User talk:Llez/Archives/2010 (1)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Selenicereus grandiflorus 01.JPG

This image and the others that follow illustrate the species Selenicereus pteranthus and not S. grandiflorus, please change the file names. I can explain how to tell them apart if you wish. epibase (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I am absolutely sure this isn't Selenicereus grandiflorus whatever the label says. It is a common mistake, even in botanical gardens. I've done research on this genus for many years. Your plant a typical Selenicereus pteranthus without doubt.
short: S. grandiflorus - rather thin stems, 5-8 angles, needle shaped spines, often light brown or gray c. 10 mm long.
S. pteranthus - rather robust stems, 4-5 angles, very short, bulbous or conical, often black spines to 2 mm.
Flora of North America
Often confused in cultivation, where S. pteranthus is common and S. grandiflorus is rare. Several types of Selenicereus are grown for pharmaceutical purpouses, usually S. pteranthus and S. coniflorus as they are easily cultivated... never S. grandiflorus which is more delicate. Ulf Eliasson (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Carduus defloratus 05.JPG

Cette photographie représente Carlina vulgaris et non Carduus defloratus.

Dieses Bild zeigt Carlina vulgaris (Golddistel) und nicht Carduus defloratus (Langstielige Distel, Alpen-distel, Berg-distel).

This image illustrate the species Carlina vulgaris (Carline Thistle) and not the species Carduus defloratus (Alpine Thistle).

S'il vous plaît corrigez cette erreur.

Bitte korrigieren Sie diesen Fehler.

Please correct this error.

Hubert Laroche 23/02/2010, 18:45.

I dont't believe so. The plant is about 50 cm high with the infrutescence on the top (The photo is focussed on the top of the plant). I never saw Carlina acaulis with the flower respect. the infrutescence in such a high. In addition, the plant was labelled as Carduus defloratus. Llez (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I think now, you are right. I will rename the file. Llez (talk) 18:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Homeopathic remedy

Hi Llez, please note that categorizing of single images like this as homeopathic remedy doesn't make sense. It's not only the certain plant in your image that is the remedy (if one ever beleives in homeopathy) but certainly all the plants in the entire species. Therefore don't categorize your single images, categorize the species instead! Thanks. -- Ies (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

You are right. I will remove the categories from the pictures, but it will last some days. Llez (talk) 11:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Cyclamen repandum 001.JPG & File:Cyclamen repandum 002.JPG

Dear H. Zell,

The pictures you have uploaded as File:Cyclamen repandum 001.JPG & File:Cyclamen repandum 002.JPG are obviously not Cyclamen repandum but Cyclamen hederifolium.
For your info: I have found several times that plants of Botanical Gardens (Karlsruhe, Berlin) are mislabelled.

I have re-categorised your pictures to Category:Cyclamen hederifolium.

Botanically yours, --Réginald (To reply) 11:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

The pictures are correctly renamed. An additional proof: your pictures have been taken in September, the period of flowering of C. hederifolium. C. repandum is flowering in the spring (March to May). --Réginald (To reply) 15:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Thrissops cf formosus 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thrissops .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

FP Promotion

Thrissops cf formosus 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Thrissops cf formosus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Thrissops cf formosus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Euphorbia_helioscopia_001.JPG, File:Euphorbia_helioscopia_002.JPG und File:Euphorbia_helioscopia_003.JPG

Hallo Llez/Archives/2010 (1),

die drei Bilder File:Euphorbia_helioscopia_001.JPG, File:Euphorbia_helioscopia_002.JPG und File:Euphorbia_helioscopia_003.JPG zeigen nicht Euphorbia helioscopia, da diese Art u. a. keine Warzen auf den Fruchtknoten hat. Ich habe sie erst mal in Category:Unidentified Euphorbiaceae verschoben. Falls es sich um eine Wildpflanze handelt, könnte es sich eventuell um Euphorbia verrucosa handeln. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Laggania cambria 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laggania cambria 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Gobius melanopus - 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cryptocentrus leptocephalus 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kos - Strand beiTigkaki.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kos - Strand beiTigkaki.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion

Calliactis and Dardanus 001.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Calliactis and Dardanus 001.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calliactis and Dardanus 001.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 23:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Westerhever.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westerhever.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Oxalis pes-caprae Chinamada.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis pes-caprae Chinamada.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Cardiospermum_halicacabum_08.jpg

Hi! You may want to have a look here: In summary, we like the image, but the scope's a little broad for the unusual preparation. If you modify the scope, this could probably pass. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Responded to you there (it can sometimes take a few minutes for the front page to update - basically, the Wiki software cachés pages, so it can take a few minutes. There's a "Purge" link to update them a bit quicker, but it's easy to miss.
By all means go for QI - maybe even Featured picture, if it passes there - but I do think that VI is possible, with a slightly more specific scope. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Cardiospermum halicacabum

Hello Llez, There are comments and suggestions on the review page of the VIC you've nominated : Commons:Valued image candidates/Cardiospermum halicacabum 08.jpg. Could you please glance at it and answer on this review page? Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Cardiospermum halicacabum (Balloonvine).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Cardiospermum halicacabum (Balloonvine).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Phyllobates terribilis 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyllobates barbouri 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Hippocampus barbouri 01.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hippocampus barbouri (Barbour's Seahorse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Hyoscyamus niger

Hello Llez, Now a reviewer (strongly) suggests an adjunct in the scope for Commons:Valued image candidates/Hyoscyamus niger 0002.JPG. I don't review VICs for living species scopes myself by lack of knowledge, but I guess that if you wrote the scope exactly like that :
Hyoscyamus niger (Henbane), flower
your image would be promoted. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I've seen the change and added the proper template. Now, I advise you to get in touch with the previous voters to ask them to confirm or reconsider their vote ("A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".) --Myrabella (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Acanthostachys strobilacea 02.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthostachys strobilacea (Pine cone bromeliad).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

orientation

Hallo, orientation=landscape heißt Querformat, orientation=portrait heißt Hochformat. Um den Inhalt geht es dabei nicht. Grüße, --Ikar.us (talk) 11:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Hyoscyamus niger 0002.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyoscyamus niger (Henbane), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

File:Nothosaurus mirabilis 01.jpg

Bonsoir
dans la "file description page", l'animal mesure "3m" en Anglais, et "3cm" en Allemand !! Nicht schlimm, aber... Friendly from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 23:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Calliactis and Dardanus 001.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dardanus calidus (Large Red Hermit Crab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Cardiospermum halicacabum 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardiospermum halicacabum 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Germanodactylus spec 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Germanodactylus spec 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:2009-01-21 Eibsee.JPG

  • Hello, Llez, I know this is totally unnecessary (asking permission). I was going through the pictures up for voting and when I scrolled down to this one, I was overcome with all kinds of feelings. I thank you very much for posting this wonderful picture for all to see. I used to paint as a casual hobby and I painted a picture similar to this one, I've haven't painted in a very long time and miss it dearly. So I felt compelled to tell you this little story and thank you for the memories. Also if you don't mind I would like to display this picture on my user page at en-wiki, and maybe else where. Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 16:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Germanodactylus spec 01.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Germanodactylus .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Coffea arabica.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Coffea arabica.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Scorpaena scrofa 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scorpaena scrofa 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Scorpaena scrofa 02.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scorpaena scrofa (Largescaled Scorpionfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

La Tarta - Tenerife.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tarta - Tenerife.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Schillerfelsen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schillerfelsen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Delphinus delphis 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delphinus delphis 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Cinchona officinalis 001.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinchona officinalis (Quinine bark), Bark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Please don't blank pages

Hi Llez,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Roque Chinchado on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 15:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk

Valued Image Promotion

Cyclamen creticum 002.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclamen creticum (Cretan Cyclamen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Roque Chinchado 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roque Chinchado 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Crete Panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crete Panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Passiflora incarnata 003.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passiflora incarnata 003.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ornithogalum umbellatum 003.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ornithogalum umbellatum 003.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.