User talk:ManiacParisien

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Tarry.jpeg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Emile-Chenon.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Emile-Chenon.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Emile-Chenon.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 14:54, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Noether les dubreil.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Noether les dubreil.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 17:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Catégorisation des photos sur Commons[edit]

Bonjour,

Je suis désolé de passer derrière vous concernant la catégorisation des photos (notamment celles de la ville de la châtre). J’essaie juste d'appliquer les règles suivantes : Arborescence des catégories et Sur-catégorisation. Cordialement, Peyot (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, C'est vrai que je ne comprends toujours pas les catégories (tantôt en français, tantôt en anglais, tantôt en barbare : Monuments historiques in ...). Je trouve aussi que l'on ne trouve jamais les photos qu'on cherche, mais qu'on est content parfois de trouver des photos qu'on ne cherche pas. C'est sûr que j'ai exagéré en ajoutant "La Châtre" partout. Mais une catégorie par monument classé, je trouve que cela fait beaucoup. Et l'église Saint-Germain, bien que Monument, n'est pas classé. Où sont ses photos ?
Tout cela pour vous dire merci de faire le ménage !!! Cordialement --ManiacParisien 15:21, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Marie-Louise Jacotin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marie-Louise Jacotin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ralf Roleček 06:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:ME0000112926 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ME0000112926 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fram (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Il y avait une notice de copyright imprimé sur l'image. On n'accepte pas des images avec de notices de copyright, même s'ils sont incorrectes (comme ici, la peinture n'est plus copyrighté). Fram (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Merci pour votre réponse. Vous êtes probablement d'accord avec moi que Microsoft n'avait pas le droit de mettre le copyright; mais si ça vous amuse de vous marcher sur vos propres pieds, vive l'absurde ! Bien cordialement --ManiacParisien 15:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Maître de Delft - Triptyque avec Vierge à l'Enfant, saints et donateurs.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maître de Delft - Triptyque avec Vierge à l'Enfant, saints et donateurs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Schroeder rectangulation 4.svg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Schroeder rectangulation 4.svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Verneuil-Maillaud.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Verneuil-Maillaud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

82.124.63.65 19:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Lanterne des morts La Châtre.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lanterne des morts La Châtre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

82.124.63.65 19:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Metz Kassel Ansicht 1620.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Metz Kassel Ansicht 1620.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Metz Kassel Ansicht 1620.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 22:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Correlatio, je viens de voir votre avertissement. Pourtant, sur le site dont j'importe les images, il y a écrit qu'ils sont sous la licence CC-BY-SA 3.0 etc. Pouvez-vous m'aider pour compléter les informations ? --ManiacParisien 09:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Metzarchiv Opernplatz Waitz.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Metzarchiv Opernplatz Waitz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Metzarchiv Altmarkt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Metzarchiv Altmarkt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 02:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Memling1948-138 gesamt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Memling1948-138 gesamt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amitie 10g (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Suter.rotational.symmetry.svg[edit]

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | മലയാളം | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Suter.rotational.symmetry.svg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. --ManiacParisien 11:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please give valid date and source[edit]

Hello, you maniac from Paris ;-), your findings for public domain images are great, but when you upload them, then, please, add the correct date and a valid source. I came frequently across your uploads, because I decided to fix links to German Bildindex (step by step, it will need time) – I know their site programming is a catastrophy – and I noticed that you beside the missing link also consequently give the wrong date: In both templates {{Information}} and {{Artwork}} the date field is thought for the creation time of the pictured work, not the uploading time, which can easily be seen in file version information. You added sometimes the actual creation date into the author field, which is wrong, too. For complicated date information you can use the templates {{Other date}} or, when even more complex, {{Complex date}}. For giving a valid source from Bildindex, please read information in the according category Images from Bildindex der Kunst und Architektur – give at least a link to the object page, but the best would be using the template {{From Bildindex}}. And there are more templates for other source sites, see category Source templates. — Speravir_Talk – 18:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Speravir, thank you for this message. I was not aware at all of these templates for Bildindex. Also, since I use the upload wizard and the date field proposes the current date, I used it freely. Now, I will try to may better links, especially for Bildindex. I must confess that Wikipedia and Wikidata and Commons all three have their own conventions and rules of presentation, and still have to learn them. I am now preparing the illustrations for the french page on the "Klarenaltar" in the Cologne cathedral, and I will start to apply the rules you recommend. Best, --ManiacParisien 17:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes, these differing rules can be confusing. For the date I guess the UploadWizard is by default set up for own photographs, not for old public images. And if you find the template tooooo complicated, you are not forced to use it, but at least the link to the object page as described in the category would be very helpful. (Think of this: Sometimes the work data varies in different sources, so controlling must be possible.) By the way, just another thing: For many creators exists a special template, that can be inserted as {{Creator:Name of Creator}}; you can search for it in category Creator templates. 3 examples for changes I did recently on files you’ve uploaded: Special:Diff/146831683/193278320 (in total 12 or 13 files I updated regarding this altar), Special:Diff/150068554/193405814 (in total 4 files for this altar), Special:Diff/118323906/188940925 (7 files). — Speravir_Talk – 20:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Scènes de la vie de Marie et du Christ WRM 737.jpeg[edit]

The license {{PD-Art|PD-old-1923}} is incorrect. You should choose more precise template:

  • {{PD-Art|PD-old-70-1923}}
  • {{PD-Art|PD-old-100-1923}}
  • {{PD-Art|PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=}}
  • {{PD-Art|PD-1923}}

Thanks in advance :-) Wieralee (talk) 09:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for having made the correct modification for me. Best regards --ManiacParisien 18:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Couronnement d'épines (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach).jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Couronnement d'épines (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach).jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again. Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Mise au tombeau (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach) - détail.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Mise au tombeau (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach) - détail.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Elisfkc (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Mise au tombeau (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach).jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Mise au tombeau (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Elisfkc (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Flagellation (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach) - détail.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Flagellation (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach) - détail.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Elisfkc (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Flagellation (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach).jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Flagellation (maître du Retable d'Heisterbach).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Elisfkc (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Bien noté. Je n'avais pas vu le (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) dans la licence. --ManiacParisien 05:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Homme des douleurs et instruments de la Passion.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Homme des douleurs et instruments de la Passion.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

J'ai changé la licence. --ManiacParisien 05:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

File:CostasArrays4.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CostasArrays4.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Ledrappier 2013 Oberwolfach.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ledrappier 2013 Oberwolfach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@Droit de retrait 03: Victoire, après deux mois de palabres --ManiacParisien 11:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)