Support Good quality. --XRay 12:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Foto:Aegviidu basseini suvekohvik Mustjõe kaldal 1940 a
Foto "Aegviidu basseini suvekohvik Mustjõe kaldal 1940 a" autor on Aleksander Kaasik.Digitaliseeritud Aleksander Kaasiku poolt (20. jaanuar 2015, kell 13:13). Et olen oma isa filminegativi digitaliseerinud (fotoaparaadi vahendusel), ei tohiks olla arusaamatusi foto pildistamise aasta ega autorluse kohta, kuna olen päranduseks saanud Aleksander Kaasiku (minu isa) filminegativi nii kasutamise ja käsutamise õiguse. Ja sellest lähtuvalt, on suvekohviku pildistamise aeg 1940 aasta.Hoone lammutati kuskil 1947-1948, mis antud juhul pole ka oluline märkida jne.Ma ei saa aru,hr Kruusimägi, mis probleem selle digipildiga õieti on.Palun lähemalt selgitust
Hi Ivo, this looks like a great initiative – how can I get involved? -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 21:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Great to hear that you are interested! I was just looking for local organizers at a moment who would lead the promotional activities in their respective countries. Maybe you could set up and lead the German team? Kruusamägi (talk) 03:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
So, Daniel, would the Germany be the first country (next to Estonia), that declares it will definetly participate in this competition? Kruusamägi (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm actually more interested in contributions at EU level (e.g. from EU research projects or EU-backed institutions), but I'll pitch it to the German community too. Can't make any definitive statement for either, though. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Oled eespool nõustunud, et ühe pildiga kategooriaid pole tarvis ette näha. Ma olen ka nõus. Aga milleks siis hulk kategooriaid nagu see? Teiseks, on omajagu pilte, kus loale pole viidatud, näiteks mitu aastat tagasi üles laaditud piirivalve pildid. Kas lubadele viitamine on plaanis? Pikne 14:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Nende TÜ piltide juures on kohati neid eraldi kategooriasse pandud eeldusega, et pilte lisandub veel. Samuti on olnud paiguti lihtsam pildi lisamisel samanimeline kategooria tekitada ja pärast vaadata, et mis selle kategooriaga edasi teha annab. Üldiselt peaks neid aga üsna vähe olema (ehk u 30 tk). Kui need sulle ikka väga vastu hakkavad, siis tee ümber.
Vaatan seda piirivalve piltide asja. Mäletasin, et sinna said load lisatud. Kruusamägi (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Nüüd sai vast kõigi PPA antud piltide juurde OTRS kinnituse. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Hea. Aga neid on rohkem, näiteks see, see. Sa võiks ehk kõik saadud pildid selle pilguga üle vaadata. Pikne 22:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Ah. Jube töö see asi. Kohati on see kirjavahetus kole keeruline (nt on luba ühes kohas ja pildid hoopis teistes paikades või on mingid pildid üles saadud ja siis hiljem on paar tükki lisaks tulnud jne.). Kruusamägi (talk) 01:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Jaan Künnap on Lenin Peak, Pamir Mountains.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
So Lenin Peak, the highest point of Trans-Alay Range in Pamir Mountains, isn't suitable? Kruusamägi (talk) 13:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Support Yes very well. I corrected your scope. Viewing the syntax. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment Most valued image of a mountain located in Tajikistan / Kyrgyzstan featuring prominently someone waving a Estonian flag? --QuimGil (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment The most important is that this image is seen by many people. Labels are done to help. A good scope is a consensual scope sometimes with a little diplomacy. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
We need to update the CentralNotice for the Science Photo Competition in Greece. We prefer this instead of the generic message. Pointing to the central page in english seems not so useful for non Wikimedians. We want to point to the website specifically for the competition in Greece, with more prominent information about how to participate. --GerakiTLG 12:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Good morning. I noticed, that you are constantly nominating images for QIC but in return are not or rarely taking part in the assessment of images. it is good practice in QIC to review the same amount of images that you nominate. Thank you. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for that notice! I don't feel fully confident yet on evaluating others images in QIC, but I'll try to get there. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. I know every start as reviewer is not easy. Start first with images, that are doubtless QI and skip every photo where you feel unsafe. After some time, your instincts and skills will enhance. A good preparation are the Image guidelines and of course a focus on common issues like Chromatic aberrations, Sharpness, Perspective, Dust spots. Good luck and thank you again. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
can I make you a question? I'm Vincenzi Saverio and i won the Italian section of the contest "Espc 2015" for the category "People in science". Now, how i can contact the sponsor? There is an award, a certificate?
You answer me if you do I will be grateful. VincenziSaverio (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)