User talk:Kleon3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File source is not properly indicated: File:Liege-Vierge de Dom Rupert.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Liege-Vierge de Dom Rupert.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Liege-Vierge de Dom Rupert.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Fargue,Maria Margaretha la-17xx Moeder met kind op schoot2.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello,
I restored this file. Please add the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Noodkist Crypte.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Maastricht StServatius ca1887 Demolishing Fayen towers.jpg[edit]

Hi Kleon3,

You stated the beeldbank.cultureelerfgoed as source. I'm trying to link all the images from the RCE directly to their entry in the beeldbank and the image above is the only one that I can't find back. Can you find it back in the Beeldbank? If so there's a adlib priref number on the page, can you tell me that number? (If you're dutch we can talk in dutch)

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Somebody found it. I've now added the source to the image. Basvb (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Maastricht, Eurpean Top Conference, 1991 - B 145 Bild-F075760-0010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maastricht, Eurpean Top Conference, 1991 - B 145 Bild-F075760-0010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Willem Veusels, 1572.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:StAmorsplein05.jpg[edit]

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:StAmorsplein05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


File:HeiligeGeestCollege, Leuven.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  മലയാളം  فارسی  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:HeiligeGeestCollege, Leuven.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
Didym (talk) 09:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:OLVinterieurCrypte02.jpg[edit]

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:OLVinterieurCrypte02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Jarekt (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Sint-Truiden, abdijcomplex, uitzicht04-05.jpg[edit]

Hallo, browsen foto's van Wikipedia, zag ik twee van uw foto's die kunnen worden gemonteerd. Hier is het resultaat, ik hoop dat u akkoord gaat. Harte. François de Dijon (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC) (Machine vertaling)

Bonjour, en parcourant les photographies de Wikipédia, j'ai vu deux de vos photos qui pouvaient être assemblées. Voici le résultat, j'espère que cela vous conviendra. Cordialement.François de Dijon (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Sint-Truiden, abdijcomplex, uitzicht04-05.jpg

Hi François, heel goed gelukt - compliment! Ik heb de afbeelding meteen bij het artikel abdij van Sint-Truiden geplaatst. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 15:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Dank je, het is goed. Als u meer foto's te monteren, aarzel dan niet het zal worden met plezier. François de Dijon (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Maastricht Train Station[edit]

Hoi Kleon3, ik zie dat je deze categorie hernoemd hebt. We gebruiken hier op Commons de namen die gebruikelijk zijn in het Engels, dus in dit geval Maastricht railway station. Zou je in de toekomst op willen passen met zonder overleg hernoemen van categorieën? Je kan beter {{Move}} gebruiken. Multichill (talk) 10:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Multichill,
Voor zover ik het begrijp, gebruiken we voor categorieën op Commons weliswaar Engelse termen, maar geen vertalingen van Nederlandse eigennamen, ook niet van stations. Station Maastricht was het enige station in Limburg met een Engelse naam. In heel Nederland zijn vrijwel geen Engelstalige stationsnamen; Category:Amsterdam Central station is één van de weinige uitzonderingen, wellicht vanwege de internationale naamsbekendheid. Deze discussie is ook al gevoerd over namen van kerken. Zo zijn vrijwel alle door mij gecreëerde categorieën van Category:Basilica of Saint Servatius (Maastricht) herbenoemd naar Category:Sint-Servaasbasiliek (Maastricht). Kleon3 (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Ja, het is een beetje een zooitje vandaar wat conservatief met hernoemen. Ik ben zelf persoonlijk ook niet zo'n fan van die geforceerde Engelse namen. Er zit wel een oplossing aan te komen, zie User:Multichill/Next generation categories en User:Multichill/Commons Wikidata roadmap. Multichill (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | polski | română | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Kleon3,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Kleon3,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

The saint with a knife in his head...[edit]

Im sorry but this is uncorrect... The statue represents a monk with a knife in the head, iconography attributed to St. Peter of Verona, look at this (in italian) please.--Threecharlie (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Fantastic, thanks for sharing! You are absolutely right. I corrected my mistake. Kleon3 (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Campus Maastricht[edit]

Als het terrein er nu echt al zo bij lag sinds 1899 was het op slag ontegenzeggenlijk een relevant bouwproject. Maar ik denk dat je 2009 bedoelt. EvilFreD overleg 13:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Kleon3,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Augustijnenkerk[edit]

Hoi Kleon,

in de eerste plaats complimenten voor al je werk betreffende Maastricht. Zo wordt de stad nog leesbaar. In de tweede plaats heb ik enkele oude, oude foto's vanuit de Augustijnenkerk opgeladen die je misschien wel interessant vindt.

Groetjes, Mark Ahsmann (talk) 08:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey Mark,
Wat goed, dit zijn echt mooie interieurfoto's van de kerk. Ik heb één ervan meteen bij het artikel over de Augustijnenkerk gezet (kun je natuurlijk ook altijd zelf doen; het artikel is niet "van mij"...).
Ik maak best veel gebruik van je foto's, dus complimenten terug!
Groet, Leon, ofwel Kleon3 (talk) 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Johann Valentin Tischbein, Das große Familienstück, c1745.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Johann Valentin Tischbein, Das große Familienstück, c1745.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)== File:Boerenbont borden, Keramiekmuseum Princessehof, Leeuwarden.jpg ==

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  മലയാളം  فارسی  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Boerenbont borden, Keramiekmuseum Princessehof, Leeuwarden.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
1989 20:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Images from TEFAF 2015[edit]

Hi, I saw you created the category Category:Images from TEFAF 2015 and put all of the images I uploaded to the top category into it. Those pictures were not from the TEFAF website, but from the various galleries (linked in the source fields of those files). So technically you need another name for the category such as "images of artworks shown at TEFAF 2015". What you have done is incorrect. Your thoughts? Jane023 (talk) 09:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. The title you propose is much better indeed. I just went with the category titles that were there already for the previous years, a bit lazy I admit... I do think it is important to put these images in a hidden category (as the existing categories are) because the fact that an artwork is shown at TEFAF in a certain year (in some cases 2 or 3 times) is not essential information in my opinion. Do you want to do the renaming? If not, I'm happy to do it. Kleon3 (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
No, go ahead - I am no expert at renaming or moving files. Thanks, Jane023 (talk) 11:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Amsterdam, Stadsschouwburg, Koninklijke Foyer, Portret Han Bentz van den Berg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Amsterdam, Stadsschouwburg, Koninklijke Foyer, Portret Han Bentz van den Berg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:London-Woolwich, Royal Arsenal, Crossrail site.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:London-Woolwich, Royal Arsenal, Crossrail site.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:London-Woolwich, Plumstead Road 21.jpg[edit]

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:London-Woolwich, Plumstead Road 21.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

I can see nothing wrong with it. It is a photograph by myself of a building, uploaded with the correct license (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license). You must be mistaken. Kleon3 (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Verzoek[edit]

Beste Kleon3, In je koptekst file; "Servies ontworpen door Jef Schijns ,geproduceerd door Mosa ca. 1980-90 (collectie H.v.Buren, Maastrichts aardewerk, Centre Céramique Maastricht) is waarschijnlijk per abuis een vergissing geslopen. Het servies is niet door Jef Schijns ontworpen maar door zijn collega Ton Johannesma. Het dekor is wel door hem ontworpen. Dat geldt ook voor de file waarop een bord en bekers zijn afgebeeld van Piet Stockmans plus een schaal van E.Bellefroid.

Bij deze wil ik je vriendelijk verzoeken het e.a. te corrigeren.

M.vr.Gr.

T.J.

P.S. Het servies is niet in 1980 ontworpen maar in 1984/85. In de eind jaren 80 ontwikkeld en in 1989 geintroduceerd.In 1991 kreeg het servies het predikaat 'Goed Industrieel Ontwerp. Mosa produceerde het servies tot 1997 (sluiting porseleinfabriek). Vandaag de dag wordt het servies, nog altijd onder de naam Vorm 300, door handelsonderneming " Maastricht Porselein" ,gevestigd in Eisden, verkocht. De productie vindt nu in Turkije plaats.

Geachte heer Johannesma,
Ik heb uw verzoek ingediend bij de bevoegde moderator die erover beslist of het bestand hertiteld kan worden. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Maps Braun Hogenberg Maastricht[edit]

In march 2015 you uploaded some fragments of the Braun and Hogenberg map of the city of Maastricht. The part I am looking for is just clipped. I was wondering if you had any extra fragments, or a source where I can look for the entire map.

There is quite a large version of the map available on Commons: File:Civitates_Orbis_Terrarum-Maastricht.JPG. Good luck! Kleon3 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

A present for you[edit]

Ajaccio Chaudet Husson Murat Napoleon.JPG The bust of Napoleon III is now in museum Grand Curtius
Voor al het werk dat je levert Lotje (talk) 11:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Lotje, dankje :))) Kleon3 (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 05.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Konto na chwilę (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Konto na chwilę (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 06.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:St-Servaasbasiliek, westwerkaltaar, kapitelen 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Konto na chwilę (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Valkenburg, Reconstructie Halderpark en stadsgracht, nov 2014-03.JPG[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Valkenburg, Reconstructie Halderpark en stadsgracht, nov 2014-03.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Vera (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

{{PD-Art-100-1923}} Danckerts Historis[edit]

Beste Kleon,

Leuk dat je die gravures van Maastricht kunt gebruiken! Laat je de goede licentie staan: {{PD-Art-100-1923}}, dus ook voor de VS? Anders foutmelding. Bedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Nieuwe namen zonder verband met origineel en nummer zijn verwarrend, heb ze hernoemd volgens min of meer standaard, zie Category:Prints_from_Dankaerts_Historis_at_the_Peace_Palace_Library.
Zag dat je de details apart had opgeladen met UploadWizard. Dat hoeft niet, je kunt op Commons zelf met de Crop tool ter plaatse uitknippen.
Je kunt in het veld "other-versions" bij een geknipt plaatje het origineel vermelden, er is ook een apart sjabloon voor.. Groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Famien Strada Histoire-Capture of Maastricht-ppn087811480 MG 8932T3p189 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Beste Kleon,

Vind je leuke uitsnede met trommelaar.

  • Strada en Ryrer deden alleen de tekst, kunstenaar onbekend?
  • Je zet "English: Alexander Farnese, duke of Parma, before Maastricht in June 1579. Detail.." Hoe weten we dat Alexander Farnese erop staat? En waar staat hij dan precies? Ik zie twee kerels die met hoeden zwaaien en soldaten met helmen en een tent? met buit? Op het origineel zit een heerschap middenonder in een draagstoel oid onder een parasol, lange neus, hoog voorhoofd. Dat kan Farnese wel zijn.

Bedankt, groeten Hansmuller (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Met "de hertog van Parma voor Maastricht" wordt natuurlijk bedoeld: "de troepen van de hertog van Parma". Maar goed, 't is aangepast. Kleon3 (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Famien Strada Histoire-Capture of Maastricht-ppn087811480 MG 8932T3p189 (cropped1).jpg[edit]

Beste Kleon,

Je hebt geloof ik je bijschriften van je uitsnedes verwisseld, en de boektitel veranderd. Het gaat om de zoveelste uitgave in het Frans van 1727, NIET om een eerdere zoals je vermeldt. Ook hebben Strada en zijn vertaler NIET de illustraties gemaakt.

  • Kun je dit rechtzetten in je bijdragen?

Bedankt, groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Ik heb slechts een detail van een afbeelding gepubliceerd. De informatie daarbij is afkomstig van de originele afbeelding. Als dat volgens jou niet klopt, moet je dat vooral veranderen. Kleon3 (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op den dorschvloer (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op den dorschvloer (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Bij den kuiper (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Bij den kuiper (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Van schelpen tot kalk (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Van schelpen tot kalk (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters.1915), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op de scheepstimmerwerf (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schoolplaat Het volle leven - Op de scheepstimmerwerf (J Ligthart, A M Scheepstra, W Walstra, uitg J B Wolters), collectie Centre Céramique, Maastricht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 10:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Veranderen van taal[edit]

Als je een commentaartekst in het Nederlands veranderd in een Engelse tekst is het wel handig de code nl te veranderen in en. (Beelden van Woolwich) Of een nieuwe tekst in een andere taal toevoegen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Uittocht van het Spaanse garnizoen uit Breda.JPG[edit]

Als je denkt dat een verslagen leger niet met wapens (klaar voor gebruik) een stad uittrok, zou ik je graag adviseren je meer te verdiepen in oorlogshandelingen i.p.v. vreemde POV toevoegingen (een groep rooms-katholieke geestelijken uit de stad begeleid, maak je ervan) doen onder mijn uploads, zeker geen verwijt plaatsen dat er geen bron geplaats zou zijn, want die stond er wel degelijk. Even de titel in de zoekmachine van het Rijksmuseum voeren was voldoende geweest om te leren dat de info wel correct is. In dit geval (Breda 1634): "Frederik Hendrik stond aan de belegerden een eervolle aftocht toe. Op 11 oktober, 's morgens om 11 uur, trok de bezetting met slaande trom, vliegende vaandels, brandende lont en een kogel in de mond de Boschpoort uit in de richting van Mechelen." --Rode raaf (talk) 10:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Niet zo hoog van de toren blazen, want één blik op de tekening leert dat het hier in elk geval ten dele om geestelijken gaat. Bovendien, een uittocht van een verslagen garnizoen vond bij mijn weten plaats met gestreken wapens, als die wapens al niet achtergelaten moesten worden. Kleon3 (talk) 10:25, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Daarbij zie ik nu pas dat je de bron daarnet snel even hebt toegevoegd. Ook heb je de vraagtekens verwijderd die ik achter het jaartal 1737 had gezet (wat mij onwaarschijnlijk leek en wat nu fout door jou overgenomen blijkt). Daarnaast heb je ook de door mij verbeterde incorrecte spelling van anonymous teruggezet. Kortom, een tijdverspiller. Kleon3 (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Een katholieke Spaanse bezetting die werd verslagen in Breda, logisch dat daar een hoop geestelijken tussen zitten, Breda was toen een grote stad, net als Maastricht. Dan heb je het niet over een dorpspastoor, maar meerdere kerken, kloosters e.d. met misschien wel honderd of meer geestelijken. Begrijpend lezen is teveel gevraagd? Ik schrijf héél duidelijk: "Even de titel in de zoekmachine van het Rijksmuseum voeren was voldoende geweest om te leren dat de info wel correct is." n.a.v. de bron die erbij stond, dat ik vandaag een link toevoegde heb ik voor jouw gemak gedaan. Dat jaartal was niet "fout overgenomen" maar een typo, bij beschrijving staat het wel correct, de 6 en 7 staan ook zover uit elkaar op een toetsenbord hé? Ik zal dat jaartal verbeteren, schrijffouten vind ik irrelevant. Wat betreft uittrekkende garnizoenen, dat kon verschillen van een oneervolle uittocht met bonenstaken en idd achterlating van wapens, maar ook eervolle uittochten met "brandende lonten tussen de tanden" met medeneming van al het kruit, kogels, kanonnen e.d. en dat laatste kwam zelfs vaker voor dan oneervolle uittochten. Logisch ook wel, want als jij een stad wilt innemen, doe je dat liever makkelijk met een overeenkomst, dan dat je tunnels moet graven en doden en gewonden, maar vooral veel tijd wilt opofferen voor een beleg. Ik had verwacht dat jij dit wel zou weten, omdat ik je regelmatig aan lemmata over belegeringen van Maastricht zie werken. Zelf heb ik aan ruim honderd artikelen gewerkt betreffende Tachtigjarige Oorlog, net zoveel boeken erover gelezen, dat heeft niets met "hoog van de toren blazen" te maken, maar wel van op de hoogte zijn. Enfin, geen fijn overleg, moet onwillekeurig terugdenken aan mijn eerste ontmoeting met jou, drie jaar geleden toen je met vals beschuldigde dat ik jouw afbeeldingen verwijderd zou hebben, terwijl het nét andersom was. Ik las toevallig jou pleidooi op je GP daar, iets over potten die ketels wat verwijten misschien? Met dergelijke dingen kan je beter eerst even overleg opzoeken voordat je zoiets gaat wijzigen naar je eigen bevindingen. Daarbij gaat het me niet om een fout jaartal of spelfout, maar wel over correcte historie. --Rode raaf (talk) 11:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Zoals gezegd, een tijdverspiller, maar wel leuk om in de toekomst naar te kunnen verwijzen, inclusief alle taalfouten en kromme redeneringen. Kleon3 (talk) 11:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Nou, je hebt dus meer verstand van taal, dan van geschiedenis. Wees er trots op. --Rode raaf (talk) 12:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2017 Maastricht montage.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2017 Maastricht montage.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Maastricht, TEFAF2014-11.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maastricht, TEFAF2014-11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.43.37.227 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Pierre Cuypers at a Foundation Stone Ceremony Cuypershuis 0662 13.jpg[edit]

Beste Kleon, jij houdt je bezig met de geschiedenis van Maastricht, toch? Weet jij deze foto te plaatsen. Het is een eerstesteenlegging van een gebouw, vermoedelijk in Maastricht. De architect Pierre Cuypers staat tussen het publiek, dus kennelijk is het gebouw door hem ontworpen. Maar welk gebouw dit moet zijn is me niet duidelijk. Misschien heb jij een idee. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Vincent, ik herken de plek niet maar gezien het jaartal vermoed ik dat het De Stuers is, een verenigingsgebouw aan de Kommel, rijksmonument 506652. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Beste Kleon, Ik heb even op google street view gekeken en je hebt helemaal gelijk. Rechtsonder in de gevel is de hoeksteen redelijk goed te zien. Ook het baksteenpatroon komt overeen met de foto. Bedankt dus. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Graag gedaan, Vincent. Ook weer opgelost :) Kleon3 (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Überkategorisierung[edit]

Sorry, aber ich habe deine Änderung in File:Trier, Konstantinbasilika -- 2015 -- 7529.jpg zurückgesetzt, da die Kategorie bereits mit einer anderen enthalten ist. (Du hast sie selbst gesetzt. ;-) ) Bitte COM:OVERCAT beachten. Danke. --XRay talk 12:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Nicht ganz. Auf dem bild steht nicht nur die Basilika, sondern auch ein Stück des Konstantinsplatzes. Ist vielleicht ein Zweifelfall. Kein Problem aber. Kleon3 (talk) 12:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Das Problem kenne ich von mehreren Bildern, die Überkategorisierung wird ab trotzdem immer wieder bemängelt. Es ist auch meiner Meinung nach eine Lücke im System. --XRay talk 15:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Voor al je harde werken aan Wikimedia Commons, ik zie je naam constant weer terug. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey, wow, dank je :) Kleon3 (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

File:2016 Schuilen in Maastricht 03.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:2016 Schuilen in Maastricht 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

New Year[edit]

Hi Kleon3, you are coming to Arnhem tomorrow (saturday)? lol - Is wel een eindje weg voor je, dus ik vermoed van niet. Ik ga wel, voor mij is het ook niet naast de deur, zo'n 100 km. See you tomorrow? Face-smile.svg - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Hoi Richard, ik wist niet eens dat er morgen een nieuwjaarsbijeenkomst was! Ik ga dit jaar overslaan. Veel plezier morgen Face-smile.svg Kleon3 (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Gebruik foto Sterreplein Maastricht voor "us gezetsje"[edit]

Beste Kleon3,

Zou ik uw foto van het Sterreplein te Maastricht mogen gebruiken tbv "us gezetsje". Het buurtnetwerk Us Sint Maartenspoort laat vanaf deze maand, eens per twee maanden, een krantje verschijnen met nieuwtjes. Ik hoor graag van u!

Met vriendelijke groet, mithhe —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.163.77.59 (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Dag Mithhe,
Natuurlijk mag dat, leuk zelfs! Alle foto's op Wikipedia zijn in principe vrij van rechten. Het zou wel leuk zijn als u erbij zet "Foto: Kleon3, Wikipedia" of iets dergelijks. Groet en succes met het buurtkrantje! Kleon3 (talk) 18:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Wat leuk! Dank je wel en zeker wordt je naam vernoemd. Groetjes, Mirjam —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.163.77.59 (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:10e internationale Reuzenstoet[edit]

Hi! Thank you for helping me for categorizing my pictures Face-smile.svg. I noticed you withdrawed Category:10e internationale Reuzenstoet from all pictures. Was it on purpose? I wanted to categorize all the pictures of this event in the same category (not sure the category name is appropriate btw). Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Arthur. Thanks for taking these pictures! Must have been a beautiful sunny day and the photos are a great addition to the encyclopaedia. I took the liberty to withdraw the afore-mentioned category, because the pictures were already in this category as a group, so adding the same category to each individual picture is over-categorizing... Best to you, Kleon3 (talk) 08:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Renaming[edit]

Hi Kleon3, after renaming ca. 10 files you requested, the files are gone or lost (or perhaps there is something else going on). I did only rename them like was requested. See also: User talk:Steinsplitter. I asked him (a mod.) who renames a lot if he knows it. Regards, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Some of them are visible now, I hope they all return, just like they disappeared. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Gekke dingen gebeuren er soms... Ik wacht even rustig af. Bedankt voor al je inspanningen! Kleon3 (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Thnx mate! Steinsplitter heeft een paar bugreports gedaan, maar daar snap ik niets van, weet niet of hij ze allemaal heeft gedaan.. Doe je nog mee aan de schrijfwedstrijd of misschien zelfs aan de jury? (iemand als jou kunnen we wel gebruiken in de jury). Zie de NL-Wikipedia. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Hoi Leon, wegens een storing kunnen je bestanden nu niet hernoemd worden. Je ziet/merkt het vanzelf als het verholpen is, groet, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Okay, bedankt voor het bericht, Richard, sowieso geen haast. Kleon3 (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg.jpg
Hallo Kleon3,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Artikel[edit]

Dag Leon, ik heb onlangs alle artikelen voor de schrijfwedstrijd gecontroleerd op dp-links en er waren er maar enkele. Zover mogelijk heb ik die gebruikers geïnformeerd. Na je aanvulling/wijziging zie ik er echter bij jou drie, namelijk Venetië - NSB - Orde van het Heilig Graf van Jeruzalem (van boven naar beneden). Voor het geval je ze niet voor vannacht 0:01 ziet. - Verder bemoei ik me niet met de artikelen, ik ben niet voor niets jurylid, maar als ik de ene persoon op een dp-link wijs, doe ik het ook bij de ander. Dus vandaar. Groeten en succes. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Dank je, Richard, ik heb het aangepast. Sterkte met het jureren! Ik heb jullie een hoop werk bezorgd... Kleon3 (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Photograph of the statue of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in Maastricht Cuypershuis 0685.jpg[edit]

Beste Kleon, ik kwam deze foto tegen van het heilig hart-beeld op het Keizer Karelplein. Misschien kun je er wat mee. Hij lijkt inderdaad veel op Joseph Cuypers. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Dag Vincent, Mooie foto, bedankt voor de tip! Ik heb 'm in de goeie categorie geplaatst. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Crop from different original – File:Petrus Christianus Bauduin (cropped).jpg[edit]

Hi, Kleon3. While, at least in this case, I don't mind seeing a used picture removed for another one, I wonder what the rationale is for attaching a crop to a file that is clearly not from the same source. Your upload is a different print of the original negative. I think you could and should have better uploaded it as a new file, which it is, to Category:Petrus Bauduin, possibly providing your source and thereby not mainting the link to the earlier uploaded cart de visite, which is a bit messy. Greeting, Eissink (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC).

Ik lees nu dat je Nederlands spreekt, dat had ik zo snel niet door. Eissink (talk) 11:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC).
Dag Eissink, ik ben bezig het artikel over Bauduin op NL-Wikipedia bij te werken en ik vond de beschikbare afbeeldingen ongeschikt voor de te maken infobox. Vandaar deze nieuwe crop, die ook van de originele carte de visite afkomstig is (iets bijgekleurd). Misschien had ik er beter een nieuw bestand van kunnen maken inderdaad. Ik heb bij het origineel de maker en de licentie aangepast, misschien wil je daar ook nog de bron vermelden als je die weet. Daar staat nu nog dat het een eigen werk betreft, wat het zeker niet zal zijn. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Dank voor je antwoord, Kleon3. Ik denk dat de originele uploader zelf direct uit een archief een foto van de carte heeft gemaakt, zo ziet het er tenminste wel uit, maar ik weet niet waar het origineel zich bevindt. Ik had niet door dat het van dezelfde afbeelding een bewerking was – ik heb een retouche-sjabloon toegevoegd, iets dat je volgens mij altijd moet doen als je zo ingrijpend wijzigt, ook als het zichtbaar een verbetering is, zoals in dit geval. Maar ik ben natuurlijk vooral benieuwd naar je aanpassing van het artikel: altijd leuk om een redacteur in actie te zien. Vriendelijke groet, Eissink (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC).
We kunnen trouwens net zo goed even Erik Vermeeren even taggen, misschien kan hij de bron nog vermelden. Eissink (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC).
Het retouche-sjabloon kende ik nog niet. Dat zal ik onthouden! Bedankt, Kleon3 (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Afbeelding rotswoning[edit]

Hi Kleon3, Ik zag dat je een tijdje terug File:Rotswoning - Valkenburg - 20238423 - RCE.jpg toegevoegd had aan de categorie van de Plenkertstraat. Weet je misschien nog op basis waarvan je gedacht hebt dat deze aan de Plenkertstraat gesitueerd is geweest? Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Romaine, Nee, dat weet ik helaas niet meer. Als je aanwijzingen hebt dat het niet in de Plenkert geweest kan zijn, of dat het ergens anders zou kunnen zijn, zou ik zeggen: pas het vooral aan. Succes verder met je groeven- en grotwoningenproject. Het is werkelijk indrukwekkend wat je op dit gebied tot stand hebt gebracht! Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Ach ja, ik wil graag begrijpen wat ik zie. En in Zuid-Limburg zie ik gaten in de grond, maar ook molens, rijksmonumenten, bossen en wat al niet meer. Het is een ontdekkingstocht. Wat betreft de grotwoning, ik heb het bij een expert nagevraagd en die kende de locatie, was gelegen tussen Geulhemerweg 34 en de Geulhemermolen in Geulhem. Die locatie heeft nog geen artikel, staat nog op mijn lijstje. Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Zolang we lijstjes hebben waar nog wat op staat, is alles goed! Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Coition of a Hemisected Man and Woman.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Can you please undo the change here: File:Da Vinci Coition of a Hemisected Man and Woman Luc Viatour.jpg too? The original has mirrored text so that should persist in a depiction of the original. I understand the intention, but please make a copy clearly stating that it has been mirrored opposed to the original. Thank you in advance.--LittleGun (talk) 07:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
I have undone that one, and also File:Leonardo, Männergenitalien.JPG. Kleon3, Da Vinci wrote in mirror, so you were not correcting, but disturbing. It might be usefull to have a mirrored version, but upload it as a separate file, do not overwrite the originals. Thanks, Eissink (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC).

Category:Coats of arms of the House of Micault[edit]

Kan je aub het gekleurde wapenschild gebruiken op Lijst van proosten van het Sint-Servaaskapittel te Maastricht? bedankt, gr/ --Carolus (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Ah, dank je. Ziet er stukken beter uit. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Wachthuisje Limburgsche Tramweg-Maatschappij Stationsplein, Maastricht.jpg[edit]

Hallo Kleon, Via architect Turlings kwam ik dit wachthuisje van de LTM tegen. Verdere bijzonderheden in het artikel s:nl:Limburger Koerier/Jaargang 86/Nummer 50/Nieuw station L. T. M. te Maastricht. Leek me wel aardig om met je te delen. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Top, dank je wel! Hoe wist je dat ik met het artikel Stationsplein (Maastricht) bezig ben? ;) Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 08:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Nee dat wist ik niet. Ik zag alleen wel dat het op nl.wiki ontbrak. Succes ermee. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Photographs of plaster casts from Maastricht Cuypershuis 0687a (015).jpg[edit]

Hallo Kleon, Weer een Maastricht-gerelateerde vraag. Kun jij deze bouwfragmenten plaatsen? Ze zijn volgens een aantekening in het Cuypershuis afkomstig uit Maastricht, dus waarschijnlijk de Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk en/of de Sint-Servaas. Ik heb zelf al gekeken in Category:Romanesque capitals in Sint-Servaasbasiliek en Category:Romanesque capitals in Onze-Lieve-Vrouwebasiliek, maar helaas zonder resultaat. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 18:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Dag Vincent, Ik herken ze niet, maar dat zegt nog niet zoveel. Ik zou het moeten opzoeken in Den Hartogs Romanesque sculptures in Maastricht. Dat boek ligt bij mij thuis en ik ben daar pas weer over 2 weken. Even geduld dus. Kleon3 (talk) 22:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
O jee, ik was deze vraag helemaal vergeten. Sorry! Ik heb inmiddels Den Hartog doorgeplozen en kan met vrij grote zekerheid zeggen dat deze bouwfragmenten niet uit Maastricht afkomstig zijn, waarschijnlijk ook niet uit Rolduc of Susteren, dus dan moet het wel bijna 'buitenlands' zijn. Groet, Kleon3 (talk) 09:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Ja, Susteren of Rolduc. Daar had ik niet aan gedacht. Ik zal het napluizen. Bedankt voor de tip. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:London, Woolwich-Centre, General Gordon Square02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:London, Woolwich-Centre, General Gordon Square02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Limburger Koerier[edit]

Hallo Kleon, Ik heb op Wikisource een beginnetje gemaakt met de Limburger Koerier. Omdat deze krant vanaf 1901 in Maastricht werd uitgegeven, dacht ik, dat dit misschien iets voor jou is. Zie ook Category:Limburger Koerier. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Vincent, een goed idee, maar ik heb voorlopig nog mijn handen vol aan andere dingen! Ik zal zeker af en toe eens kijken of er al wat staat. Groetjes en succes met alles, Kleon3 (talk) 09:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)