Comment Vertical distortion (see: the grates of the right)--Lmbuga 22:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
In adition, to me, too tight at left, but...--Lmbuga 22:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC) Done Perspective corrected. Please notice: the left minaret is really leaning to the left! -- MJJR 08:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Support --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
tilted cw --Mbdortmund 23:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Le Nil à Louxor
J'ai tenté quelque chose avec GIMP sur ton image du Nil à Louxor que j'aime bien, et qui me paraissait améliorable. Avec des calques et des masques de calque, j'ai essayé de donner du "punch" au quai, à la ville et aux montagnes, en jouant sur les niveaux, les courbes et les contrastes. C'est une technique que je dois à un tutoriel trouvé sur Youtube de ton compatriote Luc Viatour.
Je n'ai touché ni au premier plan (le bateau, le Nil), ni au ciel. J'ai enregistré mes modifications par dessus ton fichier originel, mais si mon travail ne correspond pas à tes souhaits, naturellement sens-toi parfaitement libre de revenir à ta propre version ! Je vais mettre un mot dans les QIC, mais je ne voterai pas, puisque j'ai fait les modifications, ce ne serait pas "sport".
Bien amicalement depuis Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 13:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Merci, ce fut un plaisir ! Je ne m'interdis pas de recommencer si l'occasion se présente !--Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
right tower tilted cw --Mbdortmund 23:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Done Tilt corrected -- MJJR 21:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Good to me. Shame of the streetlamp. -- Jebulon 15:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Comment Le réverbère est le moindre des soucis. En fait, cette église est vouée à la destruction, dans le cadre d'un grand projet urbanistique visant à rétablir l'allée des sphinx reliant le temple de Louxor à celui de Karnak. En ce sens, cette photo illustre un patrimoine en péril... MJJR 21:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
I've tried some improvements with GIMP, adjusting contrasts and levels. I think it looks more "punchy" in background now.--Jebulon 13:31, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Comment Many thanks for the adjustments! It looks much better now. In fact, it was a hazy day, and the image is now even better than the reality... -- MJJR 21:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Good quality now --H005 16:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Good quality. The bird on the left side should be removed. It is a bit disturbing. --Berthold Werner 09:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Done Bird and some smaller spots in the sky removed -- MJJR 09:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Comment Nice, maybe a bit of barrel distorsion, see the first street light or pylon at the left of the lighthouse. --Myrabella 10:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Comment The other pylons and poles don't have the distortion (which moreover should be more pronounced at the edges of the image), so I guess that the pylon is really a little bit bended... -- MJJR 20:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Support Let's assume that it's the case. --Myrabella 10:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I really like it. Just one thing, the grass on the left. Is the strong, green color really natural or oversaturated?--Ankara 21:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
As the picture was a little bit hazy, contrast and saturation have slightly been increased, but the color of the young (spring time!) grass and herbs is pretty natural. -- MJJR 19:04, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Ok. Regards --Ankara 06:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Blankaart Kasteel zonder auto...
J'ai un peu modifié ta photo (réussie !) en supprimant le morceau de voiture à gauche derrière, par clonage des arbres et les plantes, j'espère que ça ne t'ennuie pas. Je n'ai rien changé d'autre. J'ai chargé la photo modifiée par dessus la tienne, la modification étant mineure. Si ça ne te convient pas, je te prie de m'excuser, et tu peux bien sûr revenir à ta version initiale. J'espère qu'elle sera promue QI, elle le mérite (moi, je considère que je ne peux plus voter, maintenant que j'y ai touché...).
Amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
I like the composition, especially the one gull staring at you, but this is rather soft. Saffron Blaze 21:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Comment The background is soft, of course, as the focus is on the gulls. I can sharpen the image, but this would increase the noise, especially in the sky, and that's not desirable, I think. -- MJJR 08:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Comment To be honest, I was talking about the gulls not being very sharp/detailed. Saffron Blaze 09:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
-- Alright. It's not DSLR quality indeed. But probably it was the best possible result with that type of (compact) camera and in these (evening) light conditions. -- MJJR 14:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC) SupportI looked at this again and I am thinking it meets QI standards. --Saffron Blaze 17:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Poor little car all covered in bird poop. Shows good detail but could use a different framing. Saffron Blaze 20:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC) Question What do you mean: a different (tighter?) crop, or a different view angle? The crop can be adjusted. For the view angle, it will be more difficult, as the picture was taken during a holiday in Tunisia... -- MJJR 08:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Comment I meant cropping so that the car was tighter to the upper left corner while retaining the 45 degree aspect. In other words crop along the top and left side about equally. I tried it and it looked more "dramatic" :) --Saffron Blaze 22:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
QI to me, but needs a little correction of perspective (vertical perspective distortion)--Lmbuga 21:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC) Comment The wall along the water is really leaning to the left. -- MJJR 09:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Comment I'm not sure if I understand you. I only say that the vertical lines aren't stright, but good picture--Lmbuga 23:52, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
See the notes. You can delete the notes when you want--Lmbuga 23:59, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree with your remarks: both indicated lines are not straight. The left one is a slight lens distortion indeed. The right one is not: this wall is actually not straight. -- MJJR 21:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Ok, thanks--Lmbuga 23:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)