User talk:MalTsilna

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MalTsilna!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, MalTsilna!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Tomchen1989 (talk) 04:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

tatar wiki[edit]

what is exactly what you need? a logo based on the green alien with the text of the image you sent me? -LadyofHats (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it is the same, but if you do not mind. Well, the text must be added another: Мин татарча сөйләшәм!. The text means: "I ​​speak the Tatar". --MalTsilna (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Мин татарча сөйләшәм.svg

oh yes could you please add categories for the image. i did not knew where to place it-LadyofHats (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Excellent! Thank you very much!--MalTsilna (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Soembika baete.ogg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Soembika baete.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Soembika baete.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

rubin16 (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, rubin16 (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Про Татарстан и лицензию[edit]

  • Здравствуйте! Смотрю я на сканированный лист с лицензионным письмом, который вы загрузили в Commons, и не вижу там ответа на следующие вопросы:
  • 1) Какие права переданы?
  • 2) На условиях какой именно лицензии?
  • 3) Кому переданы?
  • 4) Как отменяется это разрешение?
  • Полагаю, что проблема с удалением возникает именно по этой причине. Пожалуйста, ответьте на эти четыре вопроса. Похоже, что пресс-служба прислала вам недостаточный документ. Ведь если пресс-служба разрешила любое использование, то кому она его разрешила? И на каких условиях она его разрешила? И если теперь разрешила, то ведь завтра пресс-служба может отозвать своё разрешение? И если на сайте госсовета есть перепечатанные (скопированные) сведения, то откуда у госсовета право передавать эти сведения дальше?
  • Для примера расскажу вам один забавный анекдот. Вот на сайте Президента РФ есть свободные фотографии. Пресс-служба Президента РФ разрешила использовать их по свободной лицензии. Однако это не просто так фотографии. Это — очень маленькие копии настоящих фотографий. А настоящие, полные фотографии находятся в собственности другого СМИ, которое никому не даёт таких разрешений.
  • На первый взгляд, перед нами одна и та же фотография, просто тут маленькая, а там большая. Но с юридической точки зрения это два разных произведения с двумя разными правовыми условиями.
  • Вот и с пресс-службой госсовета то же самое. Они дали вам разрешение, да только неполное, неподходящее. Они разрешили не всё, не всем и не навсегда. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)