Jump to content

User talk:Kilom691

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Günther Frager in topic Notification about possible deletion

Factotum initial

[edit]

OK, Thanks for your help, JMCC1 (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Resolved, --JMCC1 (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:José_Vilalta_Saavedra

[edit]
Category discussion warning

José Vilalta Saavedra has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


P. Hughes (talk) 16:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Barcley custom corsets04.svg

[edit]

Hi, the weird license of the source has been fixed, maybe you can license your derivative work under {{Cc-zero}}? Thank you! Hekerui (talk) 11:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion

[edit]

Hi, Could you explain why you added files to this category, apparently without any reason? Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello,
these pages (hundred of thousands in the categories Fleurons by year) are supposed to be fleurons, typographical images and decorations. But among the uploaded files are many pure text images, or very low quality images, or blurred text, or whatever has been wrongly recognized as a typographical fleuron by some automated process in the website where this was taken from. I am cleaning those away, to keep only real images of something, of some quality maybe.
F (talk) 07:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Rhombohedron.svg

[edit]
File:Rhombohedron.svg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2600:1014:B062:2E42:983B:34C0:5DAD:AB45.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

License of SVG Cycling Jerseys

[edit]

Dear Kilom691, You uploaded a cycling jersey SVG icon to Wikimedia Commons. Great work, thanks for that! It is the file:Jersey_white_dots_on_red.svg .

However, the shape is exactly the same as the file:Jersey polkadot.svg that I created, and uploaded under CC-BY-SA. This means that if you create derivative works, you must

  1. credit the original creator(s), and
  2. share it under the same license

You did not credit me as the original author of the work you made a derivative of.


Could you make changes to the images you uploaded? You can do this very simply by adding the following line to the icons you originally created (and removing the current license template line)

{{Self |1= cc-by-sa-4.0|author=Kilom691 |attribution= Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey polkadot.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]}}

and if there is a summary table, change the line that reads |source={{own}} with a line that reads something like

|source={{own}} Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey polkadot.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]

If you based this icon on another icon than File:Jersey polkadot.svg, you can substitute that and credit the creator thereof as well as the authors of the work they based their work on.

See also: User:IIVQ/Cycling Jerseys and Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Cycling Jersey Icons

With regards, IIVQ (talk) 16:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Ashy Prinia 4.jpg

[edit]

Hi Kilom - File:Ashy Prinia 4.jpg is clearly identified in its filename! Please don't put it (or other similar files) in Category:Unidentified birds, that is for birds where the identification is not known. Put it directly in its relevant species category. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

And the same goes for File:100. Shikra.in.jpg and 234 other files newly added today to Category:Unidentified birds. Why? Clearly identified images should not be placed in this category unless you have good grounds for doubting the named identity. Please put them in their relevant categories, and not in an Unidentified category. - MPF (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Bandeira Itaituba.svg

[edit]
File:Bandeira Itaituba.svg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonilson Costa de Oliveira (talk) 00:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Catégorie à vérifier

[edit]

Bonjour Kilom691,

Je remarque (dix ans après) que tu as ajouté la Category:Henri Lallemand sur la page File:Die Gartenlaube (1894) 666.jpg où l'on voit un portrait de Charlotte von Hagn, d'après un tableau de "L'Allemand". Es-tu sûr de pouvoir identifier ce peintre comme Henri Lallemand ? À ma connaissance ce dernier n'a pas peint de portraits et n'a pas ou guère séjourné en Allemagne.

Cordialement Cymbella (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

[edit]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Statue of Saint Francis of Assisi, Saint Francis of Assisi Catholic Church, Utah, United states. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 00:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 10:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Were you sure about the category?

[edit]

In this edit you added category:Cherax destructor to an image that was labelled Cherax papuanus. Now that is an accepted but different species. Can you please revise that edit? Sincerely, Wikiklaas (talk) 12:38, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dump of 269 files in Category:Unidentified birds

[edit]

Hi Kilom - there are few things more demoralising to other editors working with 'unidentifieds' categories than to discover that a huge number of files has dumped into an 'unidentifieds' category in a very short space of time, and particularly so, when many of them are not unidentified, but are clearly named in their filenames. This is not the first time this has been mentioned: please stop doing this. Where a file is named in its title or description, add it to the relevant category, unless you have good reason to believe the cited identity is incorrect. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Anniversary Kilom691 🎉

[edit]

Hey @Kilom691. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 20 years of dedicated contributions to this Wikimedia Commons project. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. With over 871,512 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 09:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Edith Maryon - La danse d'Anitra.jpg

[edit]

Hi there Kilom691. You uploaded this file back in 2010, using a French title for the work: La danse d'Anitra, rather than The Dance of Anitra. From what I can tell, the work has been primarily or exclusively published under the English name, and in fact the pedestal of the sculpture spells the name in English (see here). Is there a reason you recall to name the file in French? Do you have any objection to me submitting a rename request to change it to English? Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I would prefer to keep this file name unchanged. Merci. F (talk) 07:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information on temporary account IP viewer rights

[edit]

Hello Kilom691,

On November 12, temporary accounts will be enabled on Commons. The IP of unregistered users will then be hidden for most users. You, as a patroller or license reviewer, are eligible to request the new temporary account IP viewer right, if you need it to continue fighting vandalism and abuse on Commons. If you want to request the right, please file the request here. Please be aware that you also have to accept the Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy in your preferences. For more information about temporary accounts, look at the project page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 00:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply