User talk:MGA73

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I have a question[edit]

Is it allowed to delete my image from Wikimedia Commons in order to replace it with a new one? AnsyahF (talk) 00:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@AnsyahF: That depends. If a file have a valid copyright and is in use then we usually do not delete it. If you uploade a competely wrong photo by a mistake and request deletion short after it is usually deleted. If you upload an edited photo but decide that another edit is better you can upload that on top of the old one. You can also just upload the new one and keep both. If you nominate the file for deletion or give me a link I can have a look at it. --MGA73 (talk) 05:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73: For example, I'm planning to delete File:Fort Japara XVI.jpg and replaced it with this one (which is also photographed by me). AnsyahF (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
@AnsyahF: I would keep both because I like that we can see the depth in the first photo. Since the photo is in use I think you should upload the new photo before you request a deletion of the old photo. If you upload photos published before perhaps you should request a license review of the photo or make a link on your blog and your user page so we can see that it is the same person that control both. --MGA73 (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73: Alright I'll working on it. About the deletion request, should I nominate it on DR or just requesting it to you throught this page? AnsyahF (talk) 07:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
@AnsyahF: I think a DR is best because it is an old upload. --MGA73 (talk) 08:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Please review[edit]

Please review Gulzaar Chhaniwala1.jpg VRJ Bandhu (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: I checked File:Gulzaar Chhaniwala1.jpg and the license on youtube is not creative commons. So I can't pass it. Could you please check again if it is the right file and video you mentioned? --MGA73 (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73:, The company that does the music in the video does not have the rights channel company.The video is published by this channel. VRJ Bandhu (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: but the channel have not selected a creative commons license. --MGA73 (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73:, I am sorry that I did not know about this. You can delete it. How to get license by OTRS? This is explained in detail on the Commons, but I do not understand that much. Help VRJ Bandhu (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: I deleted the file. First you send a mail to the copyright holder and ask them if they would release the file under a free license. If they agree you should ask them if they could please send a permission. If they say yes you can point them to Commons:OTRS and have them do as it say. To make it easy for them you could upload the relevant file to Commons (add {{OTRS pending}} to the file page) and give the link to the copyright holder so they can include that in the permission. Then a volunteer will try to fix the rest. --MGA73 (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks VRJ Bandhu (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: I checked Special:ListFiles/VRJ_Bandhu. The poster should be uploaded to enwiki as fair use unless you can have the copyright holder send a permission. And the photos of Deepti Maheshwari are you the photographer? --MGA73 (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73:, I am not the owner of either of these photos. I took the photo of Deepti Maheshwari from the official website. So I uploaded it on my own right. Actually, I just realized the rules. You can also remove them. VRJ Bandhu (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: Deleted those too. In future make sure not to upload as own work unless you are the photographer. --MGA73 (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

I will try and learn the rules more thoroughly. VRJ Bandhu (talk) 18:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73:, If the copyright holder allows the file to be uploaded, what link should I give it? VRJ Bandhu (talk) 06:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: If you get a permission then upload the file to Commons with a good name and add a link to where the original file is located and add {{OTRS pending}} to the file page. Then have the copyrightholder send the permission to OTRS. There are 73 million files on Commons so it is important that the copyright holder give us some info so we know what file the permission is valid for. So the permission should include the file name on Commons if possible. Or you could ask the copyright holder to forward a copy of the mail the system send when the copyright holder send a permission. In that mail there is a number and if you add that number to the file page we can see the link. Not sure if that was your question :-) --MGA73 (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73:, I uploaded the photo of File:Photos-Celebs-grave-IWM-Digital-Awards-2019-13.jpg from CC3 and also emailed the copyright holder. His reply also came and he has given permission. But they might not understand the template for commons, so their reply has not been received yet. If they have mailed the commons, can you check and tell. And what is the release generator used for? Is it for permission? VRJ Bandhu (talk) 06:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
@VRJ Bandhu: We have {{BollywoodHungama}} for some of the photos from their website so we do not need an extra permission for those. The release generator is an easy way to send a permission. It is an interactive way to create the correct permission to send. --MGA73 (talk) 07:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I want to upload crop version of this photo. VRJ Bandhu (talk) 09:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73:, File:Amit Bhadana at IWMBuzz Awards 2019 Crop.jpg

The second version has been uploaded. Please review. VRJ Bandhu (talk) 12:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

@VRJ Bandhu: ✓ Done --MGA73 (talk) 13:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Obcina Pirangrb.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Obcina Pirangrb.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 20:51, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Carte Site Hotel Sol Cayo Largo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Carte Site Hotel Sol Cayo Largo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 06:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

File:22 July Solar eclipse Delhi full.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:22 July Solar eclipse Delhi full.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:SS
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

File:構造式 S8硫黄.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:構造式 S8硫黄.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marbletan (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Romavia2.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Romavia2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

GFDL licenses[edit]

I read your message con GFDL licenses. I don't want any change for licenses of my images. If now old licenses are not good then you can delete all those images. I didn't upload new images on commons from may 2014 so ... Bye --Massimop (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

@Massimop: Thank you for your message. GFDL is not good but it is still allowed for old uploades so I will not nominate the files for deletion. I do not understand why you mention Commons. The license update was decided by Wikimedia Foundation and I think the removal of disclaimers was decided on Wikipedia. If you do not wish be a part of the license update you should add the opt-out on the file pages on itwiki so other users know too. --MGA73 (talk) 06:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Attribution[edit]

Is it allowed to add my blog in my photo's attribution? I don't have any intention to promote it. Just to assert my identity. Thanks. AnsyahF (talk) 08:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

@AnsyahF: I would say yes. As far as I know there are no restrictions as long as it is reasonable. --MGA73 (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Azerbaijan regions.svg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Azerbaijan regions.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Suspicious "own work"[edit]

Hi Michael, I have a question concerning photos claimed to be "own work" but having no EXIF metadata. These photos usually look like professionally done studio photos, yet have no EXIF and uploaded by "one-purpose accounts" (which are only used to upload several photos, and make no other edit, not contributing to Commons whatsoever). Although I do admit that no matter how hard I tried, I could not find the original on the Internet, I tried Google Images, TinEye and this website. All failed. The photos were posted in 2019, can I tag them as "no permission" or is it too late now? Băng Tỏa (talk) 19:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

@Băng Tỏa: Hi! "No permission" is best for cases where we know they are works of someone else. If you can't find any proof then I suggest to either ask the uploader or start a deletion request. --MGA73 (talk) 19:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)