User talk:Kulac

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

please leave me messages here!

copy-paste[edit]

Description

Cydia splendana

English:  ?
Deutsch: Später Kastanienwickler
  • Location: Graz, Austria
  • Camera: Nikon D2X
  • Lens: Sigma 150mm/2.8 EX DG APO IF Makro AF-S VR Nikkor 300 mm 1:2,8 IF-ED with TC-20E II converter
  • Focal Length: 150 mm
  • Exposure: 1/180 sec, f/22
  • Film / Speed: ISO 400
  • Comment: identification: Lepiforum ([1])
Date
Source Own work
Author

picture taken by Kurt Kulac

English: Please report references to kulac@gmx.at.
Deutsch: Quellenangabe und Beleg an kulac@gmx.at erbeten.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:
w:en:Creative Commons

attribution share alike

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.
You may select the license of your choice.

FP promotion[edit]

Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009 2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009 2.jpg, which was nominated by Lycaon at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Misumena vatia male01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Misumena vatia male01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Raimund Baumschlager Lavanttal Rallye 2009.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raimund Baumschlager Lavanttal Rallye 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Klasse! --Ralf Roletschek 20:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cicindela hybrida senne01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cicindela hybrida senne01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Kulac,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

FYI: Used your media file[edit]

This is a courtesy note. One of your media files is featured in a new commercial eBook in Apple’s iBooks store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/book/dr.-kemps-kids-love-bugs/id497852225?mt=11

I’ve contributed images to Wikipedia for over seven years now (including several POTD and Featured Images) and I designed the WikiSpecies logo. I respect your work here and the CC-BY-SA license we all labor under.

I know commercializing Wikipedia work is tricky and so I’ve taken great pains to follow your CC-BY-SA license requirements. I also plan to donate 10% of my proceeds to the Wikimedia Foundation directly. This is the very first self-published e-book created with Apple’s new tools and sold in the store.

I’ve given your file a credit line in the “Image and Video Credits” section starting at page 24 as required here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License

This compilation features many of the finest Wikipedia media files in their exact form and not as derivative works. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying_under_the_GFDL#Making_verbatim_copies_of_images

If I did alter your work -- such as cutting out an insect part or adding a video sound track -- I shared a Share Alike version of the new media in a DRM-free format and listed the web address in the credits section.

Thank you very much for uploading your work to Wikipedia and releasing it for the world to use in enriching educational formats.

-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeremykemp

thanks for the info. --Kulac (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Colostygia aqueata Buchstein01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Colostygia aqueata Buchstein01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Colostygia aqueata Buchstein01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Siona lineata02.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siona lineata (Black-veined Moth) Female, while deploying its eggs. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gomphocerippus rufus03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gomphocerippus rufus03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Pseudopanthera macularia kermeter01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudopanthera macularia kermeter01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nicrophorus humator01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicrophorus humator01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for me--Lmbuga 19:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Choerades fimbriata01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choerades fimbriata01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Excellent. --Florstein 16:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Imagesin QI[edit]

The three images in IQ are very good and very useful. But they are slightly under exposed you could correct it?

  • Oniscus asellus Furlbachtal01.jpg
  • Cercopis vulnerata moosheide01.jpg
  • Aphrophora alni03.jpg
Best regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
hi! sorry, but i don´t think that more brightness will be good for the pictures. did you try that out? best regards, --Kulac (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
The scientific point of view, they are good. But the esthetic point of view they are a bit dark, and it does not capture the attention in a stream of images as IQ. It is very easy to change by increasing the light only in the midtones. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
i added some brightness to 1. and 2. you were right, they look better now. but the 3. one is still ok for me. the white background is otherways to dominating. best regards, --Kulac (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oniscus asellus Furlbachtal01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oniscus asellus Furlbachtal01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Cercopis vulnerata moosheide01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cercopis vulnerata moosheide01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Aphrophora alni03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aphrophora alni03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me.--Vassil 12:36, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clematis alpina 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clematis alpina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good photo. --Florstein 12:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tatra 813 truck trial voitsberg 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatra 813 truck trial voitsberg 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Minor CA and overexposure (white parts), nevertheless nice and impressive--ArildV 13:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thisanotia chrysonuchella podgorje 2012 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thisanotia chrysonuchella podgorje 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Argynnis niobe podgorje 2012 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis niobe podgorje 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Qi for me. --Danny S. 18:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aporia crataegi mating podgorje 2012 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aporia crataegi (Black-veined White) mating..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Melitaea britomartis podgorje01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melitaea britomartis podgorje01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 21:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Zygaena loti podgorje 2012 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zygaena loti podgorje 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aporia crataegi eggs podgorje 2012 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aporia crataegi (Black-veined White) eggs on Crataegus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Phymata crassipes mating podgorje 2012 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
mating couple of Phymata crassipes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Nur zur Info! :)[edit]

Moin! Anstatt eine Datei zweimal unter unterschiedlichen Namen hochzuladen und dann eine als Speedy Deletion zu kennzeichen haben wir eine Vorlage: {{rename|NeuerDateiname.xxx|2}} wobei die 2 am Ende fuer richtigen oder klaren Dateinamen steht. So macht das ganze weniger Arbeit. :-) Vielen Dank fuer die tollen Fotos! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

danke! ich hab die dateien allerdings mit "move" verschoben. war also zumindest auf meiner seite kaum mehrarbeit. wenn das beim löschen aufs gleiche kommt, wärs also egal. lg, --Kulac (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Jein. Was am Ende rauskommt zaehlt... :-)) Macht das Leben fuer Admins einfacher, die Fileverschieber machen das mit einem Klick. Dann haben wir nicht soviele SD abzuarbeiten. Bleibt viel liegen, 40.000 Files ohne Quellenangaben zb. :) Wie gesagt, war nur zur Info. Beide Wege sind OK. Kanndu machen wie willdu, sagt das Haeschen. :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
ok, danke für die info. lg, --Kulac (talk) 04:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Xestia ashworthii Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xestia ashworthii Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 15:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Elseid Hysaj01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elseid Hysaj01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
no doubt --Herzi Pinki 10:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Arctia caja Buchstein02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arctia caja Buchstein02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me --Herzi Pinki 10:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cephenemyia stimulator Bohemian Forest01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cephenemyia stimulator Bohemian Forest01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --ANGELUS 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Aplocera praeformata Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aplocera praeformata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --ANGELUS 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Acleris forsskaleana Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acleris forsskaleana Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --ANGELUS 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Anarta myrtilli Woblitz01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
a mating pair of Anarta myrtilli on its hostplant..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Entephria caesiata Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entephria caesiata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not that bad, but too noisy IMO. --Hockei 17:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
✓ New version uploaded with less noise and chromatic noise. @Kulac: If you don't like the new version, you can revert it--Lmbuga 22:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. --Hockei 16:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Christoph Martschinko U21 Austria vs. Albania 2014-03-05 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christoph Martschinko U21 Austria vs. Albania 2014-03-05 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trombidium holosericeum Woblitz01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trombidium holosericeum Woblitz01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thomas Strakosha01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomas Strakosha01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Arbnor Fejzullahu.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arbnor Fejzullahu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Pyrrhocoris apterus hatched.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrrhocoris apterus (Firebug), a freshly molted nymph .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Elvis Prençi01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvis Prençi01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dorcus parallelipipedus Woblitz01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorcus parallelipipedus Woblitz01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

File:Deileptenia ribeata Buchstein01.jpg[edit]

Hi Kulac. Sorry I hadn't had the time to work on this. I will try to do so within a few weeks. Cheers. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 00:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Scopula nigropunctata Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scopula nigropunctata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Puengeleria capreolaria Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puengeleria capreolaria Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. - QI for me. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Xanthorhoe montanata Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanthorhoe montanata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Catocala nupta Graz01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catocala nupta Graz01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
in my opinion QI, great work --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Calliteara fascelina Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calliteara fascelina Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Deileptenia ribeata Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deileptenia ribeata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lymantria monacha Buchstein01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lymantria monacha Buchstein01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Cccefalon 05:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Alcis repandata Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcis repandata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality ok. --Cccefalon 05:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anaplectoides prasina Buchstein01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anaplectoides prasina Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 18:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Magst dich vielleicht dazu äußern?[edit]

Das wäre meiner Meinung nach eine mögliche Lösung eines Problems, welches von den Knipsern überhaupt nicht verstanden wird.--Hubertl (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liam Hemsworth at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liam Hemsworth at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 20:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment.Is it not a bit too dark? -- Spurzem 21:54, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mirjam Weichselbraun at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirjam Weichselbraun at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality despite this conditions. --Hubertl 09:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Jennifer Lawrence at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jennifer Lawrence at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The EXIF data tell me, that it is a scan and not a photography. --Cccefalon 18:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support as I cannot judge, if some minor quality flaws are about the choosen ISO rate. Thank you Hubertl, for ruling out the scanning issue. --Cccefalon 20:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Iris Berben at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris Berben at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Crisco 1492 15:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Prozessionskapelle Werfenweng 25308 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prozessionskapelle Werfenweng 25308 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 13:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Jennifer Lawrence at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jennifer Lawrence at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Conchita Wurst at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conchita Wurst at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich[edit]

... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an info@wikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über verein@wikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest[edit]

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, ist ein Bild von Dir: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016[edit]

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich[edit]

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]

WLE Austria Logo.svg

Servus Kulac,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  Disk    15:07, 5 May 2016 (CET)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)