User talk:MGA73

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:MGA73bot2)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Korrekt upload af billeder?[edit]

Hej MGA73 -- Jeg forstår, at du taler dansk, så jeg retter mit spørgsmål til dig på dansk her. Jeg har tidligere prøvet at bidrage med at uploade billeder til Wiki Commons. Jeg har blandt andet taget en del billeder af musikere. Men jeg redigerer og beskærer ofte billederne, og så falder kamera-data jo væk. Jeg er derfor løbet i, at mine billeder bliver afvist fordi mine rettigheder drages i tvivl. Jeg har så fået at vide, at jeg skal uploade både originalbilledet OG det redigerede billede og linke dem sammen. Men dét kan jeg ikke helt finde ud af, hvordan man lige gør. Den vejleding, jeg fik, da jeg senest uploadede et billede af Skillet-guitarist, Korey Cooper, forstod jeg simpelthen ikke. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SkilletKoreyCooper2016May.jpg). Nu ér billedet så blevet godkendt (tror jeg da nok). Men jeg har eksempelvis et par gode skud af Mattias Kolstrup (Dúné) og Lau Højen (Carpark North), jeg kunne dele med Wiki Commons. Men hvordan gør jeg det RIGTIGT? Har du en vejledning/manual et sted - eller et link til én, der er til at forstå? På forhånd tak :) -- User:Kmilling, 09:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Hej Kmilling! Jeg har svaret på din egen side: User talk:Kmilling#Svar på din besked. --MGA73 (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Album covers fra coverartarchive.org[edit]

Må man anvende album covers fra [CoverArtArchive] på Wikimadia / Wikipedia ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik Bachmann (talk • contribs) 14:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

@Erik Bachmann: Hej! Der står at "All images are copyrighted by their respective copyright owners." så min tanke er nej. Men hvis der står et sted på siden at "This cover is licensed cc-by-sa-4.0" for eksempel så jo. Men så skal du bare huske at tilføje {{Licensereview}} når du lægger filen op. --MGA73 (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

local files also present on commons[edit]

hello. I have seen you asked how to find local files that also exist on Commons in IRC: I was away at that time but want to comment. This tool does it for en.wiki (last update - May 7), I have forked it for ru.wiki, for example. Yes, it fails a lot due to changes in DB replicas but for me it is still working like 1 in 10 times, so, it could be a solution. I have also posted phab:T279688 with the same request. Best regards, rubin16 (talk) 07:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyvio[edit]

Hi, in the recent DR, the comment "So perhaps instead your uploads should not be deleted?" appears a tangent, so responding here rather than there.

If you want to review my India-related uploads, then you are very welcome to do so. You may be able to find some copyright issues in Category:Public Library of India which is currently being populated. However, these IA projects have deliberately selected publishing dates, which massively decreases the likelihood of accidental copyvios unless there are mistakes in the IA metadata, which sometimes there is. If you see a pattern of copyright issues in my uploads please raise them for me, or create some DRs if you wish, and I'll investigate the pattern as I always do. Thanks for your support. -- (talk) 11:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

@: Thank you for your comment. Just to be sure you did notice the word "not"? --MGA73 (talk) 11:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately one of the issues of this being a multilingual project is that negatives are often used in different ways for emphasis. In this case, I was going by context. The offer stands, anyone is welcome to challenge my own upload projects on copyright grounds, and in large upload projects mistakes can often be discovered, sadly this is especially true for the printing/reprint industry in India which makes interpreting 'significant doubt' doubly important. -- (talk) 11:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
@: Thank you. But I see no point in doing that because as you say the likelihood of copyvios are very low. I think we should delete only if we know it is a copyvio or if we have good reason to believe that it is a copyvio. As I said to someone in another descussion then according to en:Methuselah it is perhaps possible to be 969 years old but does that really mean we have to delete all "unknown" stuff younger than 1000 years because author might still be alive? Lol I hope not. --MGA73 (talk) 11:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The case is a print probably produced in the 1980s, I have similar "old" looking books from India in my home library, they age terribly as they were made on the cheap. Comparisons with thousand-year-old manuscripts do not address the realistic doubts we should take seriously for publications by modern Indian printers. -- (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
@: My point is just that there is a difference between "might be" and "significant doubt". If someone print a photo in the 1980s they should mention photographer if the photo is still copyrighted. So if they do not then that could be an indication that they checked and concluded that the copyright have expired. I do not know fashion in India so I do not know if girls dressed like that in the 1980s. If someone show me a school photo from the 1980's and everyone looked like that then I would of course agree that there is significant doubt. To me doubt is not just a question of lack of proof from uploader but also what proof the nominator of a DR provide. --MGA73 (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The photo subject has no obvious tells for a terminus post quem, the sitar being effectively timeless and the same goes for the dress and hairstyle. A keep relies on the unknown photographer rationale but that requires verifying 60 years post-publication to apply. It's perfectly normal to have difficulty with defining 'significant' for these cases and we've put in far more research than the 'norm' on this particular case, but only because it was raised during an open RFA. -- (talk) 09:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
@: yeah the RFA makes it more interessting. I know that "significant" is not the same as "beyond reasonable doubt". But directly translated to Danish "betydelig" it would mean that there have to be a lot of doubt. I would say that lack of proof does not mean "significant" there have to be indications that this does not look right. When I look at the photo I think it is more likely to be taken in 1913 than in 1985. So that is why I think that it is very likely to be older than 1946. But other users may think otherwise. --MGA73 (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Mannerheimstatue Kiasma.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mannerheimstatue Kiasma.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola tc 15:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Re:File:Population distribution of Funahashi, Toyama, Japan.svg[edit]

Thanks for your directions. I have tried FileImporter fot File:Population distribution of Namerikawa, Toyama, Japan.svg. Please tell me if there is still anything wrong. --alberth2 08:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

See my reply on your talk page. --MGA73 (talk) 09:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Sm Mall Cebu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sm Mall Cebu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 00:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)