User talk:Kotoviski

Welcome to the Commons, Kotoviski!

```{{Information
|Description={{en|Anglers on the beach near Banjul, The Gambia.}}
{{fr|Pêcheur à la ligne sur la plage près de Banjul, Gambie.}}
|Source=own work
|Date=2007-01-31
|Author=[[user:Kotoviski|Henryk Kotowski]]
|Permission=see below
|other_versions= -
}}
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}}
[[Category:Gambia]]
```

Thx a lot ! --Patricia.fidi 13:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Vilnius2.JPG

 This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vilnius2.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. cohesion 01:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sw_krzyz_tv_tower.jpg

 This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sw_krzyz_tv_tower.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ _ ${\displaystyle \vartheta }$_ 16:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Szent_imre_sw_krzyz.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 17:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sw_krzyz_3crosses.jpg

 This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sw_krzyz_3crosses.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ _ ${\displaystyle \vartheta }$_ 17:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Betel nuts3.jpg

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Barkarby airfield.jpg

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master ( John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) ) or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 23:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lietuva015.jpg

 This media was probably deleted. A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lietuva015.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (`[[:File:Lietuva015.jpg]]`). If you created the content yourself, enter `{{own}}` as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, `{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}` or `{{Cc-zero}}` to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Lietuva015.jpg

 File:Lietuva015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Druskienniki6.jpg

 File:Druskienniki6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jozef Michal Chominski 1.jpg

 This media was probably deleted. A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jozef Michal Chominski 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (`[[:File:Jozef Michal Chominski 1.jpg]]`). If you created the content yourself, enter `{{own}}` as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, `{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}` or `{{Cc-zero}}` to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:Cross Culture Festival Warszawa

Good day. I don't understand why you delete this category in derivatives. --Bff (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

My photographs after your modification are of low quality. The original files are in the category. I don't know why you crop the photographs, what is the point of such modification? --Kotoviski (talk) 11:54, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

 Dear Kotoviski, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Hello, Kotoviski!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Azores02.jpg

 File:Azores02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nino Verde (talk) 12:28, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Sabah010.jpg

 File:Sabah010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 20:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Countrysidechurch Poland20070718.jpg

Gdzie zostało zrobione te zdjęcie? Zwiadowca 21 17:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sabah010.jpg

 File:Sabah010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D-M (talk) 11:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)