User talk:M.K.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

http://maps.google.com/ 更迅速 (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr uploads[edit]

Hello Eugene, I would like to consul with you about Flickr image upload to commons. As I know, there is possibility to do so, but I am not sure about procedure. I noticed an interesting image, which I would like to upload. Could you tell me how I should proceed and that tags apply etc. Cheers, M.K. 10:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Easiest way to do do uploads from flickr (images must be under {{Cc-by-2.0}} or {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}) - to use special tool. In this case you need to choose file name and prepare description. Actual upload and license check will be performed by bot.
Other way - to use Flickr upload form (it is from Flickr link in Commons:Upload).
Or manually - you need to fill source/author fields in Template:Information and add license tag as in original image (in you case {{Cc-by-2.0}}) and {{Flickrreview}} (it's necessary to verify license because sometimes Flickr user could change it or Commons users don't care about non-commercial. non-derivative limitations).
EugeneZelenko 14:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: map request[edit]

Hi there! First of all, I sincerely apologise for the delay in getting back to you: I have been swamped with work. Anyhow, I will gladly create a map (PNG/SVG) in the next few days. Thanks! Quizimodo 15:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License[edit]

Hi M.K., I'm wondering why Image:Sporto hale 2007-07-15.JPG which is a bot upload from lt.wikipedia where it's clearly stated that the image is GDFL-self and your upload of the same picture at Image:Kaunas Sports Hall2.JPG have different licenses. Did you choose it to be PD? Thanks in advance for your answer, --Svens Welt 14:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Svens Welt. Perhaps I made a mistake then reuploded image from lt.wiki, however I cant check this as original image is not present on the lt anymore. Perhaps license should be used as bot's for now, in other had both images are identical and one of them can be removed. All the best, M.K. 08:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello M.K., I deleted the second picture with wrong copied license, now. And I'm wondering, too. What do you think, what you have done?! When you transfere a picture from a sister-projekt, you have to transfere the correct description and above all the correct license form.
We have a wonderful tool, the Move-to-commons assistant. Please use that tool, if you aren't able to do it alone. -- Ra'ike T C 09:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link to tool, will use it. M.K. 12:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 73b346321a38af89098a6fcd96fca38f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Images from Lithuanian Ministry of Defense[edit]

Hello :)

I've noticed that you've uploaded quite a few images downloaded from Lithuanian Ministry of National Defense's website. Do you have any permission or notice stating that it is allowed to distribute them under the GFDL license? --Leafnode 11:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great :) If so, tag them with {{OTRS received|id=2009040110056227}} tag instead of {{OTRS pending}} - otherwise they could be deleted. --Leafnode 12:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that might be inappropriate, I'll tag them. --Leafnode 15:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think that if you have the proper OTRS ticket ID, you can tag it by yourself :) I've tagged few, but you can finish on your own :) --Leafnode 15:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restorations[edit]

While I thank you for the request, I'm only really restoring images that have a chance at en wiki's FPC process, which requires at least a 1000x resolution, a requirement all those images lack. In addition, as JPGs (and not the raw TIFs) the restoration will not be as effective. Staxringold (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image restoration[edit]

Sorry, due to the actions of Durova, I refuse to do any more work for Wikipedia. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shortly after I ran into troubles with University over health, and was really traumatised, because they mean I'll miss at the very minimum a semester, and, at worse (and more likely should my complaint fail), have to change universities - which she was fully aware of because I told her. Durova decided that minor, polite criticism of a decision she made in one of her FPCs was unacceptable behaviour, attacked me in a long Skype chat complete with about 8 uncensored "F*** you"s, claimed polite disagreement with her judgement was original research and trolling, and promised to use her power to keep me out of several restoration projects. (She posted an image upside-down, and didn't bother to justify it, or provide an alternative for those that didn't want to turn their monitors over. While the image was originally printed upside-down, to act as if asking for a justification of her choice was trolling is so out of line...) I complained, and everyone did the Wiki equivalent of sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting "LALALA!", complete with saying that no evidence that could be presented would be considered convincing.
If someone is able to act that badly, and get nothing but a strenuous defense, I want no part of this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Req[edit]

Didn't understand exactly your needs, so uploaded new version over old file File:Romualdas Marcinkus.jpg leaving only the portrait itself, and uploaded new DW without any background as File:Romualdas Marcinkus blank.png, ir kitą karta manau būtu patogiau bendrauti lietuviškai :) --Justass (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paskubėjau, įkeltas naujas PNG paveiksliukas, vis tiek buvo rodomas kaip JPG, su juodu fonu, tad įkėliau naują failą File:Romualdas Marcinkus transparent .png --Justass (talk) 15:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vargu ar galėčiau realiai padėti, na gal elementariuose problemose. Mano rastrinės grafikos žinios gana kuklios. Labiausiai mane domina vektorinė grafika (herbai, vėliavos, visokie brėžiniai, žemėlapiai ir visa kita kas telpa į SVG). Justass (talk) 17:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sunkiai įvykdoma užduotis, herbas ganėtinai sudėtingas, daug "šešėlių", ir man nepavyko rasti didelės raiškos paveiksliuko kurį būtų galima paimti kaip pagrindą. Didžiausios raiškos kokį radau - http://www.ldm.lt/VPG/heraldika/PrezidentoHerbas.jpg, kaip matote grifo figūra labai detalizuota, pervedant į vektorius dalis detalių dingsta, o piešti "iš akies" jau būtu mano interpretacija, o ne oficialus herbas :) Gal būt šiuo atveju būtu įmanoma mandagiai parašyti prezidentūros spaudos tarnybos [1] arba heraldikos komisijos pirmininko Edmundo Rimšo [2] pagalbos? --Justass (talk) 10:09, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aš irgi peržiūrėjau įstatymų duomenų bazę, radau nutarimą dėl LR prezidento herbo, bet ten tik tekstinis aprašymas ir jokio priedo su pačiu paveiksliuku --Justass (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swedish Empire in Early Modern Europe (1560-1815).png[edit]

Mačiau įkėlėte anglišką versiją, bet kam ja pavertėte į png ? Juk prarandami visi vektorinės grafikos privalumai didinant/mažinant žemėlapį :) --Justass (talk) 13:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanian_state_in_13-15th_centuries.png[edit]

Hello M.K., I have noticed that you have created this nice map of Greater Lithuania. Would it be possible to upload an svg version of this map to permit translation into other languages? Greeting --Furfur (talk) 13:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gamma-gerät.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gamma-gerät.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rcbutcher (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christ’s_Resurrection_Church_tower.Kaunas.Lithuania.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Christ’s_Resurrection_Church_tower.Kaunas.Lithuania.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prisikelimo_baznycia.Kaunas_Christ’s_Resurrection_Church.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Prisikelimo_baznycia.Kaunas_Christ’s_Resurrection_Church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Admin EugeneZelenko asked you a question. Maybe you can give a reply? Thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto profesoriai.Professors of Vytautas Magnus University.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto profesoriai.Professors of Vytautas Magnus University.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto profesoriai.Professors of Vytautas Magnus University.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vytauto Didžiojo antspaudas.Royal seal of Lithuanian Grand Duke Vytautas the Great.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vytauto Didžiojo antspaudas.Royal seal of Lithuanian Grand Duke Vytautas the Great.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Viktoras Muntianas.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Viktoras Muntianas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 08:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

File:St. Vitas.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:St. Vitas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

195.50.31.213 20:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

No longer a penguin (talk) 11:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lietuviai.Lithuanians.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Lietuviai.Lithuanians.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: File:Gediminas.gif deleted as no source
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Finnusertop (talk) 01:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Whpq (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Constantinople (1422) by Florentine cartographer Cristoforo Buondelmonte.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Map of Constantinople (1422) by Florentine cartographer Cristoforo Buondelmonte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nanahuatl (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christ’s Resurrection Church tower.Kaunas.Lithuania.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Christ’s Resurrection Church tower.Kaunas.Lithuania.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prisikelimo baznycia.Kaunas Christ’s Resurrection Church.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Prisikelimo baznycia.Kaunas Christ’s Resurrection Church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]