User talk:Liconstan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Liconstan!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Flickr images[edit]

If you upload a flickr image, please give the exact flickr link to an image like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mercyforanimals/6556757385/in/set-72157628531396063/


Don't give a flickr link to a flickr set or the flickr bot will not pass the image....and it ends up in this Category. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Battery cage hen, Buckeye, rescued by Mercy for Animals in 2001.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Battery cage hen, Buckeye, rescued by Mercy for Animals in 2001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 23:37, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:A duck being "force-fed" through a tube to produce foie gras..jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:A duck being "force-fed" through a tube to produce foie gras..jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A duck being "force-fed" through a tube to produce foie gras..jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rosenzweig τ 23:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Overcategorising[edit]

Dear Liconstan, thank you for your contributions. They have for the most part been very useful. However I'd like to point out that the categorisation system we use here at WM Commons is not a tag system but a hierarchial category tree system. This is to keep higher level, more general categories from being overcrowded with tons and tons of heterogenic material. The most important thing to keep in mind is to not add any categories that are (or should be) supercategories to others for the same picture/category. For an example, one of your edits: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gestation_crate_pig_showing_stereotype.JPG&diff=98123939&oldid=72741315

The image previously had Category:Gestation crates after which you added the following:

  1. Category: Factory farming
  2. Category: Pigs
  3. Category: Farms
  4. Category: Agriculture
  5. Category: Agribusiness
  6. Category: Agriculture with animals
  7. Category: Livestock
  8. Category: Domesticated animals
  9. Category: Agriculture by type
  10. Category: Veterinary science
  11. category: Veterinary medicine
  12. Category: Animal welfare
  13. Category: Human use of animals

I removed all of these, with the following logic:

  • Domesticated animals, Livestock, Pigs, Agriculture with animals, Agriculture, Human use of animals -- Gestation crates is exclusive to pig farming, which is subcat to Pigs, which is subcat to Livestock etc. Pig farming is also subcat to agriculture with animals, which is a subcat to agriculture and human use of animals.
  • Agriculture by type -- this is a metacat, i.e. is only supposed to hold other categories and no files. A sow in a gestation crate is not a type of agriculture, but a feature of factory farming, which in turn is a type of agriculture.
  • Agribusiness, factory farming -- agribusiness is concerned with the business of food production. Gestation crate is a method of pig farming and not directly related to food production on a business level. It is also a subcat to factory farming, itself a subcat to agribusiness.
  • Farms -- a gestation crate is not a farm
  • Animal welfare -- gestation crates is already a subcat of controversial animal use, which is subcat to animal welfare
  • Veterinary science -- I don't even understand why this was added
  • Veterinary medicine -- very flimsy connection -- gestation crates may be unhealthy to sows, but that is not grounds to categorise it.

I hope this helps to grasp the logic behind our categorising system :) --Pitke (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)