User talk:Jtcurses

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jtcurses!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Jtcurses!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Categoria amb el nom incorrecte[edit]

He vist que has creat la categoria Category:Train stations in Vallés Occidental i és incorrecte. Hauria de ser amb accent obert, així: Category:Train stations in Vallès Occidental. Un altre cop fixa-t'hi més, he demanat que la reanomenin. --Catalaalatac (talk) 23:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011[edit]

Hola Jtcurses, he visto que has marcado las imágenes

con la plantilla {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|es}}, pero no has indicado el identificador del monumento. ¿Puedes añadir la plantilla {{BIC}} con el identificador? Muchas gracias. Platonides (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

No he sabido encontrar el código identificador, así que las he borrado. Lo siento. Gracias y un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
¿File:Ourense_12_30-07-2008.jpg es el gl:Ponte Maior de Ourense? En ese caso según http://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_de_monumentos_da_provincia_de_Ourense el identificador sería RI-51-0001283
La iglesia de Sta. María de Gallecs debería aparecer en http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llista_de_monuments_del_Vall%C3%A8s_Oriental, es extraño.
Finalmente, de Valpuesta sólo encuentro la Iglesia Parroquial de Valpuesta, que no sé si es File:Valpuesta_03_15-07-2008.jpg o no.
Platonides (talk) 20:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
La Iglesia Parroquial de Valpuesta, ya lo había visto y no es File:Valpuesta_03_15-07-2008.jpg, es File:Valpuesta 01 15-07-2008.jpg y File:Valpuesta 02 15-07-2008.jpg, que ya están incluidos y con el código. Respecto a los otros, yo había mirado la lista de códigos sólo en la Wikipedia en español, creyendo que listaría todos los de España. Gracias por tu ayuda, perdona las molestias y un saludo. --JT Curses (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
En teoría deberían estar todos, en la práctica hay varias listas y no todas tienen los mismos datos. Platonides (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Jtcurses,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Your Flickr uploads[edit]

Hello Jtcurses!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

  • Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
  • You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the whole procedure much easier and faster for you!

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


File:114008 - Madrid Chamartin - 01 - Ferro435.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:114008 - Madrid Chamartin - 01 - Ferro435.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


File:114008 - Madrid Chamartin - 02 - Ferro435.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:114008 - Madrid Chamartin - 02 - Ferro435.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


File:114009 - 130 - Valladolid Campo Grande - Ferro435.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:114009 - 130 - Valladolid Campo Grande - Ferro435.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:335.031 Granollers-Centre eldelinux.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Talgo I gente.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Talgo I gente.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

HrAd (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Estacion Puerto de Sta Maria - djpezcaito.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Estacion Puerto de Sta Maria - djpezcaito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Morning (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

RE:Category:Train station of Llansá[edit]

Buenas. Agradezco el aviso y que hayas creado la categoría con su nombre en catalán, pero no es necesario que me notifiques el borrado ya me doy por enterado por mi lista de siguimiento. Un saludo Bernard (talk) 00:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

re: File:Vías de tren Fuencarral-Chamartín.jpg[edit]

Ok, no vi que estuvieran contenidas. Gracias por el aviso. --Kadellar (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token f48f4c1656f88b310e9911a9aa5bd34c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality images of rolling stock[edit]

You might want to check Category:Quality images of the United Kingdom for these - I categorised all my QIs by county, and probably 60% are of trains. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

You really shouldn't copy from Category:Mattbuck's Quality Images - that category has custom sortkeys which you'll have to remove. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
My bad, that was High Contrast. Looks like he saved you a job. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Gràcies/Thank you[edit]

Viquimarató 35 hores a la Fundació Miró (abril 2013) / 35-hour edit-a-thon at Miró Foundation (April 2013)
Viquimarató 35 hores a la Fundació Miró (abril 2013)
35-hour edit-a-thon at Miró Foundation (April 2013)

Hola, gràcies a la teva firma donant suport a la nostra associació. El passat dia 5 de juny Amical Wikimedia (Associació Amical Viquipèdia) va ser reconeguda pel Consell d'Administració de la Fundació Wikimedia com a Organització Temàtica. Pots veure el comunicat de l'associació en català aquí o el comunicat de la WMF en anglès aquí. Per a la nostra associació és una fita molt important, portàvem 5 anys demanant ésser un organisme oficial. Nosaltres continuarem la nostra tasca de promoció al carrer i a les institucions de la Viquipèdia i els seus projectes germans arreu dels territoris de parla catalana.

Hello, thanks for your signature giving support to our association. Last 5th of June Amical Wikimedia (Associació Amical Viquipèdia) was recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees as a Thematic Organization. You can read the news bulletin of our association in Catalan here or the WMF's bulletin in English here. For our association, this is a very important achievement: we have been pursuing the official recognition for the last 5 years. We are going to continue the task of promoting Wikipedia and its sister projects all around the Catalan-speaking regions.

Moltes gràcies, Thank you --Davidpar (disc.) 15:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Stations of Barcelona Metro[edit]

Veig que a "Category:Stations of Barcelona Metro in Santa Coloma de Gramenet" has suprimit la categoria "Train stations in Barcelonès" que jo vaig afegir en el seu dia. De forma similar a "Stations of Barcelona Metro" has suprimit "Train stations in the province of Barcelona", etc. Potser per que consideres que una estació de metro no és una estació de tren? Crec que ja estava bé, ja que a commons veuràs ‎"Rapid transit stations" és una subcategoria de "Train stations by type".--Jordiferrer (talk) 08:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

  • D'acord, esperem a que s'aclareixi una mica l'assumpte.Jordiferrer (talk) 18:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Photos from my flickr stream[edit]

Thanks for letting me know you copied this across. At some point in the next few months I'll get up to that stage where I need to rename it to fit in with my naming scheme. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Locomotive_connecting_rods[edit]

Andy Dingley (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Merci[edit]

Hola, hello et merci pour le lien envoyé par e-mail. Cordialement, --Floflo (talk) 14:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Tània Sàrrias[edit]

Formula TV d'acord, però Facebook no és una font fiable. A més, molt oficial no serà la pàgina quan només té 200 seguidors! Gràcies per l'enllaç. Salut! --Judesba (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jtcurses,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Peatge novullpagar.jpg[edit]

Perdona, estava revisant els canvis a la llista de seguiment i m'ha passat per alt que una categoria ja estava inclosa en l'altra. Gràcies per l'avís! --Judesba (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:2012 in rail transport in Catalonia[edit]

En aquest cas em va semblar de treure la categoria " Category:2012 in rail transport in Catalonia" ja que la foto tant podria ser del 2012 com del 2011 o 2010. En general, tendeixo a usar categories d'aquest tipus nomès quan es tracta d'un event o fet realment relacionat amb l'any en questió. Per exemple, aplicaria " Category:2012 in rail transport in Catalonia" a una estació inaugurada el 2012, o un tren fabricat el 2012, o una conferencia celebrada el 2012. En canvi, si simplement es tracta d'una foto del 2012, no és tant relevant. Tu mateix, si la vols tornar a posar, fes el que creguis.--Jordiferrer (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:2010s train stations built in Spain[edit]

Hola. No entiendo por qué has creado esta categoría. En inglés suena un poco raro y no sigue la estructura de categorías superiores. Saludos, tyk (talk) 21:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, gracias. Creo que la cat "2010s train stations in Spain" se podría incluir en la de rail transport directamente. tyk (talk) 21:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Re:File:Ord BidAsua2.jpg[edit]

A mi me suena muy raro que estuveise en Barakaldo y más al tener como título lo de "Asua" lo que me encajaría mas que estuviese en Lutxana-Erandio pero lo de Erandio también es raro porque ahí no tendría salida a la red general pero es sitio muy común para hacer pruebas al estar la linea cerrada y al ser la primera unidad es lógico que estuviese haciendo pruebas ahí. Por otra parte a mi no me consta que en Barakaldo haya cocheras de ningún tipo y menos recientemente ya que esa locomotora data del 2009. En Barakaldo se pueden apartar trenes de vía métrica en Lutxana y Burtzeña, de hecho se hace constantemente, pero cocheras no me suena que haya. Por último todas las referencias que he encontrado de esa locomotora es que las pruebas se hicieron en Erandio: [1] [2] [3]. Un saludo. --Bizkaino (talk) 20:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Cambio de nombre[edit]

Hola, Jtcurses. He rechazado esta petición de cambio de nombre porque en principio no se deben pedir cambios de nombre sólo para corregir mayúsculas y minúsculas, como dice aquí (Files should not be renamed only because the filename is not (...) correctly capitalized). ¡Un saludo! Strakhov (talk) 01:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Ah, sí. Bueno, en ese caso supongo que puedes limitarte a pedir... retirar los dos puntos. La idea de esto es básicamente no realizar cambios en el nombre que puede que al "uploadeador" original no le hagan gracia porque le gustaba más su título de archivo (hay gente especialita por el mundo...). En principio puso minúsculas, pues mejor dejarlo así. Si hubiera que cambiar el nombre de arriba a abajo porque está tó mal... pues ok, entonces aprovechar para dejarlo con ortografía exquisita. Esa es mi interpretación al menos de las normas... Lo mismo me equivoco... Saludos, Strakhov (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Linares de Mora[edit]

Hola. Veo que has metido un carro de fotos de Linares de Mora en 2015 en Huesca, o algo así. Pero resulta que Linares de Mora está en Teruel. Pensaba apañarlo yo mismo, pero se ve que mi Cat-a-lot no rula correctamente, bueno, de hecho ni me sale en la pantalla. Si puedes hacerlo tú mismo, gracias.

B25es (talk) 14:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Vigo estacion del ferrocarril - farrangallo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vigo estacion del ferrocarril - farrangallo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 10:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikiproyecto para poner orden entre los monuments españoles en Commons[edit]

¡Hola! como te veo de forma regular en mi lista de seguimiento editando las categorías de imágenes que he subido, y viendo que están muy suelto en este tema, vengo para comentarte una iniciativa en la que estamos trabajando desde un Wikiproyecto y que puede que sea de tu interés.

Este año se han subido 10.000 imágenes de España en el marco de Wiki Loves Monuments y hemos revisado, por primera vez de forma exhaustiva, cada una de ellas, dándole una categoría específica o, en muchos casos, creándola, si no existía. Esto también está garantizado para futuras ediciones gracias a los anexos en Wikipedia que (desde hace unos meses) siempre contienen una categoría por defecto a nivel provincial, cuando no más exacta. Todos los monumentos contienen también el identificador del monumento, incluido también en los anexos de monumentos en Wikipedia, que sirven para subir las imágenes. Vamos, que en mi opinión se están haciendo las cosas con más cabeza en lugar de subir miles de imágenes y esperar que sea la comunidad de Commons solita la que se encarge del meollo. La tarea en la que estamos inmersos ahora mismo, y que nos llevará un tiempo finalizar, es organizar lo que se ha venido subiendo en WLM, o al margen de él, hasta el día de hoy. Para este propósito hemos iniciado el Wikiproyecto Wiki Loves Monuments, que quizás sea de tu interés, y al que te invito a participar sin compromiso y claro, siempre y cuando tengas algún rato para ello. Este wikiproyecto requiere mucho trabajo de mantenimiento, sobre todo aquí en Commons (en las listas de tareas verás lo que se está haciendo y lo que falta por hacer). Para coordinar la caza de las fotos de municipios inéditos también hay otro Wikiproyecto activo (este busca fotos, que, desde el 1 de octubre aterrizan aquí, no hay tareas de mantenimiento definidas). Una de las actividades concretas en Commons para organizar los monumentos que se está desarrollando ahora mismo es dejar todas estas categorías a cero, llevando las fotos de monumentos a una categoría propia (si no existe, se crea, con su BIC y coordenadas). ¿Te interesa? ¿nos echas una mano?. ¡Un saludo! Poco2 13:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Plantillas de navegación[edit]

Hola. Si vas a poner plantillas de navegación a las categorías de provincias de España, no sería mejor retirar la plantilla de la comunidad autónoma? Dos plantillas con los mismos enlaces no queda muy bien. Saludos, tyk (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Te respondo aquí para que no se confundan las conversaciones. Entiendo tu razonamiento pero no lo comparto y no quiero polemizar por lo que propongo que nos pongamos de acuerdo en algunos puntos básicos. He realizado algunos cambios en las plantillas para que sean un poco más discretas. No me opongo a que se introduzcan las plantillas de las provincias y se quiten las de las comunidades autónomas. Mi única petición es que sólo haya una plantilla por categoría (en los casos de comunidades uniprovinciales debe figurar la categoría de CCAA por ser una categoría superior) y que los mapas sólo figuren en la categoría general, en la cual ya existe una box para la bandera, el escudo y el mapa.
Por último, la plantilla de idiomas más discreta es la que se ve en la siguiente página. Creo que así es como las categorías quedan más útiles y legibles para todos Category:Province_of_Seville. Saludos, tyk (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
tyk. No se distingue ni el título, por lo que cuesta mucho saber de que va la plantilla de enlaces y su utilidad deja mucho que desear respecto a lo que se veia antes de un sólo vistazo. A veces pequeños detalles marcan la diferencia.--JT Curses (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
El comentario anterior es referente a las modificaciones en las plantilla, pero, de todas formas, me da igual, no voy a insistir sobre este tema. Tampoco estoy de acuerdo con lo de las plantillas en comunidades uniprovinciales, pero lo mismo. Respecto a lo de los mapas, tampoco estoy de acuerdo y, en este caso, si insisto en que si se trata de categorías de ámbito territorial, el mapa de localización no sobra.--JT Curses (talk) 18:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Gracias por tu respuesta. Como ambos hacemos mucho trabajo de categorización es importante que nos pongamos de acuerdo para que todas la categorías queden iguales. A mi me preocupa más el mapa que la doble plantilla en las comunidades uniprovinciales, ya que el mapa ocupa más espacio. Si aceptas que no se incluya el mapa, yo acepto la doble plantilla en las CCAA uniprovinciales. Qué te parece? Si nos ponemos de acuerdo en esto en unos pocos días podemos unificar todas las categorías provinciales y autonómicas y podremos avanzar creando las que faltan. Saludos, tyk (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Lo siento, pero no acabo de comprender que el mapa cause un problema de espacio, porque se encaja perfectamente con los textos de introducción, cuando finalmente se completan y se van añadiendo idiomas. Creo que das importancia a criterios de maquetación, estilo o estética, y es lógico y legitimo, pero creo que deberías tratar de considerar si, en ocasiones, esto afecta a la información y a la comprensión de la información, sobre todo por aquellos que no están familiarizados con Wikimedia Commons. Hay que recordar que esto es un proyecto colaborativo abierto a "todos", no sólo a los que colaboramos habitualmente, y que, en este caso concreto, incluso los "habituales" o "familiarizados" no tienen porque tener conocimientos de zonas geográficas de todo el mundo. Yo agradezco mucho tu disposición, tanto a colaborar, como a debatir y llegar a puntos de encuentro, pero en este caso no veo la posibilidad de llegar a un acuerdo, por lo que si quieres plantear un debate más amplio en el café, no hay ningún problema.--JT Curses (talk) 15:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Ok, yo ahora mismo no me apetece meterme en discusiones en el cafe. Igual más adelante. Saludos, tyk (talk) 20:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Categories a Catalunya[edit]

Hola. Veig que has entrat "a saco" dins les categories de Catalunya a Commons, traient i posant-les segons el teu superior i encertat criteri sense tenir en compte els dels anteriors editors. Vaig revertir algunes de les teves edicions per a què veiessis que no hi estava d'acord i tu, sense cap mirament ni intentar comentar el tema amb mi, ho vas tornar a editar. No vull entrar en una "guerra d'edicions" que no porta enlloc. Per això prenc jo la iniciativa.

Mira, Jtcurses: Una dels primers consells que vaig rebre d'en Pere (la solvència del qual suposo no posaràs en dubte) va ser de : "compte en treure categories". Te'l transmeto. Estarem d'acord en què les categories serveixen per localitzar i accedir als fitxers amb major facilitat, no per fer "encajes de bolillos" (que també se'n poden fer). T'hauràs adonat que, en general, a Catalunya les categories segueixen l'ordre: municipi - comarca - Catalunya, obviant la província. Almenys fins ara. Dit això:

  • La categoria "Cultural heritage..." és molt rellevant a Commons. Probablement més de la meitat de fotos porten aquesta etiqueta. Per això la penjo directament i en primer lloc al municipi i a la comarca sense passar per "Culture of.." Així és, des de fa uns anys, respecte als monuments de Catalunya, Aragó, Illes i País Valencià. Cap editor ho ha rectificat (em penso, no faig llistes de seguiment). Tu ets el primer. Cal que rectifiquis, en això sóc bel·ligerant.
  • El mateix es pot dir de "Buildings in ...". També és molt rellevant i no cal que passi per "Architecture of...". Prego que ho rectifiquis.
  • Respecte a les províncies, fes el que vulguis, però no trenquis l'estructura municipi - comarca - Catalunya utilitzant la província com pas intermedi entre comarca i Catalunya.

Per cert: Ni "Empordà" ni "Penedès" són comarques (almenys oficialment) de Catalunya.--Isidre blanc (talk) 07:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Hola Jtcourses. Creo que Isidre tiene razón en cuanto al encaje de bolillos. Se están introduciendo demasiadas plantillas y mapas de localización que no aportan nada. De verdad hace falta un mapa de la provincia o comunidad autónoma para cada subcatergoría? Las categorías de otros estados no los tienen y cuando hay plantillas de navegación éstas son más discretas.
Yo creo que se deberían quitar todos los mapas. Si acaso dejarlos sólo para la categoría principal de la provincia o CCAA.
Plantillas de navegación debería haber como máximo una por categoría (esto no queda nada bien con dos plantillas: Category:Buildings in the Community of Madrid). Las provincias deberían agruparse por CCAA. De esta manera quedería una plantilla discreta con unos pocos enlaces en lugar de 50, que se leen con dificultad. Saludos, tyk (talk) 09:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
D'acord amb en Isidre blanc tot i que entenc que les existents no són les úniques estructures possibles i que si se'n vol fer d'altres l'ideal és compatibilitzar-les totes. Aleshores, si hi ha un tema categoritzat per comarca i el vols categoritzar per província, es pot fer una subcategoria per comarques i una per províncies (exemple: category:Potatoes in Catalonia by comarca i category:Potatoes in Catalonia by province) i així funcionen els dos esquemes el millor possible.
A més, compte que estàs fent categories incorrectes, perquè estàs posant comarques senceres en províncies on no hi ha tots els municipis de la comarca (l'Osona, per exemple), de manera que alguns municipis els envies a la província equivocada. Per això val més no categoritzar per províncies.
Sobre les plantilles de navegació, d'acord amb en tyk que dues plantilles són moltes i es mengen l'espai. Ara bé, una possibilitat és posar les plantilles col·lapsades, tot i que no estic segur de si és més útil tenir en el mateix espai dues plantilles col·lapsades o una sola de desplegada.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Traslado el comentari fet per Jtcurses en en la meva pàgina de discussió (per tal de mantenir el fil de la discussió). --Isidre blanc (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

No segueixo totes les pàgines que he editat, perquè la llista de seguiment seria tan gran que no serviria per res. Les categories que he organitzat o creat, segueixen el model de les jerarquies superiors. No entenc perquè Catalunya, Aragó, Balears i País Valencià han de ser una excepció en la jerarquia de categories, així que agrairia una explicació més raonada dels motius que el simple fet que ningú hagi modificat res des de fa un temps, perquè això es dóna en un milió d'àmbits de la jerarquia.
Jo ne he creat cap categoria "Penedès", ni "Empordà".
L'estructura comarca-Catalunya segueix en peu a través de "Category: Comarques of Catalonia" i la intenció és que hi hagi el mateix esquema per a totes les subcategoria.--JT Curses (talk) 17:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

També segueixo aquí per no escampar fils, tot i que ja ho estan. D'acord amb tu que no cal crear categories per províncies. Ara bé, en el cas que es creïn, no s'haurien d'endreçar igual que les altres divisions en categories per província.

I les categories geogràfiques no s'haurien d'incloure dintre d'altres categories si les divisions no hi estan totalment incloses. Si una comarca té municipis en diferents províncies (pocs o molts) no s'hauria d'incloure dins de cap província sinó que a la província s'hi inclouen els municipis individualment. Si no, passa que les categories de províncies no serveixen de gaire perquè contenen coses que són a la província i coses que no.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Sobre comarques que no coincideixen geogràficament amb una sola província, jo només sé el cas d'Osona i Berguedà. Si sabeu d'algun cas més, us ho agrairia. Aniré rectificant aquests casos.--JT Curses (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Així de memòria, com a mínim Cerdanya, Berguedà, Osona i la Selva.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Jtcurses: Reconec que m'ha deixat intrigat això de "model de les jerarquies superiors" que tu dius seguir quan edites o crees categories. És la primera vegada que en sento a parlar i no he sigut capaç de trobar-ne cap referència enlloc. He navegat per les categories de la resta de comunitats d'Espanya per veure si en trobava algun indici. No l'he trobat. Al contrari: he pogut constatar que el conjunt de categories a Catalunya són molt més homogènies que allà. He vist per exemple, "Cultural heritage monuments in .." penjant de "Culture of..", "Architecture of ...", "Buildings in...", normalment indistintament però moltes vegades de dos en dos i inclús dels tres a l'hora. En la meva ignorància he arribat a la conclusió que "model de les jerarquies superiors" és una frase que sona bé però que t'has tret de la màniga.
No pretenc cap excepció en les categories de Catalunya, Aragó, Illes i País Valencià. Tan sols afirmo que l'estructura actual ja fa temps que es manté, i que això significa que té un cert consens i acceptació per part dels editors. Tampoc pretenc que sigui una "explicació raonada" de cap cosa. Entre altres raons perquè si algú ha de donar una "explicació raonada" ets tu que modifiques el que funciona.
No entenc per quina regla de tres tu pots modificar o eliminar tranquil·lament categories creades per altres editors i jo no pugui fer-ho amb les teves edicions. Em pots dir què tens tu d'especial que no tinguem els demès?.
A tall purament anecdòtic: sé que tu no vas crear les categories "Empordà" i "Penedès". Però sí que les vas editar com si fossin comarques de Catalunya.
En definitiva: crea les categories que et doni la gana, organitza-les com et sembli, complica-ho i embolica la troca tant com vulguis però no toquis l'estructura actual que, probablement per la seva simplicitat, sembla funcionar prou bé.--Isidre blanc (talk) 15:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Cultural heritage monuments penja de Category:Cultural heritage, que al seu torn penja de Category:Culture. Category:Buildings penja de Category:Structures, que al seu torn penja de Category:Architecture.--JT Curses (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Jtcurses: No sé què pretens dir-me amb el pràgraf anterior. Potser no em vaig explicar prou be quan vaig afirmar que les categories a Catalunya són molt més homogènies que a la resta d'Espanya posant l'exemple de "Cultural heritage monuments in...". Seré més concret: relacionaré algunes de les categories (sense ser exhaustiu) en les que tu has fet edicions recentment. Observa les categories i mira'n l'historial;

Com pots pretendre aplicar a Catalunya uns criteris que no has sigut capaç d'aplicar a altres Comunitats? Allà on has passat no has deixat les coses a mig fer? Quan et posis a retocar categories, toca-les totes o no en toquis cap. Altrament en aquestes contrades en diem posar pedaços. I un home apedaçat dóna una mala imatge de deixadesa.--Isidre blanc (talk) 09:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Només vaig incloure Category:Cultural heritage monuments in the province of Palencia a Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Spain by province, perquè li correspon, i encara no hi ha una categoría Category:Cultura of the province of Palencia, i és per això per lo que segueix a la categoría principal, però ja n'estic fart de donar explicacions, que no sembla que tinguis cap intenció d'escoltar.
Mira, si no tens els coneixements mínims i bàsics sobre les categories, com que la jerarquia principal serveix de model per a tota la jerarquia i que no es poden incloure una categoria o arxiu alhora en un categoria i en un subcategoria d'aquesta (encara que sigui sota diversos nivells), perquè és una inclusió reiterativa, hauries, si vols, d'informar-te una mica, perquè no només no has aportat cap argument coherent, sinó que t'has dedicat a recopilar el que tu creus o interpretes com fallades per construir un relat de desqualificació personal cap a mi, en base als meves "suposades" o "reals" incapacitats, arribant, fins i tot, a desqualificar-me directament ("I un home apedaçat dóna una mala imatge de deixadesa"). No m'importa absolutament res la imatge que tinguis o vulguis projectar de mi i no tinc cap pretensió d'arribar a la perfecció. És clar que hi ha categories més ordenades i altres més caòtiques, d'això es tracta, de posar ordre en elles i es fa a mesura que es pot. Les coses no es fan en un dia i, per molt que ho intentis, no marcaràs meu ritme de fer les coses i qualsevol pretensió que augmenti la meva "producció" a Wikimedia Commons, em sembla que t'has equivocat de lloc, Commons és un lloc col·laboratiu i cada un col·labora el que pot i/o vol. Fins que no es completi, hi haurà incongruències (i en sorgiran de noves), com no podia ser d'altra manera, igual que m'equivocaré i tindré errors. Em sembla perfecte que et sigui més còmode que les coses es quedin com estan, però Wikimedia no funciona així i no és argument perquè no es pugui millorar i, a més, està clar que no tens ni idea la magnitud del treball d'ordenar les categories. Finalment, tu qui et creus que ets per jutjar, dir-me com he de fer les coses, obligar-me a triar entre opcions i posar-me condicions ?. Aprèn, si vols, a col·laborar fins i tot amb aquells que fan les coses diferents a com les fas tu i, si no, com a mínim, respecta el que fan els altres, si es fa amb els criteris de Wikimedia, encara que no coincideixin amb els teus, preocupa't del que tu fas i no cal parlar del que no saps, com si això fos un debat de tertulians a la tele.--JT Curses (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:People by name[edit]

Hi Jtcurses,

why did you remove category:people by name from Miguel Pérez Cuesta? Best regards --Yoursmile (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Miguel Pérez Cuesta is a subcategory of Category:People of Asturias by name, subcategory of Category:People of Spain by name, subcategory of Category:People by name by country, subcategory of Category:People categories by name, subcategory of Category:People by name. Therefore, Category:Miguel Pérez Cuesta is a subcategory of Category:People by name and add the two, it would be reiterative.--JT Curses (talk) 19:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

In this case it is a very bad Idea to delete the Category:People by name as in many cases I only know the name for shure and I need the possibility to search a person primarily by name, as I oftend don't know the country, the birth date and so on. --Kersti (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I do not know if it's a good or bad idea, just know that the Commons rules say you can not to include an item in a superior when it is already included in a subcategory of this, because it is reiterative. I saw that this issue has been discussed, but I have not found if a firm decision to an exception in this case.--JT Curses (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

There have been some discussions of this topic. Category talk:People by name, Commons_talk:Categories/Archive_3#Flat_categories, Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/12/Some of categories "by alphabet" - there the people seem to think that this is a nessesary exception of the genreal rule. --Kersti (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I do not enter into the discussion, but the fact is that the categories are created and, failing agreement in a discussion that I do not participate, I stick to the rules of commons.--JT Curses (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry but most rules in Commons are not written rules and to stick to written rules doesn't work here. --Kersti (talk) 13:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

As I said I'm not going to participate in a sterile debate, but I returned to include all categories of Category:People of Spain by name and Category:People of Asturias by name in Category:People by name.--JT Curses (talk) 00:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Basque_and_Galician_regional_elections,_2016[edit]

. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Metacategories[edit]

Hi, Jtcurses. Thanks for adding the {{metacat}} template to some metacategories recently. You might not have known, but that template should always have a sort criterion parameter with it. For example, instead of {{metacat}}, it could be {{metacat|year}} or {{metacat|type}}. You use whatever sort criterion is mentioned in the category name. Thanks, and feel free to ask any questions you have about this. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jtcurses,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Jtcurses, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/− Daphne Lantier 19:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Irún[edit]

Hola Jtcurses, me gustaría entender por qué has eliminado la categoría de imágenes históricas de Irún de las fotos antiguas del Alarde. Gracias --Discasto talk 21:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Vale, lo he entendido ya. Como no todas las fotos son "antiguas", he creado una categoría de fotos históricas del Alarde. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 22:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Jtcurses, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)