User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Babel user information
de-N Diese Benutzerin spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English.
fr-2 Cette utilisatrice dispose d’un niveau intermédiaire de connaissance en français.
ja-4 この利用者は母語話者に近い日本語の知識を有しています。
Users by language

User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv

"Babys in pouches"[edit]

Hello, if you are going to create the marsupial pouches categories, please spell it "babies in pouches" instead of "babys". Also, it would help to have parent categories, maybe add them to the anatomy categories. This would help with organization. Thanks for your help. If you don't correct the spelling, I will do it, please don't be offended and don't revert corrections. Have fun, Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

You didn't correct the spelling you changed the category to something completely different, which isn't correct. A whole kangoroo with a baby in the pouch ist not simply a pouch. It schouldn't be directly in the kangoroo pouch category, but it is ok to put the category "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" as a whole in "Category:Marsupial pouches". It's the same principle why you dont put cats with blue eyes directly in the cat eyes category but it is ok to do so via a "cats with blue eyes"-category.
Additionally for "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" an anatomy category is an incorrect parent category, as it is not about anatomy but it is primarily a mother with child category. Kersti (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


Hello Kersti. Just to let you know about this edit. I’ve fixed the problem. Carry on. Green Giant (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Estrutura feijao.svg and other SVGs[edit]

Hi Kersti,

this is not English!--Geologiya (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Lens (anatomy)[edit]

Of course you are right. The problem is that management was not finished yet, and all the images in this category I have moved to a new category (I just created): Category:Human lens. In the same way I had already created Category:Orbit (anatomy) -> Category:Human orbit. Finally I added a new category to Schneckenauge.jpg. Thanks. --Jmarchn (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Cardellina canadensis[edit]

Hi! I am about to remove your template for VN from the category so it can use wikidata. I am sad about this because the template is really nice. Category:Cardellina canadensis. I guess that is all. (sniffle)--RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


E4024 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Bay foals with their mothers[edit]

Hey, I noticed you recently created Category:Bay foals with their mothers. Can you explain why this is a meaningful distinction from any other foals with their mothers, and bay foals in any other context? Cat Bay foals is pretty bloated, but IMO we could split it in some other ways that could be more useful. Such as by stage of coat development (before, during, after first coat shed). And of course at this point we can remove less than decent photos from the category. Glad to see you back btw! --Pitke (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

If you think, that there is a better way of splitting the categories this would be ok for me. On the other hand I think that there are enough bay foals not yet categoriced as bay foals, that alls these distinktions could be made without having categories with less than 20 photos. Kersti (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)