User talk:KPFC

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KPFC!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Queen – montagem – new.png[edit]

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Queen – montagem – new.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear KPFC,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello KPFC, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


Code issues in User:KPFC/common.js[edit]

Hi KPFC, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:KPFC/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 5 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 1 character 2: Expected a string and instead saw {. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
  2. ISSUE: line 1 character 3: Expected ':' and instead saw 'SD'. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
  3. ISSUE: line 1 character 5: Expected a JSON value. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
  4. ISSUE: line 1 character 5: Expected '}' and instead saw '|'. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
  5. ISSUE: line 1 character 6: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '1'. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC).


Code issues in User:KPFC/common.js[edit]

Hi KPFC, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:KPFC/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 1 column 7: Invalid left-hand side in assignment

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vespa orientalis (KPFC) 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vespa orientalis (KPFC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Vanessa cardui (KPFC).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vanessa cardui (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Taglilien Hybride (KPFC).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taglilien Hybride (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basile Morin 12:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Papilio machaon (KPFC) (10).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papilio machaon (KPFC) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality PumpkinSky 02:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality PumpkinSky 02:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Phacelia tanacetifolia 01 (KPFC).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phacelia tanacetifolia 01 (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Passionsblumenhybrid (KPFC).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passionsblumenhybrid (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blossom of Rubus sectio Rubus (KPFC) 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blossom of Rubus sectio Rubus (KPFC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Echinops spinosissimus and Carlina Graeca.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus and Carlina Graeca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Deutsch  español  English  français  русский  українська  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Commons File mover.svg

Hi KPFC, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Didym (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Didym (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2018-06-02 Kurmainzische Statthalterei Erfurt – Jugendfotoworkshop (KPFC) 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-06-02 Kurmainzische Statthalterei Erfurt – Jugendfotoworkshop (KPFC) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
2018-05-22 Carrer de Verdi – Barcelona (KPFC) 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-05-22 Carrer de Verdi – Barcelona (KPFC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg.jpg
Hallo KPFC,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso![edit]

English | Italiano | +/−


Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019![edit]

Χαίρετε!

Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα επειδή συμμετείχατε προηγουμένως στον ετήσιο διαγωνισμό Wiki Loves Monuments στην Ελλάδα. Θα χαρούμε να συμμετάσχετε και φέτος στο Wiki Loves Monuments και να βοηθήσετε να καταγράψετε την τοπική μας κληρονομιά για τις μελλοντικές γενιές.

Μπορείτε να βρείτε περισσότερες λεπτομέρειες στον ιστότοπο Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Ελλάδα. Ή αν έχετε τραβήξει φωτογραφίες σε άλλες χώρες, μπορείτε να ελέγξετε τις διεθνείς επιλογές. Ο διαγωνισμός του τρέχοντος έτους διαρκεί μέχρι τις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2019.

Πολλές ευχαριστίες για τη βοήθειά σας για άλλη μια φορά! --Geraki TLG 04:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 01.jpg[edit]


File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 01.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 02.jpg[edit]


File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 02.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg.jpg

Hallo KPFC,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Logo TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen[edit]

Hallo, ich habe gesehen, dass die Datei zunächst zu File:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen 1984 to 1996.svg verschoben wurde und dann wieder zurückgesetzt wurde. Um etwas Licht ins Dunkel zu bringen, was das Logo angeht, habe ich etwas recherchiert. Ggf. können dann alle falschen Dateinamen entsprechend angepasst werden:

Ich hoffe, dass das hilfreich war. Vielleicht können die Dateien ja entsprechend umbenannt werden, falls alles mit Commons-Richtlinien etc. vereinbar ist. Da kenne ich mich nicht aus. 194.8.192.162 09:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, 194.8.192.162. Dachte erst das sei ein offensichtlicher Fehler, weil ich das Logo des Fußballvereins kannte ohne zu wissen, dass der Verein ein anderes Logo hat, dann hab ich den Hinweis auf w:de:Diskussion:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen gesehen.
Das einzige, was bei File:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen.svg nicht stimmt ist ja die Umrandung und der Rotton, sehe ich das richtig? Falls es in der aktuellen Form tatsächlich nie existiert hat, würde hier einfach eine neue Version hochladen. –KPFC💬 10:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Genau. Die neue Version existiert ja sogar bereits bei w:de:Datei:Logo TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen (2021).svg 185.209.238.168 15:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)