User talk:Kelly/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright Image:Amina Munster 1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

GeorgHHtalk   09:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:488 Intelligence Squadron patch.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 14:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Amina Munster 1.jpg

Why did you approve it? Flickr claim is obviously invalid. (unless I'm missing something) -- Drini 16:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The Flickr site is the official site of the copyright holder. Kelly 16:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Flickr stuff

Sorry for not answering your previous query, I thought I already did.

I will look into preserving the categories. In any case I plan to do the "image exists" check is some nifty JavaScript way.

I have no plans yet to do anything on geocoding, but that is because I don't have time to ;) Maybe later. -- Bryan (talk to me) 16:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Fidel Smile

Wouldn't the Surco site still justify use? The onus is not on the users here to track through the entire maze of how a photo came to be where it is. It is hosted on Surco with a disclaimer that it can be used. If Surco is in violation of copyright law then they should be held accountable ... wikimedia wouldn't be. There are also a myriad of legal ways that Surco could have came up with the photo, that allow them to use it with a disclaimer as they have it. Redthoreau 17:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Can you delete?

Can you please delete this photo I uploaded ? Thanks Redthoreau 00:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I flagged it for deletion, thanks. Kelly 00:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC) curious nekclace

Dear Kelly: I only have cropped a fragment of your own image to show this particular coincidence.Of course,the hole image is your, but if you want you can delete my little contribution. No problem thank you.However,I think that we can make an accord about it.Thank you.Vicond 17:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Pd:when I put the current license I thinked this image will not take more problems.Vicond 17:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Exception request for Flickr Upload Bot

✓ Done -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Flickr reviewer!

Hi. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. You can ask me if you need any help. Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 16:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Black border

The problem looks obvious to me, I'd say it's showing a black border because the image has a black border, but maybe I'm missing something... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Cropped. (didn't know whether to respond here or on my talk page, where all the fun seems to be happening..) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 14:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

hi

FYI, see [1]. You inserted a response and sig of another user. Perhaps theres a problem with the template. Yonidebest Ω Talk 14:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

That is weird. Must have been a template bug. Kelly 14:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I believe your right (not very good in Spanish/Portugeese but still...), but I want second opinions before deleting such a high used image. Finn Rindahl (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Town hall

A town hall is NOT a hotel [2] ! --LimoWreck (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Um, OK - thanks for fixing it, then. Kelly (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:FSM_Logo.JPG

I'm not on Commons very often, Kelly, and just found your message from July 19th. I would be grateful if you would explain the issue a little more fully. I took the photo of the car's bumper, and released all rights, so that can't be it. Are you indicating that the item stuck to the bumper is copyright? If so, I don't believe that is correct. The FSM website provides the same basic graphic for use as a computer "button", with the statement "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License." I will now see if I can figure out how to add this information to the formal discussion. Tim Ross (talk) 16:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for participating

Thanks for taking part in my RFA. It passed 29-5-0, and I appreciate and will take to heart all of the feedback, and do my absolute best to better Commons with the trust placed in me by the community as a whole. rootology (T) 17:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Green-Stilt-Bug.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kanonkas(talk) 12:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Flickr Images

Hi, please pay attention that there are different resolutions on flickr, please allways select the maximum resolution for uploads and crops. Please give your files proper filenames, that means: no CAPS LOCK and no ! or something. David Tyree catch.jpg or something like that would be a much better filename for Image:!DAVID FN TYREE.jpg (espacially the ! is realy unhandsome) --Martin H. (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Some hint: if you want an image listet at the begining of a category you can use [[Category:abcd|sortkey]], if you select a space character as sortkey (...| ]]) the image will be shown in front. But please no !s or other signs. --Martin H. (talk) 00:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
I am not stupid and have uploaded hundreds of images from Flickr, look at my history. I use Flickr Upload Bot, which always selects the maximum resolution. In regards to the crops, I've been moving over them over "as is" from the English Wikipedia, with the same filenames so I don't have to edit a whole bunch of articles just to move an image over here. If you'd like to improve the cropped versions, feel free - the originals are there in the history. If you'd like to rename the images, do that too - there is a bot to replace them in their various usages. But I don't feel like manually doing that tedious work. Kelly (talk) 01:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Ah, i understand, im sorry. If possible you can avoid such improper filenames using the flickr bot because it is not necessary to keep the bad filenames from en.wp. Thank you and sorry for my narrow-minded instructions. --Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I shouldn't have been so snippy. I'm just trying to get the Flickr-sourced images from en Wikipedia to here - we can sort the filenames later. Kelly (talk) 01:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Kelly, you tagged this image as having been reviewed, stating that you found it to be under the same license on Flickr. Right now, the image appears to be on Flickr under "All rights reserved", as are all other images uploaded by the same Flickr user. Are you sure about this one? - auburnpilot talk 21:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, AuburnPilot - it's copyleft, see the Flickr uploader's profile. He uses a blanket permission on his profile page instead of individual licenses on the image pages. Also, the uploader at en Wikipedia is the copyright holder - see their userpage there. Kelly (talk) 01:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Great, thanks. I came across it when you tagged it on en.wiki to be deleted, and wanted to double check. - auburnpilot talk 21:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Permission is being sought for this image. Please do not tag it for speedy, assume good faith here. If you really feel you must nom it, use the regular deletion process, please. As long as we are good faith seeking permission, we do not have to delete immediately. Thanks. (Don't make me protect the page... I see you've been editwarring with the uploader, please don't do that) ++Lar: t/c 04:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Admin?

Hey Kelly - just saw your name at COM:DEL and took a glance at your edits (rather than closing the request!)... you do a stack of great work around here. You interested in adminship? Giggy (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey, Giggy! Wow, thanks for the compliment - I don't think I have the necessary time to devote to something like that, though. Plus, I've managed to anger a whole bunch of people at en Wikipedia at one time or another, including the ID Cabal, a certain admin into animal liberation theology, another one heavily into Power Rangers, and recently, an admin who apparently is the webmaster for a cult. So any RfA for me would likely be a heavily-canvassed dramafest, like another RfA that I could name. :) But I really appreciate the other, thanks! Kelly (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Bleh, Commons needs some drama...!. Sure, that's cool. Let me know if you're ever interested. Giggy (talk) 23:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Image

Hi, Kelly. I was looking for a mural image that I uploaded from Commons of Barack Obama. Then, I saw this and noted that the image was deleted without you notifying me. Next time you place an image for deletion, notify the uploader that you are proposing the image to be deleted. miranda 22:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

The warning ended up here for the record. Giggy (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Chuck Norris

I believe I set this category up including all subcategories & a wikicommons link in Wikipedia before I realized there was one already there for Chuck Norris. Normally, I use the full first name & middle initial for a person when setting up a category in Wikicommons. In this case, I’d be happy to change it back to Chuck Norris as the primary if you like since it was already there.
IMHO, I don’t think starting a conversation thread with “Seriously?” is a good way to start off a productive dialogue within the spirit of collaboration in Wikicommons. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 15:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Kelly, I'll change it back as I believe it to be the better title for the cat as you suggested. I may not get to it today though, but consider it done soon. Yes, I'm in the Marines & have lots of life long friends in the Air Force who I served with through the years. Happy Holidays to you. I'll see you around the Commons! Semper Fi, FieldMarine (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


Pay attention to copyright File:Wonder Girls.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Belgrano (talk) 14:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:AogaeView.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AogaeView.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AogaeView.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
  • image is licensed as 'All Rights reserved.' No evidence it was once licensed freely. Image is also not used on wikipedia.

--Leoboudv (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Wine region

SLO wine regions - Dolenjska wine region (south), largest region - is missing in this map. Ziga (talk) 08:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Is it possible to rename this photo to something more meaningful like Rainbows in Wicklow? I don't understand why this files name is two users names, as I had it on Flickr as Rainbows. http://jaqian.co.nr (talk) 09:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Kelly!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Glass moulage 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Glass moulage 2.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Lewis Black Aviano 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lewis Black Aviano 2.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 17:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jumeirah_mosque_cc.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

KALARICKAN | My Interactions 04:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

FYI, two issues with Flickr images:

  1. Any Flickr images with a full URL, you'll want to add {{Flickrreview}}
  2. File:Heirloom tomatoes 2.jpg was licensed at Flickr as cc-by-nc regardless; I always double check before finalizing a transfer. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks - I'm a Flickr reviewer. The uploader of the image claimed to be the copyright holder and had the same username. Kelly (talk) 02:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I see that now upon further reflection. Also, if you want to get my attention, feel free to just use w:template:tb; it makes it much easier to keep track of conversation. ;) Don't worry though you're doing well. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Heirloom_tomatoes_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trycatch (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

You're now a filemover

Hi Kelly/Archive 1, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • For guideline when to rename a file, please see Commons:File renaming and Commons:File naming.

Geagea (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


File:Logan 8547-square.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

File:MonteAltopotbellie.jpg

Hi. I remove your "no permission" tag from File:MonteAltopotbellie.jpg, since I didn't see any reason for it. The sculpture seen is over 1,000 years old; the uploader says they took the photo of it themself. What "permission" is needed? If there's some problem I'm missing, let me know. Thanks for your attention. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Why?

Why are you trying to delete my map ? it doesn't even fit the threshold of originality!. I made it myself! --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 07:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Gianna_Lynn_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.236.138.75 19:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Bus_speed_kochi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 15:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Wow, frankly I would have done that manually, the upload comment is filling five screens for me :) Hekerui (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

You renominated the File:Andrew_Dickson_White_statue_and_Goldwin_Smith_Hall.jpg for deletion only two days after the previous deletion request ended in keep, and with the same reason. Please provide some information on why you think the previous decision to keep the file was incorrect, and not simply state the same reason again. MKFI (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Frankincense_&_myrhh.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Frankincense_&_myrhh.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 03:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Clownfish_and_anenome.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Clownfish_and_anenome.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 03:26, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Simonxag (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

You may want to make a comment at the undeletion request.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Military dog and handler.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Military dog and handler.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Tux-small.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PL Przemek DYSKUSJA 06:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Griffith Park welcome sign 1.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Griffith Park welcome sign 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Griffith Park welcome sign 1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Personal_watercraft_warning_sticker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Logan_Mankins_periscope_(crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MSJapan (talk) 15:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Logan_Mankins_periscope.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MSJapan (talk) 15:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Notices regarding OTRS

Hi

I received three notices on my talk page regarding images not registered on OTRS. I was in a remote location for a week and did not check my email, so I apologize for the delay. I had previously sent emails to OTRS for all three images. I have since resent them. Was there an issue that caused prevented their registration? Samuell (talk) 01:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Help

Hey Kelly sorry to bother you....I hope you can point me in the right direction I'm having a problem with an Editor Fry1989 eh? who's edit warring w/ me on a file I've uploaded File:Transnistria Air Force Roundel.svg I'm not sure where to report this kind of activity. Any help would be surly appreciated, a million thanks Jetijones (talk) 05:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

I suggest uploading your image as a separate file - Commons has room for two versions. Kelly (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
File:RCMP_with_serge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Courcelles (talk) 02:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cmakvaca_userphoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 ■ MMXX  talk 22:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Kevin_Boss.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pete F (talk) 19:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Handsomedan_userphoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 ■ MMXX  talk 16:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Proof of licensing has already been given by RTAmerica in two places: on their official YouTube account[3] and on their official Internet Archive site.[4] To clarify, you will need to visit the YouTube site, click "show more" under the upload info, and the license will appear. To double check that this is correct, you can visit their official Internet Archive account where the same license appears. That is the only proof we need. In other words, the official owner of the RTAmerica account originally uploaded the video under cc-by-3.0. This account is owned and run by RTAmerica. To conclude, your claim that the image is "missing permission" is erroneous. Viriditas (talk) 00:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

File:New_Year_Aftermath.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.252.231.66 18:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:PD-Germany has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Franzia drinking.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Bernie Lightman at a meeting of the History of Science Society.jpg

The File:Bernie Lightman at a meeting of the History of Science Society.jpg that you uploaded though bot has been nominated for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. -- Asclepias (talk) 06:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Barceloneta Girl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blue Fox xyz (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Martakis Anatropi Special Edition.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Martakis Anatropi Special Edition.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:AHppl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 08:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Better source request for File:OC-135 landing.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OC-135 landing.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Madingley American cemetery chapel roof.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Barceloneta Girl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Miami Freedom Tower by Tom Schaefer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miamitom (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Jorfer userphoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jorfer (talk) 03:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to properly send you a message, and I'm not even sure if you'll get notified of this. If you do get this message: I noticed you've tagged some of my images as "no permission". I'm a bit confused as to why - I took them all, I uploaded them all, and they're all attributed to a site I built on which I licensed everything as Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (an notice of which and link is at the bottom of every page). Can I somehow fix this all in one fell swoop? Everything I've uploaded is mine and has permission to be used on wikipedia/wikimedia/wikiwhatever. Thanks!

Better source request for your uploads

Thanks for your uploading. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of these files because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file descriptions with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded multiple files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

čeština | English | svenska | русский | മലയാളം | 中文 | 中文(简体) | +/−

--High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

If you upload images from some US air force source, please paste the gallery page additionally. That's very important in order to check its copyright status. --High Contrast (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

example --High Contrast (talk) 19:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Is it ignorance or is it too complicated to understand to use valid source information? Why do you keep on uploading files with insufficient source information? --High Contrast (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

It's included. Is there any doubt that the files are all properly attributed and licensed? I suggest you concentrate on other uploads and stop posting here. Kelly (talk) 21:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
You should work better: This image has a very poor source information. Due to the .jpg-link a varification of its possible PD-status cannot be determined - as explained previously. By the way, watch your tone. --High Contrast (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Watch yours. Kelly (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Sea Gals at Croughton.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

DoD photo duplicate

Hello. You uploaded File:Missy Franklin and Prince Harry.jpg while there already was File:U.S. Olympic swimmer Missy Franklin, left, Paralympian gold medal winner Navy Lt. Bradley Snyder, center, and Prince Harry prepare to light the official torch to begin the 2013 Warrior Games at the U.S. Olympic T 130511-D-DB155-004.jpg by Fae. They has different EXIF so different checksum but the same VIRIN. Please be careful henceforth. Thank you in advance. Ain92 (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Kallara Pazhyapalli Light.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

കുമാര്‍ വൈക്കം (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Flea 2003 140x190.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 20:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The images is properly attributed and it was also before you called my attention upon its lack of attribution. Did you mix up two different files? --User:G.dallorto (talk) 11:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it was my error - sorry about that. I neglected to remove the message from your talk page, apologies. Kelly (talk) 17:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Lucy Liu photo

How do permissions issues apply to a photo that's public domain due to lack of copyright notice?Chowbok (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 01:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Categories fyki

Hi, as being tagged {categorize} has been fixed, please see here, thx Roland zh (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Mm northern rmc.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hosmich (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Highway 4 gore point.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

File:TabbTiger.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Safiel (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:CEC JM Lyngdoh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peripitus (talk) 03:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

File:CEC SL Shakdhar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peripitus (talk) 03:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

File:CEC Sukumar Sen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peripitus (talk) 03:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

File:CEC TN Seshan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peripitus (talk) 03:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kelly, there is a deletion request for a file which you have reviewed in 2011. Could you please comment? Thanks and regards, AFBorchert (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Max rspct.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buxtehude (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

File:CRIB.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 11:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)