User talk:Kallerna

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive:

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

  • Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
  • If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
  • If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.


Please leave a new message.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Merimetsokolonia Enäjärven saaressa 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merimetsokolonia Enäjärven saaressa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Freezing sea Yyteri 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freezing sea Yyteri 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Frozen Enäjärvi 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen Enäjärvi 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pyhäjärven jää 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyhäjärven jää 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality of the frozen lake. Detail of the distant shore is borderline --Tagooty 16:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kukkosaari Pyhäjärvi 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kukkosaari Pyhäjärvi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Koulukadun kenttä Tampere 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koulukadun kenttä Tampere 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pyynikin rantapolku 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyynikin rantapolku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rosendahlin ranta talvella.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosendahlin ranta talvella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pyynikki 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyynikki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pyynikin rantapolku 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyynikin rantapolku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Viikinsaari Pyhäjärvi 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viikinsaari Pyhäjärvi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 13:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tampereen Työväen Teatteri 2022.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tampereen Työväen Teatteri 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puuvilla 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puuvilla 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok --Poco a poco 19:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Helsinki-Vantaa airport escalators 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helsinki-Vantaa airport escalators 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Helsinki airport departure hall 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helsinki airport departure hall 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Helsinki airport departure hall 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helsinki airport departure hall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Location?[edit]

Hi Kallerna - do you have any location information (ideally coordinates, even if slightly inexact) for where you took File:Pyy (Tetrastes bonasia).jpg, File:Tetrastes bonasia kallerna.jpg, and File:Tetrastes bonasia.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I can't remember the exact location, although I remember the day - I was photographing bears in Kuhmo, Finland. I added Kuhmo to the description of the images, but I think that is as exact as it gets. —kallerna (talk) 05:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lempäälä canal 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lempäälä canal 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tomer T 17:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pispala Pyhäjärveltä 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pispala Pyhäjärveltä 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Siilinkari Tampere.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siilinkari Tampere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pispala Pyhäjärveltä 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pispala Pyhäjärveltä 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

2 phantom objects visible --Steindy 22:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
They are television antennas. --Kallerna 11:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality Lmbuga 14:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kullaa Church 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kullaa Church 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aismallard 20:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aismallard 20:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Saviselkä Pyhäjärvi 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saviselkä Pyhäjärvi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

@Kallerna: The snow is off-white. Is that natural or WB adjustment necessary? --Tagooty 15:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
WB is rather challenging to get right in these aerial photographs: due to air in between they are quite blue out of the camera. I have adjusted the WB already, it is IMO quite close to reality now. --Kallerna 19:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok, Good quality. --Tagooty 09:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 11:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. IMHO this one is better than the previous candidate. It’s always difficult where to focus in such situations; here you have found a good solution. --Aristeas 08:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hiillos Aitokiuas.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiillos Aitokiuas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Karisalmi Bridge 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karisalmi Bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Avanto Päijänne 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avanto Päijänne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Argenberg 09:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karisalmi Bridge view 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karisalmi Bridge view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Phragmites australis Päijänne 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phragmites australis Päijänne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tampere city library 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tampere city library 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Terragio67 18:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pyynikki swimming hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyynikki swimming hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Terragio67 19:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Port of Alicante 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Alicante 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plaza de Los Luceros 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de Los Luceros 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Explanada de España Alicante 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Explanada de España Alicante 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Excavator Postiguet Beach 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excavator Postiguet Beach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Playa del Postiguet 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa del Postiguet 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tampere Theatre 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tampere Theatre 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alicante panorama 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alicante panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Port of Alicante 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Alicante 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Playa del Postiguet 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa del Postiguet 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Excavator Postiguet Beach 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excavator Postiguet Beach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilica of St Mary Alicante.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of St Mary Alicante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
The verticals seem to be ok imo? --Kallerna 14:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Ok, right now for this picture. --Hillopo2018 07:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ciucaș Mountains 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 12:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado![edit]

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ciucaș Mountains 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciucaș Mountains 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Snow on the far right seems blown, but overall good quality for me. --Domob 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ciucaș Mountains 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A bit hazy for my taste but overall good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ciucaș Mountains 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The pole seems leaning to the left, is it like this also in reality? Also, what are the white spots -- was it snowing / wind blowing snow around? --Domob 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
The pole was leaning, but I actually don't know what those white spots are. It was windy and started raining. --Kallerna 17:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok thanks for the explanation, good quality for me. --Domob 04:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hagalundintie Otaniemi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hagalundintie Otaniemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 12:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Espoo Cultural Centre Tapiola.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espoo Cultural Centre Tapiola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Töölön pallokenttä 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Töölön pallokenttä 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Place du Capitole, Toulouse.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place du Capitole, Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tullintori 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tullintori 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. -- Ikan Kekek 19:51, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nokia Arena May 2022 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nokia Arena May 2022 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fântânile București Piața Unirii 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fântânile București Piața Unirii 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 00:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Töölö tram depot.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Töölö tram depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Valkopaadentie Vuosaari 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valkopaadentie Vuosaari 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cité de l'espace Toulouse 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cité de l'espace Toulouse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Your file description should identify the NASA object as well as the Ariane rocket. -- Ikan Kekek 20:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]