User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Babel user information
de-N Diese Benutzerin spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English.
fr-2 Cette utilisatrice dispose d’un niveau intermédiaire de connaissance en français.
ja-4 この利用者は母語話者に近い日本語の知識を有しています。
Users by language

User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv

Northern Cape[edit]

>:)< hug -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:People by name[edit]

User talk:Jtcurses#Category:People by name.--JT Curses (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC).--JT Curses (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all your categorizing of my uploaded images. Thank you! Josve05a (talk) 13:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Oggetto MuSe 023.JPG[edit]

It does stop to be taxidermied if it is identified as a replica. --Niccolò Caranti (MUSE) (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah thanks, I didin't notice this. --Kersti (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

Just letting you know that I am refining or changing some of your type categories. Some reasons are to make the English terminology more accurate, other reasons are because the lines between, say, "draft" or "light draft" or "cob" or "heavy warmblood" are not 100% clear, so a horse breed can be in more than one category. I think this will help more people find the breeds they are looking for. Montanabw (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Add location[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Add location has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 02:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Kersti Nebelsiek,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

HotCat[edit]

Do you know the gadget HotCat? It makesmakes adding categories a lot easierVera (talk) 07:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

I once tried it it it is not the tool I need. Ich think I am faster by hand as in many cases I add two categories at once. --Kersti (talk) 18:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
I started using it a lot more once I "placed categories above content, but below image on file description pages. This is a setting about the UI you can change in the gadget menu. Do you know Cat-A-Lot and VisualFilechanger? I often use a combination of the two to move stuff around, especially when I'm adding more than one category. --Vera (talk) 21:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

That's not my problem. I have a bad internet connection and HotCat doesn't work with enough speed here. If I try this I am always waiting for the computer. --Kersti (talk) 06:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Macaca skulls[edit]

Dear Kersti,

Thanks for you work on Macaca skulls, using Naturalis images i uploaded. As these individual images already reside in the Category:Media donated by Naturalis, only meant for maintenance and statistics, i removed your new category from that category. The poor macaca's were already in. Best regards, Hansmuller (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I didn't add this category. The name of the catwegory is "Category:Macaca skulls" not "Macaca skulls in Naturalis" therefore the Museum is not a mothercategory for it. --Kersti (talk) 06:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Centennial Park[edit]

Congratulations on all the work you did on the animal life in Centennial Park. Fabulous. Have you been to Cent Park?

Sardaka (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

No, i only visited the category. Australia is far away form Germany where I live. --Kersti (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Garrulax formosus - front-6.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Garrulax formosus - front-6.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Da bin ich die falsche. Ich habe nichts an der Lizenz geändet und das steht mit auch nicht zu. Kersti (talk) 22:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

categorizing my pic[edit]

why did you remove the category frome my pic?

  • File:Green bee-eater (Merops orientalis).jpg‏

if you think its not Merops orientalis - prove it plz. if you can't dont change it again. --מינוזיג (talk) 21:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

I changed to the subspecies category Category:Merops orientalis cyanophrys, and you are right, all birds in the caqtegory Category:Merops orientalis cyanophrys are Merops orientalis, but this is exactly the reason, why the Category:Merops orientalis is not nessesary. --Kersti (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Umkategorisierungen[edit]

Hallo Kersti. Sag mal, nutzt du eigentlich weder HotCat noch Cat-a-lot? --Leyo 13:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Nein, wie ich schon öfter erklärt habe, habe ich beides ausprobiert und es war nur unpraktisch. Hängt mit der langsamen Internetverbindung zusammen. --Kersti (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hm, bei deinem Vorgehen ist hingegen der fehlende Bearbeitungskommentar für alle anderen unpraktisch. :-( --Leyo 16:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Zwei Bilder hast du in die rote Category:Mammals of Tortuguero National Park einsortiert. Magst du dir das anschauen? --Leyo 23:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


File:Wallacea Fauna (cropped).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wallacea Fauna (cropped).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 08:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)