User talk:Kameraad Pjotr

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
I'm not very active at the moment. This might or might not change ...

As this is a multilingual project, you are free to post questions or comments in any possible language. However, please take this points into account when using a language:

  • Questions in Dutch and English will be answered in Dutch or English.
  • Questions in French may be asked, but if I don't understand it, I will make use of the infamous Google Translate Tool, thus some nuances might get lost. I will reply in English.
  • Questions in any other language (be it German, Klingon or Valarin) will be channelled through the infamous Google Translate Tool, and thus I will only grasp the most obvious remarks and miserably fail to see any of the nuances in your comment. I will reply in English.
  • Important: I read everything you post here, but it can take some time before you get a reply.
  • Archives are here, here, here, here, here and here.

Catholic church in Herceg Novi[edit]

Good evening. You've deleted the file Catholic church in Herceg Novi, claiming that this photo lacked the necessary permission. The site where it was taken from, montenegrophoto.net, informs that it contains Free public domain photos of Montenegro - it's visible in the site header. What's wrong about the file then? Regards, Loraine (talk) 21:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello,
I'm sorry, I must have missed that information. Probably too obvious ;). I have restored the file.
Kind regards, Kameraad Pjotr 21:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Muziekinstrumentenmuseum (Old England), Brussel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Muziekinstrumentenmuseum (Old England), Brussel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 14:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion note[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:BrickWall.jpg (for File:Fire hydrant cover (Amsterdam).jpg). NVO (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Would you erase my user page, please. --Juho Paavisto (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --Juho Paavisto (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Hertingfordbury_Station.jpg[edit]

If you are going to delete a photo from Wikimedia you could at least take the trouble to consult the person who uploaded it in the first place. I had full authorisation from the photographer. Please send me an email address to which I can forward that authorisation. Happy Christmas. Roundtheworld (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello,
You'll have to forward the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . See here for more information.
A very happy christmans!
Kameraad Pjotr 19:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

A script in your user namespace may stop working in February 2012[edit]

Hi Kameraad Pjotr, I found the deprecated function akeytt somewhere in your user-namespace, e.g. User:Kameraad Pjotr/monobook.js/test.js . It is likely that this will cause JavaScript errors after Commons is updated to MediaWiki 1.19 in February. You can simply remove this function-call as it currently does nothing. If you have a copy of user-messages in your script, you may remove it and instead activate User Messages in your preferences. Please also note that addLink is now natively supported by mw.util.addPortletLink. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 10:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC) -- RE rillke questions? 10:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Special request[edit]

Hello! I have a special request. A file that you have deleted in 2010 had been loaded on purpose to a it.wikipedia article, an article which now proved to be a hoax. This entry was created by an IP, but I imagine that the image is loaded by a registered user, and I was wondering if you could know who he was, so that they can be to ask explanations. Thanks in advance.--Midnight bird 21:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello,
The file was uploaded by Amatis.
Kind regards, Kameraad Pjotr 07:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you...! :))--Midnight bird 09:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright - Latvia[edit]

Dag,

Copyright wetten van Letland voorzien dat het werk beschermd is gedurende de 70 jaren na de dood van de artiest. Karlis Zale is dood in februari 1942, zijn werken zijn niet meer beschermd... Kunt u het afschaffen van beelden van het vrijheidsmonument te Riga herstellen? Zie : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kameraad_Pjotr/Archive1a#Fair_Use_and_FOP_:_images_of_Latvian_monuments

Alvast bedankt, AuseklisAuseklisDiscusija 10:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello,
Unless I'm mistaken, I think that copyright expires january first of next year after 70 years have passed, and not the 70th year, but I could be mistaken. Perhaps you should ask someone more knowledgeable.
Kind regards,
Kameraad Pjotr 15:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Ik zal volgend jaar terugkomen.AuseklisAuseklisDiscusija 06:32, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Be my guest ;-) If you find some that would be PD now (eg. author died 1941), I'll be happy to restore them. Kameraad Pjotr 11:58, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/All files link to Template:Archive-Mujahideen and the template itself.[edit]

As the closing admin you noted that files tagged with {{PD-Afghanistan}} were OK. That template has since then been altered significantly so those files are perhaps delete-able as Afghan law is now life+50 years. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 04:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello,
They are indeed protected in Afghanistan, but not anywhere else, or so it would seem from the template. It is dubious, but I think they still are in the public domain as far as Wiki(p|m)edia is concerned.
Kind regards, Kameraad Pjotr 15:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Permission to include one of your pictures in a textbook[edit]

I would like to include your picture of the Pont du Gard http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pont_du_Gard_-_SE.JPG in an architecture textbook. It would be printed rather small, so that the resolution in the Commons file is enough.

The picture would be credited in the legend to your name and any other location/contact information you would like to add.

I wanted to check that is OK with you.

Hi,
Thanks! And it's absolutely no problem, just crediting my name (Pieter De Praetere) is more than sufficient. Could you pass me the title if and when it's included?
Kind regards,
Kameraad Pjotr 20:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Sexual content[edit]

Dear Kameraad Pjotr,

I've seen you have taken part in a discussion about Commons:Sexual content. If you wouldn't mind, could you please give me an explanation in Dutch on my talkpage nl:User talk:Jasper Coenraats on the Duch Wikipedia? My command of Englisch language is much to restricted to understand the following issues, in wich I really like to know wat is and what isn't welcome on Commons and/or other Wikimedia projects.

  • What kind of grafic files, are not wanted?
  • Is there an issue about some kind of files being to explicit, and some others being not to explicit, maybe even wanted for example because of the educational purpose or other value?

I'm interserted because on the Dutch Wikipedia a graffic file was removed by Commons after years, and amoung some very understandable argument I noticed frases like obscure pornographic photo. In my humble opinion these are verry subjective terms, even more in relation to the other strong arguments, such as copyright violation (if I did understand well). And I don't really understand Commons:Sexual content and do not understand at all what its value is, when it's not a policy but just a tag.

Yours truely,

Jasper Coenraats (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

be.wikimedia.org[edit]

Dag Kameraad Pjotr, ben jij geïnteresseerd? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Chimgan ski slope.jpg[edit]

Hello! I've got a question - why this image was deleted? I don't see any issue with it, maybe you can explain me, please? rubin16 (talk) 17:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Omar.cavalli..jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Omar.cavalli..jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Kameraad Pjotr. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Dag Kameraad Pjotr, waarom geef je er de brui aan? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 10:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Map of austalopithecus[edit]

Hello Kameraad Pjotr,

my names is Stefan and I'm a student at a school in Augsburg, Germany. I contact you because of your graphic (Map of Africa with range of australopeticines) --> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Map_of_the_fossil_sites_of_the_early_hominids_%284.4-1M_BP%29.svg

The reason is, that we are doing a project on the human evolution for a museum in Augsburg and it would be great if we could use your picture on our poster. I don't know very well about the licences that are used here and I don't want to publish something that its owner doesn't want to be published.

Maybe just tell me wether you're OK with our idea of using your graphic and how you want us to name your name and/or other information. Thanks a lot.

Many greetings Stefan

Hello,
You're free to use the map, as long as you credit "Pieter De Praetere" (that's me) and Eric Gaba (that's Sting, who made the blank map of Africa).
Kind regards, Kameraad Pjotr 05:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Austria-Hungary-flag-1869-1914-naval-1786-1869-merchant.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Austria-Hungary-flag-1869-1914-naval-1786-1869-merchant.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ÄDA - DÄP (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

File:EU flags Comm.jpg[edit]

Zou je aub iets pragmatischer willen zijn in het verwijderen van afbeeldingen die onder het gekende riedeltje 'geen vrijheid van panorama' genomineerd worden? Hoewel het m.i. gewoon onzin is om op basis van zo'n onwerkbare interpretatie van een wet honderden goede afbeeldingen te verwijderen is het aangedragen argument is ook niet in alle gevallen juist. Bovenstaande afbeelding bv omvatte gewoon vlaggen. Op geen enkele manier kan zoiets onder auteursrechtenwetgeving vallen.--__ wɘster 17:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Airship2.jpg[edit]

Last time, this was kept because it was in use. It no longer has any links, so can we get rid of it now, please? Globbet (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia België[edit]

Hallo Kameraad Pjotr, In 2008 gaf je op deze lijst aan dat je interesse hebt in de oprichting van Wikimedia Belgium. Na enkele stille jaren hebben we het proces om een chapter in België (en Luxemburg) op te zetten in 2011 heropgestart, en zijn momenteel aan het werk om de chapter in 2012/2013 op te richten. Als je nog steeds geïnteresseerd bent, laat het ons dan weten op wmbe:Founding/Interested_people. Wees welkom! Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 01:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Map of the fossil sites of the early hominids (4.4-1M BP).svg[edit]

Hierdie kaart is baie nuttig, maar dit sou meer akkuraat wees indien die spesiename met kleinletters begin. JMK (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Zaltbommel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Coat of arms of Zaltbommel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kathisma (talk) 20:24, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy deletion[edit]

Just to let you know, since you were involved previously: [1]. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 16:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 16:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Kameraad Pjotr[edit]

Dag Kameraad Pjotr, toevallig kwam ik op je gebruikerspagina terecht en was zo vrij een typo te verbeteren. Lotje (talk) 13:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

File:ZP 05 Batara Guru 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ZP 05 Batara Guru 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:EscudoMauritania.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EscudoMauritania.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Antemister (talk) 14:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Pete F (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Pete F (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)