|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
|File:722x315_Die_Fledermaus_Luis_Carlos_Vasquez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.
- Image:Danilo perez panama jazz fest 2012.jpg was uncategorized on 25 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
The image I nominated for deletion was sourced to a random website (that is, when you uploaded it, that's where you said it came from.) Commons does not accept images taken from elsewhere on the internet, because they are copyrighted. If you would like to share work previously publised elsewhere, you should follow the procedures here. The other image I believed was suspicious is File:RobertoSpinosa.jpg, which is very low-resolution, appears elsewhere on the internet (though it's possible they got the image from here rather than the other way around), and lacks camera metadata. These are often signs of a copyright violation. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
It is very unfair, and I most certainly must complain !!! This person Calliopejen1 assumes that I violated copyright, which is NOT true !!! I do accept that the quality of the image was not the best, and maybe it needed to be deleted... but then, to accuse me of stealing intellectual property is a very prejudice and discriminatory premise...
WOW... so you discovered that this same image appears elsewhere... haven't you thought of the possibility that I may be a webmaster (indeed I am) and I may very well be the author of the other website you saw (I am)?
So... Some people like to contribute to the Wikipedia Project, while other people simply prefer to destroy the contributions of others... way to go !!!