User talk:Kürschner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Kopfzeile[edit]
Wenn ich hier auf meiner Diskussionsseite angesprochen werde, antworte ich auch hier. 
Spreche ich Dich bei Dir an, kannst Du auch dort antworten.
Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days. For the archive overview, see archive.

Hallo Kürschner!

Thank you for doing stuff like this. The translation work is appreciated! -- Slaunger (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

It is a very fine picture, gratulation!--Kürschner (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, thank you! It was an impressive sight, difficult to completely capture on a photo. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Kürschner (talk) 05:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hi, Thanks for the interaction. Let me know if you want any help regarding stuff's relation to en:Tamil, en:Indian wildlife. --Karthickbala (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 09:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Seafair Indian Days Pow Wow[edit]

Judging by your edit at File:Seafair Indian Days Pow Wow 2010 - 042.jpg, you know a lot more of the relevant terminology than I do. If at any point you would be willing to make a pass through Category:Seafair Indian Days Pow Wow and its subcategories, I bet you could add a lot of useful categories to images. - Jmabel ! talk 02:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for placing your confidence in my faculities. But I am only a specialist for furs. They do not have much fur in their costumes - and the little bit I found yesterday evening (German time) I could not really recognize - the fur pieces are to small, I just guessed ;-). I will look again, not hopefull. Regards from the furrier, in German called the --Kürschner (talk) 06:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
I did my best.--Kürschner (talk) 08:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I will keep my eyes out for fur-related materials in Seattle, but these days few Seattlites at all often wear fur. I can't even think where there is a furrier in town any more. Of course, a century or so ago, they were still trapping locally, so I may run across something archival when doing historical research. - Jmabel ! talk 16:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
If I can do anything else for you, let me know. Fur is naturally beautyful ;-)

Fur sellers in Seattle --Kürschner (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Manhattan furs[edit]

Look in the 28th Street category Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, it's not 28th Street, it's 30th Street, there's one more there. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
There are still a few remnants of the fur district -- there's a couple of shops on 30th Street near 7th Avenue, although one may have moved recently -- I saw that the building was being renovated. My wife works nearby, so the next time I'm up there I'll take a more specific look and see what I can see. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Great - give her your camera ;). I have been there around 1996, we visited a last fur supply shop, and saw some old writings on the walls. Sad for a furrier to see. I would be glad, if you can get some pictures. Here you can see a part of the collection (only the furrier's part, there is a large fur part too) till today: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Furriers_by_city
Have a nice day, 9h45 in Germany --Kürschner (talk) 08:49, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


Muzeum Łowiectwa i Jeździectwa[edit]

Na, das ging ja rasend fix mit der Kategorisierung. Da schaue ich gerade mal nach, ob es die Kat schon gibt oder ich eine neue anlegen muss - als ich sie fand, dachte ich spontan, Donnerwetter, jemand hat die gleichen Fotos wie ich gemacht .... Danke und Gruss --Wistula (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Danke für die schönen Fotos! Jetzt wüsste ich ja gern noch genau, was das für Katzenfelle da an der Wand sind. Habe übrigens auch etwas gebraucht, bis ich raus hatte, ob es die Kategorie schon gibt, polnisch müsste man können. Aber da Du so vorbildlich die Schilder fotografiert hast, kein Problem.--Kürschner (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Wegen der Tierarten-Bestimmung werde ich nicht helfen koennen, die mitgenommene Info-Broschuere weist sie nicht im Einzelnen aus. Musst Du wohl mal nach Warschau kommen, sie hatten alle ihre Schildchen, Gruss --Wistula (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Ja, ja, die Schildchen sah ich wohl, die Brille ist nicht gut genug. Warschau wäre nicht schlecht. Jetzt erst mal Potsdam. --Kürschner (talk) 21:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Fritz Writzka[edit]

Hallo, kennst Du noch einen Fritz Writzka oder Writczka, Leipziger Pelzhändler/Kürschner um 1946? --LutzBruno (talk) 15:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Leider nicht, DDR und Nachkriegsjahr, da habe ich leider wenig, überhaupt keine DDR-Adressen. --Kürschner (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Trotzdem Danke...--LutzBruno (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-05402, Berlin, Hindenburg auf der Grünen Woche.jpg[edit]

geklaute Bilder[edit]

Hallo, die zu den Seiten geführten Links habe ich deswegen eingefügt weil ich der Jenige bin dessen Account auf der Deviantartseite ist. Ich bin greasysalvador, Salvador Schulten, habe alle hier hochgeladenen Fotos selber gemacht, besitze alle diese Felle selber, sammel seit Jahren Fuchsfelle, und beschäftige mich mit der Zucht und den verschiedenen Zuchtrassen und Farbschlägen. Das meiste was ich darüber weiß, weiß ich von Leuten aus den USA die selber diese Felle sammeln und auch in Kontakt mit Züchtern stehen. Hier in Deutschland geht vieles drunter und drüber wie ich sehe. Vieles wird falsch deklariert und so, und ich habe viele andere Freunde in Deutschland, die auch Felle kaufen uns so, und die fragen mich immer, denn die sind total verwirrt. Durch eine Freundin bis ich über den Misstand auf der Pelzarten-Seite überhaupt aufmerksam geworden. Wenn du sicher gehen willst das die Bilder mir gehören, melde dich doch einfach auf deviantart.com an und schreib mir eine note, dann wirst du sehen das ich dir antworte. Ich hoffe nicht das die Bilder hier gelöscht werden. Mein Beitrag über Arcticmarblefuchsfelle wurde ja leider gelöscht. Dabei habe ich mir jede auf dem Markt bekannte Marblefuchs-Rasse sehr genau beschrieben und was den Marblefuchs generell von den anderen Zuchtrassen unterscheidet. --unsignierter Beitrag von 00:09, 5. Apr. 2012‎ User:Marblefox

Ist schon längst geschehen, habe bei einem Deiner Bilder eine Nachricht hinterlassen, bevor ich mich bei Dir gemeldet habe. War vielleicht nicht der direkte Weg. - Hast Du den Marblefuchs-Beitrag noch? Stelle ihn bei Dir auf eine Unterseite:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Marblefox/Arbeitsseite und gib mir Bescheid. Dann versuchen wir gemeinsam, den Artikel wikipediareif zu machen.
Bitte immer alle Diskussionsbeiträge unterschreiben, und zwar so: --~~~~ . Den Rest macht Wikipedia von allein. Du kannst immer dort antworten, wo Du angesprochen wirst, also auf Deiner Diskussionsseite reicht auch. Aber jetzt gehe ich endgültig schlafen! --Kürschner (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Ich find das hier total kompliziert sorry, mein gehirn funktioniert leider nicht immer so wie es soll, wo man hier eine mail schreibt, auf der linken seite stehen viele andere sachen aber nichts was mich zum link mail schreiben oder so führt. Vielleicht bin ich auch einfach nur zu blöde, manche dinge sind zu hoch für mich, ich bin Autist. Ich kann mir alle Fuchsrassen beim aussehen und mit namen merken und die auch noch zeichnen aber wenn es an so manche banalen dinge geht scheitere ich.

@Marblefox: gerade am Anfang ist es für alle hier gar nicht so einfach, sich zurecht zu finden - ich kann mich noch sehr gut an meine eigenen Anfänge erinnern. Aber: man kann es wirklich lernen, Schritt für Schritt, mit ein wenig Geduld. Und es findet sich nach meiner Erfahrung immer jemand, der helfen kann, wenn man selbst nicht weiter kommt.
Informationen, wie Du hier interne Mails verschicken kannst, findest Du unter anderem hier. Hast Du denn Deine Mail-Adresse unter Deinen Benutzereinstellungen schon hinterlegt? Ohne die geht es nämlich nicht.
Hier eine "Kurzanleitung":
als erstes gehst Du oben rechts am Bildschirm auf den Reiter "Einstellungen", dann auf "Benutzerdaten". Unten auf der Seite findest Du "E-Mail Optionen". Dort trägst Du Deine E-Mail-Adresse ein. Bitte auf jeden Fall Haken setzen bei " E-Mail-Empfang von anderen Benutzern ermöglichen". Wichtig: danach auf "Einstellungen speichern" drücken.
Letzter Schritt - passiert außerhalb von Commons: ruf bitte Deine Mails ab. Da findest Du eine E-Mail von Commons Wikimedia. Klicke auf den entsprechenden Link um Deine E-Mail-Adresse, die Du auf Commons eingetragen hast, zu bestätigen. Dann ist es geschafft!
Unter Einstellungen / Benutzerdaten findest Du danach den Hinweis "E-Mail-Bestätigung: Deine E-Mail-Adresse wurde am .... um .... Uhr bestätigt." Und auf der linken Seite unter Werkzeuge erscheint, immer wenn Du auf einer Benutzerdiskussionsseite wie z. B. hier beim Kürschner bist "E-Mail an diesen Benutzer". Dort draufklicken und los gehts. :-) Viel Spaß!
Ich hoffe, ich konnte, da Kürschner gerade nicht online ist, ein bischen weiterhelfen. Herzliche Grüße, --4028mdk09 (talk) 05:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Danke für die Hilfe, die meine führte wirklich in die Irre. Auf die Idee, dass er sich mit seiner Mailadresse erst einmal anmelden muss, bin ich nicht gekommen. Entschuldigung und noch mal danke! --Kürschner (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

kannst du mir bitte mal folgende änderung erklären...[edit]

... [1] - also nicht "warum?" - sondern wie du das gefunden hast? schaust du dir jedes bild nach kürschnern an oder kanntest du den kürschner und hast danach gesucht? viele grüße --Z thomas 06:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Schöne Frage :). Ich gucke „alle“ Bilder nach Pelzen durch, weil ich über das Thema bei Wiki schreibe. Das mit den Kürschnern ist ein zusätzliches Hobby, ich habe einen Riecher dafür, wie ein Pelzgeschäft aussieht... In diesem Fall war es jedoch anders, als ich gesehen habe, dass jemand Bilder aus Dresden hochlädt, habe ich gegoogelt, wo dort die Kürschner sind. Und dann mal nachgesehen, ob es ein Bild gibt. In Dresden ist übrigens mindestens noch ein Kürschner ....????? Mit Kürschnergruß, Schweif hoch vom --Kürschner (talk) 06:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
oh danke, ich hab mir bei dieser frage extra mühe gegeben. dein kürschnerwissen hab ich ja hier shcon mitbekommen :-)
jedes bild anschauen ist praktisch, denn dann brauchst du nicht verreisen, da du's ja schon gesehen hast.
na dann werd ich mal in dresden die augen offen halten, ob mir das "eine weitere" kürschnergeschäft vor die linse kommt. normalen unpelzigen gruß --Z thomas 14:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Witzig. Habe gerade eine Mail bekommen, von jemand der über den Brühl schreibt und von mir ein Bild möchte. --- Google mal "Pelze Dresden", ist nur gerecht, wenn ich im Gegenzug noch ein Kürschnerfoto bekomme. Gruß --Kürschner (talk) 16:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
gibt es wünsche? :-) --Z thomas 18:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Immer ;). Für den Brühl jedoch noch nicht, kurioserweise wohnt der Interessent bei mir um die Ecke, habe ihn eingeladen vorbei zu kommen. Aber wenn Du mal was Pelziges siehst... --Kürschner (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
also mein angebot war nicht auf den brühl bezogen sondern auf dresden. ABER ich versprech dir, ich halt auf jeden fall die augen auf. hab vor ein paar jahren mal die tochter eines kürschners in leipzig getroffen. da gibt's ja auch nicht so viel mehr in leipzig (also kürschner nicht töchter) :-) --Z thomas 20:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Buchtipp[edit]

Zur Zeit kostenlos als PDFs herunterladbar im Rahmen einer Werbeaktion von de Gruyter: http://www.degruyter.com/viewbooktoc/product/231412 --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 13:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Taenzelfest_KaiserMaximilian.JPG[edit]

Wie sicher bist du, dass das Kostüm von dir umsortierten Tänzelfest-Bilder (Kaiser-Max-Kostüm) "gefaktes" Hermelin ist? - Ich gehe davon aus, dass das Kostüm in der Tat echt und eine ältere Arbeit eines der beiden Kaufbeurer Kürschner ist. Ich könnte ggf. beim Pfleger des Kostüms nach Details fragen oder, wenn das notwendig und sinnvoll sein sollte, auch Detailbilder machen.. --Ordercrazy (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Nein, leider gar nicht sicher, das gibt die Bildauflösung nicht her. Es ist nur ungewöhnlich, dass für ein Kostüm für solche Gelegenheiten echtes Hermelin verwendet wurde. Wenn Du noch ein oder ein paar Detailbilder nachliefern könntest, wäre das super. Manchmal sind die Schweife echt, das Fell nicht - oder umgekehrt. Vom Bild her könnte es zwar echt sein, irritierend ist in jedem Fall (ob Kaninchenfell oder Hermelinfell) für ein älteres Teil, das strahlende Weiß, es müsste eigentlich vergilbt sein. Ich bin ab Dienstag wieder online. Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung, ich bin gespannt. Der --Kürschner (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Die Kostümleute vom Tänzelfestverein sind inzwischen ziemlich stolz auf die originaltreue der in den letzten 10 Jahren neuerstellten Kostüme. Nachdems in KF noch 2 Kürschnerwerkstätten gibt, würde mich nicht wundern, wenn der Pelz echt wäre. Ich kläre das mal - bitte aber um Geduld - der Tänzelfestverein arbeitet ehrenamtlich und manchmal ein wenig langsam. Ich bleibe dran und melde mich. Es gibt übrigens noch weitere Tänzelfestbilder vom Maximilian, die in der alten Hermelin-Kat drin sind. --Ordercrazy (talk) 09:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Nach Rückfrage: Die Kostümwerkstatt ist sich recht sicher, dass der Pelz Karnikel mit Nerzresten ist - ich hatte das Ding heute in der Hand, habe aber auf Bilder verzichtet. Danke fürs genaue Hinsehen! --Ordercrazy (talk) 11:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Prima, noch mal was davon zu hören. Zumindest der Nerz ist jetzt unerwartet. Danke und eine schöne Woche! --Kürschner (talk) 11:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Luchs? Hermelin?[edit]

Könnten Sie bitte dieses Bild anschauen und den Pelz bestimmen? Schönen Dank im voraus. --Jdsteakley (talk) 12:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Luchs war doch prima getippt. Danke für den Hinweis.--Kürschner (talk) 13:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Nachdem Sie Luchs bestätigt haben, habe ich meine anderen Neuzugänge angeschaut, und ich glaube, dass es sich auch hier um Luchs statt Ermelin handeln könnte, zumal der Abgebildete "nur" ein Baron war und kein Landesfürst. (Ich glaube, Ermelin war ausschließlich für Fürsten vorbehalten, oder?) Ihre Kategorie habe ich dahingehend abgeändert. Was meinen Sie dazu? --Jdsteakley (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Ich habe es mal in Wildkatze geändert. Wer Hermelin tragen durfte, dafür lässt sich nur schwer eine Regel aufstellen. Das ist regional und nach der Zeitepoche unterschiedlich. Unter Außerachtlassung der künstlerischen Freiheit oder der mangelnden Tierkunde des jeweiligen Malers: Hier, in diesem Fall, ist das Haar zu kurz für Luchs. Die Tupfen beim Hermelin entstehen durch die aufgesetzten, dünnen Schweife, das gibt ein besonderes Bild, meist sind sie auch gleichmäßig angeordnet. Diese drei Fellarten plus Feh sind die hauptsächlich für Honoratioren und Geistliche infrage kommenden Pelz-Standesinsignien. Dazu käme noch der Zobel, aber der ist kaum vom Marder zu unterscheiden, deshalb werfe ich alles was der zoologischen Familie der Marder angehört, aber nicht näher zu bestimmen ist, in die Kategorie Marten (clothing). Aber machen Sie es sich einfach, packen Sie mir im Zweifelsfall einen Link hierher, mich freut's. --Kürschner (talk) 21:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Das finde ich wirklich sehr interessant. Könnten Sie bitte einen Blick auf diese Zieten-Bilder (1, 2 und 3) werfen? In der Armee Friedrichs des Großen war er eine einmalige Erscheinung. --Jdsteakley (talk) 02:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Tatsächlich, da haben Sie drei spannende Bilder herausgepickt. Hilfreich wäre es, wenn man jedes Mal wüsste, ob der Maler das Fell nach dem tatsächlichen Kleidungsstück gemalt hat, was nur selten der Fall sein dürfte. Oder ob er seine Fantasie hat walten lassen. Interessant auch, dass von Zieten gleich mit drei verschiedenen Fellarten abgebildet wurde.
Könnte man davon ausgehen, dass er das Teil nach der Natur gemalt hat, wäre das erste vielleicht sogar eher ein Nebelparder als ein Leopard, der ist nun aber extrem selten, und letztlich stimmt es doch nicht. Es ist kein Jaguar, die Flecken sind anders. Aber sehr gut, fast noch besser als Leopard, wäre das auch recht seltene Schneeleopard...
Das mittlere dürfte wieder Luchs sein, das kommt recht gut hin
Aber das letzte ist schon ausgefallen, echt spannend. Vielleicht Tüpfelbeutelmarder?: Aus den Fellen wurden hauptsächlich Innenfutter gearbeitet, die unter der Bezeichnung „Chickerickfutter“ verkauft wurden. Heute ist der Tüpfelbeutelmarder geschützt. Können wir ja mal so einsortieren, bis mir etwas besseres einfällt. Womöglich muss ich dafür eine neue Kategorie einrichten...
Weiter so. --Kürschner (talk) 08:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hier steht ein weiteres Zieten-Bild, allerdings recht schemenhaft. Und - wie ist es denn mit seinem Hut? Der ist doch auch aus Fell, nicht wahr? --Jdsteakley (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Genau - erledigt. --Kürschner (talk) 17:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Vielleicht gefällt Ihnen die Verwendung Ihres Fotos?

Gehpelz --Kürschner (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

What a surprise, funny, thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Ausnahmsweise[edit]

mal kein Löschantrag von einem hirnamputierten Copyrightparanoiker, sondern eine Frage: Was ist das denn schönes? Und außerdem: frohes neues Jahr! --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hochinteressant. Habe mich erst noch mal schlau gemacht, wann Südamerika entdeckt wurde ;) - könnte Bergozelot sein. Die Abbildung ist ganz offensichtlich nach einem Original verfertigt, die Zusammensetznähte sind deutlich zu sehen. Fehlen tun für ein so akkurates Bild die Aufhellungen in den Längsflecken, die aber in der Verkleinerung der Fellabbildungen auch nicht mehr zu erkennen sind. - Deinen obskuren Löschantrag hatte ich gesehen, vermutete zurecht, das regelt sich von selbst. Ganz großen Dank! --Kürschner (talk) 16:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt kann ich vor allem sehen, wie schwierig es ist, in einem Stich Feinheiten genau darzustellen. Das waren wirklich Künstler. Noch mal danke. --Kürschner (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Kleiner Pelzwitz --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Ein Papst aus dem heißen Südamerika ist für Kürschner schwer geschäftsschädigend. Kaltes Polen oder Bayern war echt besser. --Kürschner (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Danke mal wieder fürs Nachkategorisieren der Fasnetbilder. "Furs are such a bother" --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Gern geschehen und danke - erinnere mich bitte in 7 Jahren noch mal an den Link. --Kürschner (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Über http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2011/01/04/the-coats-of-edward-gorey/ stolperte ich heute zufällig bei TumblR. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, was für eine schöne Geschichte, kannte ich noch nicht. Schade, wir hatten bis vor einigen Jahren eine humoristische Fachzeitschrift, "Die Pelzmotte" - das wäre DER Artikel dafür gewesen. Besten großen Dank! --Kürschner (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt mäkeln die Spinner sogar schon an der Fasnet herum: [2] Nur weil eine Katze "süß" ist? Gegen Lederschuhe habe ich solche Aktionen jedenfalls noch nie gehört. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 09:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Ich könnte Bücher darüber schreiben - wenn ich nicht jedes Mal einen dicken Hals dabei bekommen würde. Danke für den Hinweis. --Kürschner (talk) 10:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Was ist denn das schönes? File:Porträtbuch Ratsherren Regensburg 007r.jpg --Narrenmarsch (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hochinteressant. Ohne Deinen Hinweis hätte ich das sich gar nicht als Pelz erkannt. Hiesiges Eichhörnchen, Köpfe mit Ohren. Der dritte, mittlere Fleck ist mir unklar. --Kürschner (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Silly[edit]

I changed the category Squirrel (clothing) on File:Hanna Walter (1961).jpg to Fur jackets, and even that is far fetched in a period of time everyone was wearing plastic clothing. I'm sorry, squirrel is really not probable. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

It is definitiv Squirrel fur. No doubt about it (squirrel backs). I see the individuell skins, the problems of working small skins, the character of the naturell fur, and so on. Believe me, it is my job, also in 1961 worked thousends of furriers. But - this was not a new coat. Look the other pictures in the category squirrel (clothing), I do not know whether a non-expert can see it too?. --Kürschner (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ланская худ Макаров 1849.jpg[edit]

Hello, Kürschner! Can you help us with this image of Pushkin's wife - what fur is there? Shakko (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

No, sorry. Maybe, if you send me the original ;). Maybe. It can be a kind of marten (for example sable), but also something other. I wonder you see, it is fur... Sorry once more, --Kürschner (talk) 18:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
alas, no high res. But we have this one File:N.N. Lanskaya by I.Makarov after V.Hau (circa 1880, All-Russian Pushkin museum, SPb).jpg - same person same painter. Maybe same clothing. Shakko (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
I would say, squirrel backs again, see the text above. Evan Makarov painted the furs not very detailed. Funny, I am just writing about squirrel fur. Around 1880 squirrel was not very expensive, in Germany they made children's clothing from this. That suggest against my presumption, but Russian squirrel was most of time the fur of the low aristocracy. --Kürschner (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
her second husband was quite poor, it match.... Thanks, my dear expert! Did you see, I'm uploading high res files for Category:Romanov Anniversary Ball (1903) - Album (1904, Peterburg)? many "fresh meat" for you. --Shakko (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
I am two days not online, trying to tell the hunters at their fair that they must use the red fox furs, not threw them away after shooting, it's a sin. - I saw your uploads the days before, fine. I had categorizes the Romanow Ball under "Sable (clothing)", it is ok for nearly all photos with fur there. And the second uploads are often categorized double in this category before I categorized the whole Ball there. Good night, a little bit tired after the first hunting fair day. --Kürschner (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Furs & Fashion plates[edit]

Hello! I have been working on the category for Fashion plates. What do you think about moving all the fur publications (Lanpher, etc.) into a new sub-category just for furs? For example, "Fashion plates depicting furs" under the category "Fashion plates." Then other fashion plates showing furs could be copied to the new category as well, even when the publication is not primarily about furs. Would you mind if I make this change? Thanks! Laura1822 (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Why not. My English isn't good, therefore the question: Is a category name possible, with fur in the beginning? It is easier to find, if I want to categorize furs with HotCat. Maybe Fur fashion plates ( I do all Pictures with (a little bit) fur in "Fur garments", that is also not quite correct)? If not, this is also ok. --Kürschner (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

witgchoura[edit]

You cited "When the Austro-Italien war brought Bonaparte's troops in contact with the Russian regiments, commanded by field-marshal Suworow, who had introducted the witgchoura, the fashion soon spread to Paris"... Is there some more details about this fasion? Can't guess... The only Russian word to look like is "wichoura" (вычура). It means "something incredible fashionable" or obsolete term "fancy embroidery". "A la Souvarov" there was moustache, hats and bootfortes. --Shakko (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

This fur lined cloak, alledgedly seal skins were used for this purpose, became the rage of society. --- Sorry, I should give this information too. --Kürschner (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
so it is leather cloak from fake seal? --Shakko (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Not faked, really seal skins, I think with hair. But I want to find out more, and more sources?! Thank you till here! --Kürschner (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
we have found it! with a little help from my friends. A witchoura was a women's warm, ankle-length winter coat, fur trimmed and lined, and based upon the Polish wilczura coat. They were worn over lightweight dresses during the first third of the 19th century from about 1808 until 1830.source picture. But we can't the Russian word at all for it. The original it seems to be only Polish wilczura. --Shakko (talk) 12:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
you will be laughing. It seems to be simply Slavish evolution of German word "Wilkschur"[3]. Simply big coat from wolf.Shakko (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
I am lauhing, I wrote this (Wildschur): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildschur. Thank you very much for now, just before a have walk to the Rhine. I have to think a some longer about your surprising information, your dress looks a "little bit" different to my Wildschur ;-). --Kürschner (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
heh. Add to your article interwiki to my fresh one ru:Вилчура :) See notes there to french and english books.
As I understand, 1. at first it was simply Russian Wilkschur. They found 18th-century drawings for me[4][5] with frozen Frenchmen. Whole fur. But when Western Europe adopted it, it was converted in 2. female witchoura (like redingote, salope, mantle), mainly from textile. We, in Russia, didn't know 2nd fashion. Shakko (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you - and your friends - for the perfect investigation. I think and hope, I had described it correctly at the German Wikipedia. It is linked now to Russian. Have a nice day, sunshine here. --Kürschner (talk) 08:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

@Shakko:, @Kürschner:. Hello. Pardon me for intruding, but I found this discussion quite illuminating (and entertaining) as I have long wondered what this term really meant. You can find an example of an 1815 London fashion plate featuring a "Witzchoura Mantle" at File:Fashion Plate (Britania Witzchoura Walking Dress) LACMA M.86.266.207.jpg. The description for this plate reads, in part:

The Witzchoura mantle and spenser which is worn with this dress, is composed of blue twilled sarsnet, lined with white satin, and trimmed with Mrs. Bell's new invented pearl silk trimming; the spenser is made of white satin to correspond with the mantle. We cannot refer our readers to the Print for the form of the Witzchoura, because it would only convey an inadequate idea of this most tasteful and elegant mantle; nor shall we attempt to describe the manner in which it is made, because we are convinced that our fair readers cannot form a judgment of it without seeing it. We must, in justice to Mrs. Bell, to whose elegant taste the public is indebted for the improved Witzchoura, observe, that it is the most tasteful and becoming mantle we have ever seen: its form is extremely simple, and when properly put on, it falls in such easy graceful folds that even a tolerably pretty figure must be irresistible in a Witzchoura. The materials of this mantle are generally sarsnet, but satin or French silk are in estimation with some elegantes. The spenser and the lining are uniformly white, and the former is always composed of satin, but blue, light-green, and the most delicate shade of the wild rose shot with white, are most prevalent. French bonnet made of pearl silk to correspond with the mantle; white kid gloves, and pale-blue slippers.

—Explanation of the Prints of Fashion for April 1815 printed in the March 1815 issue of La Belle Assemblée, p. 129.


The London fashion plates for 1814-15 were full of names like the "Platoff Cap" and "Blücher Bonnet" which may or may not have had anything to do with the actual personages for which they were named, most of whom visited London for the "Victory Summer" celebrations of the Allies in 1814. You can see some of them by perusing the categories associated with the above file, if you are interested (they are sorted by date). It seems that in the case of the Witzchoura, in any event, Mrs. Bell's "improvements" resulted in a garment not much related to its namesake. I hope you found this as entertaining as I did. Cheers! Laura1822 (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Here's another, this one French from 1813: File:Costume Parisien 1290 - Chapeau de Satin à Raies de Velours. Witz-chouras de Reps. 1813..jpg Laura1822 (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Greatǃ And the Chapeau de Satin à Raies de Velours is with fur, very probably Russian squirrel (that's my topic). Continued here soon?? I love Wiki ;-) -- Kürschner (talk) 07:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

category:Fur pictures by photographer[edit]

Die Kategorisierung halte ich für übertrieben. Die Konsequenz davon ist, dass man den gesamten(!) Kategorienbaum von Commons duplizieren müsste und mit der Anzahl der Fotografen multiplizieren würde indem man ein "by photographer" dahintersetzt. Bitte für die Bildung solcher Schnittmengen auf Catsca zurückgreifen. --Martin H. (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Gleiches gilt für Category:Pictures by Wilhelm von Gloeden with fur‎ . Catscan verwenden. Unterhalb einer Einzelperson nochmal sämtliche Themen-Categorien abzuspulen macht keinen Sinn. --Martin H. (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Ich bin vorerst, nicht nur, technisch gehandicapt (fremdes Laptop ohne Maus...). Werde mich, es dauert allerdings längere Zeit. inhaltlich (ich verstehe es noch nicht so recht - eher garnicht) und mit Catscan auseinandersetzen (ich habe es wohl einmal versuchsweise benutzt, war aber irgendein Problem). Erst mal danke. Anmerkungː Eine gleiche Geschichte ist doch dann Category:Fur in art by artist? -- Kürschner (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Fur skins[edit]

Hi! I'm sorry but I didn't undestand this subtlety between trade names and scientific names.

I think we have to change name of the categories anyway, to avoid this type of misunderstood. My problem is that in Category:Felidae, we have civets or genets, and for a same species, we have different fur-trade names (for example, Leopardus tigrinus and his different fur-trade names as Mato Grosso cat, Ceara cat)... It's disturbing because we have a lot of materials about furriers (thanks to you :) ), but we can't use it effectively because of categorization.

I propose to improve the categorization :

What do you think about this proposal ? Regards, --Abujoy (talk) 11:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

I would prefer the third version (or letting it as it is, with an additional zoologic category). Who, without me, will know the exact (English!) trade names?! When I started describing the different furs in German Wikipodia, zoological writers wished, that I only use the German fur names. I liked it, it makes my work much easier. I think, the zoological terms (categories) should stand beside the fur names, which are most the same names used in popular English for the animal. Regards -- Kürschner (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

HAPPY WEDNESDAY!![edit]

Gent
Nederlands: Bedanktǃ -- Kürschner (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

FOR YOU !!!! Carolus (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

HAPPY EVENING - thank you!!! -- Kürschner (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately it is symply white long rabit. And goat back, by specialist advises. I have more pics. grts Carolus (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Surprise - well made. I had no idea, that it could be, maybe with a higher solution... But you and your specialist are right (only the goat backs... But the picture is not big enough to see it) -- Kürschner (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the mailed photographs. I am still not sure with the goat backs. It may possible, and when the expert knows... Two years ago I was in Gent, if I had known this... Good night, -- Kürschner (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Robe de Cour LACMA M.83.161.29.jpg ??

Done, thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 11:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Calf skins[edit]

Hi Kürschner. Are you not thinking of Category:Calf fur-skins instead of Category:Calf skins here? HelenOnline 12:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Helen, I think, best is to delete one of them. Which one? (nearly all fur categories are named with a hyphen (= fur-skins), but I think, in this case calf skins is the better version?)-- Kürschner (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I am not an expert on the terminology but I think Category:Calf fur-skins would be less confusing than Category:Calf skins which sounds more like Category:Cattle skin. (By the way I only think of a "calf" as a baby cow so I am still confused as to where the cattle fur-skins for older cows would go.) HelenOnline 15:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to know where to put File:D'Cor Africa animal skins.jpg. HelenOnline 15:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Don't be confused, I did not want to make an extra category for skins of older cows, they are not relevant for clothing (but unfortunately sometimes for furniture and other items). But how old is a calf and when it is a cow...? Or how large must a skin be, till it is grown up? In German I declared it: Because of the low significance for the products of haired cattle hides (...only one category).
File:D'Cor Africa animal skins.jpg - I hope, the zebra is really a zebra and not a print. I think, this are three cow hides, I will give a second category "Calf skins" - and I know, these are no calfs ;-). Maybe we really should make a new category "cattle hides" or "cattle skins" or "cattle fur-skins"...? Yours -- Kürschner (talk) 20:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I think I better leave it up to you. I was trying to photographs flags outside the shop which did not come out very well and nearly deleted the picture but then thought somebody might be interested in the skins on the side of the picture. The shop advertises zebra and Nguni cattle skins as their specialty. File:Nguni Cows.jpg shows the cows the calf skins would have come from. HelenOnline 06:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I have uploaded the full picture with a partial shop sign advertising zebra and Nguni skins at File:D'Cor Africa.jpg. HelenOnline 06:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Also for the undeleted pictures. In English Wiki I saw a photo, where I could see the whole zebra tail. You are right, it should really be a zebra. Regards from Germany, hope to meet you again (latest when you have more fur pictures for me ;-) ) -- Kürschner (talk) 06:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Restorationist's Barnstar.png The Historical Media Barnstar
Please accept this barnstar for your help cataloguing the recent Rijksmuseum uploads. It's much appreciated. :-) (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Bedanktǃ --Kürschner (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Separate categories for Rembrandt paintings[edit]

Hello Kürschner! I am in the process of creating separate categories for Rembrandt's paintings; most of the time, there is more than one (or even two or three) image(s) of each painting, and this makes linking in Wikidata easier. I am not deleting the categories that you added; just transferring them from the individual images to the painting's own categories. Keep up the good work! Spinster (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. And keep it up tooǃ -- Kürschner (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Gruss zum Wochenende[edit]

Jacob Ephraim Polzin - um 1830.jpg

Mit der Bitte um eine Pelz-Kategorie ;-) --Concord (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Solche Grüße lob ich mir. Gleichfalls ein schönes Wochenende. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Happy St-Gummarus![edit]

File:Saint Gummarus inter2.JPG

More where they come from! Carolus (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Fine picture! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Bekannte Sticharten (Nähen) im Jahr 1882 - Sewing stitches.jpg[edit]

Bekannte Sticharten (Nähen) im Jahr 1882 - Sewing stitches.jpg


Hallo,
von Dir stammt folgendes Bild (siehe links).
Die einzelnen Sticharten sind nummeriert.
Gibt es hierzu auch eine Liste der Namen
der einzelnen Sticharten zu den Nummern?
Viele Grüße
-- Der Barbar (talk) 07:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

--- Tatsächlich, findet sich in dem Heft. Nachgetragen, s. beim Bild. -- Kürschner (talk) 08:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Bild: Karakul lamb men's fur jacket, Germany, 1987.jpg[edit]

Hallo - was hat das Bild Karakul lamb men's fur jacket, Germany, 1987.jpg mit der Hochschule Trier zu tun? Nebenbei: es gibt keine Modeschule Trier. Grüße --HelgeRieder (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Die angehende Designerin hat das während Studiums anlässlich eines Wettbewerbs an Hochschule entworfen und die Arbeit beim Kürschner begleitet. Könnte es sein, dass der Zweig damals vielleicht doch so hieß? Immerhin muss es sowas gegeben haben, die Zusammenarbeit ging offensichtlich mindestens über drei Jahre. Siehe dazu auch https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fachhochschule_Trier,_Swakara,_Vereinigung_Initiative_Pelzgestaltung_-_Urkunde_1989.jpg Auch auf dem Foto der Jacke ist eine entsprechende Urkunde zu sehen, den Text kann man, wenn man es weiß, erahnen. Grüße zurück -- Kürschner (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Heißt jetzt Hochschule Trier, Fachrichtung Modedesign. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Russian embassy (1576 engraving) hats 01 by shakko.jpg[edit]

Maybe you'll need it?

And this one? --Shakko (talk) 19:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Fine, thank you. I know them and I saw your uploads. But they are much better then the one I uploaded, and above all, they are complete! Thank you very much! -- Kürschner (talk) 20:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
See one here: Sable skins. -- Kürschner (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
and here (fine collection!): fur caps. -- Kürschner (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
the hats had differents sub-names but I didn't find the source for it yet. Murmolka and etc. Shakko (talk) 07:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
here you can see the way to transpotting the pack of 40 sables in textile cover (gift for your emperor from our tsar, I hope he liked it :). And in Gothic inscription in German the author speaks about it. --Shakko (talk) 07:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Not my, the German Emperor - for the Austrian one. This part of the picture is sometimes shown in fur literature. Have a nice day! -- Kürschner (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Wellcome Images Barnstar[edit]

Wellcome barnstar.gif Wellcome Images volunteer barnstar
Thank you for helping to categorise the Wellcome Image library uploads. You are in our project hall of fame for your work! :-) -- (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Karmel-Mayerling 3764.JPG[edit]

Hallo Kürschner, die Kategorie ist ein Irrtum, denn es handelt sich um eine Kopfbedckung eines Sargträgers von Kronprinz Rudolf, nur habe ich nach wie vor keine passende Kategorie gefunden, ich habe es nur etwas genauer erklärt. --gruß K@rl (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Eine Bestatter-Kopfbedeckung mit Pelz (wenn es dann wirklich welcher ist...), das hatte ich noch nicht. Dafür lege ich vorerst  ;-) keine neue Kategorie an. Schönen Abend! -- Kürschner (talk) 21:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Wenn ich es ganz sicher wüsste, könnte ich sie vielleicht hier unterbringen: → Pelzmütze. --Kürschner (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Ich glaube nicht dass es Pelz, sondern wie Webpelz, ähnlich dieser Form gibt es das ganze in AT noch heute --K@rl (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Wenn kein Pelz, sind es vermutlich Wollfäden. Nur meine ich zu erkennen (erahnen), dass die Haare spitz auslaufen. Dann wäre es weder Webpelz noch Wolle, sondern doch Pelz. Ist mir einfach zu weit weg, um mal eben selbst nachzusehen. -- Kürschner (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Frohes neues Jahr[edit]

Une loge au Théâtre des Italiens en 1860.jpg

Hier etwas aus meiner Theatersammlung... mehr Kategorien wären natürlich fein. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Gleichfalls - und danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

German-Japanese Center[edit]

Thank you so much for photographing it! WhisperToMe (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome! -- Kürschner (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Furriers in Barcelona[edit]

I have found no more photos. But I'll follow this topic in the future! --Jordiferrer (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

This is, what I hoped, great. Thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Bitte einsortieren[edit]

Ich habe zu danken. -- Kürschner (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:American marten (clothing) in art[edit]

Hallo Kürschner, diese cat ist IMHO widersprüchlich verlinkt, da Zobel sub von marten ist, dann sollte das hier nicht durcheinandergehen. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 14:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Zobel ist eine Unterkategorie von Marder, weil er der zoologischen Familie der Marder angehört. Fichtenmarder ist eine Unterkategorie von Zobel, weil er als Pelz als Amerikanischer bzw. Kanadischer Zobel bezeichnet wird. Gilt auch im Englischen. Ich habe etwas nachgebessert, ist das ok? -- Kürschner (talk) 15:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Neue...?[edit]

category:Reliquary of the Precious Blood and file:Cardeal franc rodé.jpg HAVE SOME FUN Grussen. Carolus (talk) 11:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Carolus, I do not find this jpg (or cat)? --Kürschner (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Let's try again. Carolus (talk) 13:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Oops - thank you, great (I was blind, did not see the ermine trimmings). Really new for me! -- Kürschner (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Zürich, Wohnung Lenin, 1953.jpg ist falsch kategorisiert[edit]

Hallo Kürschner! Das File https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zürich,_Wohnung_Lenin,_1953.jpg# zeigt nicht die Spiegelgasse 14, auch nicht die Spiegelgasse überhaupt und mit grösster Wahrscheinlichkeit auch nicht Zürich. Bitte ändere die Kategorien! Wandersmann (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Geändert, danke. -- Kürschner (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Danke. Irgendwie eine faszinierende Fotografie, aber mit allergrösster Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht von Zürich (Topografie, Bautypen, oktogonaler (Kirchen?)turm und Kuppel oben stimmen nicht mit Zürich überein, ferner eigenartige perspektivische Verzerrung - die Fenster im grossen weissen Flachdachbau sind doppelt so hoch wie die der Bauten rechts davor, obschon viel weiter hinten). Kann eine Fotomontage ausgeschlossen werden? Wandersmann (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Wenn es wirklich eine Originalaufnahme meines Schwiegervaters ist, kann eine Fotomontage ausgeschlossen werden. Ist es dagegen eine gekaufte Postkarte (die Rückseite weist eine Postkartenaufteilung auf, wie sie damals allerdings auch bei Privatvergrößerungen in Postkartengröße üblich war), ist natürlich nichts auszuschließen. Allerdings glaube ich, dass Montagen aus der Zeit zu erkennen wären, die waren noch nicht am Computer sondern mit der Schere gemacht ;-). Aber die handschriftlichen Angaben lassen doch den Schluss zu, dass mein Schwiegervater, wenn nicht selbst fotografiert, zumindest sicher war, das es sich um Zürich handelt, wenn er sich offensichtlich auch mit der Ansicht geirrt hat. Ich empfinde die Häuser übrigens dem Leninhaus und den Nachbarhäusern sehr ähnlich, aber das liegt wohl an der damals üblichen, allgemeinen Bauweise. Es bleibt etwas mysteriös, zumal mein Schwiegervater ein recht gewisssenhafter, geschichtsbewusster Mann war.
Es gibt auf derselben Albumseite ein zweites, gleichartiges Bild, das die Unterschrift "Münster" trägt und zweifelsfrei den Eingangsbereich des Großmünsters zeigt, weitaus besser, als ich es im Netz gefunden habe. Das ich nun nicht hochlade, weil ja vielleicht doch die Urheberschaft unklar ist. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hier ein Link zu einer sehr schönen Darstellung des Hauses Spiegelgasse 14: http://www.bild-video-ton.ch/bestand/objekt/Sozarch_F_Fa-0008-42 Das Haus wurde 1971 abgerissen und durch einen Neubau mit ähnlicher Fassade ersetzt. Das Restaurant war seit etwa 1945 als "Restaurant Jakobsbrunnen" angeschrieben. Das Haus Spiegelgasse 12 gleich rechts daneben (1944/1945 durch einen Neubau mit ähnlicher Fassade wie der Altbau ersetzt, zeitweise Wohnung des deutschen Revolutionärs Georg Büchner) hat übrigens links einen Erker. Die Spiegelgasse ist so schmal, dass sie von der Seite Neumarkt / Restaurant Kantorei nur knapp einspurig befahrbar wäre - früher war sie, wobei sich die Fussgänger dann an die Haustüren drücken mussten (mittlerweile ist sie für den Fahrverkehr gesperrt) - und von der andern Seite Münstergasse / Cabaret Voltaire gar nicht. Parkplätze gibt es da nicht, sie haben keinen Platz. Die Umgebung stimmt absolut nicht. Achteckige Türme dieser Art gibt es in Zürich nicht. Typisch für Zürich ist dagegen die unregelmässige Befensterung der seit dem Mittelalter immer wieder umgebauten Altstadthäuser. Ich habe nochmals recherchiert und bin nun 100% sicher, dass es sich nicht um Zürich handelt. Eindeutig ist es eine einfache Verwechslung. Bitte auch aus der Kategorie Zürich entfernen!
Das sollte man meines Erachtens nach nicht, ehe nicht eine andere Kategorie gefunden ist. Sonst verschwindet das Bild im Nirwana. Ich gucke mal, ob es sowas wie unkategorisierte Schweizer Fotos gibt. Sonst auf jeden Fall lassen, eine falsche Kategorie ist besser als keine, sie ermuntert dazu, zu recherchieren. --Kürschner (talk) 11:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Einverstanden. Als Architekt (ich bin seit 1998 daran, das Nachbarhaus Spiegelgasse 12 sanft umzubauen) bin ich mir allerdings sehr sicher, dass es sich nicht um Zürich handelt. Von mir aus kann das Thema wie soeben vorgeschlagen gerne abgeschlossen werden - nochmals besten Dank! Wandersmann (talk) 11:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Ich habe mal eine Suchanfrage bei den Schweizer Wikipedianern gestartet. Mal schauen, ob was kommt. --Kürschner (talk) 12:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Dank der Hilfe von Freunden habe ich herausgefunden, von wo die Fotografie von 1953 stammt. Es handelt sich um die Rue Cheneau-de-Bourg in 1003 Lausanne, von der Brücke Pont Bessières gegen Süden fotografiert. Lenin war m.W. nie hier. https://www.flickr.com/photos/96256933@N08/20729639385/in/dateposted-public/ MfG Wandersmaa

Fur shields[edit]

Are a "fur shields" a shield with human hair? -Haabet 16:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Portret_van_een_Kenja_Dajak_krijger_op_Borneo_TMnr_60043376.jpg

No, the category should only include images of shields with animal fur (haired animal skin). Did you find a wrong categorized image? -- Kürschner (talk) 18:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes/no
Dieses Schild ist mit skape steckt bedeckt. This shield is covered with skape from enemies

-Haabet 15:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

How gruesome, thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Bulgarian Wikipedia question[edit]

Hi, I'm writing you in regards to the question you posted to BG wiki. It is hard to tell if the girl is Bulgarian, but the image uploader to flickr has put the tag "Romania" on it. This might be why nobody on bg-wiki seems to able to answer your question. I, personally, have no idea, and didn't want to just tell you this. However, seeing that nobody has answered you, and since you sort of pinged the page today, I felt I had to give you an explanation of sorts. Maybe addressing the question to Romanian Wikipedians might give better results. Cheers,--Laveol (talk) 09:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your answer. I did not notice, that I wrote it at the Bulgarian and not at the Romania wikipedia, I categorized some pictures wrong before I noticed my mistake. Thank you once more, very kind --Kürschner (talk) 10:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

German question[edit]

How do you translate the German description of File:Metro-Zentrale Düsseldorf, 2015 (12).jpg? Thanks for taking these pictures! WhisperToMe (talk) 23:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Zentrale (department) is not really right, better is "Metro Group headquarter [Germany?] in Düsseldorf". Regards -- Kürschner (talk) 06:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
I translated it as "head office" in English (either head office or headquarters is fine). I wonder how "Auf dem Metro-Gelände, Pilotanlage für Photovoltaik." is translated into English WhisperToMe (talk) 11:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Maybe: Pilot [= starting, first] project of a Photovoltaik system [= installation] (or somehow similar, in correct English). -- Kürschner (talk) 11:57, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
That works. Thanks :) WhisperToMe (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Haus der Pelze Kurt H. Christen[edit]

Hallo

ich habe deine Änderung gesehen. Im Zusammenhang deiner Ergänzung von 2011 verstehe ich das nicht ganz. --Atamari (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Die Anzeige sollte mit der Adresse kategorisiert sein (Unterkategorie), nicht die Hausnummer (Überkategorie) mit der Anzeige? Ich hatte etwas gezögert vor dem Löschen, du siehst mich selbst etwas verwirrt heute vormittag. Liege ich verkehrt, einfach ohne Diskussion revertieren. Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Noch mal von vorne... ich glaube der erste Fehler war von 2011. Die Adresse stimmt nicht mit der Adresse im Bild überein. Hier: bei diesem Haus ist ein Geschäftshaus zu vermuten in ein Pelzhänder existiert oder in der Vergangenheit existierte. Ich glaube wenn man sich das Bild anschaut - müssen wir die Adress auf Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 31-35 ändern. Zu deinem Kommentar: Adresse ist gleich Haus (also Straße mit der Hausnummer) -> c:Category:Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 51 (Wuppertal). Wenn es im Haus Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 51 mehrere Mietparteien gibt, also ein Händer und Wohneinheiten - dann sammeln wir das trotzdem in die selbe Kategorie - es sei denn wir legen eine eigene Unterkategorie für den speziellen Händer Kurt H. Christen an. --Atamari (talk) 11:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Ist der Link wirklich der, den Du einfügen wolltest (unterstrichen)? Im Übrigen lege ich es vertrauensvoll in Deine Hände, und damit auch in Hausnummer 31-35. Trotz Dauerregen, schönen Sonntag! -- Kürschner (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
So ich habe mal geschaut, die Adresse "Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 31-35" findet sich auf Google StreetView, dort ist nun ein Buchhänderler (schon lange) und seit wenigen Jahren ein Cafe. Zu Zeit sind keine Bilder auf den Commons (nur eine Ecke von der Ecke mit der auffälligen neuen roten Fassadenfarbe.
Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 51 gibt es auch nicht, Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 53 ist der Chinesische Imbiss (seit wenigen Wochen geschlossen) und Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 49 ist die Sushi-Bar. --Atamari (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Ich habe vorhin in Wuppertal eine Wuppertaler Kollegin angefragt, ob ich mal zum Fotografieren vorbei kommen kann. Magst du Sushi (eingeladen, nicht aufgefordert, heißt es hier)? -- Kürschner (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Und wirst du Sushi essen gehen? Aber ein Pelzhänder ist an beiden Adressen (Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 31-35/Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 51) nicht mehr. --Atamari (talk) 09:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Meine Kollegin ist woanders. Wenn du die Einladung annimmst, die Kollegin hat sich jedoch noch nicht gemeldet, gern. War noch nie Sushi essen (nach dem privaten Sushi-Essen war mir schlecht, sagt meine Frau...). -- Kürschner (talk) 10:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Das wird nix- bekam eben eine Mail, die Kollegin packt gerade ein, sie zieht aus Wuppertal weg. :-( -- Kürschner (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Sushi kann man mal machen in Leverkusen-Wiesdorf war ich jetzt schon zwei mal (war nicht schlecht). Besser ist aber ein Rindersteak ... ;-) --Atamari (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Kann ich nur vollinhaltlich zustimmen! -- Kürschner (talk) 16:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Fur fashion in 1414[edit]

I don't understand the meaning of this category : how could you say this is the "fashion" of 1414 ? but not 1413 ? 1412 ? 1416 ? or 1410 ? because nobody can say the Limbourg Brothers copy a clothing of years before ? Do you have historical sources that can assert this ? At least, a category by decades could be eligible for this period but not by year ! this categorization need also to be explain : why this year but not another one ? Thanks for your explanations. Mel22 (talk) 08:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

You're right, an additional category for decades would make it more correct. And then we need a category for centurys, maybe better for half centurys too. And later back in the time for milleniums. But I am glad, to have a template for the years, most newer pictures have the specificated year. And it is not very funny, to put each year in the category of the decade, the decade in the half century and so on. There are now several thousend images in the year's categories, who shall manage this? I think, this is not perfect, but a very good help for people who want to look which fashion was in that time. For individuell, correct information they have to look the information at the image. I do my best, to make it as accurate as possible. With thousends of pictures in some weeks nevertheless surely with a high quote of mistakes. --- And thank for asking, your question is legitime! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I didn't know that fur fashion change every year at the begining of the 15th cent : can you show me the catalogs ? Several categories are sorted by year, by decade and by century and nobody says it is to hard to manage. And I still don't know why you put this cat on this image... Mel22 (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I started it in the present time. In principle I agree with you, if you make me the templates for decades etc., I will use them in future too. Thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 17:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Category redirects[edit]

Hi, why did you do this, this, this, etc? Matiia (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Wrong button, i think, sorry, I have to think what happened -- Kürschner (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Category Sardegna is a redirect to Sardinia, I wanted to change it in the direct category Sardinia (as you did it now) with Cat-a-lot. But this happend. Sorry, thank you. -- Kürschner (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Zürich, Wohnung Lenin, 1953.jpg ist falsch kategorisiert (II)[edit]

Ich habe dank der Hilfe von Freunden herausgefunden, von wo die Fotografie von 1953 ist: Es handelt sich um die Rue Cheneau-de-Bourg in 1003 Lausanne, von der Brücke Pont Bessières gegen Süden fotografiert. Lenin war hier vermutlich nie.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/96256933@N08/20729639385/in/dateposted-public/

MfG Wandersmaa Wandersmann (talk) 18:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Ich hatte mich oben bedankt und gefreut, füge den von Wandersmaa oben gelöschten Text wieder ein:

 : SUUUPER! Herzlichen Dank, auch für die Information. Ich werde es im Famlienalbum vermerken. -- Kürschner (talk) 12:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC) -- Kürschner (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Deine Scans der Jubiläumsschrift 50 Jahre C. Louis Weber ...[edit]

Lieber Kürschner, vielen Dank für Deine hochaufgelösten und vollumfänglichen Scans, mit denen Du auch Menschen mit anderen Interessen Dienste geleistet hast. Zur Vorbereitung eines eigenständigen Wikipedia-Artikels über C. Louis Weber habe ich mir erlaubt, Bildausschnitte aus dem Buch zu fertigen, die dann den noch zu schreibenden Artikel illustrieren sollen. Sicher im Namen auch anderer Nutznießer Deiner ehrenamtlichen Arbeiten sende ich Dir Gruß und Dank. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Freut mich, bin gespannt auf den Artikel. -- Kürschner (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JarektBot (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Fur[edit]

It clearly only interests fur scientists. The subcategories in Cornelis de Vos have to do with his various genres. We are also not going to add subcategories on 'Paintings of de Vos with hats' or 'shoes' etc., that would make this completely chaotic. That is why it should be a category inside the file not a sub-category of the Cornelis de Vos category. Caravaggista (talk)

Hallo Caravaggista, I cannot agree with you. If you think so, a lot of subcategories would be nonsense. "Facing right" or left and thousends more. Maybe this is not so often in artist's categories, I don't know. But I think, if the name of the artist is in the category name, it should appear there. Two opinions - what shall we do?-- Kürschner (talk)

Capitalization[edit]

I've moved Category:Fur clothing of Nez perce people to Category:Fur clothing of Nez Perce people to follow correct English-language usage. - Jmabel ! talk 22:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Fur. The Full Saga, 2004, book cover.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fur. The Full Saga, 2004, book cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 12:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

little gift :)[edit]

File:Maria Alexandrova's coronation mantle (1856, Kremlin) by shakko 05.JPG and more here. --Shakko (talk) 16:48, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Really great :-O thank you!!! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Pelzmütze / Klebeband[edit]

Die Pelzmütze einer schönen Tübingerin wartet noch auf sachkundige Kategorisierung. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo NearEMPTiness, interessant. Da hast Du mir ja eine Nuss zu knacken gegeben, für die ich im Moment keinen Nussknacker sehe. Ich habe so etwas bisher als eine Frisur angesehen. Jetzt sehe ich auch, dass darunter eine Spitzenverzierung, wohl einer Haube, vorlugt. Im Moment muss ich passen, was für ein Fell das ist, werde ich wohl nie herausfinden. Ich werde künftig auch nach diesen Mützen Ausschau halten. Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 08:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung und den Kommentar, den ich schon hier eingepflegt habe. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Fein! -- Kürschner (talk) 08:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Eurowings head office[edit]

Do you have any plans to photograph the Eurowings head office? It's at Großenbaumer Weg 6 40472 Dusseldorf Germany - I did a Google Maps search and saw that it's in a business park adjacent to the airport. If the park is not accessible to the public perhaps an entrance sign/gate which has a sign for the Eurowings head office would be the best substitution.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 06:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hallo WhisperToMe, this place is a little far up from my home. Maybe in summer, when it's bicycle time. If anybody other likes to do it, feel so free. Regards -- Kürschner (talk) 07:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Ok! What is the best forum for me to see if there's anybody closer to the airport site? WhisperToMe (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
WhisperToMe: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:D%C3%BCsseldorf
Thank you! Just made a post there WhisperToMe (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
The problem could be - who lives at the airport... Good luck! -- Kürschner (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

festplatte bereinigt :-)[edit]

Kürschner in der Langen Erfurt 26 in Erfurt

Hallo Kürschner, vor Jahren hab ich den Laden gesehen und für dich aufgenommen, jetzt auf der festplatte wiederentdeckt :-) hoffe, du freust dich ein bisschen... viele grüße --Z thomas 18:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hoho, hoho, nicht nur ein bisschen. Thomas, der Tag ist gerettet, DANKE! -- Kürschner (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
sehr schön, dann halte ich mal weiter die augen auf :-) --Z thomas 18:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Oh Thomas - ich werde schon nervös. Viel Erfolg und toi toi toi! Kürschner (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Fur clothing of native people of Livonia[edit]

Hi! You added a description of historical region of Livonia. The main problem with this category however currently is that non of these images depict the clothign of native people. These are all about the clothing of either German, Russian, Polish etc. nobility, that is not native to this territory.

Besides if actual clothing of native people was added into this category. The the description and purpose of this category still shouldn't be ambiguous. In other words it should me made clear what extent/period Livonia is considered, otherwise it's a mess. 90.191.109.9 09:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Only historical clothing or special, only or, if modern, especially for that country typical garment should be sorted her (for example military fur clothing). Normal modern mode is to similar in all countries. From people, who live in this region. I think all files sorted here in this moment are descripted by the authors as Livonian people. -- Kürschner (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Internationale Pelzmesse Frankfurt am Main 1969, Messestand der Murrhardter Pelzveredlung MPV (02).jpg[edit]

All deletions on wiki projects are a kind of hiding (deleted files remain on the servers - and are always available for administrators, so -- in a fact -- it is never really deleted).
It is not good you have renamed it with Criterion #1: At the original uploader's request. You are not an uploader!
Read the Commons:File_renaming rules and keep it, please. Yours, Wieralee (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the wrong number, most of this categories have been uploaded from me. -- Kürschner (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Beschreibung Lambertusstraße 5 in Liste der Baudenkmäler in der Altstadt (Düsseldorf)[edit]

Hallo Kürschner,

Die Nr. 5 zu Lambertusstraße gibt es gar nicht. Auf dieser Seite der Straße sind alle Nummern gerade = 2, 4, 6 und 8. Das von Dir eingestellte Bild (sehr schön) ist auch die Nr. 6. Ein tolles Haus de:Lambertusstraße 6 (Düsseldorf). Beste Grüße--Jula2812 (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Lambertusstraße_5 schau -> Lambertusstraße 6 von Süden

oups - ein PS. kommt jetzt auch noch - Schätze Deine Beiträge sehr Face-smile.svg - Danke und nochmals Grüße --Jula2812 (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Oha Jula2812, pardon, sehr aufmerksam - danke, auch für die Blumen. Werde es ändern. -- Kürschner (talk) 17:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Boaaaahhhh bist du schnell. --Jula2812 (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Eben war bei uns eine Glühbirne und die Sicherung durchgebrannt - das hält mich auf und fährt den Rechner runter. Aber ich bewundere gerade deinen Text zwischen den Bildern. Raffiniert. Schönen Abend! -- Kürschner (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Kimsath poster[edit]

Hi, The image i uploaded was a promotional poster of the movie which will help users to recognize the film from other movies which might have the same name. Its a free online poster from the production house, which does not violate any copyright violation as is been added the page of the same movie.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jishnuvv (talk • contribs) 05:24, 03 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 06:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Ueberkategorisierung[edit]

Hallo Kürschner !

Please notice that the category "Den Kongelige Livgarde" (the royal danish lifeguard) is already inclueded in the category "Bearskin hats" ! So adding the category "Bearskin hats" for photographs listed in the category "Den Kongelige Livgarde" is just overcategorization, which is prohibited by our rules. Please read COM:OVERCAT (eine deutsche Übersetzung existiert). Danke sehr.--Jebulon (talk) 13:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Danke Jebulon, wollte gerade nachfagen, ob du weißt, was es stattdessen ist. Alles klar!! -- Kürschner (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


Eine Postkarte meines Ururgroßvaters Ambros Pospischek.[edit]

Die Kürschnerei wurde weiter geführt von seinem Sohn Rudolf Pospischek, danach von dessen Söhnen Emil Rudolf Pospischek und Gerbert Pospischek und zuletzt von Emil Rudolf Pospischeks Sohn, Edlef Holger Pospischek. Der letztgenannte ist mein Vater. {{unsignedIP2|02:51, 28 August 2016|176.0.89.23}

Category:Events in Düsseldorf by year[edit]

Ich habe erst später gesehen, dass auch Düsseldorf Category:Events in Düsseldorf by year hat, das Problem ist hier die andere Schreibweise: " Events in Düsseldorf in JJJJ". Bei Wuppertal und den anderen Beispielen die ich gesehen habe ist die Schreibweise "JJJJ events in Wuppertal‎". Sollte man die Düsseldorfer Kategorien mal verschieben? --Atamari (talk) 12:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Atamari! Wenn du halbwegs sicher bist, dass es überwiegend so gehandhabt wird, nix wie ran. Danke! (Nebenbei, sinnvoller wäre wahrscheinlich gewesen, die Kategorien mit dem Städtenamen beginnen zu lassen. So dass man bei der Kategorieauswahl gleich den Vorschlag bekommt (Düsseldorf events in 2016). Aber es ist, wie es ist. -- Kürschner (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Ich habe noch bei anderen Städten geschaut, die Schreibweise JJJJ events in Wuppertal‎ ist wohl die gebräuchliche. --Atamari (talk) 13:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Rechtschreibfehler Philosphie -> Philosophie[edit]

Hi, ich habe einen Rechtschreibfehler hier korrigiert; falls die fehlerhafte Schreibung gewollt war, bitte rückgängig machen. --Jaquento (talk) 17:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Danke Jaquento, gleich daneben, war noch einer, hättest du ruhig auch gleich mit verbessern können ;-) -- Kürschner (talk) 20:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Haha, ups, ich war zu sehr auf die Fehler aus der Liste von Tippfehlern konzentriert. --Jaquento (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Alles muss man selber machen...[edit]

[6]... Nein, war nur ein Scherz. Wusstest du übrigens, dass Calvin drei Hände hatte und, dass sein Bart nur angeklebt war? Kann man beides auf dem Bild deutlich erkennen! :) --Edelseider (talk) 17:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Ja, ja Edelseider, und er trug immer noch die Mütze, die Mutti ihm damals genäht hatte. - Danke für die Nachhilfe! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Emmendingen, Pelzhaus Schwörer, Fritz und Heidi Schwörer, 2015 (1a).jpg[edit]

Hallo - das Relief ist kein Wappen. Es fehlen alle Merkmale wie Wappenbeschreibung, Wappenschild usw. Bitte nicht in den Bereich Wappen kategorisieren. -- MaxxL - talk 12:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Hallo MaxxL! Nein nicht in den Bereich Wappen. Aber in Zeichen der Kürschner. Kann schlecht dafür noch eine eigene, speziellere (bzw. weniger spezielle) Kategorie einrichten (nicht genau kategorisiert ist nicht so schlimm wie gar nicht kategorisiert). -- Kürschner (talk) 12:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Dies ist eine Majolika-Allegorie, eine Plastik die mit Heraldik aber auch gar nichts gemein hat. Die klassischen Zunftwappen sind dir doch bekannt und in dieser Kategorie allein nur zulässig. -- MaxxL - talk 12:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Emmendingen, Pelzhaus Schwörer, Fritz und Heidi Schwörer, 2015 (1a).jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emmendingen, Pelzhaus Schwörer, Fritz und Heidi Schwörer, 2015 (1a).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 MaxxL - talk 12:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Carl Baum starb erst im Jahre 1966. Es ist für diese Darstellung eine Freigabe der Erben erforderlich. Erst 70 Jahre nach dem Ableben wird die Darstellung gemeinfrei. Zur Vita lies bitte den Artikel in der Badischen Zeitung. -- MaxxL - talk 13:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
MaxxL, das Bild befindet sich dauerhaft an einer Hauswand im öffentlichen Raum. -- Kürschner (talk)

How to count Russian sables[edit]

Hi, maybe you know some info about the way in Russian Tsardom they count sables? Article about "sorok" (forty) in rus. and it's discussion here. --Shakko (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Shakko, 40 is 40 (universally, generally), nothing else for sable (not 24 or 37), see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimmer_(Einheit). It is an old counting for leather and for bundles of furred skins (pelts). For fox skins in some times only 20 skins. In France it meant in some times 60.
I will try to find out, where the numbers 24 or 37(this seems curious?) come from, especially the use of a Zimmer=40, English timbre, in Russia. Soon here. -- Kürschner (talk) 19:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
1) It seems, that sables always were sold separatly, or as pairs, or 2 pairs of 20 skins (= 40 = a timbre, German 1 Zimmer). Taxes and duties were count by Russion pud, especially for leather, but also for furs.
2) "Die Porogen an der Oka lieferten 170 Sorok, das heißt Zimmer gleich 6800 Zobel-Felle ab. (year 1640)" (German "Zimmer" = Russian "sorok".) -- Kürschner (talk) 20:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
3) I looked through four special works about Russian fur trade, but sorry, I found nothing about the numbers 24 or 37. 24 are two dozen, also an often size in the fur trade. But it is another measure. If I find sometimes something more, i will let it know you. Good night! -- Kürschner (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Shakko, I loaded up for you a Russian book about the fur trade in the 17th century. I hope, in the second half of the book you will find an answer for your question:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Fur_Trade_in_the_17th_Century_(Janizkij,_Russian,_1912)
Can you please write the Russian description in the category description? Thanks! -- Kürschner (talk) 08:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Düsseldorf, Andreas Kieling anlässlich der Bambi-Verleihung 2012 (2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Düsseldorf, Andreas Kieling anlässlich der Bambi-Verleihung 2012 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Frze > talk 16:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

File:La pellicia in mostra, Pagin-edizioni, Marzo 1996 (Head of the front cover).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:La pellicia in mostra, Pagin-edizioni, Marzo 1996 (Head of the front cover).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

XXN, 19:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Nuvola apps important.svg
Your image or other content, File:La pellicia in mostra, Pagin-edizioni, Marzo 1996 (Head of the front cover).jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

(tJosve05a (c) 08:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Nuvola apps important.svg
Your image or other content, File:2004 - 2005 Redbook International, International Fur Trade Directory (footer of the cover).jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

(tJosve05a (c) 08:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

BC[edit]

Hi! I tried creating that category by copying yours with a |BC in the template, but it didn't work (it made 1350 AD, according to the box with nearby years). So I wrote to the person who made your furfashioncat template to see if he could fix it. Or can you fix it? Laura1822 (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Laura1822, thank you so much. He is a very nice boy, I think, he will manage it for me ;). -- Kürschner (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Yay!  :) Laura1822 (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Furrier in Hilden Kristen, Germany 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Furrier in Hilden Kristen, Germany 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kasimix (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Furrier in Hilden Kristen, Germany 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Furrier in Hilden Kristen, Germany 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kasimix (talk) 07:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Dateien verschieben[edit]

Hallo Kürschner,

du hast doch das Recht als Dateiverschieber Dateien, die du selbst (oder ein anderer) hochgeladen hast, umzubenennen. LG Hystrix (talk) 13:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Hystrix, mache ich doch laufend. Aber manche Cowboys ziehen eben schneller. Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Hab´ wieder etwas gelernt. Dank dir auch. Hystrix (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Furrier and wholesale dealer Anton Kurzbauer in Gablitz, Austria 2010, advertisement.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Furrier and wholesale dealer Anton Kurzbauer in Gablitz, Austria 2010, advertisement.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JonnyBrazil (talk) 20:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


File:Further Fantasy - Exhibition Galleria Giò Marconi, Milano, 1.-21. March 1999, catalogue Associazione Italiana Pellicceria by Vogue Italia.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Further Fantasy - Exhibition Galleria Giò Marconi, Milano, 1.-21. March 1999, catalogue Associazione Italiana Pellicceria by Vogue Italia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Further Fantasy - Exhibition Galleria Giò Marconi, Milano, 1.-21. March 1999, catalogue Associazione Italiana Pellicceria by Vogue Italia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Further Fantasy - Exhibition Galleria Giò Marconi, Milano, 1.-21. March 1999, catalogue Associazione Italiana Pellicceria by Vogue Italia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sealle (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

für die ersten Tourfotos! Ich hoffe, ich kann in den nächsten Tagen auch noch einiges beisteuern. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 11:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Nicola, schön von dir zu hören. Man könnte sich dranhalten, zum Beispiel mit originellen Schaufensterdekorationen. Beifang aus unserem täglichen Spaziergang. -- Kürschner (talk) 11:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Wie wäre es denn, wenn Du mal einen Stammtisch-Termin festlegst? :) Wiegels kriegt es gerade nicht gebacken, zuviel Arbeit, schätze ich. --Nicola (talk) 11:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Hmm, Nicola. Im Café Velo? ;-) -- Kürschner (talk) 11:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Haben die nicht abends geschlossen? --- andererseits freue ich mich immer auf die Dorade im La Bora, aber daran solls nicht scheitern. Bin aber jetzt offline, bewege mich in Deine Richtung :) --Nicola (talk)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Steinfeld-feld (talk) 16:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

restore files[edit]

Hi, Mr. Kürschner, i am writing to ask you if you could restore some PD files while keeping a recently blocked user, I had tried to do some bugs at the COM: UDR, but without many results, I would ask her if they could do something for some recovery:

--87.14.89.82 15:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.76.230 (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.76.230 (talk) 01:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Zur Info: Haken dran. Da heult nur ein Langzeitvandale. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, الواد الجامد (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hi Kürschner! Could you please clarify what Dębno did you have in mind in Category:Economy of Dębno as there are so many of them — Category:Dębno. Danke schoen. --Taterian (talk) 07:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello Taterian! Good question. Can you help? This Debno, which formerly was German Neudamm (Neumark). Thank you, podziękować! -- Kürschner (talk) 07:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Bingo! Dębno, a town in West Pomeranian Voivodeship (NW Poland) via de:Dębno! --Taterian (talk) 21:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Good morning Taterian! Great, thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 06:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Nice talking to you. --Taterian (talk) 23:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Sam Jones Mayor of Barnsley (2).JPG[edit]

Please do not categorise this as fur fashion of the date of the photograph. British mayors represent the ancient tradition of their city when they wear traditional ceremonial robes. It is not about fashion.

In the case of Barnsley mayors, their robe was presented to the town in the 1870s. Successive mayors continued to wear it on formal occasions, whether they liked it or not, into the 20th century. This type of robe imitates medieval and renaissance fashion, that is, Court fashion of the years before about 1600. It is worn for tradition. Storye book (talk) 10:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Storye book, thank you for your interesting information, great. But where is the problem? Clothing fashion is, what people wear in that time. Fashion from citicens maybe not the same as the individual clothes of lawyers, bakers, kings and so on. But it is a special fashion of the time. And must be categorized in that year as a help for people, who write about fashion of the time. Alternativ there are categories for fur costumes by year, but this categories I want reserve for real costumes, costumes which represent another time as they were used (actors, carneval, etc.). It is the normal use to describe robes as fashion in the time they are used! --- But - better a cateogory to much, then one less and somebody will not find the image he needs. Regards -- Kürschner (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
You say that fashion is "a special fashion of the time." A traditional, ceremonial robe, in the case of British mayors, is usually the exact same single item of clothing, made maybe 100 or more years ago, which is worn by whoever is elected to office for many, many decades. It is usually created in imitation of medieval or renaissance fashion (i.e. up to about 1600.) You could say that the style is medieval/renaissance. Or if you want to define it by when it is worn, then the "time" of the Barnsley mayoral robe is 1873-present - or 19th century, 20th century and 21st century. But it is certainly not a fashion of the 1920s, for example. I agree that costumes can represent the fashion of a previous era. British mayoral robes can fall into the costume category, then, because they are used specifically for parades and display on special occasions. Storye book (talk) 12:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Storye book, that is all fine. But please show me another way to categorize these (and thousends others, which are categorized this way till now, for example military fur clothing, clerics etc.) in the year they were used. I think, we shall let it as it is used till now and do not start dozens (thousends, each year for every sort of robe) of lower or upper categories?! -- Kürschner (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
You say "please show me another way to categorize these." I have already done so: I suggest that you categorise them as costume, since that is what they are - at least for the mayors. In the UK, mayors only wear their traditional robes about once or twice a year - normally for their official photograph on accession, and for their annual Mayoral parade. An exception might be a visit to the town by the Queen, or a national-event funeral. At most other official events they just wear the mayoral chain and a normal office suit. If a young child in the UK asked a robed mayor whether he was wearing "fashion", the mayor would laugh kindly, and explain that his/her fashionable dress was the office suit worn under the robe, and that the robe was a costume for parades, representing the dignity of the town. Storye book (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello Storye book, ok, I will do this with the images you have uploaded. But please consider, in actual fact I am the only one who serve as specialist these categories. It would be nice, to let them as their are... ;-). Thank you, have a nice week! -- Kürschner (talk) 12:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Kurschner. Much appreciated. And thank you for all your had work on the categories. Storye book (talk) 12:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Dateien wiederherstellen[edit]

Guten Morgen, Herr Kürschner, ich möchte Sie fragen, ob Sie die Datei wiederherstellen möchten, die Sie auf diesem Link finden: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/L%C3%BBgn%C3%BBg?uselang = de Danke und guten Tag --87.5.4.145 09:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Es tut mir leid, ich kann weder erkennen um welche Datei es sich handelt noch bin ich befugt (kein Administrator), Dateien wieder herzustellen. Schönen Tag! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Antwort[edit]

danke dem gleichen und guten Tag —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.5.4.145 (talk) 09:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Lanpher Furs North Star Brand Season 1906-7 Lanpher, Skinner & Co, Saint Paul Minnesota[edit]

Hello Kürschner,

I am a PhD student studying the use of Australian native animal furs. I was very excited to discover the Lanpher and Skinner catalogues that you have uploaded. They are wonderful and provide a great resource on the use of such a great variety of different furs.

I would like to reproduce some of the pages from the 1906 catalogue in an academic article in 'History Australia' journal that I am writing on the use of Australian possum, wallaby, koala (wombat) and platypus furs.

The pages that I would like to use are: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lanpher_Furs_Automobile_coat_lady_Opossum.jpg (between 25 & 26) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lanpher_Furs_page_39.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lanpher_Furs_Sheep_lined_ulsters_11_21.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lanpher_Furs_Australian_Wombat_Coat_S63.jpg

It would be a very kind favour on your part, as unfortunately I cannot afford to pay you as I am a student and I do not get paid for the article. However I promise to send you a copy of the article.

Can you reply giving me permission to do this?

The journal requires 600dpi quality for reproduction.

I am new to wikicommons but I think that you can email me? Please reply here if not.

Thanks EDownes (talk)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by EDownes (talk • contribs) 01:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hallo EDownes, I answered you per mail. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

"Costumes"[edit]

File:Raising John T. Williams Memorial Totem Pole 167.jpg, File:Raising John T. Williams Memorial Totem Pole 185.jpg: in my experience, the term "costumes" for Native American regalia is considered offensive, so I an changing the category you added to Category:Fur clothing of native people of North America. I figured you might want to know for the future. - Jmabel ! talk 17:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Oops, I see, more specific categories on everything but year were already there. I hope you don't mind that I'm removing Category:Fur costumes in 2012 from these two photos. If you can come up with something differently worded, I'm all for the inclusion of the category, but the word is really a bad choice in this context. - Jmabel ! talk 17:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jmabel, my answer got lost, we wrote at the same time. I try it again. The alternative category for clothing which is current wear in the time is "Fur fashion in 2012" (here I was not sure), if only the photograph is from this year "Furs in 2012" and if it is clothing or decoration, usually from another time (or carnival, theatre etc.), I use "Costumes in 2012", because I think, these are enough categories for the theme... Thank you for your engagement. -- Kürschner (talk) 17:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Fur_clothing_of_native_people[edit]

Themightyquill (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello and I am sorry[edit]

I am sorry I did not answer your request on my Talk page. This is the first time I have logged in since August. My house was destroyed by Hurricane Harvey and I have been very busy! I hope you got the help you needed and that you are well. Laura1822 (talk) 17:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear Laura1822, how terrible! I hope, all is as well as possible now! Yes, I found somebody, who could clear my bad English problem. Thank you, with best wishes for the future, regards from Germany, -- Kürschner (talk) 17:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! It was very bad: every house in our neighborhood and other nearby neighborhoods was destroyed by flood. People are rebuilding though! And no people died. My family and I are safe and as well as we can be. We are still very tired!

Museum zur Völkerschlacht bei Leipzig, Dolman und Pelz eines Freiwilligen Jägers zu Pferd[edit]

Von welcher Einheit der französischenn Armee wurde denn das getragen? Nur mal so ne Frage! -- Centenier (talk) 13:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Das ist jetzt sehr hinterhältig gefragt! Ich ändere es, danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 13:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Centenier (talk) 13:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)War keine böse Absicht! --

Fur lined coats for men[edit]

Hello. I am wondering if you have images of fur lined coats in catalogues etc that is not on wikicommons? Can you tell me where i can get catalogues and photos of these coats for myself? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.129.201.166 (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

All images of my and my friend's catalogues etc. you will find at Commons, if they are free copyright. Our collections are now dissolved. Most items I got from Ebay. There is a German article at Wikipedia about fur linings: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelzinnenfutter --
Next days some current photos will follow. Kürschner (talk) 17:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Palls[edit]

I think we need two categories for palls. Does File:Stadtgeschichtliches Museum Leipzig, Sargtuchschild der Kürschner-Innung.jpg relate to the linen cloth used to cover the chalice during Catholic mass? That's what category:Palls is. Which sort of pall does File:Stadtgeschichtliches Museum Leipzig, Sargtuchschild der Kürschner-Innung.jpg belong with? - PKM (talk) 20:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Oh, does File:Stadtgeschichtliches Museum Leipzig, Sargtuchschild der Kürschner-Innung.jpg go with Category:Pallium (clothing) (also "Palla" in Latin)? - PKM (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
PKM, thank you. No, I will try a translation for Sargtuchschild: A plate, probably sewn, on a funeral pall (of the furriers guild). Therefore I think it should categorized under "palls". Have a nice evening! -- Kürschner (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Ah, thank you! We have Category:Funeral_cloths "English: A funeral cloth, a hearse cloth, a funeral pall or a mort cloth is a cloth or textile which covers a casket or coffin at funerals."
Did you do all the work on fur in German Wikipedia? If so, thank you, it's great. - PKM (talk) 21:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
PKM, thank you again!

Category:Paintings_by_Albert_Guillaume[edit]

Look, who many 20th century fur fashion! --Shakko (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Good morning Shakko! Geat! I love it! Thank you so much! -- Kürschner (talk) 07:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Use of the "Undo" link[edit]

Hi! Do not use the "Undo" link when you are not undoing things. I received a notification saying that you had undone my edit and it is also written in your edit comment that you have undone my edit. But you did never change my edit since it was a correct edit. Svensson1 (talk) 18:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Sorry Svensson1, I made a lot of undoes with these categories of one user, and I didn't see this edit was from another user. But by the way, I corrected your wrong edit, and so it was not really wrong ;-). -- Kürschner (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Düsseldorf, Blauschafe von Rainer Bonk auf dem Burgplatz, Juli 2012 (1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Düsseldorf, Blauschafe von Rainer Bonk auf dem Burgplatz, Juli 2012 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ies (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Kürschner, ich merke gerade erst, dass das Bild von Dir ist. Leider entspricht es nicht den Copyright- bzw. Lizenzregeln von Commons, da es ein modernes Kunstwerk zeigt, dass hier nicht zum Verbleib aufgestellt ist und somit nicht von FoP-Germany abgedeckt ist. Du könntest es noch durch Hochladen ins deutsche Wiki retten! Das gleiche Problem sehe ich übrigens auch bei File:Düsseldorf, Blauschafe von Rainer Bonk auf dem Burgplatz, Juli 2012 (2).jpg. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 16:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Ies, aber du hast leider recht, danke. Werde deinen Tipp berherzigen. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

user Kboht removing "fur" categories from "artist" categories[edit]

I think I've seen him doing this several times already, most recently, with Wenzel Hollar: undo edit url
It pains me to see some random guy thoughtlessly ruining the great job you've done over the years.
I assume all the fur categories are on your watchlist, so, you probably know this already, but just in case.
Primaler (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Dear Primaler, thank you very much for your encouraging message. Great! -- Kürschner (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Domestic cat (clothing)[edit]

Thanks so much for all the work you've done on this category. I love all the pictures of this type of fur. Do you think that these photos should be moved to this category? They look more like domestic cat to me.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tatra_T77_rear_view.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Women%27s_fur_fashion_at_the_Paris_show_1905_(4).jpg

Hjlocke83 (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Hjlocke83, thank you for your flowers! Very difficult to say, but I did it, probably you are right. Have a nice day, -- Kürschner (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I thought they might be, but it's a little hard to be sure from the pictures. If you have any other photos for this category, I'd love to see them. I really like the red tabby coat this woman is wearing: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carnaval_des_Femmes_de_Bagneux_2016_-_P1470113.JPG and am intrigued by the coats made from cat paws: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Domestic_cat_fur_paws_jacket_and_coat%2C_1987.jpg. I've never seen ones like that before. -- Hjlocke83 (talk) 06:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hjlocke83, Chinese cat paws had been a not expensive fur for young furriers, to create their own fashion. The customers which bought it, one was a teacher (very active in the German Green Party), we mail her till today, was very certisfied. The colour was a little bit photosensitive - nobody is perfect...-- Kürschner (talk) 07:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

-- Kürschner (talk) 07:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Very interesting info. Thanks for the responses. Looks like it would take a lot of labor to make (it must have taken hundreds of paws for the full length!), but I suppose the fur came as plates? Good to hear that the customers liked the furs. Did cat fur sell very well? -- Hjlocke83 (talk) 02:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, as plates. Sorry, in German: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelzreste#Kastoria_und_Siatista
Hjlocke83 - No, cat fur was not an important fur, only a little bit a little time after the last World War. Since some years it is forbidden here to sell it, cat and dog skins go into the trash. Have a nice weekend! -- Kürschner (talk) 06:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

dupe-Markierungen[edit]

Hallo Kürschner, du hast eine Reihe von Uploads als Duplikat zur SL markiert, dabei aber die falsche Syntax gewählt, was unnötige Mehrarbeit bereitet, da kein aktives Link auf die Zieldatei gesetzt wurde. Korrekt wäre {{duplicate|Zieldateiname.xyz}}.
Hinzu kommt, dass du bei mehreren dieser Dateien die falsche Zieldatei angegeben hast, womit es sich nicht mehr um ein Duplikat handelt. Letztere habe ich komplett revertiert. Die müsstest du mit der korrekten Zieldatei erneuern. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Túrelio, danke und sorry. Wäre es nicht einfacher, ich würde "auf Wunsch des Hochladenden" angeben"? Das wird doch in der Regel auch akzeptiert? Der Fehler hier war, dass die Dokumente doppelt vorhanden waren, und ich das erst nachträglich bemerkt habe. Noch mal danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok, das ging in diesem Fall auch, weil die Bilder ja unbenutzt sind und erst kürzlich hochgeladen wurden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Düsseldorf, 2013-11-20, Wir fordern die Aufklärung der Morde Sakine, Fidan und Leyla.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Düsseldorf, 2013-11-20, Wir fordern die Aufklärung der Morde Sakine, Fidan und Leyla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

E4024 (talk) 09:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


Zwei F(a)elle für Dich[edit]

Hallo Kürschner, darf ich Dich zu diesen zwei Bildern (File:Papenburg - Mittelaltermarkt 2017 28 ies.jpg, File:Papenburg - Mittelaltermarkt 2017 19 ies.jpg) um passende Kategorien bezüglich der Felle bitten? Das kannst Du besser als ich! Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Ies, prima, danke. F(a)elle gelöst. Heute Abend nicht verpassen: Falk, im Ersten, letzter Fall. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Danke. Da Deine Diskussionsseite langsam unübersichtlich wird, wäre es vielleicht eine gute Idee, die abschnittsweise zu archivieren. Schaue doch mal, wie ich das Problem auf meiner Diskussionsseite gelöst habe. -- Ies (talk) 17:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich weiß, ich weiß. Ich kann mich so schlecht von etwas trennen ;-). Ich weiß auch, dass es dann nicht wirklich weg ist... Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Die Quadratur des Pelzes, Cora Fisch (3).jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Die Quadratur des Pelzes, Cora Fisch (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Die Quadratur des Pelzes, Cora Fisch (2).jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Die Quadratur des Pelzes, Cora Fisch (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Die Quadratur des Pelzes, Cora Fisch (1).jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Die Quadratur des Pelzes, Cora Fisch (1).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fur egg warmers by Cora Fisch (2).jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fur egg warmers by Cora Fisch (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Martin Sg., die Genehmigungen von Cora Fisch sollten eigentlich bereits eingegangen sein. Ich habe sicherheitshalber noch einmal erinnert. Danke. -- Kürschner (talk) 20:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Martin Sg., die Eingangsbestätigung der Freigabe ist [Ticket#: 2018061910003775]. -- Kürschner (talk) 06:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:H. Espey, Pelzzutaten-Großhandel, 2018 (3).jpg usw.[edit]

Hallo Kürschner, ich kann die Datei(en) nicht löschen, wenn sie noch auf :de in Benutzung ist. --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry Túrelio, ich hoffe, ich habe alle erwischt. Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)