User talk:Mac9/Archivio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Orta Isola San Giulio[edit]

Image deletion warning Orta Isola San Giulio has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ciao Mac, ho proposto la pagina per la cancellazione perché il nome corretto del comune è Orta San Giulio. Proporrei di creare la pagina Isola di San Giulio. Anche tu ami il lago d'Orta? :-) Secondo me è uno dei posti più belli del mondo... Ciao --Civvi 19:02, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Image:Firenze dot.png and other[edit]

Please don't add this images into generic categories such as Category:Maps. They'll become overcrowded and useless for search. Category:Maps of Italy is enough. --EugeneZelenko 01:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Continuous deletion of cetegories[edit]

Hi Mac,

I do not want to play category addition-removal games with you. If you delete a category namely from Image:VeniceCanalGrandeMariaSalute.jpg please make sure that any reasonable category remains. Moreover I would love if you give an explanation for your continuos removal of the categories I've added. That's what the commenting line is for.

Kind regards Andreas Tille 07:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

That's me again[edit]

Hi Mac,

would it be possible to find a reasonable category for Image:VeniceSantApolloniaCloister.jpg. This would be great. Andreas Tille 20:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Twice25[edit]

Ciao, re: qui :) --「Twice29.0 · contributi · talk」 19:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Ciao, ti ho risposto nella mia talk :) --「Twice29.0 · contributi · talk」 18:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Categorie, Pagine e Foto[edit]

Ciao e buona settimana; Ho visto le vostre foto su Roma e mi sono piaciute molto; temo che quelle fatte da me non siano così ben fatte.
Vi lascio qui un post per avvertirvi che, dopo aver verificato che le vostre fote fossero tutte linkate ad una pagina relativa a Roma, ho eliminato la relativa categoria Roma.
Se ci fate caso, per le città italiane, ho cercato di mettere un pò d'ordine in questo modo: le categorie contengono o sottocategorie o pagine, e le pagine contengono foto, in modo da non avere foto linkate a categorie.
In questo modo ci possiamo accorgere immediatamente di nuove foto (in genere gli user strenieri si limitano all'indicazione della regione se non di italia), possiamo creare pagine da inserire nelle wiki , possiamo dare più informazioni con le pagine relativamente ad una foto senza essere costretti a fare il download delle foto, possiamo correggere indicazioni sbagliate (ad esempio una foto si chiamava arco di costantino mentre era l'arco di tito ).
Spero di non aver fatto niente di sbagliato o arbitrario. Ciao e a presto. —Mac9 08:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Grazie tante, Mac: questi sono esattamente i lavori in cui mi annodo (a Napoli si direbbe <m'arravuglie>, a Roma <me 'mpiccio>) - insomma se qualcuno mi mette in ordine gli resto debitrice :) --Lalupa 22:34, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


Grazie per l'informazione. --Zinn 16:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Trentino-South Tyrol[edit]

Hello there, thanks for your message. Well I don't want to get into a naming argument. However the name Trentino-Alto Adige is the italian name, you have to take into account that German is also an official language there. Therefore, I could as well argue that the category should be called Trentino-Südtirol. And the Category South Tyrol should be named Südtirol in that case. However I refrained from taking that step, because I think that naming it the english way South Tyrol would be most neutral. I understand the Italian regions are named in Italian, however if you look at the Austrian ones, they are kept in English such as Styria and not Steiermark. So I'm a bit at a loss here. If you want to push for Trentino-South Tyrol to be listed as Trentino-Alto Adige, I will have to plead in that case that for South Tyrol to be listed as Südtirol. The language sensitivities should be addressed. I hope you can understand my concern. Gryffindor 11:18, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

That's what I thought. I really appreciate from you that you understand my concerns. Again, I don't want to be difficult or even start a naming-argument, far from it. I just want to be careful about the sensitivities of the language issue so that both sides can agree on a solution. And since I knew that both ways, Italian (Trentino-Alto Adige) as well as German (Trentino (Trient)-Südtirol) are both official in Italy, I thought that at least having it in English (Trentino-South Tyrol) would be the most neutral name. But I agree with you that for example Tuscany can be listed as Toskana, I wonder also why the Austrian states such as Steiermark are listed in English, but that is another issue, I would have to talk to the users there first what they think. In any case, what would you suggest now as a solution, I am open for everything... ciao (is correct?-) Tschüs in German :-) Gryffindor 11:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
I was just about to ask you the same thing. It's not the most elegant solution, but I think we can agree on this. Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, is that fine? Gryffindor 12:05, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
The new category will be "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol". e perfeto, multo grazie. if you need help with redoing it, let me know, glad to help. ciao... Gryffindor 12:17, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Bar italiano[edit]

Ciao Mac9,
da stasera abbiamo anche qui su Commons un bar, il Bar italiano.
Se vuoi farci un salto ... :)

--「Twice29.0 · contributi · talk」 22:38, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Ma congratulazioni., Mac !!!![edit]

Vivissime felicitazioni, Mac !! Le notizie di nuove nascite sono le più belle !!! Auguri a te, alla mamma, alla neonata e alla sorellona :) Io ho quasi 56 anni e un figlio di ventisette, ma di nipotini per ora non si parla ... ma amo i bambini tantissimo perché il domani è loro ! :)) - Aspettiamo la foto, eh? (c'è una category:children, no?)
D'accordo per il discorso delle città minori: tengo in vista la tua corrispondenza e spero di ricordarmene. Se ci fossero cambiamenti, avvisami.
Ma ora dedicati alle tue pargolette :))

--「Twice29.0 · contributi · talk」 22:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Reggio Emilia[edit]

ho visto che in settembre hai fatto un notevole lavoro di riordino delle immagini di Reggio Emilia e provincia. Mi chiedo però perchè hai eliminato dalle foto la categoria che avevo indicato (Reggio Emilia, Castelnovo Monti ecc). Mi sono utili per utilizzarle in seguito. Ciao --Paolo da Reggio 14:08, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Cachoeirinha[edit]

Hi, I reverted your edit in Image:PE-mapa-Cachoeirinha.png, because there are two diferent citys in Brazil know as Cachoeirinha. The map and the satellite photo do not refer to the same one. --Patrick-br msg 12:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Category:Salta[edit]

Ciao! I wanted to know why where you removing from the Salta Category images of the city of Salta (for instance Image:Salta-Capital-ColonialCentre-2005-P3130046.jpg) leaving them orphan. I would really prefer to have them back in the category. Mariano 16:02, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure why it would be better to have the images within a page instead of in probably more than one category? Categories are flexible and herarchical, and you don't need to edit 2 pages when uploading an image (you just add the category). I thought it was commons's policy to have the pictures in Categories, and the such articles where optional. Yes, I would really prefer to have the images also in categories (no extra space needed), as its a lot easier for me to find them. Thanks for your understanding. Good wiking, Mariano 08:31, 5 December 2005 (UTC)