User talk:Kong of Lasers

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hey welcome to my talk page!!!

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kong_of_Lasers.

This is the user talk page of Kong of Lasers, where you can send messages and comments to Kong of Lasers.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

See ya later alligator. Face-wink.svg I'll edit once in a while, mainly uploading pictures. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 01:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Yellow Nasturtium Flower.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tropaeolum majus (Nasturtium) flower and button .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Gharial at San Diego Zoo.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gavialis gangeticus, (Indian Gharial). .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Closing VI images[edit]

Small mistake: it is necessary to wait, 48H after the last vote, to close. Reassure you I happen to be mistaken also on this point. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Encelia californica[edit]

it is necessary to give the name of the species in the caption (I added). I slightly modify the scope. It is potentially eligible. It is necessary to remove landscape for Portrait in your appointment. Personally I avoid voting for images that are not used. You can place it in many pages of many Wikis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus:, ✓ Done Put it in Vietnamese and Wikispecies wikis. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Anolis carolinensis[edit]

The picture is very good. But you forgot the vernacular name in English. Place it in a Wiki at least it is well worth it --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: ✓ Done Placed in Japanese and Wikispecies wikis. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Signature change[edit]

Hi, I saw that you changed your signature to reflect your actual user name. Would you like me to update it for all your past comments? Guanaco (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

@Guanaco: Yes please. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done. I realized it was alerting people with "new messages" so I left the old signature on some user talk pages. Other pages are updated. Guanaco (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yellow Nasturtium Flower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow Nasturtium Flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


Thanks[edit]

I thank you for your gift. You will always find me ready to help you when you ask. Takes care of your images but also captions. The lifetime of images and their use in encyclopedias are often linked to good caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Biting[edit]

Just a reminder, please be polite with the newcomers. You never know when they might turn out to be a distinguished individual (e.g., a Chief Magistrate to the Supreme Court[1]). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: What do you mean? --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


Commons-checkuser.svg
CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address, IP range, or account has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

Users: You may request {{unblock}} through the normal channels, however a CheckUser will review the block.


Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | português | Simple English | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Green Anole on Tree.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anolis carolinensis (Carolina anole) back and tail.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States – Results![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svgThis user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!
Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States - Logo (text under).svg

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,400 people (the most of any nation this year) contribute over 8,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate pages on various Wikimedia projects.

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States! These photos are recognized for their photographic quality, artistic merit, and their encyclopedic value as illustrations of unique historical sites. We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret only being able to formally recognize the top 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other national contests, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 winners.

If you would like to view all the photos submitted for the U.S. this year, you may do so here.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all U.S. participants to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

A quick thank you to our national jury, as well as Commons editors who have helped categorize and place photos for the event. And finally, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments and helping to preserve our history through photography - we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events!

~Kevin Payravi & Nikikana, from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States (16:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC))

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2018![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svgThis user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2018}} to your userpage!
Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States - Logo (text under).svg

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,400 people contributing over 8,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. The event runs similar to last year with some small but exciting changes: improved state guides, an interactive map, and a larger prize pool! Like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Glenfinnan-viaduct-2708265 960 720.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Glenfinnan-viaduct-2708265 960 720.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huntster (t @ c) 04:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access[edit]

Per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections, your talk page access is enabled. --VKras (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stonehenge-2287980 960 720.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stonehenge-2287980 960 720.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Stonehenge-2287980 960 720.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Castelmezzano, Italy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Castelmezzano, Italy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lion-hearted85 (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)