" des images francaises, et j'ai applique cette regle systematiquement. C'est la regle egalement appliquee dans le Wikipedia anglais, et j'ai essaye autant que possible d'avoir un systeme de categorisation qui soit parallele a celui de Wikipedia, ce qui devra faciliter la creation de liens entre Commons et Wikipedia. A defaut de cela, il est difficile d'harmoniser le classement des images, et on les trouve dans des categories tres disparates. Olivier2 11:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Veneto-Stemma.png
|This media was probably deleted.|
|A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Veneto-Stemma.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
If you created the content yourself, enter
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.
|File:Orvieto Dome Bronze door by E. Greco 1970.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.