User talk:MD-5100

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MD-5100!

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | українська | +/−

Hello MD-5100,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Miley Cyrus - "Can't Be Tamed" Photoshoot.png

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Martin H. (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Remember the meaning of free: free to use by anyone, anywhere for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification by the written permission granted voluntarily by the copyright holder. Thats free content, Commons is a free content project and for that reason we dont have album covers and such stuff here. Also fair use for educational purposes isnt allowed here, see Commons:Fair use. --Martin H. (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

OK. I'm right with your decision. But, I'd like to say something : Wikimedia, Wikipedia and all your stuff, ... look sooooo old ! Even with your so-called new design. Wiki looks like a website built in the 90s! I don't know to who should I say that (because Wiki is also so poorly organized! There's links everywhere and when you click on a link, there's a new page with another link which bring you to the previous page. You turn in circles! It's a nonsense!) but your so-called web colors look so crappy in your articles and your graphics are so... Umh. And when you click on a "Unroll" link, there's no transition! It's not more expansive adding Javascript libraries to Wiki!
Also: did you ever take a look at how long is the form for sending a new file?! It's too complicated! There are also lots of kinds of licenses! There's one license for each little thing! How are you supposed to choose when you don't remember where did you get the file? IMPOSSIBLE !
You also should simplify your Wiki code. A new user cannot understand how to use those meta. Even with your 'help'.
So... I wish you a good day or night. I don't know where you are...
--MD-5100 (talk) 13:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Google Belgique après l'accident de Sierre.png[edit]

File:Google Belgique après l'accident de Sierre.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)