User talk:KTC

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Greenwich Park panorama 2013-09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greenwich Park panorama 2013-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

1SL Alan West (cropped).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alan West, photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Cat-a-lot: Removing from Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 by Katie Chan[edit]

Bleah. I seem to have messed up this morning (it was too early!) by accidentally removing all your WLM images from the wrong category. I put the wrong one into cat-a-lot, and removed your images from Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 by Katie Chan. I'm so sorry. I'm looking into how to revert that, but for the moment don't know of a tool that can bulk rollback all the edits at once. Am investigating. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

All fixed. :) It's a good thing they're almost always titled in the form of "EH1234567 XYZ.jpg", and no one else has decided to name their uploads using similar names. KTC (talk) 10:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Oh, thanks. And sorry again. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

AoS McDull statue.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McDull, statue at Avenue of Stars, Hong Kong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2013 - Bradley Wiggins 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2013 - Bradley Wiggins 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me -- Spurzem 09:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Star Ferry's Harbour Tour 12.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star Ferry's Harbour Tour 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear KTC,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear KTC,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sony HDR-CX220E.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony HDR-CX220E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 10:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 photo exhibition at Wikimania 2013.JPG[edit]

Hi, this photo is a derivative work. The exhibited and displayed original works need credits. Besides authors' names, the licences, and titles (if given at the description pages) are required. Please add this information for each work to avoid deletion requests. Thank you. --Martina talk 18:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Unlike the other people you have left similar comments to, when I first uploaded I had already clearly marked in the Permission field the photo as {{Derived from}} each of the images shown. If you had actually looked, you would have seen that. In fact, I had also done so with a similiar photo from another photographer. If you don't think that's enough, to borrow a enwiki term SOFIXIT. Altneratively, feel free to nominate it for deletion, along with Template:Derived from, and I'm guessing most of the 27,000 images here. Regards -- KTC (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Like in the other files with images of WLM exihibitions that I commented on, your file description page does not name the authors nor the specific licenses chosen by them (partly national CC versions). Best practice examples how to comply with the license requirements are File:GLAM-WIKI_2013_068.jpg and File:Wikimania 2013 reception area, Jockey Club Auditorium, Hong Kong Polytechnic University - 20130811-03.JPG.
The very vast majority of files with Template:Derived_from are cropped or otherwise optimized images, thus original authors and licenses are anyway copied from in the original work. --Martina talk 05:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
I don't disagree that what you added to this is perhaps better practice. However, what's currently on File:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 photo exhibition at Wikimania 2013.JPG is sufficient. CC stated in their FAQ on CC4 that "licensees [can] satisfy the attribution requirement with a link to a separate page for attribution information [... as] was already common practice on the internet and possible under earlier versions of the licenses". If that wasn't true, every use of images hosted on Wikimedia Commons at the other projects would be considered a violation. Don't get me wrong, I applaud your efforts in getting image licensing compliant but let's have some common sense and spend our energy going after those images that doesn't have the source images listed/linked at all. -- KTC (talk) 11:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
CC4 does not apply to these 2012 files. CC-by-ca 3.0 license legalcode does not cover CC's point of view. There are even court decisions that a hyperlink is not a suffiient attribution. I agree that giving no source at all is even worse. But that doesn't heal a weaker copyvio. --Martina talk 18:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
I didn't say CC4 applies here. We will just have to agree to disagree on the interpretation here. You are of course free to remove every use of Commons files on all the other Wikimedia projects since by your interpretation they are all copyvio..... -- KTC (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
My interpreation does not go so far.
"if a credit for all contributing authors of the Adaptation or Collection appears, then as part of these credits and in a manner at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors. "
The main problem in your handling can be seen at a glance, if you click on the button "use this file on the web" at the top of your file's description page. --Martina talk 06:20, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear KTC,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Blackburn Pavilion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Blackburn Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 18:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014[edit]

Hello KTC! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poco2 17:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-05 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-05 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-06 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-06 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ightham Mote, west & south.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ightham Mote, west & south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Tilted ccw --Cccefalon 04:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC).
All the buildings verticals are straight, the chimneys in the centre is not straight, hence the appearance. See this. -- KTC 20:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stegop 15:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Photo review[edit]

Hi,you forget to firm your comment,anyway if you want only leave a opinion on a picture you can do without decline (naturally if you don't be sure) bye :) --LivioAndronico talk 18:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Yuen Long Wing Wah mooncakes box.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Yuen Long Wing Wah mooncakes box.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SMUconlaw (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Richard Holmes[edit]

Katie, I think you might add quotes to 'women in science' in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Holmes_%28biographer%29#mediaviewer/File:Richard_Holmes.JPG JohnWheater (talk) 16:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC) (Maybe you could also help find my talk page, which may have got lost because of the homonymous train robber:-) )

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnWheater (talk • contribs) 16:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Unfortunately not, I have only a PSD format. What is your deadline? Maybe I can convert to SVG in a few days. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Although we will have a new identity soon this will be useful. I will send you through WeTransfer. Regards, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Monks' cellarium, Fountains Abbey.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monks' cellarium, Fountains Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC) * Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I´m just waiting for someone, who will say: "The eyes are not sharp!" ;-) --Hubertl 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Owain Doull 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Owain Doull 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:40, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bradley Morgan 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bradley Morgan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK --Kreuzschnabel 06:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bert De Backer 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bert De Backer 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could do with 0.5 EV less but still OK --Kreuzschnabel 06:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
ToB 2014 stage 8a - Robert Partridge 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Robert Partridge 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This one is definitely overexposed IMHO. Fixable? --Kreuzschnabel 06:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done KTC 11:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK now --Kreuzschnabel 22:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK categories[edit]

I don't understand Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, German supported by Wikimedia UK and Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English supported by Wikimedia UK. For a start, I don't think it is at all useful to have hand-made categories on Commons that indicate usage or feature status on any given Wikipedia. There are hundreds of thousands of images used on Wikipedia and they get added and removed every day. Who would maintain such a list? The individual pages record their usages and if you want to discover usage then there are tools on Commons / toolserver that retrieve this sort of thing by making a simply query. If it can't get the "featured" status then perhaps that can be fixed - because Dschwen's "good pictures" button certainly has access to that info. Secondly, my images were not "supported by Wikimedia UK". I wasn't paid, nor was my equipment donated by Wikmedia UK. The fact that I entered them into WLMUK is quite different to "supported by". I'd have taken and uploaded those images regardless of the contest. -- Colin (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Colin, categories for featured status on Wikipedia (as opposed to usage) is not new. While usage can and does change easily every day, featured status is something special that we want to highlight, as done by the little banner in the image description page for example. I understand your point about the "supported by" and it was not my intention to suggest otherwise. I have hopefully clarify what I meant a little bit. If you want me to remove your images from the categories, I would of course do so. -- KTC (talk) 10:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Well there is already Category:Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2014. I think it would be clearer if my pictures were in that category only. You can add the WLMUK categories to to a "supported by WMUK" parent category if you like. Best to keep "supported by" image categories for those that really were funded (or taken at events organised by) WM UK. I see you've changed the wording but it doesn't really change the fact that the category is wrong and appears to be taking credit for images that aren't really directly supported. I believe some of Diliff's cathedral images were partly supported by WMUK when he did his grand tour but not all of them will be. -- Colin (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
@Colin: how about this? -- KTC (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I think there is confusion as there are two feature picture forums. So some of images in that category are featured pictures on Commons that just happen to also be in Wikipedia articles. I would expect "Featured pictures on Wikipedia" to be ones that were awarded FP on Wikipedia. -- Colin (talk) 08:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
They all are. All 9 images in that category at the moment are featured pictures on at least one language Wikipedia, at least according to their description page: "This is a featured picture on the XXX language Wikipedia (... ...) and is considered one of the finest images." -- KTC (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (04).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 06:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: FPC nomination[edit]

Ok, ✓ Done thanks.--لا روسا (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Could you sign, please?[edit]

[1] thanks! --Hubertl (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Doh! Thanks Hubertl. -- KTC (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi KTC, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 06:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK --Kreuzschnabel 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
tilted CCW --Kreuzschnabel 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done New version uploaded. -- KTC 00:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
ok --Kreuzschnabel 20:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
CNY 2015 London - lion dance (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Needs perspective and/or tilt correction (background) --Kreuzschnabel 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done New version uploaded. -- KTC 00:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
ok --Kreuzschnabel 20:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Catamaran's capstans.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catamaran's capstans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support good --Christian Ferrer 21:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yellow-legged gull, Port of Xàbia (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, Port of Xàbia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good shot! --Isiwal 22:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hockei 11:42, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support, not too curious what it's eating. –Be..anyone 17:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Yellow-legged gull, CAC (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, CAC (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yellow-legged gull, CAC (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, CAC (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Weak support QI for me, despite the shallow DOF. --C messier 07:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Tight crop[edit]

Hey Katie, any chance you could upload a version of File:Boat Race 2015 - Women's Trophy (01).jpg with a tight crop around the trophy itself? I'd like to use it in en:Women's Boat Race 2014 if I may as it was the first time that particular trophy was presented. If it's ok, could you ping me at Wikipedia as I seldom frequent Commons.... Thanks! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 17:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Chapultepec Zoo - African lion (06).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - African lion (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 17:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Chapultepec Zoo - Canadian wolf (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - Canadian wolf (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

FPCBot[edit]

Hi, FPCBot seems be enjoying the holiday again. Can you solve the problem? Regards. --Laitche (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

[2] -- KTC (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/File:Pedicularis sceptrum-carolinum - Seed capsule - Niitvälja bog.jpg[edit]

What did I wrong by removing withdrawn FP candidate? --Ivar (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

ok-ok I got it, sorry! --Ivar (talk) 11:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured pictures/Animated[edit]

Hello KTC, maybe you can help me. Have you the ability and or the right to change the FPCBot. In this gallery the BOT sort the images in this way however that's not corresponding to the current formatting of the gallery. I changed the formatting, as I did for all the other FP galleries, because it was not really pleasant. I would like the BOT sort the image in the unsorted section, as it is done in the other galleries. Can you help me? Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: I have issued a pull request on Github with the required code changes. Once reviewed and approved by @Daniel78:, it'll start taking effect the following day. -- KTC (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Northern rockhopper penguin (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Northern rockhopper penguin (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Vietnamese mossy frog (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Vietnamese mossy frog (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality in dark colors. --Marrovi 22:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Noreen Murray (cropped).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Noreen Murray (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Menai Suspension Bridge (7604).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menai Suspension Bridge (7604).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --A.Savin 07:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
St Tysilio's Church, Menai Bridge (7601).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Tysilio's Church, Menai Bridge (7601).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Conwy Castle (7989).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conwy Castle (7989).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beach hut at Abersoch (7297).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach hut at Abersoch (7297).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality high enough for a Q1photo, but IMO composition is not really interesting --Michielverbeek 06:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Blaenau Ffestiniog railway station (7821).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blaenau Ffestiniog railway station (7821).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Awesome scenario. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

FPCBot[edit]

Hi,

I think you set up the FPCBot account at wmflabs and I have not used it myself so I am not sure how to login. But do you know how to stop the daily spam from "Cron Daemon", I am getting a mail every time the bot is running with content "Your job 1112609 ("python2") has been submitted". /Daniel78 (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

@Daniel78:, I should have changed it so that it doesn't email you anymore. Let me know if you still receive the next email at 00:00GMT. -- KTC (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Didn't get any further mails. Thanks a lot! :) /Daniel78 (talk) 10:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (011).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (148).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (148).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit too much noise, can you reduce it?--Peulle 12:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --KTC 15:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK.--Peulle 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (149).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (149).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit too much noise, can you reduce it?--Peulle 12:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --KTC 15:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit soft but OK.--Peulle 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (043).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (043).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image itself is good quality but you need to add a category and description including the player's name.--Peulle 11:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done -- KTC 14:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. A portrait format would probably have given a better composition, but good enough for QI. Good timing and focus! -- Slaunger 15:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (048).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (048).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image itself is good quality but you need to add a category and description including the player's name.--Peulle 11:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done -- KTC 14:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Symbol support vote.svg Support QI.--Peulle 18:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (062).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good enough, although it could have been rotated a bit more. But then again this is not an architecture shot, so not terribly important. -- Slaunger 18:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (091).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (091).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image itself is good quality but you need to add a category and description that include the team name.--Peulle 11:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done -- KTC 14:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Excellent quality. -- Slaunger 15:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (205).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (205).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2017 London Marathon - Misato Michishita.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 London Marathon - Misato Michishita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good shot, but those neon colors are not helping. Do you think you could reduce some of the glare and 'halos' they create around the vest and shoes? --W.carter 19:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
How about now? --KTC 22:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I guess that is as good as it can get. Good quality. --W.carter 09:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
2017 London Marathon - Josh Griffiths.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 London Marathon - Josh Griffiths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Acceptable as an action shot but the white areas are a bit overexposed. Do you think you could bring those down to get some detail in there and also get a little more contrast in the face so we can see his features despite all the sweat? --W.carter 19:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Should be better now. --KTC 22:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Much better. Good quality. --W.carter 09:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
2017 London Marathon - Men's Wheelchair.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 London Marathon - Men's Wheelchair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good action shot with focus in the right place but too much uninteresting asphalt. Do you think you could crop it a bit? See note. --W.carter 19:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done --KTC 22:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 09:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (062) (cropped).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (062) (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:London Bees v Millwall Lionesses, 15 April 2017 (062).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Deryck Chan at Wikimania 2017[edit]

Okay, thanks for the category. I think there's also Category:Deryck Chan at Wikimania 2014 (but curiously no 2013). Charles Matthews has categorised some stuff under the redlink-category Category:Deryck Chan so you're welcome to create that... Deryck Chan (talk) 13:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Eight days into Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

WLM United Kingdom.svg Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK
Thank you for submitting so many photos to the competition! You're one of five people who have uploaded more than 50 images to the UK competition. Photos from this year are already being used on Wikipedia - though it may take a while for the monuments map to catch up so don't be disheartened if some pins haven't turned blue yet. WLM runs until the end of the month, so please add more and invite other people to take part. The UK is closing in on 1,000 uploads putting us just behind the United States in 14th place out of 49 countries taking part. Let's see if we can jump a few places. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message here or contact me directly at richard.nevell@wikimedia.org.uk.

Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1211382 Statue of George II (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1211382 Statue of George II (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
HE1289371 Entrance Building To Greenwich Footway Tunnel (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1289371 Entrance Building To Greenwich Footway Tunnel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Boat Race 2015 - CUWBC (07).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boat Race 2015 - CUWBC (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Good sharpness and composition. --Peulle 16:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1080991 Old Town Hall Stratford (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1080991 Old Town Hall Stratford (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 03:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
HE1065141 Entrance Building To Geenwich Footway Tunnel (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1065141 Entrance Building To Geenwich Footway Tunnel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 03:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1065817 Formerly St Pauls Presbyterian Church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1065817 Formerly St Pauls Presbyterian Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
HE1080991 Old Town Hall Stratford (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1080991 Old Town Hall Stratford (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
HE1081059 Lincoln Memorial Tower 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1081059 Lincoln Memorial Tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Qi imo.--ArildV 19:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1394456 K6 Telephone Kiosk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1394456 K6 Telephone Kiosk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

An update from Wiki Loves Monuments UK[edit]

Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK WLM United Kingdom.svg
More than 300 people have contributed a total of 4,000 photos to this year's competition and we wanted to say thank you for helping us get this far. The competition runs until the end of September, and you can upload as many images as you want - so feel free to document some more sites. Or why not go through your old images to see if you have any others that could be submitted?

Since you've already submitted some pictures to the competition, you might be interested in the banner mini-contest; to take part you crop your images to a 7:1 and upload a new version. You can find out more about how to do that here. In the meantime, we hope you enjoy the competition and share it with others! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1078922 Gates And Railings Along North Boundary Of Royal Naval College (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1078922 Gates And Railings Along North Boundary Of Royal Naval College (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good but it needs a specific category Poco a poco 10:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done--KTC 12:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
HE1211382 Statue of George II (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1211382 Statue of George II (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 11:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
HE1211382 Statue of George II (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1211382 Statue of George II (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. The file description should be better --Moroder 10:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Common lime butterflies.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Common lime butterflies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, this is quite good. KTC, I think you should note in your file description that this is a mating couple. -- Ikan Kekek 21:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done KTC 21:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Tottenham Hotspur LFC v Blackburn Rovers LFC, 28 May 2017 (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tottenham Hotspur LFC v Blackburn Rovers LFC, 28 May 2017 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Billy69150 11:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
London Bees v Everton LFC, 20 May 2017 (001).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Everton LFC, 20 May 2017 (001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
London Bees v Everton LFC, 20 May 2017 (002).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bees v Everton LFC, 20 May 2017 (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --ArildV 05:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1290044 Royal Naval College North East Building Queen Anne's Quarter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1290044 Royal Naval College North East Building Queen Anne's Quarter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality but overcorrected perspective (the walls are leaning outwards).--ArildV 19:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Distortion from the stitching I'm afraid. Tried but unable to fix. -- KTC 08:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC) I understand, not a big problem imo. Maybe a second opinion?--ArildV 20:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support Greatly detailed. I think the alignment is ok for QI --Milseburg 15:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Common lime butterflies.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:ZSL London - Common lime butterflies.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ZSL London - Common lime butterflies.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Greenwich Park panorama 2017-09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greenwich Park panorama 2017-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI IMO -- Sixflashphoto 04:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HE1078922 Gates And Railings Along North Boundary Of Royal Naval College (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HE1078922 Gates And Railings Along North Boundary Of Royal Naval College (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 10:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 ends on December, the 15th[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition.svg
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

Twitter Logo Mini.svg #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Linkedin icon.svg Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Fortezza Verrucole Archeopark interno.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fortezza Verrucole Archeopark interno.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fortezza Verrucole Archeopark interno.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello! Thank you for participating in the banner competition of Wiki Loves Monuments! Some of your page banners are already in use in Wikivoyage travel guides. The full gallery of banners, their current usage, and the results of the competition can be found here. We look forward to your future contributions to Wikivoyage. See you next year!

On behalf of the organizers, --Alexander (talk) 08:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons Photographers meetup[edit]

Dear KTC;

I invite you to the meetup for wikimedia photographers and for the members of commons photographers user group during the wikimedia conference , the meeting will be hold in saturday at 16:00, if you are interested to attend the meeting please add your name to this page Touzrimounir (talk) 16:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trooping the Colour 2018 (13).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trooping the Colour 2018 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 12:31, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear KTC,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Demoted FP[edit]

Sadly one of your FP nominations was demoted to 'not featured' due to a sock double vote. However, you are welcome to re-nominated if you like. The nom is: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg. --Cart (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Photo ID[edit]

Hi there. A user came into the Wikipedia help room tonight saying that this photo which was extracted from here is not of Alice White but instead a different (French) rower. I am in no position to judge whether this is true or not and so instead pass along this concern for you to look into (or not) as you see fit. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

I just took (and uploaded) the photo, another editor did the ID, but yeah I think it's wrong. I'll fix it. Thanks -- KTC (talk) 03:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New 2019[edit]

Hallacas con pan de jamon, Venezuelan food.jpg Happy New 2019
Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer 01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Happy New 2019[edit]

Hallacas con pan de jamon, Venezuelan food.jpg Happy New 2019
Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer 01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (talk) 09:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Could you please increase the frequency of git-pulling of the FPCBot ?[edit]

Hey KTC,

I noticed that the FPCBot is not working as I used a the Wikipedia python library (which was used by the bot in 2013) instead of the pywikibot library and It's taking too much time to pull the code and probably the Wikipedia library is deprecated. Could you increase it's git-pulling to 3 times a day ? Who about 2 hours (at 3:00, 10:00, 19:00 UTC) before the bot runs ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 02:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Eatcha: Okay. And the bot is back at work. :-)
Just to note this warning that may or may not be of interest:
WARNING: /shared/pywikipedia/core/pywikibot/__init__.py:132: FutureWarning: 
Python 2.7.13 will be dropped in 2020.
It is recommended to use Python 3.5 or above.
See T213287 for further information.

  FutureWarning)
-- KTC (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I really appreciate your help. Thank you. :) -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 10:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I used 2to3 library, could you please git-pull and test-run it. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 11:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: It worked no problems :) Still give the warning though. I don't know if that's expected behaviour or not. -- KTC (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the update, I asked about this on T213287. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 11:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Please check the T213287, we have a reply-- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 12:08, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: No module named 'tendo'. -- KTC (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Could you try pip install tendo ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 12:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I need to make sure only a single instance of a program is running -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 12:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
@Eatcha: This confuses me as to whether I can just run pip install without worrying about whatever virtualenv's about. In any case

$ pip --version
pip 6.1.1 from /data/project/fpcbot/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages (python 2.7)

and

$ pip install tendo
<snip>
Requirement already satisifed (use --upgrade to upgrade): tendo in ./.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages

And no, there is no pip3. -- KTC (talk) 13:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

No more required to install it, please test-run the FPCBot. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 13:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
After pulling the source -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 13:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
And in future you don't need to bother about Virtualenv, it's just the virtual python environment you are running the commands. In short : You can't do any damage by running a wrong command accidently -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 13:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: It works fine. Removing the single instance check is an interesting decision though. :D I'll change the crontab to run using python3 from now on. -- KTC (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Are you online now ? Could you please pull the new code and test-run the new code ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 19:42, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: So it works but there's a warning. WARNING: /shared/pywikipedia/core/pywikibot/bot.py:907: UserWarning: Site objects have been created before arguments were handled UserWarning) I'm guessing it's from this change? -- KTC (talk) 20:14, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Do you have any Idea how to fix https://github.com/Zitrax/FPCBot/issues/6 and https://github.com/Zitrax/FPCBot/issues/7 . -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 20:38, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Any guesses what's caused the bot to stop removing withdrawn and FPXed Noms ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 20:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: If I knew how to fix it, I would have done it. Clin All I can tell you is that oldEnough = self.daysSinceLastEdit() > 0 (line 201) evaluates as FALSE. -- KTC (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Please pull the source and run the bot, I had replaced a redirect with a direct link that caused some mior problem at the FPC. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 14:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
oldEnough = self.daysSinceLastEdit() > 0 is okay, at max we can only get a lapse of 8 hrs(same as the cron job) during which a user edits the page to confirm the bot's edits. Thus it should print false, it indicates users a FPC are fast enough to review the bot's edits. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 14:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: I've got a fix for the withdrawn thing I think. Let me figure out how to contribute the patch on github. -- KTC (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Don't you have the merge rights on the repository ? If not, I will merge your fork. Or you forgot your password ? Or anything else ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 14:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Please Pull and test-run -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 15:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
@Eatcha: My withdrawn changes worked! :) -- KTC (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Great, I'm now adding a test for the FPXed and If it works (I think It will, then we can close the issue at github) -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 15:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: Assuming isFPX() works correctly, then it should work as is, but the issue on github stated FPD as well, which is why I hadn't closed it. Could of course spilt it into two different issues, one the regression (FPX), and one a feature request (FPD). -- KTC (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Don't need to split, I think it should be easier than the FPX problem -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 15:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Are you working on the FPD ? If not I will start working on it with my friend , I don't want double workforce to do the same work that can be done by one. I added a test nom for the FPX -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 16:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: No, please go ahead. I don't actually know python, so the best I can contribute is relatively simple code changes for bugfixes. -- KTC (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Ok, but do you know how to set-up a new bot ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 17:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Of course I will provide the source -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 17:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: A scheduled job like FPCBot? Sure, pretty much just follow the instructions on Wikitech. I can help if you want, or you can just add me to improve the bus factor. -- KTC (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Yes I would like to deploy two bots similar to the FPCBot for COM:FSC and COM:FVC, these are 2 new projects that I started earlier this month. And thanks for linking to the article of Bus Factor, I never heard of It. I'm planning to use the source of FPCBot with some modifications to adapt with these projects. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 18:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Made some changes, FPD template should work now. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 18:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: Did you make a typo? I'm not sure about treating it as if it's been withdrawn, but I guess that make things simpler. -- KTC (talk) 18:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Just give me a ping if and when you want help setting it up. I'll leave you to make the bot requests when you're ready. -- KTC (talk) 18:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
I fixed the typo -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 19:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
I added a test nom for FDP and merged the instance pull request -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 21:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Invite Link (push access to the FSCBot) : https://github.com/eatcha-wikimedia/FSCBot/invitations -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 05:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
WARNING: /shared/pywikipedia/core/pywikibot/bot.py:907: UserWarning: Site objects have been created before arguments were handled UserWarning) The warning means that if you provide `-lang:` and `-family:` options to invoke the script, it is likely that they will be ignored (which is true in this case).

The downside: If your default site in user-config.py is set to something other than commons wiki, and you forget to use -lang and -family, the script will work on the wrong site. Maybe in the future we may need to test it on https://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page , but as of now it's okay -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 06:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

FSCBot[edit]

Added you at tools-admin https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/tools/id/fscbot -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 07:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

What's your time zone ? I mean when you are free ? I think the source of FSCBot is ready, are we allowed to test it without the bot flag ? -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 11:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Do you need password for this bot account ? -- FSCBot (talk) 11:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: I'm in the UK. I do not have access to Toolsforge etc. during work day. I am unfamiliar with Commons Bots policy and expectation. Looking through the page quickly suggest one can test things manually slowly, especially why the Bot Request is open. Maybe you should open that and ask explicitly? In the mean time, some tests can be done without the bot actually making any edits.
Someone need to set up the bot on Toolsforge to be able to login. From what I can tell, pywikibot support normal password, BotPassword, and OAuth. Either you can sort it out, or you can email me the relevant information to set things up. -- KTC (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
User_ID and Password sent -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 05:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
I added a request. Check out Commons:Bots/Requests/FSCBot . --- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 06:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Yes, we can run the bot. See this Eatcha.sign.png 15:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Vitruvian Barnstar Hires.png The Technical Barnstar
For all your work with some much needed repair on the FPCBot. Thank You!!! Cart (talk) 06:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Why is this if statement used ?[edit]

Hey KTC,

Could you take a look at https://github.com/Zitrax/FPCBot/blob/47061ff372b43dd22680d97781bf9d01ce3aaa5f/fpc.py#L178 why is this statement used ? Looks a bug to me -- Eatcha (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

@Eatcha:, it's checking if rule 8.1 is true (with the assumption that the nominator voted for the nomination which is almost always the case). -- KTC (public) (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Photo walk in Stockholm[edit]

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)