User talk:Manfred Kuzel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 30 days. For the archive overview, see Archive/. The latest archive is located at Archive/2019.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Manfred1!

File:Martin-Kaserne (Eisenstadt) Sonderbriefmarke1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Martin-Kaserne (Eisenstadt) Sonderbriefmarke1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Martin-Kaserne (Eisenstadt) Sonderbriefmarke2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Martin-Kaserne (Eisenstadt) Sonderbriefmarke2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 20:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Symposium 26. Oktober.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Symposium 26. Oktober.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Symposium 26. Oktober.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aggstein bauphasen.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aggstein bauphasen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aggstein bauphasen.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth O (talk) 08:15, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Was soll denn das nun wieder? Die Bilddatei enthält eine ordnungsgemäße Beschreibung mit der Bildquelle und eine ebenso ordnungsgemäße Lizenz als Werk mit geringer Schöpfungshöhe.--M@nfred (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Image pattern issue[edit]

Hello Manfred! I posted about the image pattern issue in File talk section. -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Advise for better camera installation[edit]

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have been looking to your photos and until now I have only seen you install your camera the same way ISO200 en f/11. You are using ISO200 while the sky is beautiful blue, ISO100 is much better. I use ISO200 when it is cloudy and a little bit more light is necessay. Generally a higher ISO gives also more noise. I would use f/11 if the differences between the several objects is very large and f/4 if I want to focus one object (like you mostly do). Just play more with your camera to find out how your camera works. And, yo ucan always look to other people. --Michielverbeek 07:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
@Michielverbeek: Thanks for your comment, which I will gladly follow. A nice start of the week and friendly greetings--M@nfred (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Waasen 27a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 27a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 27.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gute Qualität, vielleicht könnte man das Subjekt besser zuschneiden, aber das wäre fakultativ --PantheraLeo1359531 17:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Isiwal 21:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 25b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 25b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 25a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 25a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Isiwal 21:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Mannersdorf Rochusberg 38.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannersdorf Rochusberg 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Patterns on the sky. Rework with other software needed. --Steindy 13:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done Reworked with other software. --Manfred Kuzel 07:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 16:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Symbol unsupport vote.svg I withdraw my support after I had to take note, I have no idea about photography. --Steindy 20:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Good. --Podzemnik 23:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Mannersdorf Rochusberg 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannersdorf Rochusberg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Waasen 25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 07:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Mannersdorf Rochusberg 32.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannersdorf Rochusberg 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mannersdorf Rochusberg 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannersdorf Rochusberg 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Waasen 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 12a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Mannersdorf Rochuskapelle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannersdorf Rochuskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Dust spots in the sky --Podzemnik 05:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done Reworked. --Manfred Kuzel 08:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK to me --Podzemnik 17:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Waasen 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 06:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Waasen 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 3a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 33.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 06:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Waasen 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carschten 00:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Isiwal 19:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großweikersdorf Höllgraben.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. (Minor CAs.) --XRay 06:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 10:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Schade, dass das Gerät nicht mehr funktions­tüchtig ist. -- Spurzem 10:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Sehr gute Komposition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 37.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

Hi Manfred Kuzel,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

-- ~riley (talk) 21:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 53 a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 53 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 56.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 55.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 54.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 53.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Sehr schöne Serie! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

}

Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse d.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse c.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tomer T 16:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse Neugebäude 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tomer T 16:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 35.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 47.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
}
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Höllgraben 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Großweikersdorf Waasen 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großweikersdorf Waasen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Like this it is not a QI for me. A horizontal perspective correction would have been a serious imporovement. Can you also make the photo a bit darker by a combination of more contrast and/or stronger shadows and/or less light? --Michielverbeek 07:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
✓ DoneThank you for review, new version uploaded. Better so? --Manfred Kuzel 12:14, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 17:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 46.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 44.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 38.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
}
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 10:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 40.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Isiwal 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 39.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 37.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 27.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
}
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 09:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 09:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Absberg Kellergasse 23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Absberg Kellergasse 36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Absberg Kellergasse 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Domob 13:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)