User talk:KTC

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Greenwich Park panorama 2013-09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greenwich Park panorama 2013-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

1SL Alan West (cropped).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alan West, photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Cat-a-lot: Removing from Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 by Katie Chan[edit]

Bleah. I seem to have messed up this morning (it was too early!) by accidentally removing all your WLM images from the wrong category. I put the wrong one into cat-a-lot, and removed your images from Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 by Katie Chan. I'm so sorry. I'm looking into how to revert that, but for the moment don't know of a tool that can bulk rollback all the edits at once. Am investigating. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

All fixed. :) It's a good thing they're almost always titled in the form of "EH1234567 XYZ.jpg", and no one else has decided to name their uploads using similar names. KTC (talk) 10:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Oh, thanks. And sorry again. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

AoS McDull statue.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McDull, statue at Avenue of Stars, Hong Kong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2013 - Bradley Wiggins 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2013 - Bradley Wiggins 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Star Ferry's Harbour Tour 12.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star Ferry's Harbour Tour 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear KTC,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear KTC,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sony HDR-CX220E.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony HDR-CX220E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 photo exhibition at Wikimania 2013.JPG[edit]

Hi, this photo is a derivative work. The exhibited and displayed original works need credits. Besides authors' names, the licences, and titles (if given at the description pages) are required. Please add this information for each work to avoid deletion requests. Thank you. --Martina talk 18:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Unlike the other people you have left similar comments to, when I first uploaded I had already clearly marked in the Permission field the photo as {{Derived from}} each of the images shown. If you had actually looked, you would have seen that. In fact, I had also done so with a similiar photo from another photographer. If you don't think that's enough, to borrow a enwiki term SOFIXIT. Altneratively, feel free to nominate it for deletion, along with Template:Derived from, and I'm guessing most of the 27,000 images here. Regards -- KTC (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Like in the other files with images of WLM exihibitions that I commented on, your file description page does not name the authors nor the specific licenses chosen by them (partly national CC versions). Best practice examples how to comply with the license requirements are File:GLAM-WIKI_2013_068.jpg and File:Wikimania 2013 reception area, Jockey Club Auditorium, Hong Kong Polytechnic University - 20130811-03.JPG.
The very vast majority of files with Template:Derived_from are cropped or otherwise optimized images, thus original authors and licenses are anyway copied from in the original work. --Martina talk 05:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
I don't disagree that what you added to this is perhaps better practice. However, what's currently on File:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 photo exhibition at Wikimania 2013.JPG is sufficient. CC stated in their FAQ on CC4 that "licensees [can] satisfy the attribution requirement with a link to a separate page for attribution information [... as] was already common practice on the internet and possible under earlier versions of the licenses". If that wasn't true, every use of images hosted on Wikimedia Commons at the other projects would be considered a violation. Don't get me wrong, I applaud your efforts in getting image licensing compliant but let's have some common sense and spend our energy going after those images that doesn't have the source images listed/linked at all. -- KTC (talk) 11:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
CC4 does not apply to these 2012 files. CC-by-ca 3.0 license legalcode does not cover CC's point of view. There are even court decisions that a hyperlink is not a suffiient attribution. I agree that giving no source at all is even worse. But that doesn't heal a weaker copyvio. --Martina talk 18:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
I didn't say CC4 applies here. We will just have to agree to disagree on the interpretation here. You are of course free to remove every use of Commons files on all the other Wikimedia projects since by your interpretation they are all copyvio..... -- KTC (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
My interpreation does not go so far.
"if a credit for all contributing authors of the Adaptation or Collection appears, then as part of these credits and in a manner at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors. "
The main problem in your handling can be seen at a glance, if you click on the button "use this file on the web" at the top of your file's description page. --Martina talk 06:20, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear KTC,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Blackburn Pavilion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Blackburn Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014[edit]

Hello KTC! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poco2 17:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-05 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-05 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-06 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh panorama 2014-07-06 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ightham Mote, west & south.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ightham Mote, west & south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Photo review[edit]

Hi,you forget to firm your comment,anyway if you want only leave a opinion on a picture you can do without decline (naturally if you don't be sure) bye :) --LivioAndronico talk 18:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Yuen Long Wing Wah mooncakes box.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Yuen Long Wing Wah mooncakes box.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SMUconlaw (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Richard Holmes[edit]

Katie, I think you might add quotes to 'women in science' in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Holmes_%28biographer%29#mediaviewer/File:Richard_Holmes.JPG JohnWheater (talk) 16:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC) (Maybe you could also help find my talk page, which may have got lost because of the homonymous train robber:-) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnWheater (talk • contribs) 16:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Unfortunately not, I have only a PSD format. What is your deadline? Maybe I can convert to SVG in a few days. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Although we will have a new identity soon this will be useful. I will send you through WeTransfer. Regards, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Monks' cellarium, Fountains Abbey.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monks' cellarium, Fountains Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Owain Doull 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Owain Doull 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bradley Morgan 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bradley Morgan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bert De Backer 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Bert De Backer 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Robert Partridge 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToB 2014 stage 8a - Robert Partridge 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wikimedia UK categories[edit]

I don't understand Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, German supported by Wikimedia UK and Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English supported by Wikimedia UK. For a start, I don't think it is at all useful to have hand-made categories on Commons that indicate usage or feature status on any given Wikipedia. There are hundreds of thousands of images used on Wikipedia and they get added and removed every day. Who would maintain such a list? The individual pages record their usages and if you want to discover usage then there are tools on Commons / toolserver that retrieve this sort of thing by making a simply query. If it can't get the "featured" status then perhaps that can be fixed - because Dschwen's "good pictures" button certainly has access to that info. Secondly, my images were not "supported by Wikimedia UK". I wasn't paid, nor was my equipment donated by Wikmedia UK. The fact that I entered them into WLMUK is quite different to "supported by". I'd have taken and uploaded those images regardless of the contest. -- Colin (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Colin, categories for featured status on Wikipedia (as opposed to usage) is not new. While usage can and does change easily every day, featured status is something special that we want to highlight, as done by the little banner in the image description page for example. I understand your point about the "supported by" and it was not my intention to suggest otherwise. I have hopefully clarify what I meant a little bit. If you want me to remove your images from the categories, I would of course do so. -- KTC (talk) 10:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Well there is already Category:Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2014. I think it would be clearer if my pictures were in that category only. You can add the WLMUK categories to to a "supported by WMUK" parent category if you like. Best to keep "supported by" image categories for those that really were funded (or taken at events organised by) WM UK. I see you've changed the wording but it doesn't really change the fact that the category is wrong and appears to be taking credit for images that aren't really directly supported. I believe some of Diliff's cathedral images were partly supported by WMUK when he did his grand tour but not all of them will be. -- Colin (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
@Colin: how about this? -- KTC (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I think there is confusion as there are two feature picture forums. So some of images in that category are featured pictures on Commons that just happen to also be in Wikipedia articles. I would expect "Featured pictures on Wikipedia" to be ones that were awarded FP on Wikipedia. -- Colin (talk) 08:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
They all are. All 9 images in that category at the moment are featured pictures on at least one language Wikipedia, at least according to their description page: "This is a featured picture on the XXX language Wikipedia (... ...) and is considered one of the finest images." -- KTC (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (04).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re: FPC nomination[edit]

Ok, ✓ Done thanks.--لا روسا (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Could you sign, please?[edit]

[1] thanks! --Hubertl (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Doh! Thanks Hubertl. -- KTC (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi KTC, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 06:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ToB 2014 stage 8a - Scott Thwaites 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

CNY 2015 London - lion dance (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CNY 2015 London - lion dance (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Catamaran's capstans.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catamaran's capstans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yellow-legged gull, Port of Xàbia (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, Port of Xàbia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green-backed heron, L'Oceanogràfic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yellow-legged gull, CAC (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, CAC (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yellow-legged gull, CAC (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull, CAC (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yellow-legged gull, CAC (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Tight crop[edit]

Hey Katie, any chance you could upload a version of File:Boat Race 2015 - Women's Trophy (01).jpg with a tight crop around the trophy itself? I'd like to use it in en:Women's Boat Race 2014 if I may as it was the first time that particular trophy was presented. If it's ok, could you ping me at Wikipedia as I seldom frequent Commons.... Thanks! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Ring-tailed lemur (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chapultepec Zoo - African lion (06).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - African lion (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chapultepec Zoo - Canadian wolf (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapultepec Zoo - Canadian wolf (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapultepec Zoo - Jaguar (02).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

FPCBot[edit]

Hi, FPCBot seems be enjoying the holiday again. Can you solve the problem? Regards. --Laitche (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

[2] -- KTC (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/File:Pedicularis sceptrum-carolinum - Seed capsule - Niitvälja bog.jpg[edit]

What did I wrong by removing withdrawn FP candidate? --Ivar (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

ok-ok I got it, sorry! --Ivar (talk) 11:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured pictures/Animated[edit]

Hello KTC, maybe you can help me. Have you the ability and or the right to change the FPCBot. In this gallery the BOT sort the images in this way however that's not corresponding to the current formatting of the gallery. I changed the formatting, as I did for all the other FP galleries, because it was not really pleasant. I would like the BOT sort the image in the unsorted section, as it is done in the other galleries. Can you help me? Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: I have issued a pull request on Github with the required code changes. Once reviewed and approved by @Daniel78:, it'll start taking effect the following day. -- KTC (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Northern rockhopper penguin (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Northern rockhopper penguin (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ZSL London - Vietnamese mossy frog (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSL London - Vietnamese mossy frog (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Noreen Murray (cropped).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Noreen Murray (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Menai Suspension Bridge (7604).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menai Suspension Bridge (7604).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Tysilio's Church, Menai Bridge (7601).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Tysilio's Church, Menai Bridge (7601).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Conwy Castle (7989).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conwy Castle (7989).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beach hut at Abersoch (7297).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach hut at Abersoch (7297).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Blaenau Ffestiniog railway station (7821).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blaenau Ffestiniog railway station (7821).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

FPCBot[edit]

Hi,

I think you set up the FPCBot account at wmflabs and I have not used it myself so I am not sure how to login. But do you know how to stop the daily spam from "Cron Daemon", I am getting a mail every time the bot is running with content "Your job 1112609 ("python2") has been submitted". /Daniel78 (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

@Daniel78:, I should have changed it so that it doesn't email you anymore. Let me know if you still receive the next email at 00:00GMT. -- KTC (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Didn't get any further mails. Thanks a lot! :) /Daniel78 (talk) 10:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (011).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (148).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (148).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (149).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenal LFC v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI (149).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)