User talk:Kleon3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File source is not properly indicated: File:Liege-Vierge de Dom Rupert.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Liege-Vierge de Dom Rupert.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Liege-Vierge de Dom Rupert.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Fargue,Maria Margaretha la-17xx Moeder met kind op schoot2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello,
I restored this file. Please add the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Noodkist Crypte.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 20:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Maastricht StServatius ca1887 Demolishing Fayen towers.jpg[edit]

Hi Kleon3,

You stated the beeldbank.cultureelerfgoed as source. I'm trying to link all the images from the RCE directly to their entry in the beeldbank and the image above is the only one that I can't find back. Can you find it back in the Beeldbank? If so there's a adlib priref number on the page, can you tell me that number? (If you're dutch we can talk in dutch)

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Somebody found it. I've now added the source to the image. Basvb (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Maastricht, Eurpean Top Conference, 1991 - B 145 Bild-F075760-0010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maastricht, Eurpean Top Conference, 1991 - B 145 Bild-F075760-0010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarekt (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Willem Veusels, 1572.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:StAmorsplein05.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:StAmorsplein05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


File:HeiligeGeestCollege, Leuven.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:HeiligeGeestCollege, Leuven.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Didym (talk) 09:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:OLVinterieurCrypte02.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:OLVinterieurCrypte02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Sint-Truiden, abdijcomplex, uitzicht04-05.jpg[edit]

Hallo, browsen foto's van Wikipedia, zag ik twee van uw foto's die kunnen worden gemonteerd. Hier is het resultaat, ik hoop dat u akkoord gaat. Harte. François de Dijon (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC) (Machine vertaling)

Bonjour, en parcourant les photographies de Wikipédia, j'ai vu deux de vos photos qui pouvaient être assemblées. Voici le résultat, j'espère que cela vous conviendra. Cordialement.François de Dijon (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Sint-Truiden, abdijcomplex, uitzicht04-05.jpg

Hi François, heel goed gelukt - compliment! Ik heb de afbeelding meteen bij het artikel abdij van Sint-Truiden geplaatst. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 15:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Dank je, het is goed. Als u meer foto's te monteren, aarzel dan niet het zal worden met plezier. François de Dijon (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Maastricht Train Station[edit]

Hoi Kleon3, ik zie dat je deze categorie hernoemd hebt. We gebruiken hier op Commons de namen die gebruikelijk zijn in het Engels, dus in dit geval Maastricht railway station. Zou je in de toekomst op willen passen met zonder overleg hernoemen van categorieën? Je kan beter {{Move}} gebruiken. Multichill (talk) 10:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Multichill,
Voor zover ik het begrijp, gebruiken we voor categorieën op Commons weliswaar Engelse termen, maar geen vertalingen van Nederlandse eigennamen, ook niet van stations. Station Maastricht was het enige station in Limburg met een Engelse naam. In heel Nederland zijn vrijwel geen Engelstalige stationsnamen; Category:Amsterdam Central station is één van de weinige uitzonderingen, wellicht vanwege de internationale naamsbekendheid. Deze discussie is ook al gevoerd over namen van kerken. Zo zijn vrijwel alle door mij gecreëerde categorieën van Category:Basilica of Saint Servatius (Maastricht) herbenoemd naar Category:Sint-Servaasbasiliek (Maastricht). Kleon3 (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Ja, het is een beetje een zooitje vandaar wat conservatief met hernoemen. Ik ben zelf persoonlijk ook niet zo'n fan van die geforceerde Engelse namen. Er zit wel een oplossing aan te komen, zie User:Multichill/Next generation categories en User:Multichill/Commons Wikidata roadmap. Multichill (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Kleon3,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Kleon3,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

The saint with a knife in his head...[edit]

Im sorry but this is uncorrect... The statue represents a monk with a knife in the head, iconography attributed to St. Peter of Verona, look at this (in italian) please.--Threecharlie (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Fantastic, thanks for sharing! You are absolutely right. I corrected my mistake. Kleon3 (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 ;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Campus Maastricht[edit]

Als het terrein er nu echt al zo bij lag sinds 1899 was het op slag ontegenzeggenlijk een relevant bouwproject. Maar ik denk dat je 2009 bedoelt. EvilFreD overleg 13:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Kleon3,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Augustijnenkerk[edit]

Hoi Kleon,

in de eerste plaats complimenten voor al je werk betreffende Maastricht. Zo wordt de stad nog leesbaar. In de tweede plaats heb ik enkele oude, oude foto's vanuit de Augustijnenkerk opgeladen die je misschien wel interessant vindt.

Groetjes, Mark Ahsmann (talk) 08:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey Mark,
Wat goed, dit zijn echt mooie interieurfoto's van de kerk. Ik heb één ervan meteen bij het artikel over de Augustijnenkerk gezet (kun je natuurlijk ook altijd zelf doen; het artikel is niet "van mij"...).
Ik maak best veel gebruik van je foto's, dus complimenten terug!
Groet, Leon, ofwel Kleon3 (talk) 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Johann Valentin Tischbein, Das große Familienstück, c1745.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Johann Valentin Tischbein, Das große Familienstück, c1745.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)== File:Boerenbont borden, Keramiekmuseum Princessehof, Leeuwarden.jpg ==

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Boerenbont borden, Keramiekmuseum Princessehof, Leeuwarden.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. 1989 20:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Images from TEFAF 2015[edit]

Hi, I saw you created the category Category:Images from TEFAF 2015 and put all of the images I uploaded to the top category into it. Those pictures were not from the TEFAF website, but from the various galleries (linked in the source fields of those files). So technically you need another name for the category such as "images of artworks shown at TEFAF 2015". What you have done is incorrect. Your thoughts? Jane023 (talk) 09:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. The title you propose is much better indeed. I just went with the category titles that were there already for the previous years, a bit lazy I admit... I do think it is important to put these images in a hidden category (as the existing categories are) because the fact that an artwork is shown at TEFAF in a certain year (in some cases 2 or 3 times) is not essential information in my opinion. Do you want to do the renaming? If not, I'm happy to do it. Kleon3 (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
No, go ahead - I am no expert at renaming or moving files. Thanks, Jane023 (talk) 11:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Amsterdam, Stadsschouwburg, Koninklijke Foyer, Portret Han Bentz van den Berg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Amsterdam, Stadsschouwburg, Koninklijke Foyer, Portret Han Bentz van den Berg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:London-Woolwich, Royal Arsenal, Crossrail site.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:London-Woolwich, Royal Arsenal, Crossrail site.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:London-Woolwich, Plumstead Road 21.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:London-Woolwich, Plumstead Road 21.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

I can see nothing wrong with it. It is a photograph by myself of a building, uploaded with the correct license (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license). You must be mistaken. Kleon3 (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Verzoek[edit]

Beste Kleon3, In je koptekst file; "Servies ontworpen door Jef Schijns ,geproduceerd door Mosa ca. 1980-90 (collectie H.v.Buren, Maastrichts aardewerk, Centre Céramique Maastricht) is waarschijnlijk per abuis een vergissing geslopen. Het servies is niet door Jef Schijns ontworpen maar door zijn collega Ton Johannesma. Het dekor is wel door hem ontworpen. Dat geldt ook voor de file waarop een bord en bekers zijn afgebeeld van Piet Stockmans plus een schaal van E.Bellefroid.

Bij deze wil ik je vriendelijk verzoeken het e.a. te corrigeren.

M.vr.Gr.

T.J.

P.S. Het servies is niet in 1980 ontworpen maar in 1984/85. In de eind jaren 80 ontwikkeld en in 1989 geintroduceerd.In 1991 kreeg het servies het predikaat 'Goed Industrieel Ontwerp. Mosa produceerde het servies tot 1997 (sluiting porseleinfabriek). Vandaag de dag wordt het servies, nog altijd onder de naam Vorm 300, door handelsonderneming " Maastricht Porselein" ,gevestigd in Eisden, verkocht. De productie vindt nu in Turkije plaats.

Geachte heer Johannesma,
Ik heb uw verzoek ingediend bij de bevoegde moderator die erover beslist of het bestand hertiteld kan worden. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Maps Braun Hogenberg Maastricht[edit]

In march 2015 you uploaded some fragments of the Braun and Hogenberg map of the city of Maastricht. The part I am looking for is just clipped. I was wondering if you had any extra fragments, or a source where I can look for the entire map.

There is quite a large version of the map available on Commons: File:Civitates_Orbis_Terrarum-Maastricht.JPG. Good luck! Kleon3 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

A present for you[edit]

Ajaccio Chaudet Husson Murat Napoleon.JPG The bust of Napoleon III is now in museum Grand Curtius
Voor al het werk dat je levert Lotje (talk) 11:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Lotje, dankje :))) Kleon3 (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 05.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Konto na chwilę (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Konto na chwilę (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 06.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Konto na chwilę (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Valkenburg, Reconstructie Halderpark en stadsgracht, nov 2014-03.JPG[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Valkenburg, Reconstructie Halderpark en stadsgracht, nov 2014-03.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

{{PD-Art-100-1923}} Danckerts Historis[edit]

Beste Kleon,

Leuk dat je die gravures van Maastricht kunt gebruiken! Laat je de goede licentie staan: {{PD-Art-100-1923}}, dus ook voor de VS? Anders foutmelding. Bedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Nieuwe namen zonder verband met origineel en nummer zijn verwarrend, heb ze hernoemd volgens min of meer standaard, zie Category:Prints_from_Dankaerts_Historis_at_the_Peace_Palace_Library.
Zag dat je de details apart had opgeladen met UploadWizard. Dat hoeft niet, je kunt op Commons zelf met de Crop tool ter plaatse uitknippen.
Je kunt in het veld "other-versions" bij een geknipt plaatje het origineel vermelden, er is ook een apart sjabloon voor.. Groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Famien Strada Histoire-Capture of Maastricht-ppn087811480 MG 8932T3p189 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Beste Kleon,

Vind je leuke uitsnede met trommelaar.

  • Strada en Ryrer deden alleen de tekst, kunstenaar onbekend?
  • Je zet "English: Alexander Farnese, duke of Parma, before Maastricht in June 1579. Detail.." Hoe weten we dat Alexander Farnese erop staat? En waar staat hij dan precies? Ik zie twee kerels die met hoeden zwaaien en soldaten met helmen en een tent? met buit? Op het origineel zit een heerschap middenonder in een draagstoel oid onder een parasol, lange neus, hoog voorhoofd. Dat kan Farnese wel zijn.

Bedankt, groeten Hansmuller (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Met "de hertog van Parma voor Maastricht" wordt natuurlijk bedoeld: "de troepen van de hertog van Parma". Maar goed, 't is aangepast. Kleon3 (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Famien Strada Histoire-Capture of Maastricht-ppn087811480 MG 8932T3p189 (cropped1).jpg[edit]

Beste Kleon,

Je hebt geloof ik je bijschriften van je uitsnedes verwisseld, en de boektitel veranderd. Het gaat om de zoveelste uitgave in het Frans van 1727, NIET om een eerdere zoals je vermeldt. Ook hebben Strada en zijn vertaler NIET de illustraties gemaakt.

  • Kun je dit rechtzetten in je bijdragen?

Bedankt, groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Ik heb slechts een detail van een afbeelding gepubliceerd. De informatie daarbij is afkomstig van de originele afbeelding. Als dat volgens jou niet klopt, moet je dat vooral veranderen. Kleon3 (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op den dorschvloer (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op den dorschvloer (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Bij den kuiper (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Bij den kuiper (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Van schelpen tot kalk (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Van schelpen tot kalk (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op de scheepstimmerwerf (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op de scheepstimmerwerf (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tekstman (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 10:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Veranderen van taal[edit]

Als je een commentaartekst in het Nederlands veranderd in een Engelse tekst is het wel handig de code nl te veranderen in en. (Beelden van Woolwich) Of een nieuwe tekst in een andere taal toevoegen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)