User talk:Louis-garden

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives : Archive 01 (-> novembre 2009)

Si vous désirez voir sur Commons des photographies de lieu ou d'objet qui font partie des miennes et que j'en libère les droits, regardez en [mon site Photos] et dites-le moi ici . Signé-- Louis-garden 10:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Pareil pour les croquis et les reproductions de fresques. -- Louis-garden (talk) 10:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Beau travail[edit]

Félicitations Adri08 (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Syntaxe des dates[edit]

Bonjour. Commons suit la norme ISO-je-sais-plus-combien, enfin les dates c'est AAAA-MM-JJ avec des « - » et pas des « / ». Ça peut te paraitre inessentiel, mais les modèles comme {{Information}} convertissent gentiment les dates dans le format que préfère chaque utilisateur, à condition qu'elles soient dans le bon format. Alors si tu pouvais y penser la prochaine fois...

Par ailleurs j'aime bien tes peintures Face-smile.svg. --GaAs11671 16:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

C'est noté... et merci. -- Louis-garden (talk) 21:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Désolé si mon message a pu paraitre agressif, ce n'était pas mon intention. Amitiés. --GaAs11671 03:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Non non aucune interprétation de cet ordre, soit tranquille. --Louis-garden (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

C'est en fait PD[edit]

Les reproductions de peintures murales sont du domaine public. Cf la réponse qui m'a été faite sur COM:VP#Does PD-art apply to reproductions of old mural paintings?. --GaAs11671 18:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Je n'ai pu trouver la réponse que tu invoques. --Louis-garden (talk) 06:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Normal, je me suis trompé de lien : Commons talk:Licensing#Does PD-art apply to reproductions of old mural paintings?. Désolé. --GaAs11671 14:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Ambigu[edit]

Bonjour,

Vous avez raison, c'est un peu ambigu, mais c'est un peu complexe : En réalité j'appose ce bandeau sur toutes les photos que j'uploade et ce quelque soit leur licence. Cependant, sur Commons, les reproductions fidèles d'œuvres en deux dimensions (par exemple, la photographie d'une peinture, ou un scan de livre) sont considérées comme étant dans le domaine public (à condition évidemment que l'œuvre originale le soit également). Dans ce cas, le bandeau est effectivement un peu absurde. Néanmoins, dans certains pays, il n'est pas possible de mettre une œuvre dans le domaine public (c'est le cas de la France par exemple), les ayants-droits ne peuvent en aucun cas se déposséder de manière totale et définitive des droits d'auteurs avant que le fichier ne tombe lui même dans le domaine public 70 ans après le décès de son auteur. Dans ce cas, le bandeau indique qu'il ne faut pas considérer cette photographie comme étant dans le domaine public, et qu'il faut à minima citer l'auteur.

Voilà, j'espère avoir répondu à vos questions, sinon, n'hésitez pas ! Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 12:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

En fait, plus simplement, après y avoir re-réfléchi, le bandeau demande de faire attention à la licence et il renvoie vers elle pour plus d'information. Si la licence est "Domaine public", tant mieux pour ceux qui veulent réutiliser là photo ;-) --M0tty (talk) 12:59, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Neuberth-Carton1.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Neuberth-Carton1.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Missvain (talk) 18:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

L'image est celle d'un carton et elle m'a été transmise en son temps par l'Association des Amis de Jean Neuberth qui en possède les droits. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinxit (On en cause) 19:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Neuberth-Expo1951.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Neuberth-Expo1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Missvain (talk) 18:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

L'image m'a été transmise en son temps par l'Association des Amis de Jean Neuberth qui en possède les droits. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinxit (On en cause) 19:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:BrumidiBust.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BrumidiBust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 21:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Fondation Maeght[edit]

Hi, thanks for keeping me in the loop regarding the (unfortunate) deletion of the Fondation Maeght photos. Since you have opened a conversation with them, have you asked them, if they have an "official" photo they could perhaps share (that is, license under a Commons compatible license) for inclusion in the English Wikipedia's Fondation Maeght article? After all, the article looks a bit dry without any photos at all, and it would be some kind advertisment for them as well. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The only possible privileges are those authorized after their agreement for newsletters promotion. And The rights holders of these contemporary works do not grant permission. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 15:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Santa Fiora[edit]

I was there after I visited a friend of mine in the Amiata.. Very nice afternoon! I ate at il Barilotto.. you know it? I would like to come back to the zone to see the new Coins Museums in Sovana... If I will be in the area I will tell you!! Francesco --Sailko (talk) 10:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

We're not there yet gone since 2008! Is it expensive and do we eat well? --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 12:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Pont Isère et Pont Savoie[edit]

J'ai transférée l'image File:ES 11946 - PONT DE BEAUVOISIN - La station de Tramway.JPG du côté Savoie car tout cela (villes reliées, place Carouge) ne concerne que la ville côté Savoie. -- - Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 10:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

OK. Merci ---Claude villetaneuse (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:DioramaPiombino.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DioramaPiombino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, Plutôt que des protestations mal informées et inutiles, veuillez lire Commons:Bistro#Photos supprimées pour cause de non FOP. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Rien compris : les images des dioramas italiens de musées construits et installés depuis moins de 70 ans remplissent la base Commons. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 10:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

File:PerspecPiombino.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PerspecPiombino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 18:58, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Présentez-vous sans rougir, je ne discute pas avec des utilisateurs sans personnalité. Faites les présentations ça aide au contact de savoir vos intentions. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 21:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Copyright status: File:StFrGiottoLouvre.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:StFrGiottoLouvre.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 00:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Oups ! Fait. Merci. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 05:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


File:Halles-Chambery.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Halles-Chambery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bonsoir Louis-Garden, j'ai demandé la suppression de cette image car il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. En revanche, j'ai transféré la photographie sur Wikipédia en français où elle peut être conservée. Vous pouvez la trouver ici. Cordialement, Nemesis III (discuter) 22:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC).

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Hello how are you? hope every thing is good. I saw the file that you uploaded sound very intersting work and i like it, espeacilly this one File:BandeauPortailItalie.jpg, I would ask if you can help to the same with the pictures of this File/: File:Christian_Civilization_1.jpg and this File:Collage-Christian-culture.jpg would appraicted if can help me in mix it and doing the same picture.

Have a Nice day and hope to hear from you soon.--Jobas (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello; Can you introduce yourself (your user page is empty and bloqued since may 2014). - Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 06:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes my User page is User:Jobas, user:Jobas1 was aonther account, Becouse i forgot my passoword befor then it's blocked but my user that i use is user:Jobas, Iwanted to make these File/: File:Christian_Civilization_1.jpg and this File:Collage-Christian-culture.jpg as File:BandeauPortailItalie.jpg, i woild appracied if you helo me :) .--Jobas (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
if i understand, you will a new image that combine the elements of this images ? - Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 08:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes Thank you for respond, I want a new image that combine the elements of this images in same way of the picutre File:BandeauPortailItalie.jpg which i founded very intersting work.--Jobas (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
You'll to be patient, I'm presently on other studies. - Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 19:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
No problem sure, I will be :). Thank you again--Jobas (talk) 18:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:PlanPonteRotto.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PlanPonteRotto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 18:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CrucifixMPPalaisAvignon.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CrucifixMPPalaisAvignon.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Fait. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 13:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Louis-garden-Charlie.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Louis-garden-Charlie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Rotazioni[edit]

Ciao! I difetti sono nel sito Wga da cui avevo preso le foto, non le ho ruotate io. --Sailko (talk) 15:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Reconstitution[edit]

Marsupium (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Images en miroir[edit]

Salut. J'ai lit votre message à Sailko à propos des immages en miroir. Si vous êtes absolumment sûr que l'image est en miroir, vous pouvez demander qu'elle soit renversé en ajoutant au sommet d'elle [[Category:Images to be flopped back]]. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 04:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Grazie. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 08:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Montecatini-Tempestini.jpeg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Montecatini-Tempestini.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Krdbot 22:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Montecatini-Tempestini.jpeg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Montecatini-Tempestini.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)