User talk:T.seppelt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:KasparBot)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, T.seppelt!

-- 15:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Logo of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Logo of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.


File:Referendum über die Unbhängigkeit Schottlands Entwicklung der Umfrageergebnisse.svg[edit]

Hallo T.seppelt, wenn sie nicht nur als statistisches Blendwerk gedacht ist, erfordert diese Grafik noch einige Erklärung.

  • Wie kommt es zu den Punkten, auf welche Umfragen beziehst Du Dich?
  • Wie kommt es zu den Kurven?
  • Wie kommt es zu den Streubändern um die Kurven, welche Streubereiche stellen sie dar?

Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Ies ich habe eine nähere Beschreibung eingefügt. Gerne stelle ich auch die gesamte Datenbasis zur Verfügung. -- T.seppelt (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Săpânța Panorama.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Săpânța Panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

Hi T.seppelt,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English  español  മലയാളം  +/−

-- ~riley (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear T.seppelt,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Authority control task[edit]

hello, it come to my attention that I added incorrect q-codes to some category {{Authority control}} templates: q-code for the categories related to the subject instead of subject itself. I will try to find those and correct them, but in the mean time you should be aware of this complication. --Jarekt (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@Jarekt: I'll work first on the Creator and Institution namespace. Let me know when you solved the problem. -- T.seppelt (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I will, but it might be also good to add a check that instance of (P31) is not d:Q4167836 before modifying any wikidata items. Just to be on the safe side. --Jarekt (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm now checking this. Thanks for letting me know. -- T.seppelt (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I think now all q-codes in {{Authority control}} templates are "article" q-codes not "category" q-codes. --Jarekt (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I also cleaned some up based on category's main topic (P301). -- T.seppelt (talk) 21:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg[edit]

Hallo T.seppelt, erstmal vielen Dank für Deine Grafik der Meinungsumfragen zum EU-Referendum im Vereinigten Königreich! Ich muss allerdings sagen, dass ich den grauen Hintergrund nicht so optimal finde. Ich fände wohl einen weißen bzw. transparenten Hintergrund besser. Die feinen Gitternetzlinien müssten dann natürlich in grau sein. Das Grün der Remain-Befürworter ist für meinen Geschmack auch etwas zu grell. Viele Grüße --Furfur (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Furfur, ich werde mir das ansehen. Du hast rechts, das Layout ist momentan nicht optimal. Viele Grüße, -- T.seppelt (talk) 12:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
@Furfur: Ich habe eine neue transparente Version hochgeladen. -- T.seppelt (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Halle T.seppelt, vielen Dank, diese Version gefällt mir auf jeden Fall deutlich besser. Einen Vorschlag habe ich aber noch: könntest Du die hellgrünen Punkte etwas dunkler machen? Das hebt sich dann besser vom Hintergrund ab. Danke und Grüße --Furfur (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Is your bot done?[edit]

I noticed your bot is not very active last week or so, but there are still a lot of pages in Category:Pages using authority control with parameters that could use some help. Categories like Category:Wikidata with missing ISNI identifier list pages where Commons has identifier but Wikidata does not, I was hoping your bot can verify and copy those to Wikidata. Similar thing with mismatch pages. I was looking at Category and Institution pages in Category:Pages with mismatching GND identifier (for time being you can see them at User:Jarekt/a) and they all seem to me like they are all valid alternative GND number. Can we use your bot to copy them to Wikidata? --Jarekt (talk) 20:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

@Jarekt: no, it wasn't done. I added the task now to my crontab. It will start every day at UTC+0. I also enabled the error tracking system. Regarding the alternative GND numbers: Do you have an idea for how to validate that a second GND number really represents the same entity as the first one? I imagine this to be pretty tricky. Warm regards, -- T.seppelt (talk) 12:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I was doing "validation" by hand by removing GND from all Creator/Institution templates that either had non-working identifier (leads to non-existing page), identifier redirecting to a page for identifier already on Wikidata, or identifier leading to the page that had no identifying information other than name. What is left are very probable matches, often with matching dates of birth and death (+- a year or two). I do not speak German so it is hard to validate at 100%. One issue I run into several times that Commons pages are tagged with wrong q-code, so a quick verification that Commons dates of birth and death match Wikidata might be a good idea.
Yesterday I had an idea that I could add to Module:Authority control a link using Wikidata API that would pre-fill wikidata edit with identifier + "Imported from" Commons reference. That would really simplified process of manual copying of identifiers. Do you know if it is possible and if anybody tried it before? --Jarekt (talk) 13:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
By the way, a good way to validate VIAF number is if Commons VIAF is linked to the same q-code as the creator. For example Creator:Friedrich Hagenauer has q-code d:Q1459474 and VIAF=96130563. That VIAF is also linked to d:Q1459474, so we can add it to the Wikidata. --Jarekt (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello again. User:Zhuyifei1999 and I were working on linking category pages to Wikidata items and adding Wikidata item q-codes to {{Authority control}} templates. We got over 100k done, but there are still ~3500 pages left in Category:Pages using authority control without Wikidata. You are much more familiar with Wikidata and tools used there. Any ideas on how to match some more pages? Many categories or creator templates I try to match if I put enough effort I often find a match on Wikidata. Sometimes an image in a person category is used in an article about the person. Or VIAF number has a link to Wikidata. Or multibeacon tool can be used to look up item with a given VIAF number, category name or GND identifier ( only ~100 at a time, so very slow). But all of them are quite time consuming. Any ideas for other ways of matching Category:Pages using authority control without Wikidata with wikidata items? --Jarekt (talk) 00:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
@Jarekt: I went through the pages in the category and tried different methods to match them. I think that it's just impossible to match many of the pages because there are just no items on Wikidata for them. What we need is a method to create new items based on the content for creator templates / categories. I'm not sure whether we can do this automatically because the Commons pages don't contain that much information. I would rather prefer to do it manually and depending on the amount of work maybe using some kind of tool which we could create. --T.seppelt (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
That sounds like a good plan. Most pages with Authority Control info should be good candidates for the move. I am still looking through 500 pages that might have links to wikipedia pages in the text. Many of them already have wikidata items. --Jarekt (talk) 12:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
@Jarekt: this will be very complicated. Firstly to make sure that there is no other item and secondly to fetch a minimum amount of information to create new entities. I think I won't have enough time and energy to implement all these parsing and checking functionality. Maybe it would be good to rewrite {{Creator}} first so it makes use of Wikidata. Then we could migrate the information to Wikidata and delete it here. Everything could be done at one go. You did a great job with Module:Authority control. Could you start working on Module:Creator? -- T.seppelt (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Why?[edit]

Wacław Wąsowicz - Czytający gazetę.jpg

Helloǃ Questionable licensing of File:Wacław Wąsowicz - Czytający gazetę.jpg? Why? ̴̴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ablakok (talk • contribs) 16 July 2016, 09:59 (UTC)

@Ablakok: Hi, you state that this picture is your Own work, but it seem to be a painting by Wacław Wąsowicz. Therefore this cannot be true. That the file is now proposed for deletion doesn't mean necessarily that it's going to be delete but that we need a better copyright declaration. Warm regards, -- T.seppelt (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

"Praca własna" means in this case that I am an author of the photo. Wacław Wąsowicz died in 1942, therefore his works are no longer protected by copyright law and everyone is legally entitled to publish their pictures. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ablakok (talk • contribs) 19:58, 16 July 2016‎ (UTC)

@Ablakok: Please have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wacław Wąsowicz - Czytający gazetę.jpg. It should be fine now. -- T.seppelt (talk) 10:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

It's OK. Thx ː-)

newton category[edit]

Hi,. You have moved some files : (diff | hist) . . File:Mandelbrot set - multiplier map.png‎; 16:58 . . (+2)‎ . . ‎T.seppelt (talk | contribs)‎ (Cat-a-lot: Moving from Category:Newton Method to Category:Newton fractals) (diff | hist) . . File:One arm spiral - part of Mandelbrot set.png‎; 16:58 . . (+2)‎ . . ‎T.seppelt (talk | contribs)‎ (Cat-a-lot: Moving from Category:Newton Method to Category:Newton fractals) (diff | hist) . . File:Part of parameter plane with external 3 rays landing on the Mandelbrot set.png‎; 16:58 . . (+2)‎ . . ‎T.seppelt (talk | contribs)‎ (Cat-a-lot: Moving from Category:Newton Method to Category:Newton fractals) (diff | hist) . . File:Part of parameter plane with external 5 rays landing on the Mandelbrot set.png‎; 16:58 . . (+2)‎ . . ‎T.seppelt (talk | contribs)‎ (Cat-a-lot: Moving from Category:Newton Method to Category:Newton fractals)

These are not Newton fractals. These are images of Mandelbrot set but Newton method is used. You can ask for second opinion the other person ( I have made these images). I think these changes shpould be undo. Have a nice day. --Adam majewski (talk) 18:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Brexit[edit]

Bitte aktualisieren !

Kannst Du bitte dingend mal diese Grafik aktualisieren?!
Danke, --Markus (talk) 08:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Council_of_Europe_Commissioner_for_Human_Rights[edit]

Category discussion warning

Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

E4024 (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)