User talk:Luxo/Archive2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Rotatebot cropping?

Hi Luxo, could you check File:Philodromus_praelustris.jpg please? First version: 750×604 (57 KB), second version: 736×592 (59 KB), comment: "Bot: Rotate 180°". A little part of that spider's leg is missing now. It's not that important, but in general I guess it shouldn't happen, or? --:bdk: 02:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Bdk, the problem is explained here. I've uploaded a new version because it's visible in this case. Greetings,--Luxo 18:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Oh, thanks for that hint and also for the new version, of course :-) --:bdk: 18:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Translation of derivativeFX

Hello. I'd like to translate the interface for your derivativeFX tool to the Catalan language, in order to make it easier to use for speakers of this language. What should I do? Thanks. --Leptictidium (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, ↑#DerivativeFX_in_Spanish. Greetings,--Luxo 16:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Destination filename. What does it mean?

Hallo Luxo, I tried to upload a cropped version of an existing image to Commons with the Derivative FX tool, but when I reach the "destination filename" box any name that a give gets the answer "file doesn't exist". Of course it doesn't exist, it's a new name. I don't understand how it works. Can you help me? Thank you, (talk) 10:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

yes, it means that it doesn't exist, you can upload it under this name. That's not a warning, only a simple note that your name is ok. If you take a name which is already used, you become a warning that this file already exist. greetings--Luxo 11:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

I tried to upload File:Cowboys Stadium configured for basketball - cropped.jpg using your tool. It uploaded the file but the text didn't get uploaded. I got a Wikimedia error saying the servers were having problems. Your tool would not let me re-upload it saying it was already uploaded, which was true, but it did not tell me there was no associated text. I thought you would like to know so you can track down the problem and possibly do better error-recovery the next time this happens. Even something as simple as "Oops, something bad happened, your file might or might not be uploaded, and the licensing information and other text might or might not be present, please check it. This error has been logged" would be enough. Davidwr (talk) 21:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

because the toolserver is totally independent from wikimedia server, the tool cannot see if a upload was successful or not. But if a upload fails you should be able to press back in your browser and upload it again. Greetings,--Luxo 16:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Bot and tool


Thanks a lots fot your bot and tool. I used derivativeFX several times and I just test Cropbot. These tools are great. I just discover uvumi (a free croping tool) maybe it can help you (it seems it work with GIF and PNG). Moreover, is it possible to have a tool that extract image from DJVU ? For example, I extract File:Sato Tadanobu with a goban.jpeg from File:Smith - The game of go.djvu. It could be very useful for the Wikisourcers. Thank you again, cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 13:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

gif and png would be possible to support, but I'm at the moment a bit busy to implant that. Same for a DJVU extract tool, possible is everything, but time.... ;)
Greetings,--Luxo 16:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Ok, thanx.
When you will have some time (I hope soon for you Clin), please re-think about it. The wikisourcers use a lot of DJVU but most of them don't really know how to handle this format.
Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 09:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Bilderbot error?

This edit looks like it did not work as expected. /Ö 10:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

It was because of the = in the file name, I've moved the files to better titles. --Luxo 14:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Bilderbot file extension forcing

Hi, I just used Bilderbot for the first time, and was disappointed that it forced the derivative to have a .JPG extension, when the original extension was .jpg (which I am told is more consistent with the file naming guidelines). Otherwise everything worked well. Can you fix this? --99of9 (talk) 02:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Bilderbot only notes derivative works in the original files, do you mean DerivativeFX? Derivative FX propose only .JPG if the original ends with .JPG too. Which image do you mean exactly? Thanks --Luxo 16:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
OK, I mean DerivativeFX. The problem is it forced me to change case from lower case .jpg to upper case .JPG 99of9 (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I've tested some images, can't see that it change (and if I look the code I don't think that it happens). Which image do you mean exactly?--Luxo 16:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
When I cropped this image File:Kniphofia uvaria.jpg to give this image File:Kniphofia uvaria close.JPG, it wouldn't let me choose .jpg as the file extension, I was forced to use .JPG because it said I wasn't allowed to "change" file type (even though I wanted it to stay the same). In your tests, try starting with a lower case image, and try to name the derivative also with a lower case. --99of9 (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, it works here with lower case.. No idea why it should force upper case. which browser do you use?--Luxo 21:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
A recent version of Firefox. --99of9 (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Date on FX uploads

Hi Luxo. Once in a while I come across uploads assisted with DerivativeFX, e.g. File:3976 - Zermatt and Riffelalp viewed from Riffelberg - B.jpg. These take the current date rather than the original date the image was taken in the Information templates. At least in images with changes like the above, IMHO, the date should remain the original one. (diff). However, I'm not sure if your tool can or should do something about this. I thought I should mention it though. -- User:Docu at 08:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, the date should be the orig one - at least if you've only reworked the orig pic rather than created a whole new pic (derivative). Maybe there should be a switch to select "reworked pic" or "new image composition". Each time it use this tool (for reworked pics), I change the date back to the orig one - manually. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

derivativeFX error

When asked for the "Original work" I use "File:Madagascar range map template.svg", but the page generates the error: "License of this file: File doesn't exist!" I have tried numerous other images for the file name, but always get an error. When I start using derivativeFX, it shows that I am logged in correctly. Is there something else I can try? – VisionHolder « talk » 07:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Same problem here, I tried it with File:Amy_Macdonald_on_stage_at_T_On_The_Fringe_After_Party_at_The_Caves,_Edinburgh.jpg‎ Regards SoWhy 15:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Happens with every image, I look for it...--Luxo 17:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Fixed.--Luxo 18:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello, is it possible to translate the interface of derivativeFX into other languages? If it is possible, will you be so kind to point where I can translate it?--Gaeser (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

User_talk:Luxo/Archive2009#DerivativeFX_in_Spanish. Greetings,--Luxo 22:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


Hello Luxo,

It looks like the Rotatebot isn't working, is that correct or is it in maintenance mode ? Gohe007 (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Uh haven't see it, sorry. works again.--Luxo 17:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I hadn't noticed either and File:Stockportmap1924.jpg could easily have waited another year to get fixed ;) -- User:Docu at 21:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

derivativeFX issues

Hello, Luxo. derivativeFX keeps telling me that I'm not logged in, when I clearly am. (To be more specific, a screenshot of the userpage of my IP address keeps showing up.) Any suggestions?--Benny the mascot (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

which browser do you use? --Luxo 16:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

derivativeFX options for destination filename

Hi. Could you add more propositions? Cropped, color... I think that cropped images are often uploaded. Przykuta (talk) 18:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I will do it. Do you know Cropbot? :-) Greetings,--Luxo 19:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
^_^ Przykuta (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Luxo. Flopped, mirrored, or flipped would be nice too. Possibly adding them directly into Category:Flopped images. -- User:Docu at 07:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

some propositions added. --Luxo 19:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Luxo, could you please fix the proposition "_cropped .JPG". There is always a space. Thank you! --Saibo (Δ) 23:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Bilderbot mistake

Bilderbot fügt derivative work templates/links zu upload logs hinzu, siehe here. Das sollte korrigiert werden, es verfälscht und ist nutzlos. Gruß Hekerui (talk) 10:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Hoppla ja das ist ein Bug. Vielen Dank! --Luxo 16:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Kann der Bot auch falsche Vorgänge zurücknehmen? Hekerui (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Naja, der Aufwand wäre riesig. Aber ich denke es sind nicht so viele?--Luxo 17:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Another problem: here. It replaces an original upload log with "minor fix" etcetera. Thanks for your work with the bot—it's a great help. Ucucha (talk) 13:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Uh one problem fixed but in the same a new one opened :-( Thanks, I'll fix it.--Luxo 18:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Fixed with r201. Should not happen again, thank you for being vigilant :) Greetings,--Luxo 22:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick fix! Ucucha (talk) 01:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid it happened again. Ucucha (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I've stopped the bot, I'll look for that. Thanks,--Luxo 15:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I think I've found the bug (r208), but I'll check all next edits of the bot.--Luxo 20:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
I hope so; it's very convenient in uploading derivative works. Thanks for the fix. Ucucha (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Well there were 3 bad pictures, but I hope now with r210 I have found all bugs ;). A other improvement is that the bot, if the template is already there, don't put the new ones simply ahead of the old one, he sort them by name.--Luxo 15:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


Hallo, stelle bitte sicher, daß der Cropbot keine Bilder aus dem Bundesarchiv cropt. --Matthiasb (talk) 18:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Warum? Der Bot informiert bei jedem Upload wer ihn gerade bedient. Wenn etwas nicht passt, informiere diesen Benutzer.--Luxo 20:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Ok, Ich sehe das Problem ein, die weissen Beschreibungsränder sehen wohl viele als überflüssig an, ich bastle da eine Sperre damit das nicht mehr möglich ist. Gruss--Luxo 20:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
User_talk:Cropbot#Bundesarchiv--Luxo 20:41, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


I added Commons:FAQ#How_do_I_fix_the_orientation_of_an_image.3F to the FAQ. -- User:Docu at 12:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

cool, thanks.--Luxo 16:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Bot problem ?

Hi, this looks very wrong... I have reverted the edit (but kept the informative part about derivative works). Schutz (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that is very wrong... Thanks for the advice, I will analyse that.--Luxo 20:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
#Bilderbot_mistake--Luxo 20:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI: Commons:Village_pump#Rotatebot

Just for information, your bot works. -- User:Docu at 09:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Would you check the bot, it looks like the value might have been too high. -- User:Docu at 05:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm looks like a api.php request don't work... Probably the url is too long with 300 images

$queryurl = "".$urlpageids."&prop=revisions|imageinfo&format=php&iiprop=timestamp|user|url|size|metadata";

$urlpageids is a list with all id's of the pages, (e.g. "454654|546456|7897897" ). Probably I should make that with a POST-request...--Luxo 21:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Maybe it could do it sub-batches of 10 or 20? BTW, I asked Turelio to lower the value. Maybe it works with that. Unless you need it for testing, would you try to have it go through the category in one way or the other? -- User:Docu at 21:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
It don't work with 150, I set it back to 50. So it takes some time to rotate all images. I'm busy until Saturday, I don't have time to do it faster, sorry. --Luxo 21:52, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I still had hopes for 150. As usual, the ones I rotate were upside down for quite some time, so a couple of days more don't matter, but I planned to check if any remained. You could shorten the 6 hour wait? -- User:Docu at 21:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Rotatebot category

Hi Luxo. As I had just a few images to rotate, I tried the method you suggested the other day: adding the category with sortkey (e.g. here). The image was rotated, but the category not removed. To avoid that it gets rotated once more, I removed it manually.

BTW, Rotatebot did quite well with the bulk of the series. -- User:Docu at 12:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Uh sorry that's right he don't remove the category. Do you have more images you like to rotate with the category? --Luxo 12:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Not for now. I just figured as you mentioned it I should try. If I have to load the image page, it doesn't matter that much which one I use. Still, as HotCat allows to set sortkeys, it's a little bit quicker ;). For the pure lazy, maybe one would even want to add a category redirect from Category:Rotatebot ;) -- User:Docu at 12:25, 15 May 2010 (UTC)



derivateFX could'nt recognize existing in commons licence template {{PD Egypt}}. Annoucement of derivateFX was:

your images can't be merged!

The licenses are incompatible or the licenses can't be detected.
See above for all license tags the tool found for this images:

File:Princess_Amina_Elhami.jpg 2
{{PD Egypt}} 1

1.)Unknown templates
2.)no known license found for this image!

So, I could'nt reload derivate of File:Princess_Amina_Elhami.jpg. PawełMM (talk) 13:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Same here, trying to create a collage from files available at commons. wtf? Ich wunder mich nur, weil d-FX zu jeder Datei eine Lizenz gefunden hat. für jede hilfe dankbar etc., Gruss und so, --G-41614 (talk) 12:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
License detection and merging are separate processes. I'll fix it.--Luxo 16:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


Hi,can I translate Derivative FX in Finnish language? --Olli (talk) 11:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

User_talk:Luxo/Archive2009#DerivativeFX_in_Spanish--Luxo 16:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Photo rotate

File:Gate leading to the akha hilltribe village.jpg is rotated and not correct orientation on ja:鳥居. Why it is rotated and Can you revert to correct orientation?--Namazu-tron (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

The file is rotated correctly; if you see it the wrong side facing up you must reload the page. You have uploaded the image not with the original size, because of that User:FlickreviewR replaced it with the original, but with the wrong side facing up. User:Leoboudv has added the rotate-template and Rotatebot has rotated the image. Everything ok :)--Luxo 09:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Can't login to Cropbot

Hi, I'm trying to use your Cropbot, but when I enter my TUSC name (Svick) and password, is says that “A user with the name svick already exist!” gWatch says “Wrong password!” on the same combination. I know I have the correct password, because I use it with CommonsHelper. Can you help me? Thanks. Svick (talk) 09:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Cropbot uses the same login system like gWatch. You have probably created a account there, because of that the account already exist.
The tool ask just at the first login the TUSC-System if the password is correct; after that it saves the password (as a md5-hash) in the own database. So if you had an account on gWatch with a other password, TUSC is not asked for the password verification again.
But I have removed this account, you can login now with your TUSC password. Greetings,--Luxo 14:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Svick (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Bug in DerivativeFX

Hi! You made a really useful tool, but I noticed it listed the original file and then "created by " with nothing afterwards. After examining the wikimarkup, it says created by [[en:NASA|NASA]]. Commons thinks the file is called NASA on the English Wikipedia! It needs to insert another colon before the en, so it becomes created by [[:en:NASA|NASA]]. Cheers, HereToHelp (talk) 05:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

[[:en:NASA|NASA]] = NASA
So it's the same. which image do you mean?--Luxo 19:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Anpassungen derivativeFX

Hallo Luxo. Kannst du folgende Anpassungen vornehmen:

  • |Permission=see below → |Permission=
  • Original upload log → {{Original upload log}}

Vielen Dank! --Leyo 16:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Erledigt, Danke. --Luxo 20:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Anpassungen derivativeFX - Datum

Ist es möglich, dass derivativeFX auf Wunsch nicht das aktuelle Datum einsetzt, sondern das Datum wie im Original belässt?

Wenn es nur ein Quellbild gibt, sollte es eine Radiocheckbox geben, ob das neue Bild eine völlige Neubearbeitung ist, oder nur eine Verbesserung des ursprünglichen Fotos. Standardmäßig sollte sie bei einem Quellbild, meines Erachtens, auf "ursprüngliches Datum" stehen. Aktuell ändere ich immer manuell das Datum auf das Orig.datum, wenn ich eine Bearbeitung aus der de:WP:FWS hochlade - und ich nehme an, dass derivativeFX entgegen seinen Fähigkeiten hauptsächlich für solche Bearbeitungen genutzt wird. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

File - license not recognized

Hello Luxo,

when asked for the "Original work" I use "File:Wappen_Backnang.svg", but the page generates the error: "License of this file: No valid license found" although it it covered by the PD:Coat of Arms. When I start using derivativeFX, it shows that I am logged in correctly. Is there something else I can try?



Unable to upload derivative file, because gets stuck.

I can't open file Kamchatka_peninsula_topo.jpg in the page in order to upload a derivative file. The upload program gets stuck, probably because that file is so huge. Please help.

No - it's just because the source file File:Kamchatka_peninsula_topo.jpg has no valid license in the eyes of derivativeFX: "License of this file: No valid license found!" {{PD-USGov-NASA-SRTM}} Is apparently not understood by derivativeFX.
Workaround if this cannot be fixed promptly: Add {{PD-author|NASA's Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM)}} to the source file. Upload your derivative version. Revert your change in the source file. Also add the correct original license template to your derivative version instead of the PD-author. --Saibo (Δ) 17:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Just for your information: Luxo wrote at the bottom of this page: "Ich habe im Moment 0,0 Minuten Zeit für Commons, Toolserver, etc." - Translated: I have no spare minute for Commons, Toolserver, etc.. So it seemes that you'll have to stick with the workaround for some time. --Saibo (Δ) 23:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

translate request

Hello! Is it possible to add new translations to derivativeFX ? I would be glad to help you with Russian version, if it is possible Spectorman (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


Hej, kann es sein, dass weder Geokoordinaten noch die den Attribution-Parameter der Lizenz beachtet und Benutzer-Kategorien herausgeworfen werden? --Prolineserver (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Geokoordinaten werden nicht kopiert. Wenn du mit Attribution Template:Attribution meinst: Doch, das wird beachtet. Kategorien werden nur die "normalen" kopiert, versteckte Kategorien nicht. Ich habe im Moment 0,0 Minuten Zeit für Commons, Toolserver, etc. darum werden Verbesserungen wohl nicht sehr schnell kommen. Gruss,--Luxo 20:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Ich meine z.B. den ersten Parameter von Template:cc-by-sa-2.5. Den nicht zu kopieren ist mMn Lizenzrechtlich nicht sauber. Sind die nicht mitkopierten versteckten Kategorien Absicht? Wenn nein sollte es reichen, das hidden in zeile 373 von deri2.php zu entfernen. --Prolineserver (talk) 07:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Ja, das ist Absicht, ansonsten werden Kats wie GFDL, CC-BY-SA-3.0 oder ähnlich separat auch noch aufgelistet. Der Parameter wird wirklich nicht beachtet, ja, das ist nicht ganz sauber. Es wird nur das genommen was unter |Author= aufgelistet ist, mMn müsste dort aber das selbe stehen. --Luxo 13:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Warum bastelst du eigentlich gleich eine komplett neue Beschreibungsseite? Dadurch genen wahrscheinlich noch eine ganze Menge nicht-standard Vorlagen verloren, z.B. auch noch eine andere Möglichkeit, eine benutzerspezifische Attribution zu verlangen: Template:Information#Example_other_fields. Aus diesem "offiziellen" Beispiel geht ganz klar hervor, dass das Name des Autors eben nicht gleich der Attribution sein muss, die CC-BY sagt ja Namensnennung in einer vom Autor festelegten weise, und genau das wird mit den parametern angegeben. Was schlägst du also als Workaround fuer die Probleme vor? --Prolineserver (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Weil es ansonsten mit mehreren Bildern als Quelle nicht funktioniert. Wie schon geschrieben habe ich momentan keine Zeit daran zu Basteln, ich habe die Optionen abstellen oder weiterlaufen lassen. Wenn du oder jemanden das Tool übernehmen oder ein neues schreiben möchte, stehe ich nicht im Weg. Gruss --Luxo 21:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Prolineserver, es ist ganz einfach: der "Workaround fuer die Probleme" ist der Bediener. Er alleine ist verantwortlich dafür was er unter seinem Namen veranstaltet - mit oder ohne Toolhilfe. Das sagt das Tool sogar ganz klar in fetter, roter Schrift und der Bediener muss es bestätigen. Das Tool ist ja lediglich eine Hilfe, damit man nicht immer manuell die komplette neue Beschreibungsseite basteln muss. Wenn das Tool irgendwelche Vorlagen "vergisst" liegt es am Bediener sie manuell nachzutragen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Admin inactivity

Hello Luxo, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 05:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

derivateFX and dates

Hi and thanks for creating a fine tool! At the moment derivateFX always sets the upload date of the derivate work as a date parameter of the derivate work. However, I think it should retain the date in the description page of the original file because that is (or at least should be) the date the original work was created (e.g. photograph taken) and usually that is much more relevant information than the date of the (minor) modification. Moreover, the date of the modification is seen in the file history of the derivative work. BR, --Apalsola tc 17:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Star Trek TOS logo (1).jpg

Your Bilderbot marked my image as a derivative work of Star Trek portal logo.jpg. Funny is I didn't see that image till I saw editation of your bot. I of course undid it, but I think you should know about it. My image was simply derived from original TOS logo and created in two versions indenpedently on any image uploaded here.
Niusereset (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

You misunderstood the template {{derivative versions}}. It does not mark your image as derivative of another. It is meant the other way round: the other image is a derivative work of your image, which is correct in this case! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Some notes on derivative fx

Firstly thank you so much for such useful instrument!

  • I have to notice you with some problem in uploading files with Internet explorer: the control of filename in wikimedia archives doesn't work for 3 times on 3. Conversely it work proper using Mozilla Firefox.
  • Another minor problem is in updating of categories aquired by former file. Normally who used derivative fx has limited to add a new category, and probably doesn't note the formers ones. Is it possible to use a template where this matter is more evident?

The problem is in creating a lot of files inserted in wrong categories using in example a blank map as canvas to draw a biological areal.Ciaurlec (talk) 21:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

270° rotation messed up

Rotatebot messed up rotation of File:A_large_barge_in_Tournai_on_the_Escaut..jpg: did the correct rotation, then later another 90° rotation which is wrong. I have reverted to the correct version. Bjung (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Looks like the 6 o'clock run omitted removing {{rotate|270}} for this image.  Docu  at 20:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)